
Amess family ‘deeply hurt' after Home Secretary letter following Prevent review
Radd Seiger said Sir David's family were 'deeply hurt and angered by the utterly dismissive tone' of Yvette Cooper's letter and that her 'piecemeal approach… will never deliver the whole truth, accountability and justice.'
He also said the family were given 'next to no notice' of the timing or advance sight of the report, adding media leaks were a further insult to the family.
The Amess family have said they will respond in full to the report once they have consulted their legal team.
In her written statement laid before Parliament, Ms Cooper said: 'My department remains steadfast in its commitment to keeping the public safe and safeguarding people at risk of radicalisation.
'The victims, their families and those who survived the Southport attack but continue to live with the physical and emotional pain, and Sir David Amess's family remain in our hearts and prayers.'
In his review, Independent Prevent Commissioner David Anderson KC said 'intensive' efforts have been made to improve Prevent processes, but the 'jury is out' on some of the changes
In the Home Secretary's letter, seen by the PA news agency, Ms Cooper said she realises the 'seriousness' of the failings in Sir David's case and that she hoped the family found Lord Anderson's report to be 'thorough and considered'.
Sir David's terrorist killer Ali Harbi Ali was referred to Prevent seven years before the so-called Islamic State fanatic stabbed the veteran MP at his constituency surgery in Essex in October 2021.
He was sentenced to a whole-life order the following year.
In her letter, Ms Cooper said Lord Anderson had 'conducted an incisive analysis of the perpetrator's case management, the findings of the Prevent Learning Review and the impact of changes made since then'.
She added: 'I realise the seriousness of these failings and it reflects the deep concerns you have long held about what went wrong.
'Lord Anderson acknowledges improvements made to Prevent since then but also identifies further important opportunities for change in the wider Prevent system.'
Her letter added: 'My determination to make whatever changes are considered necessary is unflinching and a further formal Government response to Lord Anderson's report will follow in the autumn.
'However, I want to be clear that it is without question that where recommendations can be implemented immediately, I will ensure that these are delivered.'
Mr Seiger told PA the letter had left the family 'retraumatised, blindsided and feeling marginalised'.
He said: 'This is an absolutely appalling letter from the Home Secretary who frankly should know better than to insult the family in this way.
'They are deeply hurt and angered, by the utterly dismissive tone as well as the timing of the Home Secretary's letter accompanying the publication of Lord Anderson KC's report.
'It is difficult to see it as anything other than a calculated exercise in damage limitation, designed not to support the family in their search for answers but to protect the Government following its failings.
'Yet again, we see victims being kicked when they are down.
'This supposed act of courtesy has left the family retraumatised, blindsided, and feeling marginalised in a process that should have had their voices and wellbeing at its heart from the outset.
'The Prime Minister and Home Secretary must understand that a piecemeal approach, which is what they are taking, however well-dressed in public relations, will never deliver the whole truth, accountability and justice for Sir David.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
25 minutes ago
- ITV News
Mother of Joanne Tulip calls for tougher restrictions on violent offenders after release from prison
The mother of a young woman who was brutally murdered in Northumberland almost 30 years ago is calling for changes to better protect the families of victims. On Christmas Day 1997, 29-year-old Joanne Tulip was raped and stabbed 60 times by Steven Ling. The violent attack happened at Ling's home in Stamfordham, Northumberland. He was jailed for life. After serving 27 years, Ling was recommended for release from prison. Joanne's mother Doreen Soulsby called on the Parole Board to reconsider, but the request was rejected and Ling was released in January 2025. Now, Doreen would like tougher restrictions for violent offenders once they're out of prison, including where they can go. Ms Soulsby met Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood on Tuesday to discuss tougher restrictions. Speaking on Good Morning Britain on Wednesday (16 July) Ms Soulsby said Justice Secretary "listened attentively" and had looked in great detail at the document sent by Ms Soulsby ahead of the meeting. Among the changes to the parole system she's campaigning for are a change to the restraining orders placed on offenders. Soulsby would like to see exclusion zones (which prevent a perpetrator from entering an area where their victims live) replaced with inclusion zones (which instead restrict the movements of perpetrators to a set perimeter). This would mean victims would be free to roam the country in the knowledge their aggressor is contained in a single zone. "At the minute with an exclusion zone, he's got the freedom of the rest of the country, whereas if there was an inclusion zone, we would have the freedom, because the victims haven't done anything wrong." She also called for victims to be able to access more information on perpetrators progress in prison. Soulsby told ITV's Good Morning Britain: "once an offender goes into prison a brick wall goes up. You get nothing back. "I just want to know what he's doing, has he shown any remorse? What work is he doing? What courses? "All we get on an annual basis is what category of prison he's in." Soulsby confirmed the justice secretary had committed to looking into what more information could be given to victims. Following his fifth parole hearing, Ling was recommended for release into the community, subject to conditions including informing authorities of any relationships he might develop; being subject to monitoring and a curfew, and remaining outside an exclusion zone to avoid contact with his victim's family. The Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood asked the Parole Board to reconsider the recommendation to release him on the basis that it was 'legally irrational'. However, on the Parole Board confirmed this application had been rejected and its original decision had been upheld, meaning the killer would be released. A spokesperson for the Parole Board said: 'A Judge at the Parole Board considered the application for reconsideration and has decided, based on the evidence, that it will be refused. "Decisions of the Parole Board are solely focused on what risk a prisoner could represent to the public and whether that risk is manageable in the community. "When assessing the reconsideration application, the Judge recognised the very significant gravity of the case and the profound ongoing impact on the victim's family."


