&w=3840&q=100)
After Operation Sindoor exposed Pakistan, why is Islamabad turning to German defence?
People walk past a cut-out of BrahMos missile as they arrive to attend the roadshow of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Ahmedabad, India, May 26, 2025. File Image/Reuters
In the aftermath of India's assertive military response, Pakistan is reassessing its air defence capabilities.
Operation Sindoor, conducted from 7 to 10 May 2025, demonstrated the effectiveness of the Indo-Russian BrahMos cruise missile in penetrating and crippling existing Pakistani air defence infrastructure.
With India's supersonic precision-strike capabilities now proven in operational settings, Pakistan has turned its attention to advanced Western systems — particularly Germany's IRIS-T SLM — hoping to neutralise future threats from weapons like the BrahMos.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The BrahMos not only exposed the vulnerabilities in Pakistan's Comprehensive Layered Integrated Air Defence (CLIAD), but also left 11 out of 13 of Pakistan's Air Force bases compromised.
The missile, with speeds reaching up to Mach 3 and a range between 450 to 800 km, overwhelmed Pakistan's Chinese-supplied HQ-9B and HQ-16 missile defence systems. The accuracy and velocity of BrahMos, combined with its stealth and low radar cross-section, made it a particularly difficult target.
In this context, Islamabad is now reportedly evaluating two advanced air defence options — the German-developed IRIS-T and the Italian CAMM-ER.
However, Pakistan is showing a clear tilt towards the IRIS-T system, manufactured by Diehl Defence, which has seen operational success in Ukraine against Russian cruise missiles.
Why does Pakistan want Germany's IRIS-T?
The IRIS-T (InfraRed Imaging System – Tail/Thrust Vector Controlled), particularly its surface-launched medium-range version IRIS-T SLM, has garnered attention for its ability to tackle fast-moving cruise missiles and drones.
The SLM variant offers a maximum engagement range of 40 km and can target threats up to 20 km in altitude.
Reports from the Ukrainian frontlines suggest that the system successfully intercepted over 60 aerial targets — including missiles similar to India's BrahMos — since its deployment began in October 2022.
Originally designed for Egypt, the IRIS-T SLM batteries were partly redirected to Ukraine during the ongoing conflict, where they have been used to counter Russian P-800 Oniks missiles — an earlier technological sibling of the BrahMos.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Ukrainian officials revealed that in one engagement, the IRIS-T system intercepted eight Russian cruise missiles in just 30 seconds, safeguarding critical infrastructure from damage.
According to the Indian Defence Research Wing, the Oniks, like the BrahMos, flies at low altitudes at high speeds, making it a difficult target. Though the interception rate of the Oniks remains in single digits, the IRIS-T's relative success has reportedly impressed Pakistani military planners.
Each IRIS-T SLM unit comprises a radar, command and control centre, and a set of launchers, all mounted on compact frames for swift deployment. The entire system is modular and transportable, enhancing battlefield flexibility.
At an estimated cost of €178–200 million per battery, the system is expensive, but its proven performance and adaptability make it appealing to Islamabad, which is racing to upgrade its defences despite significant economic pressures.
Can Pakistan afford German defence?
Despite being in the midst of a fiscal crisis, Pakistan has sharply raised its defence expenditure. This year, the defence budget was increased by almost 20 per cent, even as development projects worth 1,000 billion Pakistani rupees were shelved.
In the same time frame, Islamabad secured nearly $1.8 billion in financial assistance from the International Monetary Fund and the Asian Development Bank.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Criticism has followed. New Delhi raised objections to Islamabad's rising military spending while continuing to receive international loans, pointing out that 'the loan amount would be used for terror financing rather than their intended use for development.'
One complicating factor is Diehl Defence's existing collaboration with India. The company, along with Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems, is involved in supplying the Interactive Defence and Attack System (IDAS) for India's Rs 70,000 crore Project 75I submarine initiative.
If Germany chooses to proceed with arms sales to Pakistan, it could trigger diplomatic friction with New Delhi, which may view it as undermining India's strategic edge.
Nevertheless, Germany and Pakistan have a history of defence and economic cooperation. The 2011 Pak-Germany Strategic Dialogue and a bilateral trade volume of €3.3 billion in 2023 form the backdrop for discreet German outreach to Islamabad through the European Security and Stability Initiative (ESSI).
Why is Islamabad leaning towards Germany?
While Italy's CAMM-ER system, developed by MBDA, is also under consideration by Pakistan, it appears to fall short in key operational parameters when compared to the IRIS-T.
The CAMM-ER has a maximum range of 45 km and is designed to engage aircraft and cruise missiles at altitudes up to 20 km.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It uses a 'fire-and-forget' guidance system with a two-way datalink for mid-course correction, making it robust against electronic jamming. According to Resonant News, Its vertical launch capability reduces thermal signatures, offering a level of survivability.
However, the CAMM-ER's interception capabilities may be insufficient against the BrahMos's supersonic speed and sea-skimming trajectory.
While more affordable and compatible with Nato-standard systems, the Italian system has not undergone the same level of combat testing as the IRIS-T, particularly against missiles sharing the BrahMos' performance envelope.
Moreover, geopolitical alignment plays a role. Italy's close ties with Nato and a stronger relationship with India could complicate any direct sale of CAMM-ER systems to Pakistan.
