logo
Shabbir seeks BRS' stand on inclusuion of Muslims under BC quota

Shabbir seeks BRS' stand on inclusuion of Muslims under BC quota

Time of India3 days ago
1
2
Hyderabad: Mohammed Ali Shabbir, advisor to the govt, on Saturday demanded the BRS leaders to clarify their stand on the inclusion of Muslims under the proposed 42% BC quota in Telangana.
He questioned whether BRS leaders, including former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao and former ministers KT Rama Rao and T Harish Rao, were supporting the BJP's demand to remove BC-E Muslims from the BC category or backing the Congress' efforts to enhance the BC quota.
"Despite several clarifications that the BC quota is not based on religion, the BJP has been trying to polarise the issue. The silence of BRS leaders on BJP's stand raises suspicions that they may be supporting the removal of Muslims from the BC list," Shabbir Ali said.
You Can Also Check:
Hyderabad AQI
|
Weather in Hyderabad
|
Bank Holidays in Hyderabad
|
Public Holidays in Hyderabad
Accusing the BJP of communalising every issue related to minorities, he reminded that it was the previous Congress govt that introduced 4% reservation for Muslims under the BC-E category in 2004-05, benefitting over 22 lakh in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. He said that the Congress govt is fighting the case in the Supreme Court to safeguard and uphold this reservation.
He further stated that the proposed 42% BC reservation in local body elections would also benefit Muslims classified under BC-E, ensuring their political representation and social upliftment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Epstein ‘stole' young women from Mar-a-Lago spa, including Virginia Giuffre, claims Donald Trump
Epstein ‘stole' young women from Mar-a-Lago spa, including Virginia Giuffre, claims Donald Trump

Mint

time12 minutes ago

  • Mint

Epstein ‘stole' young women from Mar-a-Lago spa, including Virginia Giuffre, claims Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Jeffrey Epstein had 'stolen' young women who worked at the Mar-a-Lago spa, marking a notable shift in how he now characterises their past relationship, as reported by AP. Trump specifically acknowledged that one of those women was Virginia Giuffre, a central figure among Epstein's most prominent accusers in the long-running sex trafficking case. Giuffre has alleged she was recruited as a teenager and later abused by Epstein and his associates, according to the report. Trump's comments expanded on remarks he had made a day earlier, when he said he had banned Epstein from his private club in Florida two decades ago because his one-time friend 'stole people that worked for me.' At the time, he did not make clear who those workers were. The Republican president has faced an outcry over his administration's refusal to release more records about Epstein after promises of transparency, a rare example of strain within Trump's tightly controlled political coalition. Trump has attempted to tamp down questions about the case, expressing annoyance that people are still talking about it six years after Epstein died by suicide while awaiting trial, even though some of his own allies have promoted conspiracy theories about it. Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's imprisoned former girlfriend, was recently interviewed inside a Florida courthouse by the Justice Department's No. 2 official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, though officials have not publicly disclosed what she said. Her lawyers said Tuesday that she's willing to answer more questions from Congress if she is granted immunity from future prosecution for her testimony and if lawmakers agree to satisfy other conditions. Aboard Air Force One while returning from Scotland, Trump said he was upset that Epstein was 'taking people who worked for me.' The women, he said, were 'taken out of the spa, hired by him — in other words, gone.' 'I said, listen, we don't want you taking our people,' Trump said. When it happened again, Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. Asked if Giuffre was one of the employees poached by Epstein, he demurred but then said 'he stole her.' The White House originally said Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago because he was acting like a 'creep.' Giuffre died by suicide earlier this year. She claimed that Maxwell spotted her working as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, when she was a teenager, and hired her as Epstein's masseuse, which led to sexual abuse. Although Giuffre's allegations did not become part of criminal prosecutions against Epstein, she is central to conspiracy theories about the case. She accused Epstein of pressuring her into having sex with powerful men. Maxwell, who has denied Giuffre's allegations, is serving a 20-year-prison sentence in a Florida federal prison for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse underage girls. A spokeswoman for the House Oversight Committee, which requested the interview with Maxwell, said the panel would not consider granting the immunity she requested. The potential interview is part of a frenzied, renewed interest in the Epstein saga following the Justice Department's statement earlier this month that it would not be releasing any additional records from the investigation, an abrupt announcement that stunned online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of Trump's political base who had been hoping to find proof of a government coverup. Since then, the Trump administration has sought to present itself as promoting transparency, with the department urging courts to unseal grand jury transcripts from the sex-trafficking investigations. A judge in Florida last week rejected the request, though similar requests are pending in New York. In a letter Tuesday, Maxwell's attorneys said that though their initial instinct was for Maxwell to invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, they are open to having her cooperate provided that lawmakers satisfy their request for immunity and other conditions.

