Porter County Commissioners oppose ‘terrible' House bill that bypasses local permitting
'I think it's a terrible thing, unless you're there supporting special interests,' said Porter County Board of Commissioners President Jim Biggs, R-North. 'A bill like this will pertain to every area of the state.'
The bill summary says it 'provides that a person that seeks to locate, construct, or deploy any facilities, equipment, or infrastructure in connection with a multi-jurisdictional project is not required to obtain from a local authority a permit, or any other land use or zoning approval, with respect to the siting, construction, or deployment' used in the generation, transmission, or distribution of electricity, gases or fluids, or water if those services 'will provide utility services to employ or economic benefits to residents, businesses, or political subdivisions in more than one county.
However, it also states that those criteria are to be set forth to the state by the developer, owner, or operator of the project, not the communities where the operator seeks to develop the project.
The bill, sponsored by Indiana State Representative Craig Snow, R-Warsaw, had its first reading Jan. 21 and was referred to the Committee on Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications. If passed, it would go into effect July 1 of this year.
Snow's office did not respond to questions about the bill by press time.
Porter County Council President Andy Vasquez, R-4th, was on his way back from Indianapolis where he had been attending a conference for county officeholders on understanding the state's lawmaking process when he learned about the bill. He said he'll be at the meeting Friday. 'As president of the county council I'd like to gather more information so an educated decision' can be made, he said.
Biggs brought up the recent efforts of NextEra, the largest energy utility holding company in the world, to bring a solar farm to Malden in south Porter County. NextEra's application to build a solar farm in Malden was rejected by the county on Aug. 17 on the grounds of failing to meet the standards set forth in the 2020 solar ordinance and the county's unified development ordinance. Any future application by NextEra or any other company to put a solar farm on agricultural land would have to be made under a new ordinance or an appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals.
'Currently, say if a solar company wants to come to Porter County they have to go before several boards and meet several land zoning laws,' Biggs said. 'If the intent was not the way it reads now, then it needs to be rewritten.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on Comstock Resources, Inc. on DeepValue Capital's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on CRK.. Comstock Resources, Inc.'s share was trading at $16.08 as of August 7th. CRK's trailing and forward P/E were 48.73 and 26.81, respectively according to Yahoo Finance. Photo by american-public-power-association on Unsplash Comstock Resources (CRK), a natural gas pure-play based in Frisco, Texas, represents a classic deep-value setup: mispriced, overlooked, and strategically levered to a structural theme in U.S. energy. CRK is one of the largest operators in the Haynesville shale—a prolific gas basin in North Louisiana and East Texas—producing ~1,350 MMcf/day from over 2,400 wells across 822,000+ net acres. Its business is sharply focused: acquire acreage, drill horizontally into high-pressure rock, extract gas at the lowest cost, and sell into proximate Gulf Coast infrastructure. Under the long-standing leadership of Jay Allison since 1988, CRK has consistently outperformed peers by being the lowest-cost dry gas producer in one of the most infrastructure-rich regions of the country. This cost advantage is not merely about margins—it's a strategic moat. CRK remains profitable at lower gas prices, takes market share in downturns, and avoids over-hedging, leaving upside exposure intact in bull cycles. The company's recent expansion into Western Haynesville—a deeper, more expensive but higher-yielding region—adds a material growth lever, with large swathes of acreage yet to be proved up. Despite these operational strengths and favorable positioning near LNG terminals, the stock trades at just one-third of its base-case intrinsic value, per the author. A Q2 check reinforces the bullish view amid a supply/demand mismatch building in U.S. gas markets. While risks remain—from commodity volatility to drilling costs—the asymmetric setup is compelling. With shares at $16.28, the author expects CRK to rerate to $40+, offering a potential 2.5x upside, supported by its scale, cost leadership, and strategic geography. Previously, we covered a bullish thesis on Civitas Resources (CIVI) by mbacandidate1 in January 2025, which highlighted the company's debt-driven expansion strategy, undervaluation versus peers, and high shareholder return yield. The company's stock price has depreciated by approximately 39% since our coverage. This is because the thesis didn't play out amid weak oil prices. DeepValue Capital shares a similar view on Comstock Resources (CRK) but emphasizes cost leadership and structural gas tailwinds. Comstock Resources, Inc. is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 20 hedge fund portfolios held CRK. at the end of the first quarter which was 18 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of CRK. as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer on Albemarle: 'It's Too Volatile'
Albemarle Corporation (NYSE:ALB) is one of the stocks on Jim Cramer's radar. During the lightning round, a caller asked about the company, and Cramer commented: 'No, it's too, we're not going to go there. It's too volatile and too hard to actually nail down. I'm going to say skip that one.' A man in black suit holding a tablet looks at stock market data on a monitor. Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko on Pexels Albemarle Corporation (NYSE:ALB) produces lithium compounds and other specialty chemicals for applications in energy storage, mobility, and other industrial uses. The company also provides catalysts, bromine products, and recycling services. Cramer mentioned the company in a June episode and said: 'Next is Albemarle. This is a chemical company that produces lithium. I honestly don't know where this one's coming from. We haven't suddenly seen a surge in electric vehicle sales that I've seen, or any tax credits in the Congressional bill. It's a broadening out mystery, could be happening.' While we acknowledge the potential of ALB as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
News24
14 hours ago
- News24
Africa's nuclear capacity could expand tenfold by 2050 — report
