
Himachal govt college student dies by suicide, female friend booked
A student of a government college was died by suicide in his hostel room in Himachal Pradesh's Mandi district with police recovering a suicide note in which he blamed a female collegemate for him taking the extreme step, officials said on Sunday.
The incident came to light on Saturday when other students of the college knocked on the door of the victim, a fourth semester Computer Science student, and they broke it down upon receiving no response. Rushing into the room they found his body.
Police recovered a suicide note from the room which revealed that the extreme step was taken on account of an ongoing affair, following which a second semester female student of the college was arrested for abetting suicide. She was booked under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108 (abetment of suicide) based on the complaint of the deceased's mother who alleged that her son killed self after being blackmailed by the accused.
The body has been handed over to the family members following a postmortem, police said.
The accused was produced before the court of additional chief judicial magistrate Sundernagar. She has been remanded to two days police custody, they added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
44 minutes ago
- News18
Bengaluru Stampede Victim Files FIR Against RCB, Karnataka Cricket Body, DNA Firm
Last Updated: The FIR, which has been filed at the Cubbon Park Police Station, has also named Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) and event organiser DNA, responsible for the stampede. In mounting legal woes for Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) over its IPL 2025 victory celebrations that led to a fatal stampede in Bengaluru, a man, claiming to be a victim of the incident, has filed First Information Report (FIR) holding the entities responsible for the deadly incident. The FIR, which has been filed at the Cubbon Park Police Station, has also named Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) and event organiser DNA agency, responsible for the M Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede which claimed 11 lives and left several others injured. In the FIR, the stampede survivor, identified as 25-year-old Rolan Gomes, who reportedly got fractured his right shoulder joint after getting caught in the stampede, accused the three entities of negligence, saying that they 'failed to make proper arrangements and facilities." The complainant further pointed out that the announcement of the celebration was disseminated widely across RCB's social media platforms. These posts, he noted, specified that entry would be complimentary, with tickets to be distributed at the venue, particularly in the vicinity of Gate No 17, as reported by NDTV. He added that some posts also suggested unofficial ticket sales. Gomes further recounted arriving at one of the stadium gates around 2:15 PM to find a massive crowd of RCB fans. He stated that police officers opened the gate around 3:10 PM, leading to 'thousands of people rushing simultaneously through the narrow gate and the stampede occurred. 'I slipped and fell, and people behind me trampled over those who had fallen. I saw several others lose consciousness due to the crush," the 25-year-old said. 'Their irresponsibility resulted in a tragic situation with loss of life and injuries. Therefore, I am giving this statement requesting that appropriate legal action be taken against them," he added. The second FIR against RCB, the event management firm DNA, and KSCA came a day after the first FIR was registered against them on various charges, including culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The FIR was filed following a complaint by a police inspector at the Cubbon Park Police Station. The charges listed in the FIR include voluntarily causing hurt (Section 115), causing hurt or grievous hurt by using dangerous weapons or means (Section 118), causing hurt or grievous hurt to deter a public servant from duty (Section 121), and unlawful assembly (Section 190) under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Legal Action Against Entities On Thursday, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah had instructed the DGP and IGP of the state to immediately arrest the representatives of RCB and DNA event managers and Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) in connection with the stampede, as prima facie there was 'irresponsibility" and 'carelessness" on their part. Earlier today, four officials of RCB and the event management firm DNA Entertainment Private Limited were taken into custody . Hours later, the Karnataka High Court granted interim protection from coercive action against KSCA after they approached the high court. In its writ petition, the KSCA argued that the government is attempting to shift blame onto the association to deflect public outrage over the stampede. The association further claimed that crowd management was not its responsibility and that the FIR was unjustified. What Happened At Chinnaswamy Stadium? A massive crowd gathered to celebrate Royal Challengers Bengaluru's (RCB) first Indian Premier League (IPL) title turned tragic on Wednesday evening when a stampede near M Chinnaswamy Stadium left 11 dead and over 30 injured. Authorities said most of the victims were young men and women, including several students. RCB ended an 18-year wait for the IPL trophy after defeating Punjab Kings at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Bengaluru. Post their win, the team arrived in Bengaluru for a felicitation ceremony. Fans had arrived in large numbers to catch a glimpse of their champion team. News india Bengaluru Stampede Victim Files FIR Against RCB, Karnataka Cricket Body, DNA Firm


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie review: Asif Ali film claims to spotlight ‘issues faced by men'; but is that its true intent?
Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie review: At a crucial moment in debutant director Sethunath Padmakumar's Abhyanthara Kuttavali, Sahadevan (Asif Ali) breaks the fourth wall and tells the audience directly, 'Don't bother reacting; after all, it's a man who died.' He also, during a court hearing, comments on the rising number of suicide cases among men in the country, particularly owing to 'marriage-related problems'. While the well-being of every person, regardless of caste, gender, race or creed, is equally important, and many experts have pointed out that patriarchy harms everyone, including men, Abhyanthara Kuttavali positions itself as an attempt to spotlight issues faced by men. Particularly focusing on how 'fake cases' are slapped on them without humane consideration. However, in all honesty, the film ends up being a brazen attempt to overlook and invisibilise the harassment and crimes women have faced for centuries, mostly at the hands of men, by reducing it all to three cases (including two subplots) told through a masculinist lens, by completely villainising the female characters. Although his marriage to Nayana (Thulasi) was a joyous occasion for Sahadevan, his happiness was short-lived. He soon ends up at the Anthikad police station after she files a complaint accusing him of demanding more dowry and physically abusing her. As a result, the police register a case against him under Section 498A of the IPC (now Sections 85 and 86 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). As Sahadevan narrates to the police the 'truths' behind the incidents mentioned in the complaint, Abhyanthara Kuttavali cuts to flashbacks, in which we are shown that Nayana, though seemingly happy, has been keeping a distance from Sahadevan since day one. They barely even communicate, let alone have physical intimacy. Nayana soon tells Sahadevan that she wishes to pursue higher studies in the Netherlands, which would help settle there too, and suggests selling the gold ornaments her parents gifted her to fund it. When he objects, she is shown injuring herself. Her parents soon arrive and take her back home, following which she files the complaint. Once the case reaches the court, Sahadevan meets two other men — Peter (Sidharth Bharathan) and Makkar (Harisree Ashokan) — who are also dealing with unfair cases filed against them by their wife and daughter-in-law, respectively, as the system 'only favours the women'. The remainder of the film follows Sahadevan's efforts to prove his innocence. Although Abhyanthara Kuttavali mentions at the start that it is a 'work of fiction', the movie leaves no opportunity to generalise things and give good conduct certificates to men. This is achieved by cleverly portraying the male characters as noble and good-natured, albeit with some flaws like occasional drinking, while most of the women are depicted as apathetic, manipulative and often 'gold diggers'. From Sahadevan, his father Menon (Balachandran Chullikkad), and his friends Yudas (Anand Manmadhan) and Deshavasi (Azees Nedumangad) to Peter and Makkar, all the men are portrayed with sympathy, their moral grey areas conveniently omitted. Even Viswanathan (Jagadeesh), Nayana's lawyer, is ultimately shown in a positive light. In contrast, nearly all the female characters, except for elderly women who conform to the patriarchal norms of the 'ideal mother', are presented as greedy and lacking compassion. To reinforce this, the film even includes a scene where a woman is shown asking Yudas about his financial assets in detail during a pennukaanal (matchmaking visit), prompting him to give a lecture on how women should fend for themselves. In another instance, one of the few self-reliant women in the film, Anila (Shreya Rukmini), an assistant to Sahadevan's advocate, is shown sitting silently in court during the only time she appears on her senior's behalf without speaking up for her client. Although the scene suggests that she is too inexperienced and intimidated to argue in front of Viswanathan, prompting Sahadevan to represent himself, it inadvertently implies that even women who do have a voice choose not to speak up when men are the victims, leaving the latter to fight for themselves. The film is, in fact, packed with similar stereotypical and misogynistic narrative devices that reduce the complex topic of 'issues faced by men' to 'women are misusing the laws (and the freedom they have been 'given')'. It fails to even acknowledge the structural and systemic challenges men face within a patriarchal and elitist society, where only the rich and affluent wield real power. Towards the end, seemingly in an attempt to suggest that the film isn't anti-women, Abhyanthara Kuttavali shows Nayana and one of her friends briefly addressing their life struggles. 'Interestingly', this is one of the few occasions wherein the movie gives the women the chance to narrate their stories. Almost all other times, we are only shown the men's versions. While Nayana's friend shares how she lost a hand due to violence inflicted by her father, Nayana herself recounts how harassment by a teacher made her detest men and marriage altogether, prompting the two to decide to move abroad together and live in freedom. Nayana mentions this as the reason why she agreed to marry Sahadevan, as it would give her complete ownership of the gold gifted by her parents, which would help them fund their dream. However, their stories appear only as passing references, quickly dropped after five minutes. Just a (rhetorical) question to the makers: what about the heinous crimes faced by these women? It is certain that these were only the tip of the iceberg of the torments they faced in life, including many forms of daily sexual harassment. Were their sufferings not as important as Sahadevan's to get more screentime and a bit of empathy? While the film addresses