'No moral equivalence' over Russia prisoner swap talk
There should be no moral equivalence drawn from any prisoner swap for an Australian fighter being held in Russia, a former ambassador says.
A prisoner of war swap has become more complicated after Russia sentenced Australian Oscar Jenkins to 13 years in a maximum security prison on criminal charges for fighting with the Ukrainian military as a mercenary.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong branded it a "sham trial", saying Mr Jenkins should be classified as a prisoner of war, which comes with added protections under international law.
Australia's former ambassador to Russia Peter Tesch said the sentencing showed the Kremlin was engaging in hostage diplomacy, which is when trumped-up criminal charges are leveraged to get back Russian prisoners.
"This could put him outside prisoner swaps with Ukraine and at another level. It could be Russia starting to look at who they want in other prisons," Mr Tesch told AAP.
High-profile cases include Russia swapping American journalist Evan Gershkovich and former US Marine Paul Whelan for 24 detainees across western nations.
"They had very obviously done that with a view to use them as assets in an eventual negotiated exchange," Mr Tesch said.
Ukraine is handling the negotiations with Russia, with past prisoner of war swaps occurring between the two nations.
But there is internal doubt over whether Russia would include Mr Jenkins in a similar deal given the added leverage of him being Australian.
This was underscored by Russia sentencing him through criminal charges rather than holding him as a prisoner of war.
The former envoy wouldn't speculate on potential swaps or what should be done to get Mr Jenkins back.
But he was keen to make the point there was "a false equivalence when we talk about prisoner swaps because we don't take people political hostage".
"Any of the names that have been swirling around, like the Korolevs, they are Australian citizens who have been subject to due process with rights of appeal based on criminal charges," Mr Tesch said.
"To talk about a prisoner swap applies legal and moral equivalence and that just doesn't apply in this case."
Married couple Kira Korolev and Igor Korolev have been charged with espionage and face 15 years behind bars.
They are yet to enter pleas, but the Kremlin has criticised the charges, saying the arrests were an attempt to trump up "another wave of anti-Russian paranoia in Australia".
This was denied by the Australian government.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
35 minutes ago
- West Australian
Australian Defence Force alert Geraldton locals and visitors to military training exercise
If you see a strong military presence in Geraldton this week, there is no need to be alarmed. The Australian Defence Force is conducting a military training exercise in the Geraldton area between Monday, June 9 and Sunday, June, 15. Military personnel will be performing a security tasks such as on-foot and vehicle patrols, vehicle check points and emergency response throughout the town and the wider region. The ADF said Geraldton locals and visitors could expect to see uniformed Australian soldiers using a variety of equipment and carrying weapons, as well as military vehicles and other vehicles carrying ADF personnel. 'Members of the public should be mindful that Defence personnel are conducting important training during the course of this exercise,' a spokesperson said. 'In the interests of public safety, any safety instructions and advice given by Defence personnel should be followed.' The ADF is working with the WA Government, WA Police, the Australian Federal Police and other relevant government agencies as part of the exercise.
The Age
44 minutes ago
- The Age
Trump was spoiling for another street war. Now he's got one
Trump inflamed the scene. 'Violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents,' he wrote. He was determined to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion.' It's a Trump political attack on the Democrat stronghold through the proxy of deportation and immigration. Asked if he would order the arrest of Californian officials who tried to interfere with the immigrant round-up, Trump replied: 'Officials who stand in the way of law and order, yea, they will face judges.' Newsom's response: 'Arrest me, let's go.' And Trump a little later: 'We're gonna have troops everywhere,' he told reporters. Despite the pleas of the governor and the mayor to ask that protesters remain peaceful, by Monday afternoon (Australian time) the streets had turned decidedly violent. 'This violence I've seen is disgusting. It's escalated now,' said LAPD's McDonnell. 'We are overwhelmed as far as the number of people out there engaged in this type of activity.' The Trump provocation worked. He's been spoiling for a fight. For years. In his first term, he asked the country's most senior military officer to shoot unarmed civilian protesters in the Black Lives Matter demonstrations. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, refused. In 2020, Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act to justify ordering the military to shoot civilians. According to a book by former Wall Street Journal and now New York Times reporter Michael Bender, Milley pointed to a portrait of Abraham Lincoln, the president who led the Union in the Civil War, and told Trump: 'That guy had an insurrection. What we have, Mr President, is a protest.' Trump stayed his hand then; he's intent on playing now. 