Aging, stealthy, suspected of sabotage: What to know about Russia's ‘shadow fleet'
The European Union and Britain adopted new sanctions against Russia's 'shadow fleet' on Tuesday, in a bid to cut off a source of funding for Russia's war in Ukraine.
Relief from Western sanctions is a goal of Russian President Vladimir Putin's in negotiating an end to the war. The latest crackdown, which the E.U. describes as its 'largest ever package targeting Putin's shadow fleet,' is designed to increase pressure on Putin to commit to a ceasefire by cutting off the funding for the Kremlin's war machine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
23 minutes ago
After talks with Zelenskyy and Macron, US senators warn: Putin 'is preparing for more war'
PARIS -- Russian President Vladimir Putin is stalling at the peace table while preparing a new military offensive in Ukraine, two senior U.S. senators warned Sunday, arguing that the next two weeks could shape the future of a war that has already smashed cities, displaced millions and redrawn Europe's security map. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal spoke to The Associated Press in Paris after meeting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and touring neighborhoods shattered by what they called the worst Russian bombardments since the full-scale invasion began. In Paris for talks with French President Emmanuel Macron — who they say is '100% aligned' with them on the war — the senators warned the window to prevent a renewed assault is closing. A sweeping U.S. sanctions bill could be the West's last chance to choke off the Kremlin's war economy, they said — adding that they hope their firsthand findings will shift momentum in Washington and help bring a skeptical President Donald Trump on board. "What I learned on this trip was he's preparing for more war,' Graham said of Putin. Blumenthal called the sanctions proposed in legislation 'bone-crushing' and said it would place Russia's economy 'on a trade island.' 'It is crunch time for Putin and for the world because Russia is mounting a new offensive,' he said. At the heart of their push is a bipartisan sanctions bill, backed by nearly the entire U.S. Senate but still facing uncertain odds in Washington. It would impose 500% tariffs on countries that continue buying Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports — targeting nations like China and India that account for roughly 70% of Russia's energy trade and bankroll much of its war effort. Graham called it 'the most draconian bill I've ever seen in my life in the Senate." 'The world has a lot of cards to play against Putin,' he said. 'We're going to hit China and India for propping up his war machine.' With peace talks yielding little and Trump's approach to Ukraine highly uncertain, Graham and Blumenthal have stepped into the breach — blunt emissaries on a lonely mission. Political opposites moving in lockstep, they're crossing Europe, and the aisle, with the moral urgency of two men trying to forestall another Russian offensive before it's too late. Peace talks are scheduled to resume Monday in Istanbul. But Ukrainian officials say Moscow has yet to submit a serious proposal — a delay both senators described as deliberate and dangerous. 'Putin is playing President Trump," Blumenthal said. 'He's taking him for a sucker.' The senator said Putin "is, in effect, stalling and stonewalling, prolonging the conversation so that he can mount this offensive and take control of more territory on the ground.' Graham added: 'We saw credible evidence of a summer or early fall invasion, a new offensive by Putin. ... He's preparing for more war.' Trump has yet to endorse the sanctions bill, telling reporters Friday: 'I don't know. I'll have to see it.' Graham said the legislation was drafted in consultation with Trump's advisers. Graham backed the president's diplomatic instincts but said, "By trying to engage Putin — by being friendly and enticing — it's become painfully clear he's not interested in ending this war.' Blumenthal hoped the bipartisan support for Ukraine at least in the Senate — and the personal testimonies they plan to bring home to Congress and the Oval Office— may help shift the conversation. 'He needs to see and hear that message as well from us, from the American people,' he said of Putin. In Kyiv, the senators said, the war's human toll was impossible to ignore. Graham pointed to what Ukrainian officials and Yale researchers estimate are nearly 20,000 children forcibly deported to Russia — calling their return a matter of justice, not diplomacy. Blumenthal described standing at mass grave sites in Bucha, where civilians were executed with shots to the head. The destruction, he said, and the stories of those who survived, made clear the stakes of delay. 'Putin is a thug. He's a murderer." Both said that failing to act now could pull the U.S. deeper into conflict later. If Putin isn't stopped in Ukraine, Blumenthal said, NATO treaty obligations could one day compel American troops into battle. After a one-hour meeting with Macron in Paris, both Graham, of South Carolina, and Blumenthal, of Connecticut, said they left convinced Europe was ready to toughen its stance. 'This visit has been a breakthrough moment because President Macron has shown moral clarity in his conversations with us,' Blumenthal said. 'Today, he is 100% aligned with that message that we are taking back to Washington.' Blumenthal pointed to the rare bipartisan unity behind the sanctions bill. 'There are very few causes that will take 41 Republicans and 41 Democrats and put them on record on a single piece of legislation,' he said. 'The cause of Ukraine is doing it.' Ahead, Ukrainian military leaders are set to brief Congress and a sanctions vote could follow. 'President Trump said we'll know in two weeks whether he's being strung along,' Graham said. 'There will be more evidence of that from Russia on Monday.'