the issue of false cases being filed against men, which in no way should be encouraged, it conveniently overlooks the many, many, many instances of women facing physical and emotional abuse within their own homes, the vast majority of which go unreported. A low conviction rate in such cases does not automatically imply that all cases are fabricated. It's high time we acknowledged that reality. By presenting a one-sided narrative, writer-director Sethunath Padmakumar ensures that Abhyanthara Kuttavali caters to a male audience, particularly those who blindly believe that men's victimhood exists solely because there are legal protections for the oppressed. The film offers these viewers enough 'goosebumps-inducing' moments, especially through quite a few dialogues that denounce alimony. Had men opened their mouths and moved their fingers as diligently and ferociously as they did following the Bengaluru techie suicide of December 2024, the world might have been a better place for all by now. Although Asif Ali delivers a neat performance as Sahadevan, it can't be called impactful, largely because the film relies heavily on dialogues to convey his emotions rather than allowing his acting to speak for itself. Nonetheless, there are moments in Abhyanthara Kuttavali where Asif's strength as a performer in communicating intense emotions through restrained acting shines. Despite limited screen time, Harisree Ashokan makes a strong impression as Makkar. Azees Nedumangad and Anand Manmadhan provide some comic relief, though not all the jokes land consistently. Thulasi, as Nayana, is unfortunately underwhelming. There are several moments in the movie, especially those meant to depict her anger or sorrow, where her portrayal comes across as caricatured. Rahul Raj's background score, however, does manage to elevate Abhyanthara Kuttavali to some extent and prevents it from slipping entirely into preachy territory. Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie cast: Asif Ali, Jagadeesh, Harisree Ashokan, Sidharth Bharathan, Thulasi, Shreya Rukmini Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie director: Sethunath Padmakumar Abhyanthara Kuttavali movie rating: 1.5 stars Anandu Suresh is a Senior sub-editor at Indian Express Online. He specialises in Malayalam cinema, but doesn't limit himself to it and explores various aspects of the art form. He also pens a column titled Cinema Anatomy, where he delves extensively into the diverse layers and dimensions of cinema, aiming to uncover deeper meanings and foster continuous discourse. Anandu previously worked with The New Indian Express' news desk in Hyderabad, Telangana. You can follow him on Twitter @anandu_suresh_ and write (or send movie recommendations) to him at ... Read More


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Why arrest Virat Kohli is going viral amidst tragic stampede at RCB's IPL victory parade
Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) finally clinched their maiden IPL title after eighteen years, a moment that should have been pure joy for Virat Kohli and fans alike. However, the celebrations took a grim turn in Bengaluru when a massive crowd gathered to greet the team outside M. Chinnaswamy Stadium. A stampede broke out, tragically claiming eleven lives and injuring sixty-seven others. Watching and hearing about the stampede in Bangalore made me wonder where we are going ! This is not a national team winning the World Cup ! It's a mere franchise called RCB which works on commercial lines and does not have a single Hyderabad player in it !? It's not even a… Tragedy mars RCB's historic IPL win Despite the chaos outside, festivities continued inside the stadium. Kohli and RCB captain Rajat Patidar addressed enthusiastic fans, while the squad was earlier honoured by Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah at Vidhana Soudha. The joyous mood was in stark contrast to the distress unfolding beyond the stadium gates. Police action and FIR registrations The Bengaluru Police responded swiftly, taking four officials from RCB and event management firm DNA Entertainment Private Limited into custody. An FIR has been registered against RCB, DNA Entertainment, and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), citing serious charges including culpable homicide not amounting to murder and other sections relating to public safety and unlawful assembly under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 1 parade, 0 brains, & now 7 funerals. What kind of idiots plans a mass celebration without barricades, without strategy?This isn't a celebration gone wrong, this is an administration that went brain-dead🤬#chinnaswamystadium #stampede #RCB Why is #ArrestViratKohli trending? The incident sparked outrage on social media, with #ArrestViratKohli trending prominently on the platform X (formerly Twitter). Many users blamed Kohli and other RCB players, suggesting they share responsibility for the tragedy due to inadequate crowd control and safety measures. Others criticised Kohli for reportedly leaving for London soon after the incident instead of staying back to console victims' families. Zara Fir se Boliyo 😶🙂#chinnaswamystadium #ArrestViratKohli #arrestviratkohli The man who wrote a paragraph on social media about his kid's privacy in public areas across india now has no words other than copy-pasting content to cover up loss of 11 innocent called people for roadshow without Govt & BCCI permission#ArrestViratKohli - @imVkohli CHOKLI IS THE WORST HUMAN # Ongoing investigation into the disaster Authorities are currently probing the causes of the stampede. The FIR details multiple charges including causing hurt, obstructing public servants, and acts endangering the safety of others. The case remains under active investigation as Bengaluru grapples with the aftermath of what was meant to be a victorious celebration.