logo
North American iguanas rafted 5,000 miles to colonize Fiji: Study

North American iguanas rafted 5,000 miles to colonize Fiji: Study

The Hill17-03-2025
A subset of North American iguanas likely landed on an isolated group of South Pacific islands about 34 million years ago — having rafted some 5,000 miles from the West Coast of the faraway continent, a new study has found.
Their epic journey to what is now Fiji marks the longest known transoceanic expansion of any terrestrial vertebrate species, according to the study, published on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Overwater travel for both animals and plants isn't unique in and of itself, as this is the primary way in which newly formed islands have become populated by plants and animals, the study authors noted.
Such travel has often led to the evolution of new species and ecosystems — a phenomenon that has fascinated scientists since the time of Charles Darwin.
Iguanas themselves are also known for their propensity to float elsewhere and are often found rafting around the Caribbean aboard plant life, the researchers explained.
And while the scientists were already aware that the lizards traveled 600 miles to get from Central American to the Galapagos Islands, the massive 5,000-mile trip to Fiji took them by surprise.
'That they reached Fiji directly from North America seems crazy,' senior author Jimmy McGuire, a professor of integrative biology at the University of California Berkeley, said in a statement.
'As soon as land appeared where Fiji now resides, these iguanas may have colonized it,' added McGuire, who is also a herpetology curator at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology.
Previously, biologists had assumed that Fiji iguanas — four species from the genus Brachylophus — descended from an older lineage that was at one point common around the Pacific but ultimately died out. Another possibility was the idea that the lizards 'hitchhiked' from South America and then through Antarctica or Australia.
Nonethless, the researchers found that there was no genetic or fossil evidence to support those theories.
To draw their conclusions, the researchers acquired genome-wide, sequence DNA from more than 4,000 genes and from the tissues of more than 200 iguana specimens in global museum collections.
As they began comparing the data to that of the Fiji iguanas, the scientists found that these animals were most closely related to iguanas in the genus Dipsosaurus. Within that genus, the most widespread lizard is the North American desert iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis, which has adapted to the desert heat of the U.S. Southwest and Northern Mexico, according to the study.
'If there had to be any group of vertebrate or any group of lizard that really could make an 8,000 kilometer journey across the Pacific on a mass of vegetation, a desert iguana-like ancestor would be the one,' lead author Simon Scarpetta, a former postdoctoral fellow at UC Berkeley.
The findings also indicated a much more recent emergence on Fiji — up to 34 million years ago — than the previously suggested arrival times of either 43 million years ago or up to 60 million years ago.
'The lineage of Fiji iguanas split from their sister lineage relatively recently, much closer to 30 million years ago,' added Scarpetta, who is now an assistant professor in environmental science at University of San Francisco.
That appearance in Fiji would have either post-dated or occurred 'at about the same time that there was volcanic activity that could have produced land,' Scarpetta said.
The four species of Fiji iguanas, which inhabit both Fiji and Tonga, are listed as endangered — due to habitat loss, predation by invasive rats and smuggling for exotic pet trades, the authors noted.
McGuire acknowledged that it may have been 'easier to imagine that Brachylophus originated from South America,' since marine and land iguanas dispersed to the Galapagos from the mainland. But this theory can now be ruled out, he and his colleagues confirmed.
Although the scientists might could not pinpoint the exact moment and circumstances under which the iguanas arrived in Fiji, they marveled at the prospect of the journey.
'Regardless of the actual timing of dispersal, the event itself was spectacular,' McGuire added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michigan's only rattlesnake is inbreeding
Michigan's only rattlesnake is inbreeding

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Michigan's only rattlesnake is inbreeding

