Oil Prices Slump 7% After Iran's Muted Response To U.S. Attack
A pipeline at Big Hill near Beaumont, Texas, U.S. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Newsmakers)
Global oil prices slumped by 7% on Monday after Iran's response to U.S. attacks on its nuclear facilities did not cause any fatalities or major damage, much to the relief of global crude markets.
Tehran's threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime artery for oil and gas shipments from the Persian Gulf out to the Gulf of Oman and beyond, have also not been realised so far. As of Monday, at the time of writing, satellite imagery pointed to a normal passage of energy cargoes in the shipping lane.
At 14:31pm EDT on Monday, global proxy benchmark Brent's front-month contract traded down 6.9% or $5.21 at $70.27 per barrel. Concurrently, the main U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate's front-month contract traded at $68.32 per barrel, down 7.38% or $5.52.
That's after Iran launched an attack on Al Udeid U.S. Air Force base, located near Qatar's capital Doha. The base serves as the headquarters for the U.S. Central Command's air operations in the Middle East, and hosts nearly 8,000 U.S. troops alongside rotational contingents of U.K. armed forces.
Six missiles were launched by the Iranians on Monday to target the base. But no casualties or major damage was reported, as air defenses intercepted them, according to the Qatari government.
The attack was telegraphed in advance, mirroring what Iran did in 2020 when responding to the U.S. assassination of its Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani.
After the attack, U.S. Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson told media: "I got a classified briefing on all this early this morning. This is the retaliation that was expected."
How the U.S. responds to this attack is up to the president, Johnson added. But oil markets have taken it as a cue for de-risking for now. More so, after Iran's seemingly unlikely threats to blockade the Strait of Hormuz have not been followed through even partially.
Oil futures, initially spiked after hostilities began in the Middle East late on June 13, as Israel launched a surprise attack on Iranian nuclear and military targets. Retaliatory responses by Iran have since resulted in a constant exchange of fire between both countries, including attacks on oil and gas facilities, prior to the U.S. involvement on Saturday.
Back To Market Fundamentals
As a consequence, up until Monday's market de-risking both Brent and WTI futures posted month-over-month gains of over 20%, sidestepping wider supply and demand fundamentals. Contingent upon the response of U.S. President Donald Trump those fundamentals are now seen returning to set the market's tone.
Earlier this month, eight members of OPEC+, a select group of Russia-led oil producers and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) spearheaded by Saudi Arabia, opted to raise their collective production levels for July by another 411,000 barrels per day.
The move was the third consecutive output hike of 411,000 bpd announced by OPEC+. That too at a time when non-OPEC production remains elevated, with the U.S. currently the world's largest oil producer pumping well north of 13 million bpd. Brazil, Canada, Guyana and Norway are also pumping more oil relative to last year.
Such a level of production may likely result in an oil market surplus given global demand growth - thought to be less than 1 million bpd this year, according to the International Energy Agency.
Furthermore, this demand growth can be serviced by rising non-OPEC production alone. With expectations of a market surplus returning to the fore, oil prices may inevitably heading lower as de-risking continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump bombs Iranian nuclear facilities in major escalation. What happens next?
President Donald Trump has claimed to have 'completely, totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear program in a series of missile strikes and bombings, marking explicit U.S. intervention into Israel's war that risks a wider international crisis. The true extent of the damage is unclear. Retaliatory strikes are expected, as are efforts to revive already-fractured negotiations and diplomatic efforts to lower temperatures. But the United States is now embroiled in a war between two well-armed nations that could spill out far beyond their borders with untold casualties, experts have warned. 'Remember, there are many targets left,' Trump said in a brief address to the nation on June 21, roughly two hours after announcing a 'very successful' series of strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. 'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.' The world is watching to see what will happen, as experts and analysts consider how current conditions, history and a volatile political environment could inform what's next. A 'dangerous escalation' Trump had campaigned on a promise to end all wars, including Israel's war in Gaza and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, yet the president has so far failed to negotiate an end to either. Israel sought American military support for its campaign against Iran after receiving virtual permission for its devastating war in Gaza in the wake of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks — 'undermining Trump's claim to be a peacemaker and his assertion that wars would never have started under his leadership,' according to Brookings Institution senior fellow Sharan Grewal at the Center for Middle East Policy. He now risks exploding a wider crisis across the Middle East that could endanger U.S. installations abroad and embolden Iran's allies to retaliate, following a legacy of U.S. intervention and destabilization in the Middle East dovetailing with U.S. support for Israel's ongoing devastation in Gaza and in occupied territories. United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres said late Saturday that he was 'gravely alarmed' by Trump's decision to bomb Iran, calling it 'a dangerous escalation' and 'a direct threat to international peace and security.' 