logo
Index shows upbeat sentiment on South Africa's agricultural sector

Index shows upbeat sentiment on South Africa's agricultural sector

Mail & Guardian19-06-2025
Favourable production conditions for crops, wine grapes, fruit and vegetables will drive the sector's performance.
South African farmers and agribusinesses continue to exhibit resilience and optimism. The
After a notable uptick in the first quarter of 2025, the ACI fell by 5 points in the second quarter of the year to 65. Any level of the ACI that is above the 50-neutral point signals optimism.
Regarding the slight decline, most respondents identified the uncertain global trade environment, lingering geopolitical tension and the domestic animal disease challenge as key factors constraining the sector.
Despite the slight quarterly decline, the
This survey was conducted in the second week of June, covering various agribusinesses operating in all agricultural subsectors across South Africa.
A crucial point to remember when reviewing the index is that sustained optimism, at levels above the 50-neutral market, is fundamental, especially in the long run, for fixed investment in the agriculture and agribusiness sectors.
The ACI also serves as a leading indicator of agricultural growth prospects over time. We can thus expect slightly better farming output data for the second quarter of the year. The favourable production conditions for field crops, wine grapes and various fruits and vegetables will be the primary drivers of the sector's performance.
Indeed, we are yet to see the full impact of the foot-and-mouth disease that is challenging the sector. This has started to affect sentiment and is likely to continue in the coming months.
In essence, the ACI results for the second quarter of 2025 indicate that the sector's mood remains upbeat about the recovery this year. Still, the results also show that recovery will probably be uneven as some key subsectors struggle with animal diseases.
Notably, the dominance of geopolitical concerns in respondents' views illustrates the strong dependence of South Africa's agricultural sector on export markets and the need to diversify these markets. China, India, Saudi Arabia and Egypt are among the key markets we should target for expansion.
However, as we drive diversification, we must work vigorously to retain access in various markets across the European Union, United Kingdom, Africa, Asia, the Middle East and the Americas, among others.
Also significant are the collaborative efforts between business and government in addressing biosecurity issues in South Africa's agriculture, as well as efforts to promote more efficient network industries, better municipal management and the implementation of the
Wandile Sihlobo is the chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sassa flags 'unlawful' grant deductions by insurance companies
Sassa flags 'unlawful' grant deductions by insurance companies

The Herald

timean hour ago

  • The Herald

Sassa flags 'unlawful' grant deductions by insurance companies

The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has raised concern about the surge in 'unlawful' deductions by financial services providers, such as insurance companies and funeral schemes, targeting grant beneficiaries. The agency said it has been receiving complaints from beneficiaries who have had money deducted using Sassa's name without permission. Sassa CEO Themba Matlou said the agency does not work with financial service providers and has no authority to make deductions without the consent of the beneficiaries. 'We have respect for our beneficiaries and the act governing social assistance and we will never do anything to short change our clients,' he said. 'Your money is your money, If you qualify for a grant the money belongs to you and as Sassa we have no right, nor authority, to dictate how you use it.' He urged beneficiaries who have fallen victim to visit the Sassa local office to report the matter for investigation. 'Alternatively, clients who dispute signing a funeral policy with the financial services provider are advised to dispute the deduction by sending an SMS to 34548 with their identity number and the financial services provider's name. They should also visit the insurer or the services provider to cancel the policy.' According to the Social Assistance Act, the agency only allows one deduction per month of no more than 10% of the grant for a funeral policy issued by an insurer registered under the Long-term Insurance Act to be made directly from a social grant. Funeral deductions are not permitted from child-related grants such as the child support grant, care dependency grant or foster child grant. Temporary grants are also excluded, the agency said. 'The regulation says the beneficiary of the social grant must consent to such deduction by electronic communication or any other means of communication and has submitted such consent by electronic communication or any other means of communication to the agency.' TimesLIVE

