Latest news with #Beaumont
Yahoo
a day ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Advisor Team with Nearly $500 Million Joins Ameriprise Financial For Client-Focused Culture
The father-son, father-daughter team joins Q5 Wealth Management, an established Ameriprise practice MINNEAPOLIS, July 21, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Financial advisors Chuck Heare, Ross Heare, CFP®, Tommy Goth and Jennifer Goth-Castillo, recently joined the independent channel of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (NYSE: AMP) from UBS Financial Services, Inc. in Beaumont, Texas managing over $480 million in client assets. The team – comprised of father-son and father-daughter duos – was formerly known as Goth Heare Wealth Management Group. They join Q5 Wealth Management, an established Ameriprise practice led by managing partners Omar Bitar, Jeremy Saba, Mike Persia, Ed Persia, APMA™, and Brad Klein. Q5 transitioned their practice from UBS to Ameriprise in 2024. The two teams worked closely at UBS for many years before Q5 Wealth Management moved to Ameriprise last year. Soon after Q5's transition, the Goth Heare Wealth Management Group reached out to learn more about their move and it quickly became clear they needed to join forces at Ameriprise. The team cited several factors that drew them to Ameriprise and Q5 Wealth Management: Client-First Culture: "We were looking for a firm and team that prioritizes clients above all else and is not encumbered by the traditional Wall Street investment bank or wirehouse culture," said Ross Heare. "At Ameriprise, the firm's client-centric philosophy, integrated technology, and depth of resources helps us truly focus on serving our clients and put their needs first." Freedom To Build Out Support Model: "The ability to easily employ support staff was also a big draw for us," said Tommy Goth. "We now have the autonomy to build a team and service model that's tailored to our clients' needs – allowing us to deliver a more consistent and efficient client experience." Shared Values: "We've known Omar, Jeremy, Mike, Ed and Brad for years, and we share very similar values, starting with a deep commitment to serving clients," said Chuck Heare. The transition to Ameriprise and Q5 is off to a strong start. "The feedback from our clients has been overwhelmingly positive," added Jennifer Goth-Castillo. "We're excited about the future and what we can build together at Ameriprise and Q5 Wealth Management." Tiffany Barber, client service assistant, also made the transition to Q5 with the Goth Heare Wealth Management Group. Growth of Q5 Wealth Management Less than a year after joining Ameriprise with an eye towards growth, Q5 Wealth Management has expanded significantly – adding six financial advisors to the practice. In addition to the recent arrival of the Goth Heare Wealth Management Group, the team has welcomed Scott Guptill, who came on board with $100 million in client assets from Morgan Stanley and Kurtis Bell, who joined from LPL Financial with $25 million in client assets. Today, Q5 Wealth Management includes 11 financial advisors and 7 support staff who manage over $1.9 billion in client assets. "Ameriprise has been incredibly supportive in our ambitious goals to grow our practice and ultimately bring more value to the clients we serve," said Omar Bitar, financial advisor and managing partner of Q5 Wealth Management. "The firm's integrated technology capabilities, vast product lineup and supportive leadership structure have made it possible for us run a thriving practice that's centered on creating an incredible experience for both advisors and clients." The team is supported locally by Ameriprise Franchise Field Vice President Logan Clipp and Ameriprise Regional Vice President Tres Rouquette. Ameriprise has continued to attract experienced, productive financial advisors, with approximately 1,700 joining the firm in the last 5 years.1 To find out why experienced financial advisors are joining Ameriprise, visit About the Ameriprise Ultimate Advisor Partnership The Ameriprise Ultimate Advisor Partnership offers a differentiated experience for advisors that helps them accelerate growth while delivering an excellent client experience. Combined with the company's culture of support and independence, the Ultimate Advisor Partnership enables advisors to scale their businesses, deepen client relationships and drive referrals for future growth. About Ameriprise Financial At Ameriprise Financial, we have been helping people feel confident about their financial future for more than 130 years2. With extensive investment advice, global asset management capabilities and insurance solutions, and a nationwide network of more than 10,000 financial advisors, we have the strength and expertise to serve the full range of individual and institutional investors' financial needs. 1 Ameriprise Financial Q4 2024 Earnings Release. 2 Company founded June 29, 1894 Ameriprise Financial cannot guarantee future financial results. Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc. (CFP Board) owns the CFP® certification mark, the CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ certification mark, and the CFP® certification mark (with plaque design) logo in the United States, which it authorizes use of by individuals who successfully complete CFP Board's initial and ongoing certification requirements. Investment products are not insured by the FDIC, NCUA or any federal agency, are not deposits or obligations of, or guaranteed by any financial institution, and involve investment risks including possible loss of principal and fluctuation in value. Investment advisory products and services are made available through Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC, a registered investment adviser. Securities offered by Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC. Member FINRA and SIPC. ©2025 Ameriprise Financial, Inc. All rights reserved. View source version on Contacts Allison Harries, Media Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hindu
2 days ago
- Sport
- The Hindu
ENG-W vs IND-W, 2nd ODI: Why was Tammy Beaumont not given out obstructing the field during the second ODI?