While sexual reversal, genetic gambling, or evolving to reproduce later into life make the animal kingdom incredibly resilient, it's difficult to outrun inbreeding. Or out-slither it, in the case of the only rattlesnake species found in the state of Michigan. A 15-year study found that farms, buildings, and roads are making it difficult for the Eastern Massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus) to find a mate. The most inbred snakes had some serious problems not only producing viable offspring, but in simply surviving year-to-year.. The findings are detailed in a study published August 18 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). 'These are fairly large and stable populations of Eastern Massasaugas,' study co-author and Michigan State University conservation biologist Sarah Fitzpatrick said in a statement. 'The fact that we're detecting problems from inbreeding in these populations is concerning, given that many other populations throughout the Midwest are much smaller and even more fragmented.' Checking fitness As venomous snakes, Eastern Massasauga rattlesnakes aren't necessarily the most popular animal. Yet the reptiles are a keystone species of wetland food webs throughout the Midwest. The snakes hunt mice and rats that could run rampant in nearby homes and barns if not kept in check. According to study co-author Meaghan Clark, if the rattlesnakes disappeared, the entire balance of the ecosystem would be disrupted. These rattlesnakes are considered timid, and don't stray too far from the wetlands where they were born. They will typically only wander to explore a nearby habitat and find a mate before they head home. However, increasing human development is likely keeping Eastern Massasaugas even more homebound. When it's eventually time for the snakes to choose a mate, they are more likely to end up with a snake that is related to them instead of one from a distant population. [ Related: The last woolly mammoths were impressively inbred—but that's not what killed them. ] 'They're very vulnerable to even minor disturbances to their habitat,' said Fitzpatrick. 'Even a single road can isolate populations.' When animals reproduce with their relatives, it typically harms their babies' fitness. In biology, 'fitness' describes how successful an animal is at surviving, producing babies, and continuing on the species. Inbreeding can decrease fitness in what conservationists call inbreeding depression. However, it can be quite difficult to prove in wild populations, especially snakes with a venomous bite. Rattlesnake family trees In the study, Fitzpatrick's lab joined forces with long-term snake monitoring projects, partnering with researchers at Grand Valley State University, West Virginia University, and the Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Every summer since 2009, scientists armed with snake tongs have trekked through wetlands to capture the elusive reptile. The team noted each snake's length, weight, and pregnancy status. They also drew blood so that they could extract DNA and sequence their genomes. That genetic information helped them track how many babies were born and survive into adulthood, but also allowed the team to reconstruct pedigrees and determine how closely any two individual snakes were related. The team ultimately traced the family histories of over 1,000 Eastern Massasauga rattlesnakes. Before being released into the wild, each snake was marked with a PIT tag, similar to a microchip that a pet might have. This tracking means that the team can track the snakes' survival, based on whether they were recaptured. They found that the most inbred snakes were 13 percent less likely to have surviving offspring and their annual survival rate was nearly 12 percent lower than the less inbred rattlesnakes. Numbers this high even surprised the researchers. 'This long-term field monitoring is the backbone of the study,' Clark said. 'Having people out each season catching these snakes made all of this possible.' The team hopes that this data informs conservation efforts that could help Eastern Massasaugas find mates outside their families. Some small changes, including road underpasses or habitat restoration in wetlands, could promote more connectivity between snakes that would boost the gene pool. Conservationists could also experiment with moving the reptiles to new habitats with more options for finding suitable rattlesnake mates. Solve the daily Crossword

The athletes at China's robot games fell down a lot, but also showed possibilities
The athletes at China's robot games fell down a lot, but also showed possibilities

Boston Globe

time2 days ago

  • Boston Globe

The athletes at China's robot games fell down a lot, but also showed possibilities

During soccer matches, child-size ones tripped over each other, falling down like dominoes. One goalkeeper robot stood placidly as its opponent kicked a ball at its legs several times before finally managing to score. One robot by China's Unitree Robotics plowed into a human staff member while sprinting during a track event, knocking him down. Advertisement In kickboxing matches, robots wearing colorful gloves and head gear struggled to land punches. 'To be honest, the hit rate is a little low,' a commentator said in the event's official livestream. 'They're punching the air.' After a few minutes of flailing jabs and kicks, the referee declared one robot the winner. It raised its gloved hands and pumped them in the air to the sound of spectators applauding, while its opponent laid down in an apparent show of defeat. The event was China's latest high-profile robotics showcase. During China's Lunar New Year's Eve television gala, watched by hundreds of millions of people, humanoid robots performed folk dances. In April, the Beijing municipal government held a half-marathon for 12,000 runners and 20 humanoid robots. Advertisement China is trying to make rapid advancements in robotics, propelled by government directives and massive investments. Robots powered by artificial intelligence have already revolutionized manufacturing in the country. That has brought down operating costs and in some cases helped companies withstand President Trump's tariffs. Beijing officials told domestic news media the Humanoid Robot Games were a test of cutting-edge advancements in robotics technology. The test revealed limitations, but also possibilities. 'Despite the pratfalls, significant progress in robot locomotion and balance is being achieved including back flips, side flips, and other acrobatic and martial arts moves,' said Ken Goldberg, a robotics professor at the University of California Berkeley. One robot from Unitree Robotics won the gold medal for the 1,500 meter indoor track event with a time of 6 minutes, 34.40 seconds. The speed was impressive, Goldberg said. Although the robot was far slower than the human who holds the record in that event (Jakob Ingebrigtsen of Norway, who finished in 3:29.63), it was faster than many nonprofessional human runners. Some entrepreneurs believe humanoid robots will one day do many physical tasks now handled by people, including household chores, warehouse jobs, and factory labor. But for now, even simple tasks like loading the dishwasher are anything but simple for them. Alan Fern, a robotics professor at Oregon State University, said the Humanoid Robot Games helped to 'give the public a realistic impression of where things really are.' Fern said the games highlighted rapid advancements in the industry. One is that manufacturing of humanoid robots has developed enough that researchers no longer need to pay exorbitant amounts of money to buy them, or build their own, as they did only a year or two ago. Advertisement Another is that advancements in AI allow the machines to do a wider range of basic tasks. Five years ago, 'it was rare to see a humanoid robot that could reliably walk, let alone run, jump or handle rough terrain,' he said. But Fern said the type of robots used in the games are generally not equipped for higher-level functions such as planning or reasoning and usually need a human operator to help guide them. 'The robots are still dumb,' he said. This article originally appeared in

