Asim Munir gets Pak govt to promote him to Field Marshal, spins setbacks as 'victory
Islamabad [Pakistan], May 20 (ANI): In a move widely viewed as an attempt to mask recent military and strategic failures, the Pakistani federal cabinet on Tuesday approved the promotion of Chief of Army Staff General Asim Munir to Field Marshal.
The government cited his leadership during Operation Bunyanum Marsoos and the confrontation with India, labelled Marka-i-Haq, as grounds for the honour, Dawn reported.
Despite the military setbacks, Pakistan's government is projecting the outcome as a 'historic victory,' praising General Munir's leadership during the conflict.
General Asim Munir became only the second army officer in Pakistan's history to be elevated to Field Marshal.
Ayub Khan, Pakistan's president from 1958 to 1969, holds the distinction of being the country's first Field Marshal. Notably, his promotion to this highest military rank was self-appointed, following his coup and assumption of the presidency in 1958.
A year later, in 1959, Khan awarded himself the Field Marshal rank, citing 'persistent requests' from Pakistani civil society members, just before his scheduled retirement from the army.
Khan promoted himself to Field Marshal after seizing power. As President, he used his authority to issue a proclamation promoting himself.
Munir's elevation also signals who truly calls the shots in Pakistan. The government approved a promotion that further cements the army chief's dominance over the country's civilian leadership.
Notably, even General Pervez Musharraf, despite holding absolute power for years, never assumed the title. The position of field marshal is symbolic but permanent, with no retirement, and held until death.
The promotion comes just weeks after India launched Operation Sindoor, a high-impact counter-terror operation in response to the deadly April 22 Pahalgam attack.
The operation exposed Pakistan's inability to shield its territory and airspace from precise Indian strikes, which destroyed critical infrastructure and eliminated dozens of terrorists. Despite this, Pakistan's top civilian and military leadership is now projecting the outcome as a 'historic victory.'
General Munir's promotion is seen as an attempt to bolster his position and mask recent military setbacks.
In a statement following a federal cabinet meeting chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, the Prime Minister's Office said, 'The Government of Pakistan has approved the promotion of General Syed Asim Munir (Nishan-i-Imtiaz Military) to the rank of field marshal for ensuring the security of the country and defeating the enemy based on the high strategy and courageous leadership during Marka-i-Haq and Operation Bunyanum Marsoos.'
Prime Minister Sharif reportedly consulted President Asif Ali Zardari before the promotion, and the cabinet also decided to extend the tenure of Air Chief Marshal Zahar Ahmed Babar Sidhu. The PMO announced that military personnel, martyrs, veterans, and even civilians involved in the recent conflict would be awarded state honours -- further cementing what appears to be a carefully crafted narrative of national triumph.
General Munir, in a statement issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), accepted the rank and said, 'I am grateful to the president of Pakistan, the prime minister and the cabinet for their trust.' He dedicated the promotion to 'the entire nation, the armed forces of Pakistan, especially the civil and military martyrs and veterans,' adding, 'This is not an individual honour but an honour for the armed forces of Pakistan and the entire nation.'
However, the facts on the ground present a more complex reality. The escalation began after the Pahalgam attack on April 22, which killed 26 people and injured several others. In response, India launched Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7, targeting nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). The strikes led to the deaths of over 100 terrorists affiliated with groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM).