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
UK to build new attack submarines and ramp up ‘war-fighting readiness' with an eye on Russia, Starmer says
Britain will build new attack submarines, invest billions on nuclear warheads and move towards 'war-fighting readiness,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday, as he braces for a landmark report into the state of the country's military. Starmer's government said it would build 'up to' 12 new attack submarines as part of its AUKUS partnership with the United States and Australia, replacing the country's current class of seven subs from the late 2030s. And he will launch a 'historic renewal' of the UK's nuclear deterrent backed by a £15 billion ($20.3 bn) investment, Starmer said in a speech in Scotland on Monday. The announcements come as a long-awaited review into Britain's armed services is published Monday. Experts have been calling for a modernization of Britain's armed services for decades, cries that have grown in volume since Russia's invasion of Ukraine three years ago. 'When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready, and frankly, to show them that we're ready to deliver peace through strength,' Starmer said Monday. But Starmer refused to set out the timeline for his pledge that Britain's overall defense spending would hit 3% of the UK's gross domestic product (GDP). The uplift, announced earlier this year, is set to be reached by the end of the next parliament in 2034, but is dependent on economic conditions. And the prime minister did not set out where the money to pay for the new weaponry will come from; he previously announced cuts to the UK's aid budget to fund the uplift in defense spending, and he declined to rule out similar moves on Monday. The fiscal promise from the UK falls short of defense spending promises from some NATO countries, whose spending has been closely scrutinized by US President Donald Trump. NATO's Secretary General Mark Rutte said last month he 'assumed' NATO members will agree on a defense spending target of 5% at June's NATO summit, a significant increase from the 2% benchmark, which was agreed to in 2014. Per 2024 NATO data, only Poland's defense expenditure was above 4% of GDP, although Latvia and Estonia had promised increases to 5%, with Italy promising a hike to between 3.5 and 5% of GDP. The US' defense expenditure sat at 3.38% of GDP in 2024, making up some 64% of total NATO expenditure. Russia's invasion of Ukraine – and the subsequent pressure from Trump's administration on European nations to boost their own military capabilities – has sparked a race among Europe's key military powers to boost their readiness and counter the Russian threat should the White House pull its support for Kyiv. The UK 'cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses,' Starmer told the BBC on Monday. 'Russia has shown in recent weeks that it's not serious about peace, and we have to be ready.' Starmer said Monday he intended to turn the UK into a 'battle-ready, armour-clad nation with the strongest alliances, and the most advanced capabilities, equipped for the decades to come.' Alongside the promised submarines, Starmer said that a 'hybrid Royal Navy' will patrol the North Atlantic — a key transit route for Russian submarines to reach the eastern US seaboard — signalling a move to more drone-based naval capabilities. The review, commissioned by his government and led by former NATO chief George Robertson, is expected to highlight a number of emerging threats, such as drone warfare, in which Britain is falling behind. Given decades of shrinking investment in the British military, questions have been raised over the deterrence that Britain's conventional and nuclear weapons offer, particularly given its reliance on a US supply the last eight years, the UK has publicly acknowledged two failed nuclear missile tests, one of them in the waters off Florida, when dummy missiles didn't fire as intended.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
German watchdog finds no abuse in companies' pre-results calls with analysts
By Tom Sims FRANKFURT (Reuters) -An investigation by Germany's financial watchdog has found no reason to change companies' practice of communicating with analysts before publishing results, following media concerns about the potential disclosure of insider information. Regulators have taken a closer look at so-called pre-close calls after media reports highlighted an apparent connection between high volatility in share prices and the communication with analysts. Germany's BaFin watchdog disclosed at a conference on Monday the findings of a study it began last year. Details will likely be published this week. "We do not currently see any systematic problems with the execution of pre-close calls," Christoph Schell, a BaFin official who studies market surveillance and abuse, said at the conference. Strong price reactions are isolated cases, and there is no need to tighten rules around the calls, he added. Last year, the European Union's securities watchdog warned that companies should not share market-sensitive information with external analysts ahead of their financial statements. The practice of pre-close calls is widespread - not just in Germany. It is typically communication before the publication of financial statements, between a company and analysts who generate research, forecasts and recommendations on the company's shares and bonds. Supporters say the calls contribute to the orderly functioning of markets. Schell said that BaFin found in its study that 63% of companies listed on Germany's DAX index of blue-chips and the MDAX of smaller companies hold pre-close calls. More than 90% of those companies conduct individual chats with analysts, he said. BaFin found that 70% of the market trading around calls it investigated showed no significant market reaction, while only 10% did. "We have investigated these cases and have so far found no evidence of any unauthorized disclosure of insider information," Schell said. He added that companies should nevertheless be as transparent as possible, by announcing the calls on their websites and holding them in a group format rather than individually.