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' he wrote on Monday afternoon (Australian time). Hegseth said that 500 Marines were preparing to deploy. Soldiers who had enlisted, trained and, in many cases, fought to protect the US, its Constitution and its people from foreign enemies, were to be brought into action against civilians on the streets of a major US city. Which had been calm just three days earlier. There's been much commentary on Trump's use of a particular legal authority to support sending in the militia and also the military, which he justifies because the protests 'constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the government'. Loading But perhaps the most telling point of Trump's executive order is its unconditional breadth. It is not specific to Los Angeles or to California. It is generic. It could be applied to the entire country. And it is not limited in duration. The length of any deployment is at the discretion of the defence secretary. Trump gave himself the scope to deploy the militia and/or the military 'where protests against these [federal] functions are occurring or are likely to occur'. Likely to occur? He once claimed to be a very stable genius, but now, apparently, he is also clairvoyant. In addition, says his order, 'the secretary of defence may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion'. It's not difficult to see how this could be used as the basis for an authoritarian takeover attempt of the US. Asked a couple of weeks ago whether it was his job to uphold the US Constitution, Trump answered: 'I don't know.' His deportation program will prove harmful to investment, growth and stability. The US economy has always relied on millions of undocumented immigrants to do the low-wage work that locals will not touch. As LA mayor Bass says: 'You can't terrify the workforce and expect the job to get done'. Trump's power grab, his wanton authorisation of the use of armed force on American soil and his autocratic tendencies all suggest that the FBI's Bongino was only half right. More accurately, ' we bring the chaos and we bring the handcuffs'.
Sydney Morning Herald
44 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump was spoiling for another street war. Now he's got one
Trump inflamed the scene. 'Violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents,' he wrote. He was determined to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion.' It's a Trump political attack on the Democrat stronghold through the proxy of deportation and immigration. Asked if he would order the arrest of Californian officials who tried to interfere with the immigrant round-up, Trump replied: 'Officials who stand in the way of law and order, yea, they will face judges.' Newsom's response: 'Arrest me, let's go.' And Trump a little later: 'We're gonna have troops everywhere,' he told reporters. Despite the pleas of the governor and the mayor to ask that protesters remain peaceful, by Monday afternoon (Australian time) the streets had turned decidedly violent. 'This violence I've seen is disgusting. It's escalated now,' said LAPD's McDonnell. 'We are overwhelmed as far as the number of people out there engaged in this type of activity.' The Trump provocation worked. He's been spoiling for a fight. For years. In his first term, he asked the country's most senior military officer to shoot unarmed civilian protesters in the Black Lives Matter demonstrations. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, refused. In 2020, Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act to justify ordering the military to shoot civilians. According to a book by former Wall Street Journal and now New York Times reporter Michael Bender, Milley pointed to a portrait of Abraham Lincoln, the president who led the Union in the Civil War, and told Trump: 'That guy had an insurrection. What we have, Mr President, is a protest.' Trump stayed his hand then; he's intent on playing now. 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' he wrote on Monday afternoon (Australian time). Hegseth said that 500 Marines were preparing to deploy. Soldiers who had enlisted, trained and, in many cases, fought to protect the US, its Constitution and its people from foreign enemies, were to be brought into action against civilians on the streets of a major US city. Which had been calm just three days earlier. There's been much commentary on Trump's use of a particular legal authority to support sending in the militia and also the military, which he justifies because the protests 'constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the government'. Loading But perhaps the most telling point of Trump's executive order is its unconditional breadth. It is not specific to Los Angeles or to California. It is generic. It could be applied to the entire country. And it is not limited in duration. The length of any deployment is at the discretion of the defence secretary. Trump gave himself the scope to deploy the militia and/or the military 'where protests against these [federal] functions are occurring or are likely to occur'. Likely to occur? He once claimed to be a very stable genius, but now, apparently, he is also clairvoyant. In addition, says his order, 'the secretary of defence may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion'. It's not difficult to see how this could be used as the basis for an authoritarian takeover attempt of the US. Asked a couple of weeks ago whether it was his job to uphold the US Constitution, Trump answered: 'I don't know.' His deportation program will prove harmful to investment, growth and stability. The US economy has always relied on millions of undocumented immigrants to do the low-wage work that locals will not touch. As LA mayor Bass says: 'You can't terrify the workforce and expect the job to get done'. Trump's power grab, his wanton authorisation of the use of armed force on American soil and his autocratic tendencies all suggest that the FBI's Bongino was only half right. More accurately, ' we bring the chaos and we bring the handcuffs'.
