Ancient woodland threatened by £156m Manadon upgrade in Plymouth
One of the proposals is to add another lane on the approach to the roundabout on the A386 Outland Road which runs alongside ancient woodland.Dave Curno is a volunteer with Plymouth Tree People, a charity that works to protect and increase the number of trees in the city.He said: "The council has said there will be a lot of trees that need to be removed and they will be doing a three-for-one replacement."Our worry is that doesn't value the trees as they are - so a little sapling might not need replacing whereas some of the ancient or veteran trees are much more valuable and the ancient woodland in particular is irreplaceable."Mr Curno said following the Armada Way tree-felling, trust in the council "does need to be built up".He said: "The Armada Way independent learning review stated that trust is the one thing the council needed to work on and this is the sort of scheme they can use to work on that trust."
John Stevens, cabinet member for transport at the Labour-led council, said the council was consulting on all aspects of the scheme: "We have learned, we are a learning council."Stevens said some trees would have to be removed "inevitably" but the council would replace each tree lost with "at least three trees".Regarding the possibility of compulsory purchase orders on homes and land in the area to facilitate the project, Stevens said: "In all schemes where you're expecting improvements to lanes there might be the loss of some land but that wouldn't be against the will of the people who are actually living in them now."Plymouth City Council has £133m of funding from the Department for Transport to pay for the scheme and said it wanted to improve traffic flow for everyone passing through Manadon as the city expands.
The effectiveness of the plans and the cost of the scheme are also being called into question by the Conservative councillor for the area, Chris Wood.He said: "Plymouth does not have a very good track record of either financial management or project delivery."The amount of disruption residents are going to face for ten years - people losing their gardens, losing their houses as well."There's a lot of concern locally and we need to make sure the council are actually listening and can adapt the scheme to suit local people's needs."More information events will take place on Friday at Manadon Sports Hub and on Saturday at Central Library with the public consultation closing on 24 June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
We criminalise the political stunt at our peril. It is a crucial art form that is impossible to ignore
We must ask ourselves: how would the heroic suffragettes or the remarkable Greenham Common women be regarded if active today? The answer is simple: they would be locked up. Just as they were locked up then. A century ago, women chained themselves to railings, set fires, endured prison and changed the world, and we celebrate their victories without thinking too hard about their methods. Yet today's laws would criminalise them on sight. Last month, the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, wore a commemorative sash celebrating the suffragette struggle. Yet this is the same Yvette Cooper presiding over an age of repressive laws and mass arrests. It's a paradox: we laud the rebels of the past while shackling the rebels of the present. I have been retracing these acts of protest for a new BBC Radio 4 documentary, Outrage Inc. I wanted to understand not just the anger, but the creative genius and conviction behind the stunt. Because at its best, a stunt isn't chaos. It's an art form – theatre with consequences. It's designed to provoke, timed to perfection and impossible to ignore. Those who stage them aren't amateurs: they storyboard, construct narrative, marshal resources. They are producers of disruption. Take the suffragettes. With their matchsticks, they weren't vandals – they were master tacticians who understood the media economy of Edwardian Britain. By the early 1900s, papers such as the Daily Mail and Daily Express were locked in a circulation war, selling millions of copies at a penny each. Their lifeblood was advertising and their oxygen was spectacle. Respectful reports of speeches and petitions did not move papers off newsstands. Outrage did. Emmeline Pankhurst and the Women's Social and Political Union knew this. They didn't smash Bond Street windows or torch postboxes for fun. They did it because they knew the placards outside kiosks would scream 'SUFFRAGETTE OUTRAGE', forcing the issue into every parlour in Britain. Editors vilified them, yes, but they printed the stories, because sensation sold. That was the economy, and the suffragettes exploited it ruthlessly. In today's parlance, they hacked the algorithm. The Greenham women weren't eccentrics, either. They were moral Boudiccas who turned protest into performance art on a national scale. Tents, banners, singing at the wire, cutting fences, dancing on missile silos looked anarchic, but it was a rolling installation, a piece of theatre that lasted nearly a decade. Some of it was planned, some improvised, but its genius lay in persistence. They kept the story alive, constantly reframing it so the cameras always had something to see and the