Tesla awards CEO Musk millions of shares valued at about 29 billion dollars
The electric vehicle maker said in a regulatory filing on Monday that Mr Musk must first pay Tesla 23.34 dollars per share of restricted stock that vests, which is equal to the exercise price per share of the 2018 pay package that was awarded to the company's CEO.
In December, Delaware chancellor Kathaleen St Jude McCormick reaffirmed her earlier ruling that Tesla must revoke Mr Musk's multibillion-dollar pay package.
She found that Mr Musk engineered the landmark pay package in sham negotiations with directors who were not independent.
At the time, Ms McCormick also rejected an equally unprecedented and massive fee request by plaintiff attorneys, who argued that they were entitled to legal fees in the form of Tesla stock valued at more than five billion dollars.
The judge said the attorneys were entitled to a fee award of 345 million dollars.
The rulings came in a lawsuit filed by a Tesla stockholder who challenged Mr Musk's 2018 compensation package.
That pay package carried a potential maximum value of about 56 billion dollars, but that sum has fluctuated over the years based on Tesla's stock price.
Mr Musk appealed against the order in March. A month later Tesla said in a regulatory filing that it was creating a special committee to look at Mr Musk's compensation as CEO.
Wedbush analyst Dan Ives feels Mr Musk's stock award may alleviate some Tesla shareholder concerns.
'We believe this grant will now keep Musk as CEO of Tesla at least until 2030 and removes an overhang on the stock,' Mr Ives wrote in a client note.
'Musk remains Tesla's big asset and this comp issue has been a constant concern of shareholders once the Delaware soap opera began.'
Tesla shares have plunged 25% this year, largely due to blowback over Mr Musk's affiliation with President Donald Trump.
But Tesla also faces intensifying competition from both the big Detroit car makers, and from China.
In its most recent quarter, Tesla reported that quarterly profits plunged from 1.39 billion dollars to 409 million dollars.
Revenue also fell and the company fell short of even the lowered expectations on Wall Street.
Under pressure from shareholders last month, Tesla scheduled an annual shareholders meeting for November to comply with Texas state law.
A group of more than 20 Tesla shareholders, which have watched Tesla shares plummet, said in a letter to the company that it needed to at least provide public notice of the annual meeting.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Trump's sweeping new tariffs take effect against dozens of countries
US President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs on more than 90 countries around the world have come into effect. "IT'S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!," Trump said on social media minutes before the deadline in Washington, DC. Earlier, the president hit India with a 50% tariff, which will take effect on 27 August unless it stops buying Russian oil. Trump also threatened a 100% tariff on foreign-made computer chips as he pushes tech firms to invest in the US. It came as Apple announced a new $100bn (£75bn) US investment after coming under pressure from the White House to move more production to America. Last week, the Trump administration announced a revised list of import taxes on dozens of trading partners and extended a deadline for countries to reach agreements with the US to 7 August. Countries have been racing to strike deals with Washington to lower - or scrap - what Trump calls "reciprocal tariffs". His trade policies are aimed at reshaping the global trading system, which he sees as treating the US unfairly. Export-dependent economies in South East Asia were among the hardest-hit by the new tariffs. Manufacturing-focused Laos and Myanmar faced some of the highest levies at 40%. Some experts said Trump appears to have targeted countries with close trade ties with China. Stock markets in Asia seemed to take the news in their stride on Thursday. Major share indexes in Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea and mainland China were a little higher, while markets in India and Australia were lower. The latest set of tariffs will offer countries some stability after months of chaos, said economist Bert Hofman from the National University of Singapore. "This is supposed to be it. Now you can start to analyse the impact of the tariffs." Some major economies - including the UK, Japan and South Korea - have already reached agreements to get lower tariffs than Trump threatened in April. The European Union has also struck a framework deal with Washington, in which Brussels has accepted a 15% tariff on goods from the trading bloc. Taiwan, a key Washington ally in Asia, was handed a 20% tariff. Its president Lai Ching-te said the rate is "temporary" and that talks with the US are still underway. Last week, Trump boosted the tariff rate on Canada from 25% to 35%, saying the country had "failed to cooperate" in curbing the flow of fentanyl and other drugs across the US border. The Canadian government says it is cracking down on drug gangs. But most Canadian exports to the US will dodge the import tax due to an existing trade treaty, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Higher tariffs on Mexico were paused for another 90 days as negotiations continue to strike a trade deal. See the Trump tariffs list by country Shock and relief - businesses worldwide react to new Trump tariffs On Wednesday, Trump said he would impose a 100% tariff on foreign-made semiconductors. Major chipmakers that have made significant investments in the US appear to have dodged the new tariff. Government officials in Taiwan and South Korea have said in separate statements that TSMC, SK Hynix, and Samsung would be exempt from the new levy. The White House did not immediately respond to a BBC request for clarification. The BBC has also contacted SK Hynix and Samsung. TSMC declined to comment. Also on Wednesday, Trump raised the total tariff on India to 50% as he pushes the world's third largest importer of energy to stop buying oil from Russia. New Delhi has called the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable" and vowed to protect its national interests. The move marks a "sharp change" in Trump's approach to Moscow that could spark concerns among other countries in talks with the US, said market analyst Farhan Badami from financial services firm eToro. "There is the possibility here that India is only the first target that Trump intends to punish for maintaining trade relations with Russia." Brazil's exports to the US also face a 50% tariff. Trump imposed the levy after accusing President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of unfairly attacking US technology firms and calling the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro for allegedly attempting a coup a "witch hunt". The US and China have held a series of talks as they tried to agree an extension to a 90-day tariffs pause that is due to expire on 12 August. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Apple shares rise as US investment pledge eases tariff concerns
