
Angela Rayner calls on China to explain redacted images in super-embassy plans
China hawks in Westminster have raised alarm that the embassy site could be used to conduct surveillance from British soil.
Pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong, as well as Uighurs and Tibetans, meanwhile, fear that intimidation and reprisals from the Chinese state could result from the embassy going ahead.
This follows reports that bounties have been issued by China for dissident Hong Kongers now living in the UK.
In a letter seen by the PA news agency, Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government asks planning consultants representing the Chinese embassy to explain why drawings of the planned site are blacked out.
The letter gives two weeks, until August 20, for an explanation to be provided.
It also suggests that a final planning decision on the embassy site, at Royal Mint Court, just east of London's financial district, will be made by September 9.
Copies of the letter were also sent to the Home Office and the Foreign Office by email.
It notes that the Home Office requested a new 'hard perimeter' be placed around the embassy site, to prevent 'unregulated public access', and acknowledges this could require a further planning application.
Plans for the super-embassy were previously rejected by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022, with the Chinese opting not to appeal.
However, Beijing resubmitted the application a fortnight after Sir Keir Starmer's election victory last year, believing Labour may be more receptive to the application.
Since entering office Sir Keir's Government has sought closer links with Beijing after a cooling during the final years of Conservative Party rule.
The final decision will be made by Mr Rayner in her role as Housing Secretary.
Alicia Kearns, the shadow national security minister, said: 'No surprises here – Labour's rush to appease Xi Jinping's demands for a new embassy demonstrated a complacency when it came to keeping our people safe. Having deluded themselves for so long, they've recognised we were right to be vigilant.
'The disturbing bounty notes urging British citizens to kidnap and deliver their Hong Kong neighbours to the current CCP embassy laid bare the risks – yet the Foreign Secretary didn't even summon the Chinese ambassador in the face of direct threats to those seeking refuge in our country.
'CCP ambitions for a larger embassy would only amplify opportunities for espionage and transnational repression.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
12 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Homelessness minister must resign over rent hike after tenants' exit, Tories say
Labour's homelessness minister is facing calls to resign after reports claimed she hiked rent on a property she owns by hundreds of pounds just weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. Four tenants who rented a house in east London from Rushanara Ali were sent an email last November saying their lease would not be renewed, which also gave them four months' notice to leave, the i Paper reported. Ms Ali's property was then re-listed with a £700 rent increase within weeks, the newspaper said. Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative party chairman, called for the minister to stand down, accusing her of 'staggering hypocrisy' over her handling of the rental property. A spokesperson for the minister said: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.' The house, rented on a fixed-term contract, was put up for sale while the tenants were living there, and it was only re-listed as a rental because it had not sold, according to the i Paper. Tory frontbencher Mr Hollinrake said: 'I think it shows staggering hypocrisy. Rushanara Ali has been somebody who's obviously a Government minister in charge of homelessness. 'She's spoken out about exploiting tenants, about providing more protections to tenants. 'You can't say those things, then do the opposite in practice, as a landlord. She's got to resign.' He said the conduct appeared to be 'unethical, not illegal' but 'we can't just say one thing and do another'. Speaking to the i Paper, Ms Ali's former tenant Laura Jackson said she was one of four tenants who received an email giving four months notice to leave the property, for which they collectively paid £3,300 in rent. Ms Jackson, a self-employed restaurant owner, said she saw the house re-listed weeks after she and her fellow tenants had left, but with a rent of around £4,000. The 33-year-old told the i Paper: 'It's an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion.' She also said two letting companies managing the property for Ms Ali had attempted to charge £395 in cleaning fees and £2,000 to repaint the house when they left. The tenants successfully challenged this, as landlords are prohibited from charging tenants for professional cleaning, and from repainting costs unless serious damage has occurred. A Labour voter, Ms Jackson suggested it was a 'conflict of interest' for MPs to be landlords, especially in their own constituencies. Ms Jackson declined to comment further when approached by the PA news agency but confirmed the details of the i Paper's story. The minister's actions have also faced scrutiny from rental rights campaigners, as the Government seeks to clamp down on what it sees as unfair rental practices. The Renters' Rights Bill includes measures to ban landlords who end a tenancy to sell a property from re-listing it for six months. The Bill, which is nearing its end stages of scrutiny in Parliament, will also abolish fixed-term tenancies and ensure landlords give four months' notice if they want to sell their property. Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, described the allegations as 'shocking and a wake-up call to Government on the need to push ahead as quickly as possible to improve protections for renters'. He added: 'It is bad enough when any landlord turfs out their tenant to hike up the rent, or tries their luck with unfair claims on the deposit, but the minister responsible for homelessness knows only too well about the harm caused by this behaviour. 'These allegations highlight common practices that the Government can eradicate. 'The Renters' Rights Bill would ban landlords who evict tenants to sell the property from re-letting it within 12 months, to deter this kind of abuse – but unfortunately members of the House of Lords have voted to reduce this to six months. 'The Government can also use its review of the deposit protection system to penalise landlords who make exaggerated claims at the end of the tenancy.' Tom Darling, director at the Renters' Reform Coalition, said: 'It's mind-boggling that we have a homelessness minister who has just evicted four people in order to rake in more rent – something that will soon be illegal under the Renters' Rights Bill her own department is bringing through Parliament. 'The Government are currently considering an amendment to the legislation from the House of Lords which reduces the ban on re-letting after eviction from 12 months to six months. 'The Government must remove this amendment, and at the very least minister Ali must recuse herself from any discussions on this within Government.' Mairi MacRae, director of campaigns and policy at homelessness charity Shelter, said it 'beggars belief that after months of dither and delay, the Government's own homelessness minister has profited from the underhand tactics the Renters' Rights Bill is meant to outlaw'. Cabinet ministers lined up to defend Ms Ali when questioned about the allegations. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, speaking to broadcasters, said: 'I don't know any of the details of this but I understand that she has followed all of the rules in this case.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves said she 'didn't understand' why the Conservatives were calling for Ms Ali to resign, as she was interviewed in South Wales, saying: 'I don't know the details but Rushanara Ali seems to have done everything in accordance with the law.'