Pakistan responded with cross-border shelling and attempted drone strikes, to which India retaliated by targeting Pakistani radar systems, communication centres, and airfields. The hostilities de-escalated only after US intervention on May 10. While both sides agreed to a ceasefire without an expiry date, Indian officials confirmed that the strikes were purely anti-terror in nature and not part of a broader conflict -- a position that starkly contrasts Pakistan's claim of a military victory. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Jaishankar meets Macron, thanks France for strong anti-terror support
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Thursday met President Emmanuel Macron here and thanked him for France's strong message of support in the fight against terrorism. Jaishankar is on a three-nation visit to Europe to boost bilateral ties and reaffirm India's policy of zero-tolerance against terrorism, especially in the wake of April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Honoured to call on President @EmmanuelMacron of France. Conveyed greetings of PM @narendramodi. Thanked him for France's strong message of support in the fight against terrorism, Jaishankar said in a post on X after the meeting. Our discussions reflected the trust, comfort and ambition of our Strategic Partnership, he added. Jaishankar was in Brussels on Wednesday where he met top European Union leaders and discussed ways to further strengthen the EU-India strategic partnership. The April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives prompted India to carry out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Shehbaz Sharif is right. Pakistan has an elite-problem
Years after then-Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan said that the nation was a victim of "elite capture" in 2021, his successor and political rival, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, now appears to agree with that. Ahead of the presentation of Pakistan's annual budget on Tuesday, Prime Minister Sharif questioned the extent of the "elite's contribution" to the national Pakistani economist Kaiser Bengali has long argued, the country's economic distress, political dysfunction, and social decay can be traced back to its entrenched elites. The real problem of the Islamic Republic is its privileged gentry, with the all-powerful, Army-led Establishment at the it's this elite capture of Pakistan which has pushed the country onto the metaphorical ventilator where it's barely surviving on bailouts and donations. Ironic, isn't it? Just before the budget, Sharif took aim at the elites, only for the same budget to hand a 20% hike to defence spending, presumably with a nod from the elite army brass. But then, Pakistan has been a nation of DID SHEHBAZ SHARIF SAY ABOUT PAK'S ELITES?On Tuesday, ahead of the FY26 budget presentation, Shehbaz Sharif questioned the contributions made to the national exchequer by the country's economic elite."The sacrifices the common man has made, the burden the salaried class has borne in the previous budget. They say 'we are salaried [class] but still gave Rs 400 billion to the treasury. What have the elite and the wealthy groups contributed compared to us?'," said Sharif, who belongs to a wealthy family of industrialists from is a question that the elite, including me, have to answer," he Sharif's speech sounded optimistic on the surface, beneath it ran a clear undercurrent of frustration with a system where the privileged few evade fiscal has left the salaried and lower-income groups to shoulder the burden of economic reforms tied to the billions of dollars Islamabad is seeking from various institutions, including the ARE PAKISTANI ELITES, HOW PAKISTAN ARMY MILKS THE ELITE TAGPakistan's elite class is a complex nexus of wealthy industrialists, feudal landlords, politicians, senior bureaucrats, judiciary members, and, most significantly, the military establishment, which calls the shots elite problem can be traced back to the failure to implement meaningful land reforms after Partition, which allowed feudal landlords to retain control over vast resources and political power. This entrenched dominance later merged with military and bureaucratic elites, creating a powerful nexus that continues to resist structural change and equitable economic in Pakistan are the top 1% who control the country's wealth and earn an annual revenue of at least $100 million, a definition offered by political scientist Rosita Armytage in her 2020 book, Big Capital in an Unequal World: The Micropolitics of Wealth in in Pakistan, accurately assessing the income and assets of individuals and families is challenging, given that much of the economy is informal and wealth is often moved overseas, which is also facilitated by dual citizenship provisions Pakistan Army, which is a state within a state, holds unparalleled influence over the country's political, economic, and social spheres. The military's elite status is reinforced by its vast economic empire, which includes businesses, real estate, and stakes in industries ranging from cement to agriculture through entities like the Fauji Foundation and Army Welfare fascination with 'protocol' in Pakistan, (official courtesies, privileges, and security arrangements) is also part of the ruling elite, including politicians, civil and military bureaucracy, and their allies, benefit from subsidies and privileges worth approximately $17.4 billion annually, according to a 2021 UNDP include tax breaks, free housing, luxury vehicles, subsidised utilities, and prime land allotments. The military, in particular, enjoys significant perks, with senior officers receiving generous pensions, plots