logo
Social protection minister takes legal action against Data Protection Commission

Social protection minister takes legal action against Data Protection Commission

Irish Examiner08-07-2025
The Department of Social Protection has initiated a legal action against the Data Protection Commission after the regulator ordered the Government to stop processing biometric data via its public services card.
Papers were lodged in the High Court on Monday by the minister for social protection Dara Calleary for a miscellaneous common law application against the Data Protection Commission. The minister is represented by the Chief State Solicitor's Office.
It is understood the action relates directly to the Data Protection Commission order against the department confirmed last month, which was delivered along with a €550,000 fine.
It is not as yet known what the nature of the application is, given legal challenges to decisions by State agencies or bodies are typically delivered via an application for judicial review.
The department of social protection had not replied to a request for comment at the time of publication.
A spokesperson for the Data Protection Commission said that the regulator is not 'in a position to comment as the matter is now before the courts'.
Last month's decision related to an investigation into the alleged biometric nature of the public services card — the welfare-benefits card which can also be used to access separate State services, including the National Childcare Scheme and driver licence renewals.
Biometric data refers to any information that can identify a person by their physical characteristics — via a fingerprint for instance or, in this case, a photograph.
The commission found the card violated GDPR by failing to identify a legal basis for processing biometric data, retaining that data without justification, and not ensuring sufficient transparency about how the data would be used during registration.
The commission also ruled that the Government must discontinue processing such biometric data using the public services card within nine months of the decision unless it can identify a legal basis for doing so.
It is not the first time the department has taken the legal objection route with the Data Protection Commission in light of adverse decisions regarding the card.
In August 2019, the commission ruled that the State had no lawful basis for making the public services card — originally conceived in the 2000s as a welfare benefits card only by the department of social protection — mandatory for all public services.
That decision led to a prolonged legal battle between the State and one of its own regulators. The dispute ended in a December 2021 settlement, with the commission's findings left unchallenged but with the State continuing with the public services card project — albeit without mandatory requirements.
Read More
Microsoft faces lawsuit over allegations of unlawful data processing for advertising
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters: A reminder to Leaving Cert students – results are not the be all and end all
Letters: A reminder to Leaving Cert students – results are not the be all and end all

Irish Independent

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Letters: A reminder to Leaving Cert students – results are not the be all and end all

But remember, the people who love you today will love you on Friday and when your results come out and in the years to come. You did an amazing job to sit the exams. Remember, too, that while your education is very important, it is not the only thing that matters in life. Life is not just an academic or economic experience. This is only an exam. Nobody but you will ever remember your results – it's how you are as a person that really counts. Never forget that kindness is the only thing that matters in life. To be kind, you have to be kind to yourself first. Parents, never stop hugging your children and telling them how much you love them and how proud you are of them. Muiris Walsh, Ballymacarbry, Co Waterford Government needs to take action over worrying rise of racism levels in Ireland I wish to share my perspective as someone adopted from Romania by Irish parents 25 years ago and who has gone through the Irish school system and been part of Irish society since. Growing up, I was proud of my Irish identity and the opportunities I was fortunate to have. However, over time I have become increasingly concerned about the rising levels of racism in Ireland. While Ireland has long been known for its friendliness and ­hospitality, the reality today is that racism persists and, in some cases, has turned into outright hatred. I want to emphasise that I do not blame ordinary people for this; ­rather, I hold the Government responsible for failing to adequately address hate crimes and discrimination. ­ Additionally, social media has played a significant role: its ­platforms often amplify division, spread ­misinformation and foster hostility under the guise of free speech. It is deeply troubling to see racist rhetoric becoming more mainstream, as it damages communities and individuals like myself. We have the power to challenge this trend, but it requires leadership from the Government and responsible ­regulation of social media platforms. Ireland's history of emigration and diversity should be a source of pride, and we must reaffirm our ­commitment to equality and ­inclusion for all. We owe it to ourselves and future generations to build a society that values and respects everyone, regardless of background. Ali Loughman, address with editor Trump and Putin cannot be trusted to bring about any peace deal for Ukraine Contrary to prevailing wisdom, ­Donald Trump is not Vladimir Putin's asset. He is the Russian leader's ­partner as regards the fate of Ukraine. The 'nothing burger' Anchorage summit was quickly followed by the 'nothing burger' meeting at the White House on Monday. Both non-events were designed for their propaganda value, bolstering Trump's appearance as an honest broker for peace while humanising Putin, whose nearly quarter-­century of wars in Africa, Europe and the Middle East have caused untold misery to millions. This strategic partnership – the long heralded 'Russia Pivot' – would give Putin his war objectives: the permanent seizure of eastern oblasts that are essential to Ukraine's security and economy and the prevention of its integration into Nato and the EU. Trump can no more be trusted as the primary guarantor of this proposed peace deal than Putin can be trusted to abide by its terms. President Zelensky and Ukraine are advised to seize the initiative and call for multilateral negotiations in a European capital with bona fide allied nations. Say no to any further negotiations at the White House and under the sole auspices of Trump. The US-Russia axis would bring Europe under the greater influence of Trump and Putin, long a goal of both men. Eric Radack, Santa Fe, New Mexico Rewarding Russia won't bring peace, it will only invite further aggression Your editorial suggests Donald Trump's peace plan for Ukraine exposes the danger of Europe being treated as a mere spectator while Washington and Moscow redraw the map ('Europe must not be ­supplicants in new Russo-US world order,' August 19). What is being dressed up as diplomacy is in fact ­capitulation: the aggressor is ­rewarded, the victim coerced and Nato diluted into vagueness. But the implications stretch ­farther still. Dictators who trample their citizens' rights do not respect international borders, nor do they honour treaties. To reward Vladimir Putin in Ukraine is not to end war but to invite it elsewhere. Europe's leaders must resist the temptation to settle for Trump's 'deal'. The lesson of history is that peace bought at the expense of ­freedom is neither durable nor safe. To accept this carve-up would be to abandon not just Ukraine, but the very principles on which post-war order was built. Enda Cullen, Tullysaran Road, Armagh Dublin city is a great spot to visit, with lots of activity and excitement for all ages As a regular visitor to Dublin city centre, I would like to share some of my enjoyable experiences. There is a wealth of activities to enjoy. A visit to any of the many excellent bookshops, coffee shops, restaurants or hotels is always welcome. The city is full of excitement and activity. Music-lovers can visit any of our music schools and while away an hour noodling on the piano. A visit to a museum and a coffee in Bewley's is a must. So for an enjoyable day out, why not hop on a bus or train and visit Dublin city centre. I promise you, you will not be disappointed.

