
Why Boston was such a tinderbox in the 1770s
Diane Dwyer
The hat tip, new #rebels saluting the OGs, captured some of the come-and-get-us fury of Boston in the aftermath of the deadly 1770 riot on King Street, which Paul Revere branded a massacre. In time, the Massacre begat the Tea Party, the reaction to which propelled the Shot Heard Round the World, fired a quarter-millennium ago this month. But Boston's revolutionary ethos is far older than 1775, or 1770. And leveraging anniversaries was always part of it.
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Founded by British emigrants in 1630, the town that rose on a slender peninsula jutting into Massachusetts Bay was singular from the outset. Its leaders were Protestant reformers, denigrated as 'Puritans' by their enemies. They left an England on the verge of civil war, crossing a vast and furious ocean to plant a more perfect society. John Winthrop, the lawyer who became the colony's first governor, drew on the Gospel of Matthew
Advertisement
Historians have long and correctly insisted that we ought not overstate the degree to which the culture of Revolutionary or even Colonial Boston remained 'Puritan.' Yet the legacy of Boston's founding continued to matter in an increasingly commercial and cosmopolitan world.
It mattered demographically: Massachusetts was from the outset a family enterprise, with nearly equal numbers of men and women, who produced large broods of children, who married and multiplied across the stony soils of New England. The population grew quickly and remained disproportionately youthful, as in so many other developing economies then and since.
The trading economy they created was modest but vibrant. Bostonians imported more than they sold abroad, which would matter when the taxes hit. But their prosperity, such as it was, was shared widely. They were a middling people, the rich less rich and the poor less poor than in the land they'd left behind.
The Puritan 'Great Migration' to New England died in 1649, when the English Civil War ended, which meant that the generations rising thereafter did so within a relatively homogeneous society. There were blips of immigration — French Huguenots in the 1690s, Protestant Irish in the 1710s and again in the 1730s.
Advertisement
The streets of Boston teemed with people, for the most part, of common stock and common values. Ordinary men participated vigorously in public life, through a relatively broad electoral franchise. They imagined politics as a local affair. Elected officials at the town and Colony level knew themselves to be directly accountable to the people around them, especially on matters of the purse.
At first, the Old Testament shaped Boston's laws as well as its culture: a city of steeples and jails. The colonists' reputation as a coven of killjoys was lampooned in print as early as 1637 by a freethinking lawyer expelled from the godly Commonwealth for erecting a Maypole. This perception only increased after the deadly witch trials in Salem in 1692.
Yet if Puritanism bred a righteous stringency, it also nourished the skills of a self-governing people. The New England way of worship, called Congregationalism, insisted upon a direct relationship between the faithful and their God. Which meant reading the Bible, in English, at home, intensively. Literacy was a godly duty, and Massachusetts boasted some of the highest rates of it in the Western world. Mothers read the Word aloud to their sons, making the home a 'little commonwealth,' and women were people of ideas from the outset. Some of those sons went on to
Advertisement
Congregationalism bred printers as well as readers: The first press in British America — its type and hardware and even its paper imported — was set up in Cambridge shortly after the college was established.
Advertisement
A sculpture of Phillis Wheatley on The Commonwealth Avenue Mall in Boston.
David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
At midcentury, Bostonians were enormously proud of their Britishness. They fought and died in the Crown's great global war, now known as the
Few needed the reminder. When, 13 months later, the old king died and his grandson ascended the throne as George III, the patriotic men of Harvard used their printing press to send him an unctuous congratulatory ode in schoolboy Latin. And in 1763, when the war officially ended, Boston's James Otis, Harvard class of 1743 and a prominent lawyer, told the Boston Town Meeting, 'The true interests of Great Britain and her plantations are mutual, and what God in his providence has united, let no man dare attempt to pull asunder.'
Within a year, Otis would trade his hymn of praise for a protest song. The Crown's postwar tax levies punctured Bostonians' pride well before they pinched their pocketbooks. To a people used to local authority, who thought themselves exemplary Britons, the distant edicts rankled. Were these literate, liberty-loving Britons somehow lesser subjects? Their patriotism curdled, a sense of wrong feeding a culture of rights. 'A plantation or colony, is a settlement of subjects in a territory
disjoined
or
remote
from the mother country,' Otis wrote, in 1764, when the Sugar Act came into being. In the first pamphlet asserting Colonial prerogatives, he articulated a principle that would overspread the Eastern Seaboard: 'Colonists are entitled to as
ample
rights, liberties, and privileges as the subjects of the mother country are, and in some respects, to
more
.'