public always had something to talk about. And then there's Peter Tatchell. He didn't simply 'make a scene', he made himself the scene. He has spent decades putting his own body on the line: attempting a citizen's arrest of Robert Mugabe, confronting police indifference to homophobic violence, interrupting Easter sermons. He has been beaten unconscious, arrested countless times, vilified and celebrated. Tatchell embodies conviction, turning his own suffering into testimony, forcing Britain to confront prejudice it preferred to ignore. Fast-forward to 2004 and the Yes Men's audacious Bhopal stunt. They posed as Dow Chemical executives on BBC World, announcing a $12bn compensation package for victims of the disaster. For a brief moment, the world believed justice had arrived. Dow's share price plummeted before the hoax was exposed. This wasn't chaos, it was conviction armed with wit, a mind bomb detonated live on air. Or take Germany's Centre for Political Beauty, which built a replica Holocaust memorial outside the home of the Alternative für Deutschland leader, Björn Höcke. The far right had claimed the 'wounds of the Holocaust should heal'. Its answer was unignorable concrete, a daily reminder that history isn't a wound to be closed for convenience. It was satire sharpened into steel, cutting deeper than any speech. And then there's Led By Donkeys, the post-Brexit guerrillas. They don't rant. They don't editorialise. They hold up a mirror, reminding politicians of words they have said, written or tweeted, and probably wished they hadn't. Their giant projection on parliament, Boris Johnson's lies replayed on the cliffs of Dover, their Covid memorial wall of thousands of painted hearts; these weren't stunts for novelty's sake. They weaponised the words of the powerful, replaying them until they choked their authors. Clarity, timing, simplicity. This is the lesson we keep forgetting. Protest isn't just confrontation, it's an imagination weaponised. A stunt is a mind bomb that plants itself in the national conversation. These acts of theatre marry humour and symbolism to conviction, creating ripples that travel long after the news cameras have moved on. Yet the cycle is always the same. At the time, protests are demonised, particularly by the right, who instinctively oppose change. Later, the very same acts are reappraised, rehabilitated or even lauded. The suffragettes, once branded terrorists, are now national heroines. The Greenham women, once derided as cranks in cardigans, are now honoured for their foresight. Time transforms outrage into heritage. Today, with Palestine Action banned and Extinction Rebellion dismissed as a nuisance, we're told that only 'lawful protest' is legitimate. But the suffragettes would fail that test, and so would Greenham. Their legacies endure because they didn't seek permission, they sought change. Their power lay in creativity, conviction and the audacity to place truth before power and performance before permission. Having examined the BBC archives for Outrage Inc, I believe we are at a crossroads. We can allow protest to be neutered into stage-managed civility, or we can acknowledge that it has always been outrageous, risky and profoundly creative. This is not a rallying cry for lawlessness. But we should reflect on the red-hot battles that forged our society. We call them stunts, but the word feels too trivial for acts that pushed the envelope and forced us to confront inequality and injustice. Because history shows this: the stunt is never a sideshow. It is the main act of change. Mark Borkowski is a crisis PR consultant and author. His BBC Radio 4 Archive on 4 documentary, Outrage Inc, airs on 23 August
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
FTSE 100 hits new high amid Ukraine peace hopes
Updated: The FTSE 100 hit a record yesterday as European markets rallied on hopes of peace in Ukraine. London's index of blue-chip stocks ended the session up 0.3 per cent at 9189.22 – its highest ever close. The rally came after Donald Trump held talks with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and European allies, including Keir Starmer, at the White House. The US President said he has begun arranging talks between Zelensky and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, sparking hopes of an imminent end to the conflict after more than three years of war. In London, the FTSE 100 – which has gained more than 12 per cent this year – was boosted by retail stocks, offsetting a defence sector drop. And the mid-cap FTSE 250 rose 0.4 per cent, snapping a three-day losing streak. In Europe, the CAC 40 in Paris rose 1.2 per cent, while Germany's DAX 40 closed up 0.5 per cent. Meanwhile, oil prices slumped on investor expectations that a peace deal will likely lead to an easing of sanctions on Russia. Despite the stock market rally, London-listed defence giants took a hit on signs that the conflict in Ukraine could come to an end. The companies have been boosted as European leaders raced to rearm amid conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East. Babcock International fell 7.4 per cent, BAE Systems dropped 3.9 per cent and Rolls-Royce lost 2.1 per cent. But the losses were offset by retailers, which made big gains despite news of a delay to official sales data. JD Sports jumped 6.8 per cent following an upbeat statement from protein powder seller Applied Nutrition, which is backed by the sportswear chain. Shares in Marks & Spencer rose 3.5 per cent and Next shares were up 3 per cent.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
