
Explainer: Trump 2.0: What's the conservative row over H-1B visas?
Conservatives argue over specialty visa program
H-1Bs geared toward specialty fields like tech
Recipients can encounter backlogs, bureaucracy
RICHMOND, Virginia, Jan 21 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - As newly inaugurated President Donald Trump readies his immigration crackdown, his allies in his Republican Party have splintered over policies surrounding U.S. worker visas intended to go to specialty occupations like the tech industry.
The row over so-called H-1B visas is pitting Silicon Valley-aligned Trump allies like X CEO Elon Musk, who favor the program, against opponents like former White House strategist Steve Bannon, many of whom want curbs on overall immigration levels - legal and illegal - with Trump's return to office.
How have H-1Bs ended up in the fray? Here's what to know:
What are H-1Bs and how do they differ from other U.S. work visa programs?
The H-1B visa program is reserved for people from other countries who are employed in specialty occupations in the United States, frequently in the technology field.
They can include software engineers, tech program managers and other IT professionals.
People in the United States on H-1Bs can extend beyond an initial six-year time frame - three years plus a three-year extension - if a green card application has been filed.
Under the terms of their visas, workers who are laid off face the prospect of having to leave the country within 60 days unless they can find another job or manage to change their immigration status.
Other work programs include H-2A visas, which are for temporary agricultural workers, and H-2B visas for seasonal non-agricultural workers.
Tahmina Watson, an immigration lawyer based in Seattle, Washington, suggested a new category for a "startup" visa for people who want to come to the country to start new companies.
"The startup visa is something I have advocated for almost two decades," she said. "I do think our visa system is in desperate need of reform."
What are Trump allies saying about H-1Bs?
Musk has defended the program and vowed to "go to war" over it after other Trump supporters criticized the president's appointment of Indian-American entrepreneur Sriram Krishnan as a senior policy advisor for artificial intelligence and argued the H-1B program favors foreign-born workers over Americans.
Musk has had Trump's ear since the election and is working on the newly constituted Department of Government Efficiency to cut down on spending and perceived waste.
On the other side are people like Bannon, one of the architects of Trump's 2016 campaign, who has dismissed the H-1B program as a "scam."
"We're winning this round, and we're winning this round pretty big," Bannon said at a Politico event this month, referring to the H-1B fight. "I think we'll get Elon there. As soon as I can turn Elon Musk from a techno-futilist to a populist nationalist, we'll start making real progress."
Watson said an important takeaway from the national debate is to recognize there is a shortage of talent in the STEM - science, technology, engineering and math – fields that the country needs.
"Recognize and acknowledge that we do not have enough domestic talent that we need, and address both at the same time by allowing skilled immigrants to come in now but also using that policy to mandate that America starts training the next generation," she said.
What are Trump's views?
After the initial skirmish, Trump said he favors the program.
"I have many H-1B visas on my properties. I've been a believer in H-1B. I have used it many times. It's a great program," he told the New York Post.
Ahead of the inauguration, Trump's team did not respond to questions about whether he supports the program or plans to push for changes to H-1Bs or other work visa programs.
He sought to restrict them during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021.
Who could be affected by policy changes?
People from India accounted for the vast majority of approved H-1B beneficiaries in 2023, followed by China.
Under the current system, those affected by layoffs in the tech sector can find themselves scrambling to maintain their legal status.
Meta, for example, which has about 72,000 employees, said recently it planned to cut about 5% of its staff.
Watson said people or businesses who depend on H-1Bs might be well-served to tune out the political back-and-forth.
"Do not be deterred by the national rhetoric from using the H-1B if your business needs it," she said. "I say to a lot of my clients that your business success is your North Star, so do what you need to do.
"For the employees who might be afraid, I'd say if they are working in alignment with their employers, they should not be afraid."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Republican merch line scrapped after DIY giant complains
The Republican Party of Florida has pulled a line of "Deport Depot" merchandise from its online store after Home Depot objected to the unauthorized use of its brand. The merchandise, which included hats, T-shirts, and mugs, mimicked Home Depot's logo and was launched following Governor Ron DeSantis 's announcement of a new immigrant detention centre. Home Depot said it does not allow any organization to use its logo for commercial purposes. This incident follows a previous merchandise line from the Florida GOP, "Alligator Alcatraz," which also sought to fundraise from the state's immigration policies. DeSantis announced plans to convert a disused state prison into the "Deportation Depot," an immigration detention center, after a federal court order halted new construction at the "Alligator Alcatraz" site due to environmental concerns.