Protesters call on Central Bank not to renew Israel bonds
Protesters call on Central Bank not to renew Israel bonds

Irish Times

time16 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Protesters call on Central Bank not to renew Israel bonds

Protesters have urged the Central Bank of Ireland not to proceed with the approval for the sale of Israel bonds in advance of an upcoming renewal date. About 100 demonstrators gathered outside the Central Bank in Dublin on Tuesday to demand an end to the authority's role in approving Israel bonds for sale in the EU, for the Government to include services in the Occupied Territories Bill and to pass that legislation. The bank is the designated authority in relation to the sale of Israel bonds in the EU, and has determined the securities meet the standards of the union's prospectus regulations. Israel bonds have been advertised as supporting the country's economy and, more recently, websites promoting the securities emphasise their role in supporting Israel's military operations in Gaza. READ MORE Protesters and Opposition parties have called for legislation that would give Ireland the power to refuse the sale of Israeli 'war bonds' over human rights concerns. They say the bonds are intended to fund the war in Gaza, while Ireland has an obligation under the Genocide Convention to use all means likely to have a deterrent effect on those suspected of preparing genocide. The Central Bank has said regulations require it to approve prospectuses that meet standards of completeness, consistency and comprehensibility. The Israel bond prospectus is up for renewal on September 2nd. The Oireachtas Joint Committee on Finance has recommended that the bank carry out an immediate review before renewing approval of the bonds. David Landy of Jews for Palestine and Academics for Palestine outside the Central Bank in Dublin. Photograph: Niall Carson/PA Wire Meanwhile, Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon has launched legal proceedings against the Central Bank over claims that investors in Israeli bonds could be legally complicit in genocide in Gaza. It is alleged that the Central Bank's failure to ban the marketing, distribution and sale of Israel bonds exposes investors to risks that have not been disclosed to them. [ Lobby other EU countries to allow Irish Central Bank to drop Israeli war bonds, TDs recommend Opens in new window ] Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign chairwoman Zoe Lawlor said: 'The Government has to end the direct involvement of the Central Bank in apartheid Israel's sale of genocide-funding bonds. 'The Central Bank is an organ of this State, and its complicity in genocide makes Ireland complicit.' David Landy of Jews for Palestine, and Academics for Palestine, said: 'We are asking the Central Bank to do the absolute minimum required of it under law – to end the sale of Israeli war bonds, to finally end this direct Irish participation in Israeli genocide.' Sinn Féin's foreign affairs spokesman said the Irish Government 'must use every lever at its disposal' to show leadership on Gaza. Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire said: 'Clearly, ending the facilitation of Israeli war bonds is one of those.' He added: 'The people of Gaza and of Palestine need us to act.'