There was another moment of controversy during an encounter at Lord's between England and India on Saturday when opener Tammy Beaumont was ruled not out for obstructing the field. The incident took place during the fifth over of England's chase of 144. Beaumont worked a delivery by Deepti Sharma into the leg-side, where it was fielded by Jemimah Rodrigues at mid-wicket. Beaumont, who had set off for a single, retreated into her crease and then appeared to kick out at Rodrigues' attempt to hit the stumps at her end. Rodrigues and wicketkeeper Richa Ghosh immediately appeared to remonstrate with the umpires over Beaumont's kick out. On-field umpires Rob White and Anna Harris conferred and sent the matter to the TV umpire Jacqueline Williams to determine whether Beaumont should be given out for obstructing the field. Williams observed the replays, and decided that Beaumont had made her ground and was not attempting to obstruct the field, ruling it not out. The rule 37.1.1 of the playing conditions states that, 'Either batter is out Obstructing the field if, except in the circumstances of clause 37.2, and while the ball is in play, she wilfully attempts to obstruct or distract the fielding side by word or action.' The incident marks another controversial incident between the two sides in an ODI at Lord's. The meeting between the pair in 2022 was marked by the infamous run out of England's Charlie Dean at the non-striker's end by Deepti Sharma to win the game for India.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 days ago
- Sport
- First Post
Explained: The obstruction appeal controversy from India vs England Women 2nd ODI and what the law says
Controversy erupted in the second ODI between India and England Women after the Harmanpreet Kaur-led side appealed for obstructing the field against Tammy Beaumont. read more The second ODI between India and England Women that took place at the Lord's became a subject of massive controversy after Harmanpreet Kaur-led side appealed for Obstructing the Field against Tammmy Beaumont. While it certainly appeared that India had a case, the third umpire reached a different conclusion after going through the replays. As a result, the England opener survived and crafted a solid opening stand of 54 runs with Amy Jones, which perfectly set up the 116-run chase in a rain-affected game. Eventually, England won the game by 8 wickets and brought the series level at 1-1. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The match did not offer much when it comes to the contest between bat and ball, but still made headlines owing to the field obstruction incident. The odd episode transpired during the 4th over of the England chase. On the fifth delivery bowled by Deepti Sharma, Tammy Beaumont came down the track, playing a flick to mid-wicket. More from First Cricket Team India selectors make course correction as Anshul Kamboj reportedly picked ahead of Harshit Rana as pace back-up India's appeal turned down by the third umpire As the ball was collected by fielder Jemimah Rodrigues, who sent it back to the striker's end. However, the visiting team appealed for obstruction of the field. The Indian team believed the England batter deliberately blocked the throw. Paying heed to the appeal, the on-field umpires consulted each other before sending the decision to the third umpire for review. Replays indicated that wicketkeeper Richa Ghosh failed to collect the ball. At the same time, England batter Beaumont had positioned her foot in the crease as the throw was coming toward Ghosh. Notably, Beaumont's left foot was grounded inside the crease when she moved her right leg. The ball ended up hitting Beaumont's pad, which prompted Ghosh to appeal for obstructing the field. After taking a good look at the replays, the third umpire came to the decision that it was not out. Following the culmination of the game, India batter Smriti Mandhana expressed her thoughts on the incident. 'I was not in a really good angle, to be fair, probably it was not visible at all. Jemmi definitely felt that maybe she kicked it or something. They referred it, and it was not out, so I'm sure that they should have seen all the angles. That's the only view I have on it,' Mandhana told reporters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'But I was in no angle, to be fair, to see what happened. At mid-on, you don't see what exactly happened from that way. So, not being diplomatic, but genuinely, I did not see it,' she added. What does the law say? According to the game's laws, being back in the crease doesn't exempt a batter from being given out for obstructing the field. The ball was still in play, so it wasn't considered dead. However, laws specify a batter won't be out if the obstruction was accidental or done to avoid injury. 37.1.1 in MCC's law book states, 'Either batter is out Obstructing the field if, except in the circumstances of 37.2, and while the ball is in play, he/she wilfully attempts to obstruct or distract the fielding side by word or action.' 37.1.2 states, 'The striker is out Obstructing the field if, except in the circumstances of 37.2, in the act of receiving a ball delivered by the bowler, he/she wilfully strikes the ball with a hand not holding the bat. This will apply whether it is the first strike or a second or subsequent strike. The act of receiving the ball shall extend both to playing at the ball and to striking the ball more than once in defence of his/her wicket.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The incident that took place in the second ODI between India and England Women brought back the memories of the famous dismissals of Yusuf Pathan from IPL 2013 and Inzamam-ul-Haq from India's 2005/06 tour of Pakistan.