This is how much taxpayer money the Government wastes ferrying empty red despatch boxes in chauffeured cars
Red despatch boxes. You'll have seen them exiting Number 10 and featuring in TV shows like The Crown and they are an iconic part of the British political landscape. But now it's been revealed that they cost the taxpayer thousands of pounds a year because they're being ferried around in empty Ministerial cars. A freedom of information by EV outlet Fast Charge has found that the Cabinet Office made 83 red despatch box journeys between 18 June 2024 and 31 March 2025 using the Government Car Service (GCS). This came at a total cost of £14,095.02 using taxpayer money. The trips, known as 'despatch box movements', involve chauffeuring government documents securely between locations, even though no Minister is present. If the trend continues in this way, red box movements could end up costing almost £18,000 annually, at the same time Chancellor Rachel Reeves has pledged to 'cut the costs of running the government by 15 per cent'. The expense is seen as an entirely unnecessary one in today's technology-focused world, with these empty car journeys being criticised by politicians on all sides for many years. In 2011, them Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude, who was leading calls to reduce cost by using technology, suggested using hard copies in Red Boxes was not needed, commenting: 'Security is often an alibi.' Fast Charge looked into the cost of each empty chauffeur car trips for the sake of official documents and worked out that the average cost per journey, based on the most recent data, is £169.82. The data suggests that the government would hit 106 journeys by the end of the year, costing £17,600. But this is a reduction on the number of empty-car journeys compared to the same period the previous year, when 120 trips were made costing £21,932.21 under the Conservative Government. However, despite the overall cost declining compared to last year, the cost per journey is up on previous years. In 2016, the Huffington Post found the average cost per journey for such movements was £125 on average. In the year 2015-16, the Cameron Government were reported as spending £41,520 on despatch movements. In March, Reeves said cutting running costs by the stated 15 per cent was 'more than possible' given advances in technology and artificial intelligence, which would add weight to the notion that the practice of driving empty cars around in the name of paperwork is out-of-date. Responding to the FOI the Cabinet Office told the Daily Mail: 'Over the last year, we have saved thousands of pounds by reducing the number of journeys booked through the Government Car Service. 'Official documents will still need to be transported in the safest way possible in the interests of national security.' Even as far back as 2009, before coming into power, David Cameron called for an end to red box car journeys. The pledge didn't stick and 2011 saw a bumper year of red box movement costs with a total of £110,865 spent. Daily Mail columnist Sarah Vine joked in 2010 that her then husband's papers were moved around in 'air-conditioned splendour' despite Cabinet Officer Michael Gove himself using public transport. She wrote: '[The Red Box] arrives unannounced at all hours in a chauffeur-driven car, the engine purring deferentially as her handler walks her to the front door... she deposits herself on the sofa to await her master. 'My husband is free to travel home by Tube, taxi, bicycle or carrier pigeon, but the (box) must arrive in air-conditioned splendour, snug and secure in the back of a locked car'. Tom Riley, founder of Fast Charge, commented: 'It's not only paperwork being taken for a ride, clearly us taxpayers are too. At a time when the Chancellor is looking to balance Britain's books, potentially with new tax rises, it's astonishing that the government is burning cash like this. 'Cheaper, safer, and greener options must surely now exist for Ministers to access their official documents. At the very least, they should review and reverse this practice.' In April the Government pledged that all central government cars and vans (except for the Prime Minister's gas-guzzling Range Rovers) will be zero emissions by the end of 2027 Not just a waste of money, it could be adding to government produced transport pollution as the Daily Mail recently revealed that the Government has not met its own EV targets despite pushing motorists towards electric cars by increasing taxes and running costs of hybrid, petrol and diesel. It pledged to electrify 25 per cent of the central government car fleet by 2022 and then in April the Government further pledged all central government cars and vans will be zero emissions by the end of 2027. This does not include the Prime Minister's gas guzzling Range Rovers, though. But WhatCar? found that the Government is falling short of its targets to electrify its fleets, with only 15 per cent of its cars and vans being pure electric.