Tony Holohan's reluctance to admit mistakes sits badly with the national mood
Tony Holohan's reluctance to admit mistakes sits badly with the national mood

Irish Times

time18 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Tony Holohan's reluctance to admit mistakes sits badly with the national mood

Prof Tony Holohan's withdrawal from the presidential race is a mercy – not just for him, but for the rest of us. We are spared the bear-baiting with the cervical-cancer controversy and the pandemic, the performative outrage and vile social media that would have plunged all concerned into a sewer stripped of nuance and context. That Covid still scratches the national psyche hardly helps. A recent five-year anniversary Mass for a Kildare man who died during lockdown morphed into the warm, crowded service denied to his family in 2020. His favourite music was sung and the same eulogies given by his adult children five years ago at his lonely graveside were delivered to a packed congregation. What was surprising for a five-year memorial was how immediate and raw it felt. READ MORE It was an experience hardly unique to Ireland, but it is Holohan's burden to be forever associated with it. That his wife Emer was also buried under the harshest Covid rules would not have spared him from the vitriol. Inevitably, some were salivating at the idea of using his appearances as Covid inquisitions. Which raises the question – again – of why people put their heads above the presidential parapet. Holohan must have felt he had done the state some service. He had answered the call for a calm, firm, trustworthy medical leader to guide Ireland through an unprecedented public health crisis, while attending to his dying wife – all of which surely made him the very definition of a president. But no leader survives those multiple levels of hell without making mistakes – and Holohan's reluctance to admit to any mistakes sits badly with the mood of the times. Issues can be argued – as he did in his memoir – but few will listen. They don't want to hear ifs or buts or blame being ascribed elsewhere, even if it belongs there. They want to hear humility and unconditional admissions: 'Yes, I made a mistake.' Ill-wishers will grab it as vindication of course – 'Hah, told you he had blood on his hands.' But unlike other hapless hopefuls, Holohan would have known all the questions about to be catapulted at him. His USP would have been that of someone intimately familiar with the ferocity, filthy betrayals and short-termism of politics without being an actual politician. Even before his withdrawal, the weekend's media was distinguished by the startling number of pundits trotting out several of those same points as reasons Bertie Ahern should proceed with confidence. He has the experience, the likability and the peace process in his arms, they say. He has been interrogated to the max. No question on earth would surprise the one who – to quote the revered Blackadder – is as cunning as a fox who's just been appointed professor of cunning at Oxford University. And time, as we know, can soften even the sharpest memories. It's 17 years since he was taoiseach, 13 since he resigned from Fianna Fáil following the Mahon tribunal finding that he failed to account truthfully for payments of IR£165,000 made to accounts connected to him. Anyone seeking signs of contrition might catch a 2018 Deutsche Welle 'Conflict Zone' interview which sees him happily answering questions about the peace negotiations – until asked about the tribunal. 'Did you clear your name?' the interviewer asks. 'Yes, I did. I'm quite happy I cleared my name', he answers. But that wasn't 'truthful', the interviewer says. 'The tribunal gave its views … and I gave my evidence. I was very happy with my evidence', he replies, as if it were all just a matter of opinion. He ends it by getting up and leaving. 'A first on dwZone,' as DW's Twitter link described it. Since then, Micheál Martin – who sought to kick Ahern out of the party before he resigned – has consulted him about issues around the Northern Ireland protocol, acknowledging his 'invaluable insights' and range of contacts. When reminded of that threatened expulsion a few years ago, Martin said: 'It's 10 years on, I'm conscious of the contribution he has made to peace in the country. He made a very significant contribution.' Leo Varadkar , who in the Dáil once described Ahern's claims of wins on the horses as 'a defence for drug dealers and pimps', had also ratcheted down his tone by 2023, saying the remarks were made 'at a particular point in time and if you look at the totality of Bertie Ahern's career, you know, let's not forget that he was one of the architects of the Good Friday Agreement … I don't think anyone can diminish the role that he played'. Just a month ago, Ahern was at 5 per cent in an Irish Times/IpsosB&A presidency poll. Last Sunday he was up at 14 per cent, tying for third place with Mary Lou McDonald in a Sunday Independent/Ireland Thinks poll. Which brings us back to the old question: is there an optimum time for society to say, enough punishment, all that was at a particular point in time, look at the balance of his life? How many years? Does it matter if the offender has never acknowledged they did wrong in the first place? As one professor leaves the stage, the professor of cunning hovers, batting his eyelashes, saying nothing, waiting, smiling and waiting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store