New Statesman
7 minutes ago
- New Statesman
What happens in Alaska won't stay in Alaska
US President Donald Trump will meet with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday for a high stakes summit to discuss the war in Ukraine. Trump has been upping the ante with his rhetoric around Putin in recent months. On July 14, the US president set Putin a 50 day deadline to agree a ceasefire with Ukraine. On July 28th, he reduced it to 10-12 days. As that deadline was reached last Friday, Trump announced plans for this summit. So, why is this happening now, and what will be on the agenda? Anoosh Chakelian is joined by Katie Stallard. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related


The Sun
7 minutes ago
- The Sun
Moment warped Russian soldiers taunt Ukraine by flying an AMERICAN flag into battle ahead of crunch Zelensky-Trump talks
THIS is the moment twisted Russian soldiers mock Ukraine by flying an American flag into battle. Their malicious taunts come as Donald Trump meets Volodymyr Zelensky today for high-stakes peace talks on how to end the bloody war. 8 8 8 Swathes of eastern Ukraine are on the negotiating table as the leaders discuss how to stop the Russian aggression once and for all. And now, horrifying footage shows Vlad's troops flying the US flag alongside the Russian tricolour. Parading in a captured American M113 armoured personnel the Ukrainian truck is seen speeding down a road, as forces stormed Mala Tokmachka in Ukraine's Zaporizhia region. The sick jibe follows an overnight Russian drone strike on Kharkiv which killed five people, including two children, and injured dozens more. The city near the Russian border was also hit hours earlier by a ballistic missile that wounded at least 11 people, Mayor Igor Terekhov said. The head of the Centre for the Study of the Occupation, Petr Andryushchenko, fumed: 'The Russians have already declared the United States an ally and are storming Mala Tokmachka in M113 armoured personnel carriers….with Russian and American flags. 'This is the logical conclusion to all of Trump's absurdity. And all of this is on the official propaganda channel of Russia Today. There are no words.' While a local news channel wrote: 'The Russians put American flags on their armoured vehicles next to the tricolour and are driving around the occupied Ukrainian land." 'This is all you need to know about the result of the negotiations in Alaska.' Donald Trump vows full peace deal not 'mere ceasefire' after Alaska summit as Zelensky to head to White House Their bizarre taunts stem from Trump's perceived support for Vladimir Putin after the pair met in Alaska on Friday to discuss ending the war. Plans haggled at the face-to-face summit were later circulated by the Americans and The Sun was told a surrender deal would see Ukraine forced to reject Nato membership and other 'multinational deals'. Negotiations also involved the potential ceding control of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of eastern Ukraine which are, in part, occupied by Russian troops. Today, six months after his disastrous Oval Office shouting match with Trump, Zelensky will himself sit at the negotiating table to discuss Ukraine's future. What do Trump and Zelensky want from the summit? By Sayan Bose, Foreign News Reporter FOR Donald Trump, it is a chance to convince Volodymyr Zelensky to agree to a quick peace deal and end bloodshed in Ukraine - something the US president has been chasing ever since he stepped inside the White House. But the quick deal may not be all good news for Ukraine, as it may have to cede more territory to stop the Russian onslaught in a hasty decision. Zelensky instead wants to take things slow and get the Russians to stop striking his country initially with a ceasefire so that he can focus on deeper peace talks. He, too, wants lasting peace in his war-torn nation, but not at the expense of more Ukrainian territory. The brave Ukrainian leader also wants America to offer security guarantees against future Russian aggression. Europe, meanwhile, is expected to act as a mediator to facilitate the talks. It hopes to get a fair deal for Ukraine, one that diminishes the chances of Russia attacking Europe again in the future - which political analysts have warned could happen in the next five to 10 years. Ukraine and its allies have long feared that Trump could press an agreement favourable to Moscow - which now seems inevitable. But to what extent? That remains to be seen. PM Sir Keir Starmer will be in attendance, joined by the leaders of France, Germany and Italy alongside the heads of Nato and the EU in a firm show of solidarity against the Russians. Zelensky yesterday said territory haggling could only be discussed 'by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia' at his expected showdown with Putin. European leaders including Sir Keir held a video conference ahead of the White House meeting where they warned the Kremlin's barbarous invasion must not see 'borders redrawn by force'. After her own meeting on Sunday with Mr Zelensky, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said: 'These are decisions to be made by Ukraine and Ukraine alone, and these decisions cannot be taken without Ukraine at the table.' But US officials insisted it was Mr Trump who invited all of the key players as the time had come to finally work out how to police any peace deal with Russia. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters the key issue was, 'How do we stop this from happening again?' as he opened the door for a major role for the US in the so-called 'Coalition of the Willing' that has vowed to protect Ukraine's future sovereignty. 8 8 8