Ukraine talks, Hamas, AI poll and Labubu boost
U.S. President Donald Trump tells Volodymyr Zelenskiy the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end war with Russia. Hamas accepts proposed ceasefire deal for Gaza. Most Americans are worried about the role artificial intelligence could play in society, according to a new Reuters Ipsos poll. And the must-have Labubu doll helps profits soar at Pop Mart.
Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter here.
Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast here.
Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices.
You may also visit megaphone.fm/adchoices to opt out of targeted advertising.
Further Reading
US would help assure Ukraine's security in a peace deal, Trump tells Zelenskiy
Hamas accepts proposed deal for ceasefire with Israel and hostage release, Egyptian source says
Americans fear AI permanently displacing workers, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
China's Pop Mart, maker of the Labubu doll, says revenue triples in first half
Russian foreign minister praises Trump, criticises Europeans over approach to Ukraine peace push
North Korea's Kim calls for rapid nuclear buildup
Polish police bust smuggling networks and seize drugs worth $275 million
Drought depletes Turkey's Tekirdag reservoirs, forcing emergency water curbs
Recommended Read: Wooden church sets off on slow Swedish road trip to escape mining subsidence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
MTG's boyfriend says he took Zelensky's Oval Office suit zinger in good cheer: ‘It was a funny joke'
Marjorie Taylor Greene 's boyfriend, Real America's Voice correspondent Brian Glenn, laughed off Volodymyr Zelensky's zinger about him wearing the same suit during Monday's press conference in the Oval Office as he did during February's now-infamous showdown between the Ukrainian leader and President Donald Trump. Axios reported that The White House inquired about Zelensky's attire before the much-anticipated second meeting between the leaders, after Vice President JD Vance in particular voiced frustrations over his 'look and attitude' the first time around. The Ukrainian President wore his usual military-style attire during the disastrous February meeting, which Glenn mocked at the time. Zelensky again wore an all black ensemble for his return to the West Wing - but this time with a suit jacket - something noted by the reporter. 'You look fabulous in that suit,' Glenn told Zelensky. 'You look good.' 'I said the same thing,' Trump chimed in, noting that Glenn 'attacked' Zelensky for his attire 'last time.' 'I apologize to you, you look wonderful,' added Glenn. 'You are in the same suit. I changed, you are not,' Zelensky said to laughter in the Oval Office. During Glenn's subsequent appearance on LBC, he said, 'I apologized to him, and then he threw a little zinger back at me…I actually loved it.' Glenn noted that he wasn't 'technically' wearing the same suit as he had been in February, adding, 'I think it was a funny joke, I took it really well…I really did.' 'I think it loosened up that moment in the Oval Office, and, you know what, from that point on, I remember making eye contact with President Zelensky multiple times, and it was kind of like a gentleman's nod, kind of like, 'okay, we're good,'' said Glenn. The rightwing correspondent added that he believes the Ukrainian leader has forgiven him. Glenn, who's dating firebrand Republican Rep. Greene, ripped Zelensky for wearing a black sweater with the Ukrainian trident during February's heated Oval Office meeting with Trump. 'Why don't you wear a suit? You are at the highest level in this country's office, and you refuse to wear a suit. Do you own a suit?' Glenn asked. "I will wear [a suit] after this war finishes. Maybe something like yours, maybe something better," Zelensky said at the time.
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump claims he ended seven wars, despite previously saying it was six
Donald Trump claimed on Tuesday that he had ended seven wars during his current presidency, a day after stating it was six. Speaking on Fox and Friends, the US president cited the India and Pakistan conflict as a significant resolution, while calling the Ukraine war the 'toughest'. The White House indicated that the conflicts Trump referred to spanned both his first and current terms, listing six specific disputes. The article notes that many of the conflicts mentioned by Trump have not been fully resolved. Watch the video in full above.