Closing the gender wealth gap needs systemic change — but women must also act
Closing the gender wealth gap needs systemic change — but women must also act

Mail & Guardian

time17 hours ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Closing the gender wealth gap needs systemic change — but women must also act

South African women retire with only 71% of the wealth that men do. Photo: File South African women still face major challenges when it comes to building wealth. In fact, the wealth gap between men and women in our country is wider than the global average. According to the WTW Global Gender Wealth Equity report, South African women retire with only 71% of the wealth that men do. This is lower than the global average of 74%. The difference becomes even greater in senior positions, where women who are managers and executives retire with just 62% of the wealth their male colleagues accumulate. There are many reasons for this. One of the biggest is unequal pay. Women's Report Africa points out that, in 2021, South African women earned only 78 cents for every rand earned by men. Shockingly, this was a decline from 89 cents in 2008. Furthermore, fewer women than men in South Africa are actually employed. Only 54.3% of working-age women are active in the economy compared to 64.9% of men. And the unemployment rate for women remains unacceptably high at 35.7%, according to date from Women are also more likely to take breaks from work to care for children or other family members. This often means lower earnings and less money saved over time. As a result of all these factors, many women struggle to save enough for retirement, which is a significant problem when you consider that, on average, women tend to live about six years longer than men. This means women actually need more money to cover those extra years. Even for high-earning women, the path to wealth creation is hindered by investment hesitancy. A 2023 study by Maya on Money and Satrix found that only 15% of women felt very confident about investing, compared to 42% of men. About a third of the women surveyed said they avoid investing because they don't know enough about it and nearly one in five said it makes them feel anxious or uncertain. Many women say they hold back from investing because they feel pressured to be financially cautious for the sake of their families. To change this, women — and those on the path to building wealth — need to start seeing investing as the powerful tool it can be to achieve financial independence. This journey starts with the understanding that they have to do more than just save in a bank account or stokvel. Investing in things like shares or exchange-traded funds can help money grow faster over time. Targeted education is one of the keys to investment success and programmes like the JSE's #SheInvests are useful ways for women to build skills and confidence in investing. Using tax-friendly products such as retirement annuities, pension funds and tax-free savings accounts can also make a big difference. These products offer tax breaks and help protect savings. It's especially important for women to take advantage of these during peak earning years to help make up for times when they might earn or save less. Women should also rethink how they see risk. Being cautious is smart but avoiding all risk can mean missing out on opportunities. Taking calculated risks, such as maintaining equity exposure within a diversified portfolio, is essential for achieving growth that keeps pace with inflation. Finally, good financial planning plays a critical role. A trusted adviser can help build a holistic strategy that balances short- and long-term goals, optimises tax efficiency and effectively incorporates retirement planning. Women may also have access to more sophisticated vehicles like managed portfolios or offshore investments, which require professional insight to manage effectively. Having a good financial adviser is especially helpful during life changes like a career break or divorce. Having support, especially at these times, can boost confidence and keep women on track on their wealth building journeys. But closing the gap certainly isn't the responsibility of women alone. It also requires that we improve the systems that hold women back. Businesses and the government have a key role to play in this. Employers need to look at how they pay and support women, offering flexible work, fair promotions and support for mothers returning to work. Ultimately, financial independence and personal wealth growth for women are more than just personal milestones — they are powerful drivers of broader social progress. When women thrive financially, households, communities and entire economies benefit. So, closing the gender wealth gap isn't just the right thing to do; it's essential for building a stronger, more resilient South Africa for all. Hein Klee is an executive at Nedbank Financial Planning.