For now, South Africa remains the only African country generating nuclear power. But Africa's nuclear sector is poised for significant growth, with a new International Atomic Energy Agency report projecting generating capacity could increase tenfold by 2050. Despite having just one operational nuclear plant today, a new report projects that Africa's generating capacity could increase tenfold by 2050. The report, Outlook for Nuclear Energy in Africa by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), was launched at the G20 Energy Transitions meeting in South Africa held between July 30 to August 1, 2025, at the Sun City resort in the North West. The report examines how nuclear power could help address the continent's electricity shortages, diversify its energy mix away from fossil fuels, and drive industrial growth. According to MaryAnne Osike from the Nuclear Power and Energy Agency (NuPEA), 'Nuclear is not here to replace wind, solar, or hydro, it's here to strengthen them.' 'Its ability to provide constant, reliable baseload power means renewables can operate more effectively without being limited by weather or seasonal variations,' she shared in a call. 'When integrated into a diversified energy mix, nuclear offers long-term price stability, strengthens grid resilience, and reduces dependence on imported fuels. It's part of the same clean energy toolbox that Africa needs to achieve both climate goals and industrial growth,' she added. The IAEA outlook report also highlights the role of emerging technologies such as small modular reactors, outlines national programmes already underway, and stresses the need for supportive policies, regional cooperation, and innovative financing. According to Rafael Mariano Grossi, IAEA director-general, 'Access to reliable and low-carbon energy sources such as nuclear can enable Africa to further explore and add value to its vast natural resources.' The shift comes as African governments face the dual challenge of powering economies where more than 500 million people still lack electricity and replacing fossil fuels, which currently provide more than 70% of the continent's power. In the IAEA's high-growth scenario, nuclear capacity in Africa could more than triple by 2030 and expand tenfold by 2050, requiring more than US$100 billion in investment. Even in the low-growth case, output would double by 2030 and increase fivefold by mid-century. For now, South Africa remains the only African country generating nuclear power. Its two-unit Koeberg nuclear power station supplies nearly two gigawatts to the grid, and in 2024, Unit 1 received a 20-year life extension. But several other countries are moving from planning to implementation. Egypt is building the 4.8-gigawatt El Dabaa Nuclear Power Plant, with its first unit expected online by 2028. Ghana, Rwanda, Kenya, Namibia and Nigeria have made firm decisions to adopt nuclear technology and are working with the IAEA to prepare infrastructure, establish regulatory bodies, and develop human capital. Kenya set up its Nuclear Energy Programme Implementing Organisation in 2012, has since established an independent regulator, and is targeting 2038 for its first reactor, with SMRs under review to match demand patterns. Ghana's Nuclear Power Ghana is in vendor talks for both a large nuclear plant and SMRs, while Nigeria has opened bids for a 4,000-megawatt facility and signed agreements with multiple suppliers. A large part of this momentum is driven by growing interest in small modular reactors (SMRs), which offer flexible power generation in smaller increments than traditional gigawatt-scale plants. 'Global interest in SMRs is increasing due to their ability to meet the need for flexible power generation for a wider range of users and applications,' according to Zizamele Mbambo, South Africa's deputy director-general for nuclear energy. SMRs are well suited to Africa's small or fragmented grids, require less upfront capital, and can be deployed more quickly. They also offer off-grid potential for industrial projects such as mining and desalination. The IAEA outlook notes that SMRs could even be integrated into existing coal power sites, reusing infrastructure while cutting emissions, a theme it plans to explore in a forthcoming coal-to-nuclear transition report for the G20. Africa already holds a significant advantage, being home to 14% of the world's uranium production. Namibia ranks as the world's third-largest producer, while Niger and South Africa are also in the top ten. In Namibia, the previously idled Langer Heinrich mine has been reopened, with production expected to resume in 2026, and new projects are due by 2028. Tanzania has confirmed large reserves, such as the US$1.2-billion Mkuju River plant in jointly with Russia, is on course for pilot production. This resource base could bolster both export earnings and domestic energy security if countries invest in fuel cycle capabilities to convert raw uranium into reactor-ready fuel. However, according to experts like Osike, the pace at which Africa's nuclear ambitions materialise will hinge on financing, given the sector's high upfront costs and decades-long project lifecycles. 'Nuclear projects demand substantial upfront investment and a commitment that spans decades… Without innovative financing models and strong partnerships, many African countries will struggle to move from ambition to reality.' In June 2025, the IAEA and the World Bank signed an agreement, the Bank's first formal engagement with nuclear energy in decades. This opens the door for World Bank support in extending reactor lifespans, upgrading grids, and accelerating SMR deployment, while signalling to other multilateral lenders, including the African Development Bank, that nuclear is part of the clean energy transition toolkit. Vendor financing is also in play. Egypt's El Dabaa project, for example, is backed by large concessional loans from Russia with low interest rates and extended repayment terms. However, many African nations face low credit ratings and high debt-to-GDP ratios, so new financing models, from regional SMR purchase agreements to blended public-private investment, will be key. 'Developing a nuclear programme requires a century-long commitment, from construction through decommissioning and waste management,' Osike shared. 'Stable national policy, public support, and regulatory readiness are therefore essential,' she added. The IAEA's Milestones Approach identifies 19 infrastructure issues that must be addressed before construction begins. Continental and regional integration could further accelerate nuclear rollout. The Africa Single Electricity Market, launched by the African Union, aims to link national grids into the world's largest single electricity market. This could allow countries to share nuclear output, stabilise grids, and make large-scale investments viable. Shared infrastructure, training, and regulatory capacity could mirror the cooperative models already used in hydropower projects. *