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Vladimir Putin now has little choice but to agree to talks
Given Vladimir Putin's track record, it is still difficult to be optimistic about the Ukraine peace process, much as anyone with a grain of humanity would wish to be. After the recent dazzling flurry of diplomatic activity, the initiative has returned to Moscow. Putin has the future of this process in his hands but seems to be in no hurry to take it forward. More worryingly, he has hardly changed his demands in many months, and he has form, which is not encouraging. During his time running the Russian Federation in various capacities, he has flagrantly broken every previous guarantee of Ukrainian sovereignty including the Budapest Memorandum (1994), the Treaty of Friendship (1997), and a 2003 border treaty. For a decade after that, Putin gradually escalated secessionist activity in the eastern Donbas and Crimea, before annexing them. Even days before the February 2022 invasion, he was denying any such intention. Since then, Putin has taken every opportunity to declaim that Ukraine isn't a real country and merely a province of Russia, which is at least his honest view. It is also one that he will not abandon simply because he has signed some piece of paper. Putin's word counts for nothing, a fact that Donald Trump seems unable to accept. Mr Trump deals in personalities but against Putin it is, as we've seen, an unequal match. Still, there are at least some hopeful signs that have emerged from the summits in Alaska and in Washington. The most significant is the suggestion, albeit tentative and seemingly limited, that the United States would be prepared to offer Ukraine some form of 'security guarantee' for its future borders. Mr Trump seems strangely susceptible to persuasion, particularly when it is slathered in flattery, and his more isolationist colleagues in the administration would seem to have made him temper his willingness to commit US forces to the region. There will be no US forces on the ground, says President Trump, which doesn't come as much of a surprise, and the most that might be expected from Washington seems to be 'air cover', which is more than has ever been offered before. Mr Trump ruled out Nato forces, but volunteered that he'd be prepared to support the British, French and, most sensitively for historical reasons, German troops. The vague promise of a Nato Article 5-style guarantee remains, with no form of words, and not necessarily as comprehensive as the Atlantic alliance's 'all for one and one for all'. But, again, it is a shift from the doctrine of pure isolationism adumbrated in the US president's inauguration address last January. Nato membership for Ukraine is ruled out, but Volodymyr Zelensky gave that ambition up some time ago. Diplomatically, Mr Zelensky is also shrewd to accept the offer of bilateral talks with Putin, or trilateral talks involving Mr Trump, or both options. The Ukrainian leader has repaired his relations with Mr Trump, and assembled an impressive posse of European leaders to advise and to back him. The 'coalition of the willing', led jointly by Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, is a potentially powerful force with which Ukraine can build an even more formidable military capability. So we know where the Ukrainian president stands – a respectful interlocutor to Mr Trump and a willing negotiator, albeit reserving his position on territorial adjustments. With some skill, he has managed to land Putin with the task of taking up the offer of talks and negotiations. The Kremlin has long been reluctant to grant Mr Zelensky his proper status and claims that he is illegitimate because there have been no fresh presidential elections, something rendered impossible by Russian occupation and bombardment. But, if Putin wants to keep Mr Trump on side, or string him along some more, he must agree to the talks – and quickly. That leaves the most difficult issue of all for both sides – territory. Mr Zelensky and his brave nation should feel proud that the total subjugation of their country has been avoided, and seems out of the question in the short to medium term. The 2022 'special military operation', complete with a tank column heading down the road to Kyiv, was designed quickly to absorb Ukraine, and send Mr Zelensky into exile. At worst, Ukraine will have to give up some land, and, tragically, millions of its citizens, that it has little chance of regaining – or at least not until the Russian economy and its war machine collapse. But it should not have to cede any more than that – and certainly not without some meaty security guarantees, tantamount to those that would flow from Nato membership. This is the trap Mr Zelensky and his allies have set for the Kremlin – for Putin cannot accept external troops and security guarantees that would make some subsequent attack impossible. If they deter Russia, they are unacceptable to Russia, and Putin would have to reject the offer of the whole of Donbas and Crimea. Mr Trump has already accepted that possibility. That would displease the Americans and encourage them and the coalition of the willing to back Ukraine until such time that the Russian economy finally breaks. That, however, is quite an optimistic scenario.