Advertisement
Benjamin Edes and John Gil, publishers of the Boston Gazette, printed Otis's pamphlet, which quickly spawned rejoinders from Caribbean writers whom the Sugar Act protected. The city's newspapers, long an engine of British patriotism, became a seedbed of American outrage. Through the Stamp Act crisis in 1765 and the military occupation of 1768 and the Massacre of 1770 and the dumping of the tea in 1773, Boston's presses kept the tide of outrage high, even when actual outrages ebbed. 'The Newspapers teemed with everything that could inflame the Passions,' complained the customs commissioner, Henry Hulton, stationed, for his sins, in Boston.
The passion was the point. And by the time a Continental Congress gathered in Philadelphia in the fall of 1774, pamphleteers like Otis and pressmen like Edes and Gil had done a great deal to make the plight of Boston a matter of urgent continent-wide concern. 'Every Scrap of Letter or Newspaper from Boston is read here,'
The delegates were right to worry. For as the 2025 artists' collective said — artists who called themselves Silence Dogood — hell had been waiting here all along.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 hours ago
Judge rules that Rhode Island's gun permit system does not violate Second Amendment
PROVIDENCE, R.I. -- A federal judge says Rhode Island's gun permit system, which requires residents to show 'a need' to openly carry a firearm throughout the state, does not violate the Second Amendment. In a ruling handed down Friday, U.S. District Judge William Smith granted Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha's motion for summary judgment that dismisses a lawsuit filed by a coalition of gun owners in 2023. The lawsuit stems from a Rhode Island law dictating how the state issues firearms permits. According to the statute, local officials are required to issue concealed-carry permits to anyone who meets the specific criteria outlined in the statute. However, it also allows the attorney general's office to issue open-carry permits 'upon a proper showing of need.' Unlike municipalities, the attorney general is not required to issue such permits. The plaintiffs, largely led by Michael O'Neil, a lobbyist for the Rhode Island 2nd Amendment Coalition and a firearm instructor, said in their initial complaint that the attorney general's office denied all seven of their applications in 2021 for an 'unrestricted' firearm permit, allowing both open and concealed carry. Court documents show that the attorney general's office denied their permits because all of them had been granted 'restricted' permits, which only allowed concealed carry. Smith said in his ruling that unrestricted permits 'are a privilege and there is no constitutionally protected liberty interest in obtaining one.' The plaintiffs had hoped for a similar ruling handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022, where the justices struck down a New York state law that had restricted who could obtain a permit to carry a gun in public. Similar to Rhode Island, New York's law had required residents to show an actual need to carry a concealed handgun in public for self-defense. Yet, notably, Smith said in his ruling that the high court's 2022 ruling did not declare that the Second Amendment 'requires open carry,' but even if it did, Rhode Island's law 'is within the Nation's historical tradition of regulation.' Frank Saccoccio, the attorney representing the gun owners, said in an email Monday that they did not believe Smith's decision was in line with the 2022 SCOTUS decision and would be appealing.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Illegal migrant who broke free with help of anti-ICE activists caught while wearing $1,700 Louis Vuitton t-shirt
An illegal migrant who broke free from a Los Angeles detention facility with help of anti-ICE activists was caught — while apparently wearing a $1,700 Louis Vuitton t-shirt. Anti-ICE activists helped British national Ahmed Mohamed escape as he was being transferred to a detention center in downtown Los Angeles last Tuesday, The Post previously reported. Mohamed, who has a rap sheet including charges of narcotics and weapons possession, was shackled as contract guards lined him up with several other detainees before walking them into the ICE detention center for processing. Advertisement Ahmed Mohamed escaped with the help of anti-ICE activists. ICE A masked man was seen helping Mohamed escape when the guards weren't looking, Homeland Security sources said. The migrant was then loaded into a waiting van with the help of the protestors. On Friday, ICE agents in San Diego 'swiftly apprehended' the escape artist at an undisclosed location, the agency said in an Instagram post showing the cuffed migrant wearing the designer shirt. Advertisement 'You can run from the law but you cannot hide,' the post read. The illegal migrant was caught wearing a $1,700 Louis Vuitton t-shirt. Louis Vuitton He is now charged with escaping from confinement. The detention facility was at the center of anti-ICE riots that broke out in June, when rioters hurled concrete blocks at the feds and shut down major highways in an attempt to stop President Trump's mass deportation raids. Advertisement Trump later deployed 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the City of Angels to control the chaos. California's lefty Gov. Gavin Newsom sued the Trump administration over the deployment, arguing that they exceeded his authority and ignored the 10th Amendment by calling up the Guard under a federal law intended to address an 'invasion' or 'rebellion.'