Coega ignor­ing solu­tions by busi­ness to develop Mark­man
Coega ignor­ing solu­tions by busi­ness to develop Mark­man

The Herald

time18 hours ago

  • The Herald

Coega ignor­ing solu­tions by busi­ness to develop Mark­man

While this expresses belief in the success of the South African democracy, a true collaborative approach will recognise that special economic zone (SEZ) employment success is modest — at best. The Coega SEZ has come at enormous cost, failing the communities it dislocated, and is not mitigating its environmental impacts. The inception studies for the Coega SEZ projected the creation of 100,000 jobs. Nearly 30 years later, we're not even at 10% of that jobs target (many of the jobs claimed are not in the SEZ), communities relocated out of the Coega SEZ have been marginalised with unrealised promises (the Coega 360), and Algoa Bay marine life is being devastated while the SEZ and port authorities both abdicate responsibility. Meanwhile, the residents of the city are incredulous at the misrule devastating our local economy. Jobs and economic development are about strengthening the rates base of the city, and that's not happening. As reported by The Herald ( June 9 2025), the municipality is in the process of writing off R218m of Coega Development Corporation (CDC) rates debt. And the CDC is not paying rates for the property being managed on behalf of the municipality in Kariega. This is not because businesses are not paying their share of rates — they most certainly are. The rates are being withheld by the CDC due to a dispute with the municipality around who should pay for the public infrastructure serving the industries. While agreement has been reached between the two parties to write-off the CDC rates debt, the full facts of this debacle must be considered by the oversight mechanisms of council to ensure legislative compliance. These facts are available but are being ignored or withheld. However, the underlying principle remains, the government is on a rates boycott of itself, while diligent citizens paying for services carry the cost. The entire saga, including the other rates write-off proposals, begs a detailed analysis. The data is there — but the collaborative leadership to undertake it is not. And if the leadership abdicate their responsibility, citizens must simply get under the hood, understand the real reasons for the proposed write-offs, and name and shame the elites who will benefit. It is logically impossible for the poor to be benefiting from the write-offs being proposed as those write-offs are what would have funded service delivery. Charles Dickens also says: 'It was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness.' The wisdom of municipal representation on SEZ boards is only part of the story. There has always been municipal representation on CDC boards but this was managed through what political analyst Ongama Mtimka has called creative politicking. William Gumede is more blunt, attributing the failure of the public sector and state-owned enterprises to 'ideology trumping reality'. What has prevailed is an age of foolishness, where societal objectives are displaced by economies of extraction that are dominated by political elites acting in their own narrow self-interest. Markman Industrial Township is a case in point. The wisdom of good road networks servicing ports for logistics efficiencies is a building block for economic growth, but it's being broken by the foolishness of misrule. Despite clear regulation in the zoning scheme for the Coega SEZ, Markman industry continues to be illegally denied direct access to the Port of Ngqura via Neptune Road which is a public road. In Markman, businesses religiously pay their rates, they employ more than 3,000 people, yet public infrastructure supposed to service the area has collapsed — a direct consequence of businesses being excluded from access to the public infrastructure (Neptune Road) of the Coega SEZ. Business has workable solutions for enhancing the logistics efficiencies of the city and enabling more competitive businesses. Business has solutions for mitigating the negative impacts of manganese on city roads, they have solutions for creating jobs, fixing infrastructure, and for diversifying the economy in ways that only business can do. Yet five years later, the government and CDC continue to ignore the solutions being offered by business, take the rates of business, fail to provide services, and leave businesses to fend for themselves. Business has raised these issues with every sphere of government: hosted tours by government officials, made parliamentary submissions, hosted oversight visits, and received commitments that the road would be opened. Yet the simplest of first steps — opening a gate from Markman onto Neptune public road — has been blocked by the CDC for the past five years with demands for an access payment. Every sphere of government has been consulted, and all agree with the proposals to open the Neptune Road gate. Only one party is always absent when it comes to finding a collaborative solution — the CDC — and their creative politicking for survival with a dysfunctional municipality simply continues. • Graham Taylor is the spokesperson for the Markman Business Forum (MBF), a membership based nonprofit company representative of the industries and property owners of Markman Township, that develops and maintains public infrastructure. The Herald

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store