Gangrape Case against Badoli: Do not disclose name of complainant in public domain, e-court portal: HC
Gangrape Case against Badoli: Do not disclose name of complainant in public domain, e-court portal: HC

Indian Express

time12 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Gangrape Case against Badoli: Do not disclose name of complainant in public domain, e-court portal: HC

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has directed that the name of the complainant woman in a gangrape case against Haryana BJP president Mohan Lal Badoli and and Haryanvi singer Jai Bhagwan, must not be disclosed in public domain, including the e-court portal. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel passed the order Monday during the resumed hearing on a petition filed by Badoli seeking to restrain the woman from public statements about the BJP leader even as trial court in Solan is hearing the matter. During the hearing, the counsel for the woman raised objection over the disclosure of her name in the petition filed by Badoli, which was later also put up e-court portal of the high court. Accepting the objection, the court said, '…the petitioner has disclosed the name of the victim in the memo of parties, which is completely wrong and the name of the victim cannot be disclosed. He (the woman's counsel) further submits that at this stage an order be passed that the name of the victim be not reflected in the Online e-court Portal. Ordered accordingly'. Senior Advocate Ankush Dass Sood, assisted by Advocates Virbahadur Verma, Gaurav Choudhary, Ankit Dhiman, and Mukul Sharma appeared for the petitioner. The state was represented by Deputy Advocate General Rahul Thakur. The parties sought a period of four weeks for filing their replies, which was granted. The matter has now been listed for hearing on September 5, 2025, and the interim order will continue to remain in force until then. During the previous hearing on July 22, the court had refrained the woman from making any public statements beyond what has already been stated in judicial proceedings. At the time. Justice Goel had issued notices to the Himachal Pradesh Police, the Solan superintendent of police (SP), and two other respondents, directing them to submit their replies on July 28. On July 15, the district and sessions court in Solan allowed a revision petition challenging an earlier order of the Kasauli court, which had accepted a cancellation report filed by Kasauli police in the gang rape case against Badoli and Mittal. The sessions court also directed the complainant to appear before the Kasauli court on July 30. The FIR against Badoli and Mittal was registered on December 13, 2024, under sections 376(D) (gang rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code. The cancellation report, citing a lack of sufficient evidence, had been accepted by the Kasauli court on March 12, prompting the complainant to file a revision petition before the Solan court.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Congress slams PM Modi, HM Shah for Nehru criticism
Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Congress slams PM Modi, HM Shah for Nehru criticism

New Indian Express

time12 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Congress slams PM Modi, HM Shah for Nehru criticism

NEW DELHI: The Congress on Wednesday slammed Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for their criticism of India's first PM Jawaharlal Nehru in their remarks in the Lok Sabha, saying they have no answers to their "present-day failures" and they choose to "divert, distract, distort, and defame". Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said, "Yesterday in the Lok Sabha, both the HM and the PM once again showed that they suffer from what in medical language is called obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) when it comes to Jawaharlal Nehru. It is possible that this will be on display in the Rajya Sabha too today." "They have NO answers to their present-day failures. They have NO answers to legitimate questions that are being raised on their policies and actions," he said. Instead of engaging in meaningful debate, they divert, distract, distort, and defame, he said. "The Home Minister claimed to be a historian of sorts. He is India's second greatest distorian. Top honours in this regard is reserved for the man qualified in Entire Poli(e)tical Science," Ramesh said. Speaking during the discussion in Lok Sabha on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, Modi said the Congress government under Jawaharlal Nehru lost over 38,000 km of territory of Aksai Chin. He slammed the Indus Waters Treaty agreement that the first prime minister signed with Pakistan as a "big blunder". "Before asking why PoK has not been taken back yet, Congress must respond -- who let it go. India is still suffering the pain of mistakes committed by previous Congress governments, starting from Jawaharlal Nehru," Modi had said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store