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Nurse in US for 40 Years Self-Deports—'It's Really Gotten Insane'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Matthew Morrison, a 69-year-old Irish immigrant and nurse in Missouri who became an immigration example in the late 1990s, left for Ireland on July 21 after living in the United States for 40 years due to fears of removal by the Trump administration. Why It Matters Morrison's self-deportation has brought further attention to the complicated realities faced by long-term undocumented immigrants in the U.S., especially those with historic convictions or high-profile political backgrounds. His case, uniquely tied to historic U.S.–Ireland relations, was previously referenced during the Clinton administration as part of U.S.'s efforts to support the Northern Ireland peace process. Morrison's departure also underscores the anxiety and uncertainty experienced by noncitizens who fear changes in immigration enforcement policies, particularly those perceived to be at higher risk during political shifts. What To Know Morrison worked for roughly 20 years as a psychiatric nurse supervisor in Missouri, including stints at a children's hospital and several state mental health facilities. He also presented at the St. Louis County Police Academy on topics including mental health and de-escalation tactics. He told The Marshall Project that he voluntarily left the U.S. due to fear of detention by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under President Donald Trump's administration. "I would bite the dust in an ICE holding cell," Morrison said prior to going home to Ireland. "There is nothing to stop them from deporting me to Ecuador, South Sudan or whatever. It's really gotten insane here. It's crazy what they are doing now, the Trump administration. You know what I mean?" Morrison told The Marshall Project that although his work authorization expires in October, he didn't want to spend the next few months in anxiety worrying about being deported. On July 21, he and his wife reportedly boarded a one-way flight from Cleveland to Dublin and left behind a life in the St. Louis area that includes grown children, grandchildren and friends. "I've come full circle," Morrison said. "I came here as an immigrant and I am leaving as an immigrant, despite everything in between. The whole thing is a crazy, stressful situation." Morrison first arrived in the U.S. in the mid-1980s after serving time in prison in Northern Ireland due to his involvement with the Irish Republican Army (IRA) during "The Troubles." In 1985, he married his American pen pal, Francie Broderick, and had two children, Matt and Katie. Morrison later remarried to his current wife, Sandra Riley Swift. He once served as a symbolic figure in American–Irish diplomacy. The former member of IRA previously spent 10 years in prison, convicted of attempted murder in a 1976 raid on a British barracks. Other ex-IRA men, all in the New York area, faced deportation for similar reasons. In 1995, Morrison's wife flew to Belfast while President Bill Clinton was in the region, attempting to garner his attention and protect him from deportation, according to the Associated Press. By 1997, the family received more than $70,000 in donations to help with legal fees. The case for Morrison and others like him drew support from local and international lawmakers, notably due to IRA members being characterized by the U.S. government as terrorists. The Missouri Legislature passed a resolution in 1996 urging the Immigration and Naturalization Service to drop deportation proceedings against him. Members of the Derry City Council in Northern Ireland followed suit across party lines, approving a resolution urging Clinton to suspend his deportation. Morrison's struggle won support from countless Americans, including neighbors in this suburban St. Louis community to state legislators to members of Congress. The Irish Northern Aid, a nonprofit organization that helps families of Irish political prisoners, and the Ancient Order of Hibernians also have come to his defense. In 2000, the Clinton administration ultimately terminated the deportation process against Morrison and five others. Then-Attorney General Janet Reno said in a statement that she had been advised by Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to drop deportation proceedings to "support and promote the process of reconciliation that has begun in Northern Ireland." Clinton at the time said the termination was "in no way approving or condoning their past criminal acts." However, the ex-president echoed the sentiment of contributing to peace in Europe. Thousands of people gather at an anti-racism rally in the city center of Belfast, Ireland, on August 10, 2024, following a week of disorder across the province. Thousands of people gather at an anti-racism rally in the city center of Belfast, Ireland, on August 10, 2024, following a week of disorder across the province. PAUL FAITH/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying Matthew Morrison's son, Matt, 37, to The Marshall Project about his father's scheduled check-in with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in June in St. Louis: "We were terrified that they were just going to take him right has to live under that fear of somebody knocking on the door and dragging him out of the house, just like they did in Derry when he was young. I hate it. I am just worried about him. Until recently, I hadn't heard him cry about it." Morrison's daughter, Katie, to The Marshall Project: "Even though he's still alive, I feel like I am grieving. It's a huge loss for me and my children." What Happens Next? Swift has a house in St. Charles, Missouri, as well as family in the U.S., The Marshall Project reported. After helping Morrison transition into an apartment in the town where he grew up, she wrote in a social media post that she's going to travel between both countries for a while.