What was the first human species?
What was the first human species?

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

What was the first human species?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. All humans today are members of the modern human species Homo sapiens — Latin for "knowing man." But we're far from the only humans who ever existed. Fossils are revealing more and more about early humans in the genus Homo — ancestors like Homo erectus (Latin for "upright man"), who lived in Africa, Asia and parts of Europe between 1.9 million and 110,000 years ago. Scientists now recognize more than a dozen species in the Homo genus. So what, exactly, was the first human species? The answer, it turns out, is not crystal clear. Fossil finds in Morocco have revealed that anatomically modern humans emerged at least 300,000 years ago. But the oldest human species scientists definitively know about is called Homo habilis, or "handy man" — a tool-using primate who walked upright and lived in Africa between 2.4 million and 1.4 million years ago. However, earlier fossils hint that other Homo species may predate H. habilis. The scarcity of early human fossils makes it challenging to know if unusual specimens are a newfound species or simply an atypical member of a known species. On top of that, evolution can be gradual, so it's hard to pinpoint when a new species emerges, especially when fossils have a mix of features from different species. "The process of evolution is continuous, but the labels we place on it for convenience are static," Tim D. White, a paleoanthropologist at the University of California Berkeley, told Live Science. Related: Why did Homo sapiens outlast all other human species? Earliest Homo Most evolutionary theories suggest that H. habilis evolved from an earlier genus of primate named Australopithecus — Latin for "southern ape" because its fossils were first discovered in South Africa. Sign up for our newsletter Sign up for our weekly Life's Little Mysteries newsletter to get the latest mysteries before they appear online. Various species of Australopithecus lived from about 4.4 million to 1.4 million years ago. It may be that H. habilis evolved directly from the species Australopithecus afarensis — the best-known example of which is "Lucy," who was unearthed at Hadar in Ethiopia in 1974. The fossils of our genus are usually distinguished from Australopithecus fossils by Homo's distinctively smaller teeth and a relatively large brain, which led to the greater use of stone tools. But White noted that traits like smaller teeth and bigger brains must have emerged at times in the Australopithecus populations that early Homo evolved from. "If you had an Australopithecus female, there wasn't a birth at which point she would have christened the child Homo," he said. As a result, there is no fixed point in time in which Homo originated; instead, the Homo genus emerged roughly between 2 million and 3 million years ago, White said. Evolving in Africa Since the 1970s, researchers in Africa have discovered fossils that they've attributed to another ancient species, Homo rudolfensis, which challenges the idea that H. habilis was the earliest Homo. H. rudolfensis seems to have been physically much bigger, had a larger brain and a flatter facial structure than H. habilis, which may have made it look more like a modern human. Its fossils are roughly the same age as H. habilis — as much as 2.4 million years old. But "there is only one really good fossil of this Homo rudolfensis," according to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, so scientists don't know if H. rudolfensis is an unusual H. habilis or even an Austrolopithicus with a larger-than-usual brain. Paleoanthropologist Rick Potts, who heads the Smithsonian Institute's Human Origins program, told Live Science that even older fossils from Africa appear to be from the genus Homo and may predate both of those species. RELATED MYSTERIES —What did the last common ancestor between humans and apes look like? —Are Neanderthals and Homo sapiens the same species? —Why did Homo sapiens emerge in Africa? The oldest of those fossils date from about 2.8 million years ago, but they are only fragments — a few jaw bones and a few teeth — so they are not enough to establish if they came from a different, unnamed species of Homo, he said. A 2025 study found additional teeth dating to 2.59 million and 2.78 million years old that may also belong to this mysterious early Homo species. So it may be that the first human species has not yet been found. "There's a whole lot of excitement, but there is also a lot of uncertainty, about trying to discover more about the origins of the genus Homo," Potts said. Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens? Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store