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer's fury over Afghan data breach as he warns Tories ‘have questions to answer'
Keir Starmer has vented his fury over the cover-up of the catastrophic data breach that risked the lives of up to 100,000 Afghans, as it emerged no one had faced action over the huge blunder. The prime minister said the leak should never have happened and that Tory ministers have 'serious questions to answer', a day after an unprecedented superinjunction was lifted. Ben Wallace, who was defence secretary at the time the draconian legal order was granted, earlier said he took full responsibility for the leak, which happened when an MoD official released a spreadsheet containing the names of 18,000 Afghans "in error". But questions have been raised over why no one has been fired over the breach, which put the lives of those with links to UK forces in danger of reprisals from the Taliban, amid calls for further investigation. It comes as the chair of a powerful Commons committee has written to the Information Commissioner, applying pressure for a rethink on its decision not to investigate the breach, which cost the taxpayer billions in relocating thousands of affected Afghans to the UK. At the start of a tense Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir expressed his anger, telling MPs: "We warned in opposition about Conservative management of this policy and yesterday, the defence secretary set out the full extent of the failings that we inherited: a major data breach, a super injunction, a secret route that has already cost hundreds of millions of pounds. "Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen." He suggested the Conservatives should "welcome" scrutiny from the Commons Defence Committee, which has vowed to investigate. In a dramatic intervention just hours later, right-wing former home secretary Suella Braverman revealed that there were splits in the Tory government over how to deal with the breach and said she had opposed the superinjunction and the new secret route set up to bring those affected to the UK. In a scathing statement, Ms Braverman condemned the former Tory government, then led by Rishi Sunak, in which she played a major role before she was sacked by the former prime minister. She said: 'There is much more that needs to be said about the conduct of the MoD, both ministers and officials, and the House of Commons is the right place to do so. I hope we have the opportunity soon. 'What has happened is outrageous and must never happen again. We must therefore be very clear about what that was and how it happened. 'The cover-up was wrong, the super injunction was wrong, and the failure to stop unwanted mass immigration has been unforgivable. So, I am sorry: the Conservative government failed you and its leaders let you down. It wasn't good enough then. It's not good enough now.' Mr Sunak, ex-defence secretary Grant Shapps and former armed forces minister James Heappey, who oversaw the cover-up, have all been contacted for comment, but none have broken cover and have all remained silent on the breach. Amid calls for further investigation into the breach, Defence Secretary John Healey said that 'accountability starts now' after admitting that he was uncomfortable with the way that the information had been covered up for three years. The Commons Defence Committee confirmed it would launch its own inquiry, and Dame Chi Onwurah, chair of the Commons committee for science innovation and technology, is writing to the Information Commissioner pushing for an investigation. The Information Commissioner has so far declined to hold its own probe, despite previously issuing a fine of £305,000 for a much smaller MoD data breach. Dame Chi told The Independent: 'A leak of this magnitude is, of course, extremely worrying and the fact that it happened in the Ministry of Defence brings the additional dimension of security concerns. The Defence Select Committee Office (ICO) will be undertaking a full inquiry, in the meantime I will be writing to the Information Commissioner to ask for more details on his office's role in this case.' Jon Baines, a senior data protection specialist at Mishcon de Reya, expressed bafflement at the commissioner's attitude to the breach. He said: 'I have not seen such unanimous bafflement from the data protection commentariat at the ICO's lack of apparent interest. 'There is a potential argument that there is no point in a big fine against the MoD when it would punish the public purse. 'Enforcement is not just about fines. The information commissioner has the power to lay a report before parliament. I have been banging on for years about the issue of hidden data in spreadsheets, and if I were the commissioner, I would be thinking about how I can raise the issue. 'A report before parliament would give them publicity, raise the issue and seize parliament.' The ICO has not responded to The Independent 's request for comment. Meanwhile, a member of the defence select committee has warned against naming and shaming the individual responsible for the breach and said the committee should instead look at a failure of government. Confirming the committee would launch an inquiry, its chair, Labour MP Tan Dhesi, told BBC Radio 4's The World at One Programme: "We want to get to the bottom of what has happened on behalf of parliament, which has been sidelined for too long on this issue.' "Ultimately, I think the fact there has been no parliamentary scrutiny, that nobody's been held to account on this, is just not on at all." Leyton and Wanstead Labour MP Calvin Bailey, who was a key figure in organising flights out of Kabul when allied forces went into a chaotic retreat as the Taliban swept to power in 2021, called for 'proper scrutiny' on the matter. He said: 'We need to go back and give proper scrutiny to everything, not just the data breach, the whole culture management and oversight of the operation, of the extraction recovery, the foreign policy and the military engagement and involvement. 'We will probably find that people were working under duress and pressure, because there were too few people to deal with the crisis.' He also warned that the defence committee was 'best placed to do the necessary work' as a full public inquiry 'would take too long and be too expensive'.


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Thames Valley Police touched colleague inappropriately
A police officer has been found to have touched a colleague intimately in a way that was "deliberate, unwarranted and unnecessary".PC Ben Lane, who was based in Berkshire, touched the man inappropriately over his clothing while at work in September 2024, a panel Lane, who has since quit Thames Valley Police (TVP), claimed he was trying to demonstrate an alleged sexual assault he was investigating and touched his colleague on the back of his right panel, led by TVP's assistant chief constable Dennis Murray, said that was "highly implausible". The panel heard the victim, referred to in the proceedings as Officer A, gave a "very comprehensive account" of what happened, including his "surprise and shock".Mr Murray said the attack "could be classed as criminal in nature" and amounted to a "sexual assault on police premises".Mr Lane, who did not attend Wednesday's hearing at TVP's headquarters in Kidlington, Oxfordshire, said in a statement that he used 10% of the possible pressure when he touched the Officer A scored the pain inflicted on him at four or five out of panel found that Mr Lane had committed gross misconduct and that he would have been sacked had he not already will be added to the College of Policing's barred list. You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.