logo
#

Latest news with #CommitteeonUtilities

Porter Commissioners, Soliday differ on House bill shifting energy permitting to the state
Porter Commissioners, Soliday differ on House bill shifting energy permitting to the state

Chicago Tribune

time07-02-2025

  • Business
  • Chicago Tribune

Porter Commissioners, Soliday differ on House bill shifting energy permitting to the state

The Porter County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a resolution opposing Indiana House Bill 1628 on Friday morning — a measure which would give authority for approving multijurisdictional utility projects affecting electricity, gases and fluids, and water to the state by July 1, if approved in the current legislative session which ends April 29th. State Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso, who chairs the Committee on Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications, says the resolution is a reaction to local governments allowing themselves to be influenced by the same group of 300 that travels the state attempting to throw up roadblocks to progress with scaremongering. 'If you're going to do public policy by the mob, I don't know how that will work,' he said by phone Friday afternoon. 'We have 72 counties in the state that have moratoriums on renewables, and if you ask them why, they can't explain it,' Soliday said. 'All 1628 was for was to start a conversation on two things: 1) Should one county be able to block a project? And 2) We're in transition and need to onshore manufacturing.' Soliday said the $50 billion worth of new business coming to the state is 100% on board with renewable energy 'because they want to sell their products to Europe, Canada, places that want to know what you're doing' to limit our carbon footprint. 'Do we tell these people, 'Not here?' Is that who we want to be? Where are our kids going to work?' All three Porter County commissioners and the president of the county council say they want to be officeholders who answer to their constituents. 'Once local governance is taken away, why even bother having local governance?' asked Porter County Council President Andy Vasquez, R-4th. 'We serve the citizens of Porter County, and we never want to serve the interests of anyone else, because they're the ones who elected us.' 'I'm opposed to any bill that takes away local control,' said Board of Commissioners Vice President Ed Morales, R-South. 'That's never good.' Board of Commissioners President Jim Biggs, R-North, said he's never heard of a large infrastructure project where a tax abatement wasn't sought by the developer. 'Are they (the state) going to dictate a tax abatement?' he asked. 'I'm really concerned; is the state of Indiana going to take that authority away from us? I think it's stunning that they did not address that.' Soliday pushed back against Biggs' arguments, saying he knows Biggs was at the Statehouse just the other day and didn't bother to speak with himself or HB 1628 sponsor Craig Snow, R-Warsaw. For his part, Biggs complained that Soliday didn't reach out to the county and brought up the E911 bill that he said the state mandated without providing a funding mechanism as a past example of edicts from the state. County officials aren't the only ones concerned. State Sen. Rodney Poll, Jr., D-Chesterton, said he just had a conversation with Porter Council Council Vice President Red Stone, R-1st, 'about how the state is getting increasingly hostile to local government. 'I think it's terrible,' he said of HB 1628. 'It's something in which we're taking away the choice of what happens in the local community and that to me is not small government.' Others, such as State Sen. Ed Charbonneau, R-Valparaiso, are reserving an opinion until they know more. 'Since the bill's still in the House he hasn't had time to consider it yet,' said Charbonneau's Press Secretary Emma Balzer. Other legislators representing the county could not be reached for comment by press time. County Commissioner Barb Regnitz, R-Center, asked what would be the best way to get the resolution in front of them. 'I have no problem if a county wants solar farms, and there are a number of them that do, but Porter County is not one of them,' she said. She also wanted to know if these multijurisdictional projects would be allowed in any zone. 'Have they said what zone it would be in?' she asked. 'No,' replied Porter County Attorney Scott McClure. Soliday acknowledged a solar farm could qualify for circumventing local permitting requirements under the bill if it passes. 'It would be up to them to make the case' because one county would be moving electricity across county lines, he said. 'Generally the solar piece depends on what we do in the amendments.' But as far the proposed Malden Solar Farm is concerned, Soldiay said the sun has set on any industry interest there. 'They'll never come back,' he said. 'NextEra has not talked to me for a minute.' Still, he said that since solar has to be near transmission lines the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission identifies areas that are ideal for solar farms. Should the bill pass it may contain language that gives counties latitude for selecting the placement of solar farms in their borders as well as considering the location of solar on lowest-yield farmland such as sandy soils or near coalfields. Soliday said the Committee on Utilities, Energy and Telecommunications is busy working to amend the bill with input from any interested party. He said 25 witnesses testified for the committee on Tuesday and those speaking for the bill outnumbered those against it two-to-one. 'If citizens come down, they get to have input,' he said. 'That bill will not be finished, assuming I even let it out of committee, until April 27th.'

Porter County Commissioners oppose ‘terrible' House bill that bypasses local permitting
Porter County Commissioners oppose ‘terrible' House bill that bypasses local permitting

Chicago Tribune

time06-02-2025

  • Business
  • Chicago Tribune

Porter County Commissioners oppose ‘terrible' House bill that bypasses local permitting

The Porter County Board of Commissioners is holding a special meeting at 10 a.m. Friday in order to draft a letter to Indiana Governor Mike Braun letting him know its displeasure with House Bill 1628 which seeks to allow multi-jurisdictional infrastructure projects for electricity, gases and fluids, or water without the need for local permits or zoning approval. 'I think it's a terrible thing, unless you're there supporting special interests,' said Porter County Board of Commissioners President Jim Biggs, R-North. 'A bill like this will pertain to every area of the state.' The bill summary says it 'provides that a person that seeks to locate, construct, or deploy any facilities, equipment, or infrastructure in connection with a multi-jurisdictional project is not required to obtain from a local authority a permit, or any other land use or zoning approval, with respect to the siting, construction, or deployment' used in the generation, transmission, or distribution of electricity, gases or fluids, or water if those services 'will provide utility services to employ or economic benefits to residents, businesses, or political subdivisions in more than one county. However, it also states that those criteria are to be set forth to the state by the developer, owner, or operator of the project, not the communities where the operator seeks to develop the project. The bill, sponsored by Indiana State Representative Craig Snow, R-Warsaw, had its first reading Jan. 21 and was referred to the Committee on Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications. If passed, it would go into effect July 1 of this year. Snow's office did not respond to questions about the bill by press time. Porter County Council President Andy Vasquez, R-4th, was on his way back from Indianapolis where he had been attending a conference for county officeholders on understanding the state's lawmaking process when he learned about the bill. He said he'll be at the meeting Friday. 'As president of the county council I'd like to gather more information so an educated decision' can be made, he said. Biggs brought up the recent efforts of NextEra, the largest energy utility holding company in the world, to bring a solar farm to Malden in south Porter County. NextEra's application to build a solar farm in Malden was rejected by the county on Aug. 17 on the grounds of failing to meet the standards set forth in the 2020 solar ordinance and the county's unified development ordinance. Any future application by NextEra or any other company to put a solar farm on agricultural land would have to be made under a new ordinance or an appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals. 'Currently, say if a solar company wants to come to Porter County they have to go before several boards and meet several land zoning laws,' Biggs said. 'If the intent was not the way it reads now, then it needs to be rewritten.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store