In contrast, Germany's strategic balancing and economic focus are seen as more conducive to defence dealings with Islamabad. There are also reports that Pakistan might explore options to locally produce or assemble the IRIS-T system, which could alleviate stockpile concerns and potentially lower long-term costs.
Why does Pakistan think it is a necessary move?
For Pakistan, acquiring a robust, modular, and combat-proven system like the IRIS-T is not just about replacing obsolete defences — it's about restoring deterrence in the face of India's growing missile capabilities.
India's deployment of the BrahMos Extended-Range Land Attack Cruise Missile (BrahMos-ER LACM) has significantly altered the regional power dynamic. With a range now extended to 450 km and beyond, and with pinpoint accuracy of under one metre, the BrahMos has emerged as a cornerstone of India's offensive capability.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Indian Army's Brahmos missile system showcased at New Delhi, India. File Image/AFP
Pakistan's military establishment sees the IRIS-T SLM as one of the few systems capable of responding to this threat. Its infrared seeker and thrust-vector control allow for agile interceptions of fast, evasive threats.
Its multi-layered variants (SLS, SLM, SLX) offer integration options with Pakistan's Chinese and Western air defence components, giving Islamabad the flexibility it seeks.
However, acquisition comes with both strategic and financial risks. Each system would only cover a limited area, necessitating multiple deployments to safeguard key military and civilian infrastructure.
Even if deployed, the IRIS-T's 40 km range would still require supplementary systems — such as the longer-range HQ-9B — to offer a more comprehensive shield.
And yet, in the current post-Sindoor landscape, it appears that Pakistan is prioritising its defence over its growing economic crisis.
Also Watch:
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US ready to be part of security guarantees for Ukraine, Germany's Merz says
The United States is prepared to take part in security guarantees for Ukraine, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Saturday, according to Reuters. Speaking to German broadcaster ZDF, Merz said he and other European leaders had been briefed by US President Donald Trump following his meeting in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'The good news is that America is ready to participate in such security guarantees and is not leaving it to the Europeans alone,' Merz said. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will meet Trump in Washington on Monday. Merz told ZDF that a three-way meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy should follow soon with the aim of agreeing to a peace deal. 'If that works out, it's worth more than a ceasefire,' he said. Merz added that Trump suggested Russia might be willing to negotiate on the basis of current front lines rather than the wider regional borders Moscow claims. 'This is a huge difference because Russia is claiming territories that it hasn't occupied yet,' he told ZDF. In a separate interview with broadcaster n-tv, Merz said he did not expect Zelenskyy's talks with Trump to be as difficult as those in February, when the two leaders clashed publicly. He said European leaders would speak with Zelenskyy on Sunday to help him prepare. 'We'll give a few good pieces of advice,' Merz said. Merz also stressed that while European unity was important, the US would remain central to the conflict. 'The American president has the power both militarily and via appropriate sanctions and tariffs to ensure that Russia moves more than it currently does,' he told Reuters.


Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
In first remarks after meeting Trump, Putin calls Alaska summit ‘timely and extremely useful'
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday that his summit with US President Donald Trump in Alaska had been 'timely and extremely useful,' adding that Moscow respected Washington's position on the Ukraine conflict and continued to seek a peaceful resolution. Putin gave the remarks in a televised meeting of senior officials in the Kremlin, Reuters reported. Trump, who entered the high-stakes summit warning he 'won't be happy' without a ceasefire and threatening 'severe consequences' if Moscow refused to cooperate, also shelved his threats and instead called the talks 'extremely productive,' after the three-hour meeting with the Russian side that yielded no tangible results. On Saturday, Trump dropped plans for an immediate ceasefire, writing on Truth Social that 'the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often do not hold up.'


India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
Talks with Trump in Alaska sincere, bring us closer to necessary decisions: Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday described his visit to Alaska as "timely and extremely useful" during a televised meeting with senior officials at the Kremlin. Putin also told officials that Russia acknowledges the United States' position on the Ukraine conflict and reiterated Moscow's intention to pursue a peaceful resolution."We have not had direct negotiations of this kind at this level for a long time," he said, adding that Russia "had the opportunity to calmly and in detail reiterate our position."advertisement"The conversation was very frank, substantive and, in my opinion, brings us closer to the necessary decisions," he said as reported by news agency AFP. Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is set to visit Washington on Monday, facing renewed pressure from the United States to agree to a swift resolution to the ongoing war with aiming to defend Ukraine's core interests, Zelenskyy will also look to avoid a repeat of the tense Oval Office exchange he had with former US President Donald Trump earlier this visit follows a controversial summit in Alaska, where US leaders hosted Putin. The move surprised and angered many in Ukraine, which has suffered heavy casualties and destruction since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in Alaska talks ended without a ceasefire and Trump later said he now wanted a 'rapid, full-fledged peace deal,' urging Kyiv to accept that 'Russia is a very big power, and they're not.'Zelenskyy's return to Washington marks his first visit since February, when talks with Trump reportedly turned acrimonious. According to a source familiar with those discussions, Trump told Zelenskyy that Putin had offered to freeze the front lines elsewhere if Ukraine agreed to withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, an offer Zelenskyy rejected, citing the impossibility of giving up internationally recognised Ukrainian territory, according to a Reuters report.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Russia#Vladmir Putin#Donald Trump#Volodymyr Zelenskyy#Ukraine#United States of America