(Reuters) -Iphone maker Apple shares rose 1.6% in early Frankfurt trade after the company committed an additional $100 billion in U.S. investments, easing concerns over the impact of Washington's tariffs on semiconductor imports. President Donald Trump said a new 100% tariff rate he announced on Wednesday would not apply to companies that have made a commitment to manufacture in the United States. "We believe concerns over incremental tariff impact to Apple have eased," Citi analysts wrote. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fast Company
2 minutes ago
- Fast Company
America's choice: lead the AI revolution or watch from the sidelines
As artificial intelligence reshapes every industry, America stands at a crossroads. We can either double down on our greatest competitive advantage, attracting the world's brightest minds, or watch our AI leadership slowly migrate to countries that have figured out what we haven't: immigration policy is technology policy. After over a decade leading AI initiatives at Microsoft, democratizing natural language processing that serves millions globally, I've seen both the promise and the peril of our current moment. The engineers and researchers building tomorrow's breakthroughs are increasingly weighing their options. The question isn't whether they want to build in America, it's whether America wants to make it possible. The Talent Pipeline America Built Let's start with what we're doing right. The U.S. has created an unmatched ecosystem with 59% of the world's top-tier AI researchers. We've built the universities, the venture capital networks, and the innovation culture that attracts global genius. Companies like Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI didn't emerge by accident, they're the product of decades of smart talent attraction. The data shows our success: nearly half of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children, generating $8.1 trillion in revenue and employing over 14.8 million people. In AI specifically, only 20% of top researchers earned their undergraduate degrees in the U.S., but 59% choose to do their breakthrough work here. We're not starting from zero, we're optimizing a proven winning formula. When we get immigration right, the returns are extraordinary. H-1B workers earn a median wage of $108,000 compared to $45,760 for U.S. workers generally, contributing significantly to tax revenue and consumer spending. Research shows that when immigrant college graduates increase by 1%, patents per capita increase by 9–18%. Each talented engineer who builds here creates jobs for American workers through the companies they found and the teams they build. When Timing Costs Talent The challenge isn't our destination, it's our process. Processing times for employment-based Form I-129 petitions, the petitions U.S. employers must file to request permission for a foreign national to work temporarily under visas like the H‑1B or O‑1, have climbed sharply. They rose more than 25% last quarter and over 80% compared to a year ago, according to USCIS Q2 FY2025 data, even though the overall backlog has decreased. At the same time, EB-1A cases, which are meant for individuals with extraordinary ability, reached a record high of 16,000 pending petitions. For the people leading advances in AI, these are not just delays. They are missed opportunities. In a field where timing is everything, a slow and unpredictable immigration process can push talent to build somewhere else. The Global Competition Advantage Meanwhile, our allies have streamlined their approach. Canada's Global Talent Stream processes work visas in two weeks. Australia's National Innovation Visa offers permanent residency with 1–3 month processing times for exceptional talent. The UK's Global Talent visa fast-tracks digital technology experts, including those in AI and fintech. Meanwhile in the U.S., work visa petitions like the H‑1B and O‑1 often take several months to process. Employers must pay thousands in additional fees for premium processing just to reduce the wait to 15 business days. These aren't just policy differences, they're strategic choices. While we debate, they're decisively capturing talent that could be strengthening American innovation. But this also represents an opportunity: if they can create efficient systems, so can we. Evolving Policies and Smarter Strategies The encouraging news is that progress is underway. In 2024, policy clarifications helped redefine 'specialty occupation' criteria, making it easier for AI engineers and data scientists to qualify for H‑1B visas without triggering burdensome requests for evidence. In 2023, the Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence issued to Congress aimed to modernize immigration pathways for technical talent. In 2025, a new Executive Order on AI introduced a broader national strategy focused on innovation, safety, and global competitiveness. While the new order replaced the earlier 2023 directive, it places less emphasis on immigration and education, areas that many experts see as critical to long-term AI leadership. Forward-thinking companies are also adapting. Many are exploring O-1 visas for extraordinary ability, which aren't subject to annual caps, or EB-2 National Interest Waivers for researchers whose work benefits the U.S. The key is matching the right visa strategy to each individual's profile, something that requires expertise but yields dramatically better outcomes. America's Enduring Advantage The infrastructure is already here: world-class universities, robust venture capital, and innovation ecosystems that remain the global gold standard. We need immigration processes that match the speed of the minds we're trying to attract. According to research from the Center for Growth and Opportunity, a startup visa could create 500,000 to 1.6 million new jobs over 10 years. Our choice is simple: we can streamline the pathways for global talent to contribute to American innovation, or we can watch other nations benefit from the minds we educated and inspired. The future belongs to countries that can attract and empower the world's brightest. America built that playbook, now we need to execute it.