India Today
3 days ago
- Sport
- India Today
Why was Tammy Beaumont not given out Obstructing the Field in Lord's ODI: Explained
Tammy Beaumont was involved in a controversial moment during the second Women's ODI between India and England on Saturday, July 19, at Lord's. In the fifth over of England's run chase, Deepti Sharma bowled around the off stump, and Beaumont clipped the ball to mid-wicket, where Jemimah Rodrigues was reacted quickly, firing a sharp throw toward the striker's end. As the ball deflected off Beaumont's pad, she appeared to already be within her crease, moving her right leg forward. Though the throw didn't hit the stumps, wicketkeeper Richa Ghosh appealed for an Obstructing the Field VS IND-W 2ND ODI HIGHLIGHTS On-field umpires Rob White and Anna Harris conferred before referring the decision to the third umpire. After a close review, Jacqueline Williams ruled Beaumont not out, determining she was simply attempting to regain her the time, Beaumont was on 25 off 17 balls. She went on to score 34 from 35 deliveries, hitting five fours, before falling to Sneh Rana. England ultimately won the rain-curtailed match by eight wickets, chasing down 115 in just 21 overs to level the three-match series was Beaumont truly in the clear, or did she get a lucky break?Here's the MCC law on Obstructing the Field37.1 Out Obstructing the field37.1.1 Either batter is out Obstructing the field if, except in the circumstances of 37.2, and while the ball is in play, he/she wilfully attempts to obstruct or distract the fielding side by word or action. See also Law 34 (Hit the ball twice).37.1.2 The striker is out Obstructing the field if, except in the circumstances of 37.2, in the act of receiving a ball delivered by the bowler, he/she wilfully strikes the ball with a hand not holding the bat. This will apply whether it is the first strike or a second or subsequent strike. The act of receiving the ball shall extend both to playing at the ball and to striking the ball more than once in defence of his/her wicket.37.1.3 This Law will apply whether or not No ball is called.37.2 Not out Obstructing the fieldA batter shall not be out Obstructing the field if the obstruction or distraction is accidental,or the obstruction is in order to avoid injury,or in the case of the striker, he/she makes a second or subsequent strike to guard his/her wicket lawfully as in Law 34.3 (Ball lawfully struck more than once).- Ends
Time of India
3 days ago
- Sport
- Time of India
Out or Not Out? Tammy Beaumont's close call vs India: What the rules say
Tammy Beaumont vs India (Image via X/Screengrab) Controversy unfolded at Lord's during the second Women's ODI between India and England, that tipped in the hosts' favour this time around following a win for India in the 1st. In the fifth over of England's innings, Deepti Sharma bowled a fuller delivery to Tammy Beaumont . The English opener drove it towards Jemimah Rodrigues at short midwicket. Rodrigues dove to her right, stopped the ball, and threw it back towards wicketkeeper Richa Ghosh. Beaumont, whocut short her run after opting against a quick single, was walking back to the crease. After placing her left foot inside the crease, with her right leg, she appeared to attempt kicking the ball away. Though she didn't make contact, it appeared that she had tried to stop the ball with her foot before it reached Ghosh. The visitors appealed without fail, gesturing to the umpires that Beaumont had tried to interfere with the throw. The umpires had a long discussion and opted for a review. After watching a few replays, the third umpire decided Beaumont was not out. However, according to the laws, there is no exemption that protects a batter from being given out for Obstructing the Field even if they are back inside the crease. The ball was still in play at the time, which is clear from the fact that it was moving towards the India wicketkeeper. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo 37 OBSTRUCTING THE FIELD 37.1 Out Obstructing the field 37.1.1 Either batter is out Obstructing the field if, except in the circumstances of clause 37.2, and while the ball is in play, she wilfully attempts to obstruct or distract the fielding side by word or action. See also clause 34 (Hit the ball twice). 37.1.2 The striker is out Obstructing the field if, except in the circumstances of clause 37.2, in the act of receiving a ball delivered by the bowler, she wilfully strikes the ball with a hand not holding the bat. This will apply whether it is the first strike or a second or subsequent strike. The act of receiving the ball shall extend both to playing at the ball and to striking the ball more than once in defence of her wicket. 37.1.3 This clause will apply whether or not No ball is called. 37.1.4 For the avoidance of doubt, if an umpire feels that a batter, in running between the wickets, has significantly changed her direction without probable cause and thereby obstructed a fielder's attempt to effect a run out, the batter should, on appeal, be given out, obstructing the field. It shall not be relevant whether a run out would have occurred or not. If the change of direction involves the batter crossing the pitch, clause 41.14 shall also apply. Additionally, it has been mentioned in another clause that the batter will not be out if they Obstruct the field accidentally, to avoid injury or in the case of a second/subsequent strike made to guard the wicket lawfully (for a striker). However, the not out decision didn't hurt India much in terms of runs conceded, given that Beaumont was batting on 25 off 16 balls at the time and was later dismissed for 34 off 35 by Sneh Rana in the 11th over. Poll Should Tammy Beaumont have been given out for obstructing the field? Yes, she attempted to interfere with the throw. No, she was already inside the crease. England level series after rain-hit win In the match itself, England bounced back to win the second ODI by eight wickets in a rain-shortened game at Lord's. Chasing a revised target of 115, opener Amy Jones guided the hosts home with an unbeaten 46, helping them level the three-match series 1-1. India, who had successfully chased down 259 in the first ODI, struggled with the bat this time. They managed only 143/8 in the 29-overs-per-side match, with Smriti Mandhana top-scoring with 42. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