The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump Education Secretary's speech interrupted with ‘corrupt billionaire' audio and clown music
Donald Trump 's education secretary was interrupted as the sound system at a national youth conservative conference in Washington DC was hacked on Wednesday (6 August). Linda McMahon was speaking when a robotic voice blared out throughout the venue: 'McMahon is a corrupt billionaire who knows nothing about education.' Former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who was hosting the event, jokingly accused 'a few liberal senators' of working with the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) to disrupt McMahon. As she continued to speak, 'Entrance of the Gladiators,' a song commonly associated with clowns, played out of the speakers, with McMahon later stopping to chuckle.


Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
North Sea giant to move jobs overseas as tax rate hits 111pc
Britain's biggest oil and gas producer is to move skilled jobs out of the UK after windfall taxes left it with an 111pc tax rate. Harbour Energy plans to wind down its North Sea investments and has already announced 250 job losses in Aberdeen, a city once regarded as the oil and gas capital of Europe. On Thursday, a spokesman said the company would be offering jobs in its overseas operations to suitable UK workers but most of the staff marked for redundancy would be leaving the company. It came as Harbour report half-year results that made clear the impact of the energy profits levy, or windfall tax, which was initially imposed by the Conservatives and increased under Labour. Harbour made a profit before tax of $1.6bn (£1.2bn) but faced a tax bill of $1.8bn, resulting in a post tax loss of $174m. This was largely down to UK windfall levies plus foreign exchange transactions. The report said: 'The effective tax rate for the six months ending on June 30 2025 was 111pc, compared to 85pc for the same period in 2024.' The company said the increase was 'primarily' down to a deferred tax charge resulting from Labour's decision to extend windfall taxes to 2030. Linda Cook, Harbour's chief executive, said: '[The UK] remains a challenging environment for us... the fiscal regime means investment here just finds itself hard to compete with the opportunities we have in other countries. 'Going forward, we do expect investment to decline in the UK, given the fiscal and regulatory conditions. We will still have some high return opportunities, but overall investment is likely to decline and will be replaced by investment in Norway, Argentina and, over time, Mexico. 'The UK is one of our highest countries for unit operating costs… and it's one of our highest tax environments as well. So that [UK] production will get replaced over time with production from other countries, and that's a good thing for us overall.' Focus shifts permanently from UK Last week, Donald Trump said Britain was wasting a 'treasure chest' of oil and gas. He wrote on Truth Social: 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense. They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that, 'We don't want you.'' The US president said reopening the North Sea could deliver a 'vast fortune' for the UK and 'far lower energy costs for the people!' Harbour was a primarily UK-focused oil and gas producer but has shifted its focus as successive governments imposed ever-tougher windfall taxes and climate-related drilling restrictions. Last year the company acquired the upstream operations of Germany's Wintershall Dea, giving it production centres in Norway, Argentina, Germany and Mexico. The move tripled output to 475,000 barrels of oil a day compared to the 159,000 seen in the first half of 2024, with reserves also tripled at an estimated 1.3 billion barrels. The company still operates several oil and gas production hubs in UK waters. Investment is focused on two of them, J-Area and Greater Britannia Area, in the central North Sea. However, Ashley Kelty, an analyst at Panmure Liberum investment bank, said Harbour had permanently shifted its focus from the UK to other parts of the world. Harbour also published an 'adjusted profits' figure discounting the impacts of windfall taxes, showing underlying profits of $410m, and announced a $100m share buyback programme alongside a $455m dividend for shareholders.