'There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control — with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world,' he said. Iran could also retaliate by blocking the strategically important Strait of Hormuz or attacking the energy infrastructure of the Arab Gulf — dramatically driving up global oil prices. Within hours after Saturday's attacks, roughly 50 oil tankers were seen scrambling to leave the Strait of Hormuz. Iran-backed Houthis have warned that Trump 'must bear the consequences,' Houthi political bureau member Hizam al-Assad posted on X. The Houthi-controlled Yemeni Armed Forces also said the group was prepared to target U.S. Navy warships in the Red Sea 'in the event that the American enemy launches an aggression in support' of Israel. Houthi rebels had previously attacked ships linked to Israel's war in Gaza, and the United States retaliated with a series of airstrikes in Yemen earlier this year. Hardening Iran's resolve — or doing enough damage to force negotiations? Saturday's attack marks an 'unprecedented event that may prove to be transformational for Iran, the Middle East, U.S. foreign policy, global non-proliferation, and potentially even the global order,' according to Karim Sadjadpour, an Iranian-American policy analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.' 'Its impact will be measured for decades to come,' he wrote. 'It could entrench the regime — or hasten its demise. It could prevent a nuclear Iran — or accelerate one. ' Iranian officials have stressed for years that its nuclear programs are for civilian and peaceful purposes only, but Israel has claimed that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, a claim central to the long and now accelerating conflict between the two nations. Following Saturday's bombings, Iran's atomic agency vowed 'never' to stop its nuclear program, according to Iranian media. The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said the three targeted nuclear sites came under 'savage assault,' seen as 'blatant violation of international law, particularly the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.' The agency also accused the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog of 'complicity' in the effort as it urged the international community to condemn the strikes and 'never allow the progress of this national industry … to be halted.' Aerial bombardment alone would not be enough to conclusively stop any nuclear ambitions because 'neither Israel nor the U.S. can kill all the nuclear scientists,' former U.S. ambassador Ryan Crocker told Politico. Targeted strikes that significantly damage operations could convince Iran to negotiate, according to former U.S. special envoy Dennis Ross. But a wider assault — fueled by demands from Israeli officials and Iran hawks in the United States — could be seen by Iran as seeing that 'they have little to lose and their best bet is to show they can make us pay a heavy price,' he told Politico. When Israel struck nuclear programs in Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007, 'the long-term results were diametrically different,' according to Mara Karlin, former assistant secretary of defense for strategy, plans, and capabilities under Joe Biden. 'Tehran could conceivably choose either path,' she said. 'And, as long as the uranium enrichment complex at Fordow remains largely intact, it does not need to decide.' Blowback in Washington — and across America Trump's attacks risk deepening a growing divide between his allies and anti-interventionist Republicans now tenuously aligned with a wider anti-war movement and the majority of Americans who do not want the United States involved with Israel's campaign at all. Several members of Congress have questioned whether the president's actions are even legal, amounting to an unconstitutional attempt to escape congressional authorization. At least two congressional Republicans — Rep. Warren Davidson and Thomas Massie — joined Democrats to immediately condemn the bombings as unconstitutional. 'The only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress,' Sen. Bernie Sanders said in remarks in Oklahoma as the crowd learned about the bombings in real time. 'The president does not have the right.' 'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers,' said Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. 'He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations.' The New York congresswoman said the attack is 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' Top Democrats on congressional intelligence committees were also not briefed in advance of the attacks. 'The American public is overwhelmingly opposed to the U.S. waging war on Iran,' said Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, who has urged Congress to pass legislation that would require Trump to go to Congress before attacking Iran. He noted that Israeli officials said its bombs have already set Iran's nuclear capability back by two to three years. 'So what made Trump recklessly decide to rush and bomb today?' he said. 'Horrible judgment. I will push for all Senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war.' While Trump touts what he claims are unequivocal military successes, he has also spent his first few months in office developing plans to crush dissent domestically. The deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles to respond to protests against his anti-immigration agenda could be seen as a 'dress rehearsal' for far more expansive emergency powers to impose federal control of America's cities, according to The Atlantic's David Frum. More demonstrations against further military action in Iran are expected, adding to a steady rhythm of protests and unrest against the Trump administration that exploded across American streets in recent weeks.
Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Four Signs Iran and Israel Could Soon Return to War
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A ceasefire brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump this week has put on hold Israel and Iran's fiercest confrontation, but the truce is already showing cracks. Two weeks ago, Israel launched strikes targeting Iran's nuclear and military sites, killing key scientists and generals. Iran responded with long-range missile attacks on Israeli cities. Eventually, the United States struck Iranian nuclear sites too before the ceasefire was agreed. Why It Matters The Iran-Israel conflict shapes the security landscape of the entire Middle East, with the potential to ignite a broader regional war and draw in global powers. A new conflict could disrupt vital energy supplies passing through the Persian Gulf, further destabilize neighboring countries such as Lebanon and Syria, and bring the United States and its allies into a deeper military role. Fire and smoke rise into the sky after an Israeli attack on the Shahran oil depot on June 15, 2025 in Tehran, Iran. Iran's foreign minister said the country would respond decisively and proportionally to... Fire and smoke rise into the sky after an Israeli attack on the Shahran oil depot on June 15, 2025 in Tehran, Iran. Iran's foreign minister said the country would respond decisively and proportionally to a wave of attacks that Israel launched beginning in the early hours of June 13. The attacks targeted multiple military, scientific and residential locations, as well as senior government officials. More Getty Images Here are four signs that Iran and Israel could soon return to war: 1. Iran's Nuclear Infrastructure Israeli airstrikes and American bunker-busting raids targeted Iran's enrichment sites, but despite the damage, a U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency assessment states the attacks only delayed Iran's nuclear progress by months—not destroyed it—as underground centrifuges and key infrastructure remain operational. Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recently reported that Iran has further limited inspector access and increased uranium stockpiles beyond agreed limits, raising international alarms. For Israel, the ongoing nuclear threat—and Iran's reduced cooperation with the IAEA—could require further strikes, making another round of conflict highly likely if enrichment accelerates. 2. Ceasefire Under Strain Both sides accused each other of violating the truce. Israel launched retaliatory airstrikes on Iranian missile facilities, sparking Trump's frustration and calls for restraint. Iran's missile strike on a Beersheba apartment building at around the time of the ceasefire killed at least four civilians. Iran said its missiles had been fired before the ceasefire began. Meanwhile, several drones were detected and shot down over northern Iran by air defenses, according to state media. 3. Escalating Covert Operations Iran says it has arrested over 700 individuals accused of working with Israeli intelligence, dismantling what authorities describe as a major Mossad-linked espionage network. The arrests follow a surge in covert attacks blamed on Israel, including drone strikes, car bombs, and high-profile assassinations of Iranian military and nuclear personnel. Tehran has already executed several alleged spies and vowed harsh retaliation. The scale and intensity of these operations have increased tensions. Emergency responders work at a building where four people were killed by an Iranian missile strike on June 24, 2025 in Beersheba, Israel. According to Israeli authorities, Iran launched a barrage of missiles in the... Emergency responders work at a building where four people were killed by an Iranian missile strike on June 24, 2025 in Beersheba, Israel. According to Israeli authorities, Iran launched a barrage of missiles in the early hours this morning, before the start of a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between the two countries. The Iranian foreign minister said that, if Israel stopped its attacks as of this morning, Iran would also end its strikes More4. Rhetoric Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the recent military campaign as a "historic victory" and warned, "If someone in Iran tries to restore [the nuclear] program, we will act with the same determination, the same power." His message underscored Israel's readiness to strike again. In turn, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian declared the outcome a "great victory" and said Iran would "continue to stand firm against Zionist aggression." This entrenched rhetoric on both sides leaves little room for de-escalation and heightens the risk of renewed conflict. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, center, gets into his car after attending a protest following the U.S. attacks on nuclear sites in Iran, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 22, 2025. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, center, gets into his car after attending a protest following the U.S. attacks on nuclear sites in Iran, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 22, 2025. Vahid Salemi/AP Photo What Happens Next The ceasefire may offer only a temporary respite. With Iran saying its nuclear program is still intact, potential covert Israeli operations inside Iran, and hardline leaders on both sides, the risk of renewed war remains high. Unless the U.S. can broker enforceable agreements addressing nuclear limits and de-escalate hostile actions, this fragile peace could soon unravel.
Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Moelis: 'Very Bullish' on Europe and Middle East
Don't be fooled by 'pessimistic' headlines - there are multiple reasons to remain 'optimistic' on the global business outlook says Ken Moelis, Founder, Chairman, and CEO of Moelis & Company. He is expecting a surge in economic growth in Europe and the Middle East, and is particularly excited about the wave of educated Iranian talent who could be available for hire if tensions in the region calm down. Moelis spoke to Francine Lacqua on 'Bloomberg: The Pulse'. (Source: Bloomberg)