of land, and access to exclusive army's economic dominance distorts Pakistan's resource allocation, and prioritises defence over critical sectors like education and health, which have even received less than 1% of GDP THE ELITE PROBLEM IMPACTS PAKISTANThe Pakistani elite's disproportionate control over resources has exacerbated Pakistan's economic and social crises. The country's tax-to-GDP ratio, currently at 10.6%, is among the lowest in the region, with the government aiming for 14% to meet IMF loan tax-to-GDP ratio measures how much tax a country collects compared to the size of its elites, including feudal landlords and industrialists, often evade taxes through loopholes or political influence, leaving the salaried class and poor to shoulder the fiscal burden. For instance, agriculture, dominated by powerful landlords, remains largely untaxed, despite contributing significantly to GDP."The rich can still live luxurious lives in poorer countries, but the situation for the poor masses is becoming increasingly intolerable. Such is the situation in Pakistan today," political scientist and international development expert Syed Mohammad Ali wrote in an 2024 editorial piece in the Karachi-based The Express argued that institutions such as the World Bank and IMF have facilitated elite capture in developing elite problem has also perpetuated the economic dependency of himself admitted earlier this month that Pakistan's allies, including China and Saudi Arabia, no longer expect Islamabad to approach them with a "begging bowl" but to engage in trade and innovation. Yet, Pakistan's reliance on bailouts and failure to curb elite privileges, such as the billions of dollars in annual subsidies for the richest 1%, hinders same elites collectively own 9% of the country's overall income, while the feudal land-owning class, which makes up just 1.1% of the population, owns 22% of all arable the dire economic indicators and repeated bailouts, Pakistan's ruling elite, civil, military, and corporate, remain unwilling to loosen their grip. Islamabad's refusal to confront elite dominance, particularly the military's unchecked economic and political power, lies at the heart of Pakistan's persistent crises and its failure to chart a sustainable future, underlined Salman Rafi Sheikh, a scholar from the Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS).Economist Kaiser Bengali, who was tasked with recommending structural reforms, and suggested abolishing 17 divisions and 50 departments, had to resign in a few months, after he saw the Sharif government going against the Sharif's critique of Pakistan's elites may not be rare, but is at least an acknowledgement of the systemic issue that has long undermined the country's stability. Pakistan's FY26 budget's prioritisation of defence spending over social welfare suggests that Sharif's admission may not be followed by meaningful InMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
After Operation Sindoor exposed Pakistan, why is Islamabad turning to German defence?
After India's Operation Sindoor exposed Pakistan's air defence gaps and Chinese weapons failed to deliver, Islamabad is now eyeing Germany's IRIS-T missile system to counter India's BrahMos. Despite economic distress, the country is prioritising defence upgrades. Why does Germany's system appeal to Pakistan? read more People walk past a cut-out of BrahMos missile as they arrive to attend the roadshow of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Ahmedabad, India, May 26, 2025. File Image/Reuters In the aftermath of India's assertive military response, Pakistan is reassessing its air defence capabilities. Operation Sindoor, conducted from 7 to 10 May 2025, demonstrated the effectiveness of the Indo-Russian BrahMos cruise missile in penetrating and crippling existing Pakistani air defence infrastructure. With India's supersonic precision-strike capabilities now proven in operational settings, Pakistan has turned its attention to advanced Western systems — particularly Germany's IRIS-T SLM — hoping to neutralise future threats from weapons like the BrahMos. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The BrahMos not only exposed the vulnerabilities in Pakistan's Comprehensive Layered Integrated Air Defence (CLIAD), but also left 11 out of 13 of Pakistan's Air Force bases compromised. The missile, with speeds reaching up to Mach 3 and a range between 450 to 800 km, overwhelmed Pakistan's Chinese-supplied HQ-9B and HQ-16 missile defence systems. The accuracy and velocity of BrahMos, combined with its stealth and low radar cross-section, made it a particularly difficult target. In this context, Islamabad is now reportedly evaluating two advanced air defence options — the German-developed IRIS-T and the Italian CAMM-ER. However, Pakistan is showing a clear tilt towards the IRIS-T system, manufactured by Diehl Defence, which has seen operational success in Ukraine against Russian cruise missiles. Why does Pakistan want Germany's IRIS-T? The IRIS-T (InfraRed Imaging System – Tail/Thrust Vector Controlled), particularly its surface-launched medium-range version IRIS-T SLM, has garnered attention for its ability to tackle fast-moving cruise missiles and drones. The SLM variant offers a maximum engagement range of 40 km and can target threats up to 20 km in altitude. Reports from the Ukrainian frontlines suggest that the system successfully intercepted over 60 aerial targets — including missiles similar to India's BrahMos — since its deployment began in October 2022. Originally designed for Egypt, the IRIS-T SLM batteries were partly redirected to Ukraine during the ongoing conflict, where they have been used to counter Russian P-800 Oniks missiles — an earlier technological sibling of the BrahMos. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukrainian officials revealed that in one engagement, the IRIS-T system intercepted eight Russian cruise missiles in just 30 seconds, safeguarding critical infrastructure from damage. According to the Indian Defence Research Wing, the Oniks, like the BrahMos, flies at low altitudes at high speeds, making it a difficult target. Though the interception rate of the Oniks remains in single digits, the IRIS-T's relative success has reportedly impressed Pakistani military planners. Each IRIS-T SLM unit comprises a radar, command and control centre, and a set of launchers, all mounted on compact frames for swift deployment. The entire system is modular and transportable, enhancing battlefield flexibility. At an estimated cost of €178–200 million per battery, the system is expensive, but its proven performance and adaptability make it appealing to Islamabad, which is racing to upgrade its defences despite significant economic pressures. Can Pakistan afford German defence? Despite being in the midst of a fiscal crisis, Pakistan has sharply raised its defence expenditure. This year, the defence budget was increased by almost 20 per cent, even as development projects worth 1,000 billion Pakistani rupees were shelved. In the same time frame, Islamabad secured nearly $1.8 billion in financial assistance from the International Monetary Fund and the Asian Development Bank. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Criticism has followed. New Delhi raised objections to Islamabad's rising military spending while continuing to receive international loans, pointing out that 'the loan amount would be used for terror financing rather than their intended use for development.' One complicating factor is Diehl Defence's existing collaboration with India. The company, along with Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems, is involved in supplying the Interactive Defence and Attack System (IDAS) for India's Rs 70,000 crore Project 75I submarine initiative. If Germany chooses to proceed with arms sales to Pakistan, it could trigger diplomatic friction with New Delhi, which may view it as undermining India's strategic edge. Nevertheless, Germany and Pakistan have a history of defence and economic cooperation. The 2011 Pak-Germany Strategic Dialogue and a bilateral trade volume of €3.3 billion in 2023 form the backdrop for discreet German outreach to Islamabad through the European Security and Stability Initiative (ESSI). Why is Islamabad leaning towards Germany? While Italy's CAMM-ER system, developed by MBDA, is also under consideration by Pakistan, it appears to fall short in key operational parameters when compared to the IRIS-T. The CAMM-ER has a maximum range of 45 km and is designed to engage aircraft and cruise missiles at altitudes up to 20 km. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It uses a 'fire-and-forget' guidance system with a two-way datalink for mid-course correction, making it robust against electronic jamming. According to Resonant News, Its vertical launch capability reduces thermal signatures, offering a level of survivability. However, the CAMM-ER's interception capabilities may be insufficient against the BrahMos's supersonic speed and sea-skimming trajectory. While more affordable and compatible with Nato-standard systems, the Italian system has not undergone the same level of combat testing as the IRIS-T, particularly against missiles sharing the BrahMos' performance envelope. Moreover, geopolitical alignment plays a role. Italy's close ties with Nato and a stronger relationship with India could complicate any direct sale of CAMM-ER systems to Pakistan. In contrast, Germany's strategic balancing and economic focus are seen as more conducive to defence dealings with Islamabad. There are also reports that Pakistan might explore options to locally produce or assemble the IRIS-T system, which could alleviate stockpile concerns and potentially lower long-term costs. Why does Pakistan think it is a necessary move? For Pakistan, acquiring a robust, modular, and combat-proven system like the IRIS-T is not just about replacing obsolete defences — it's about restoring deterrence in the face of India's growing missile capabilities. India's deployment of the BrahMos Extended-Range Land Attack Cruise Missile (BrahMos-ER LACM) has significantly altered the regional power dynamic. With a range now extended to 450 km and beyond, and with pinpoint accuracy of under one metre, the BrahMos has emerged as a cornerstone of India's offensive capability. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Indian Army's Brahmos missile system showcased at New Delhi, India. File Image/AFP Pakistan's military establishment sees the IRIS-T SLM as one of the few systems capable of responding to this threat. Its infrared seeker and thrust-vector control allow for agile interceptions of fast, evasive threats. Its multi-layered variants (SLS, SLM, SLX) offer integration options with Pakistan's Chinese and Western air defence components, giving Islamabad the flexibility it seeks. However, acquisition comes with both strategic and financial risks. Each system would only cover a limited area, necessitating multiple deployments to safeguard key military and civilian infrastructure. Even if deployed, the IRIS-T's 40 km range would still require supplementary systems — such as the longer-range HQ-9B — to offer a more comprehensive shield. And yet, in the current post-Sindoor landscape, it appears that Pakistan is prioritising its defence over its growing economic crisis. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
