5 Benefits Of Mango Seeds For Skin, Hair, Weight Loss And More
During summer, few things bring more joy than indulging in sweet, juicy mangoes. We adore them so much that many of us buy them in bulk and dedicate an entire fridge shelf to them. While enjoying them, our attention is naturally on the succulent pulp, and we often discard the seeds (gutli) without a second thought. After all, what possible use could they have? However, that is not entirely accurate. Mango seeds offer several health benefits and could significantly boost your well-being. From aiding weight management to supporting heart health, here are five surprising benefits of mango seeds. We have also included a few easy ways to add them to your daily diet - do read on until the end.
Also Read: Looking For Another Mango Recipe? Make Dry Mango Kuzhambu In 30 Minutes
Are Mango Seeds Good For Health? Here Are 5 Benefits Backed By Research:
1. Aid In Weight Loss
If you are trying to lose weight, mango seeds may help support your efforts. According to a study published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), African mango seed extract has been shown to promote weight loss and improve overall health. Mango seed powder is also believed to help boost metabolism, which is essential for burning calories efficiently. This makes it a useful addition to natural remedies for weight loss.
2. Help Manage Blood Sugar
Mango seeds may also support healthy blood sugar levels. A study conducted by The Professional Medical Journal revealed that mango seed extract reduced blood sugar levels in diabetic rats. The extract appeared to increase insulin levels and lower HbA1c levels, which indicate long-term blood sugar control. These findings suggest that mango seed extract could support diabetes management naturally.
3. Beneficial For Skin Health
Mango seeds can contribute to healthy, glowing skin. According to a study published by the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), consumption of mango seed powder had a significant effect on lysozyme activity in the skin mucus. For context, lysozyme is an enzyme that provides a defence against bacterial infections. Including mango seed powder in your diet may help protect your skin and promote a clearer, healthier appearance.
4. Promote Hair Growth
In addition to skincare benefits, mango seeds also support healthy hair growth. Research from the NIH highlights that mango seed oil is rich in fatty acids and vitamin E, both of which are essential for strong, nourished hair. The oil can be applied directly to the scalp or mixed into a paste or hair mask. Regular use may strengthen hair roots, reduce hair fall, and enhance shine.
5. Support Heart Health
Mango seeds contain high levels of antioxidants and dietary fibre, both of which are beneficial for cardiovascular health. A study published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry confirmed that mango seed extract exhibits strong antioxidant properties. These compounds help reduce cholesterol levels and protect the body from heart disease. Adding mango seeds to your diet could be a simple way to support your heart naturally.
How To Use Mango Seeds In Your Diet
There are several easy and creative ways to add mango seeds to your daily routine. You can dry and grind the seeds to make a fine powder, which can be added to smoothies, yoghurt bowls, or cereal. Another option is to steep dried mango seeds in hot water to make a soothing herbal tea. Additionally, the powdered seeds can be used to prepare a refreshing mukhwas (mouth freshener). Want an easy recipe for it? Click here.
Also Read:
So, the next time you enjoy mangoes, do not toss the seeds into the bin. Use them wisely and take advantage of these lesser-known benefits of mango seeds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Young Edge: Why vaping or e-cigarettes continue to lure Pune young adults despite risks
Written by Siddhi Pati, Despite being banned, vapes are popular among young adults in Pune as many are under the assumption that e-cigarettes are less harmful than traditional cigarettes, while others are simply drawn to the trend under peer influence. Vaping or electronic cigarettes are banned under the Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act (2019). A Kharadi resident, who did not want to be named, said he has several friends addicted to vaping. He added that most people don't think it is harming their health until they start feeling symptoms like throat irritation or a heaviness in their voice. 'Vapes are easy to access, even though they're illegal, since many big smoke shops continue to sell them. I have seen these shops import vapes and e-cigarettes from African, South Asian, and especially Gulf countries,' he said. A student from Viman Nagar shared that there is a perception that smoking is old and unhealthy. 'Even if vaping isn't completely healthy, it feels like a better option, since it also causes less discomfort.' Many users have said that youngsters try out vaping to seek new experiences and later on at least become active tobacco smokers. A student from Kothrud admitted, 'I go to house parties, and even if I don't want to use the vape, it just gets passed around. And I end up smoking it.' A vaping addict pointed out the emotional pressure involved in the process. 'I got into it under peer pressure, and now it has gotten very difficult to quit. And unlike cigarettes, vapes have a variety. So, it's not the feeling of smoking and the nicotine hit. It's also the fact that there is so much more to try. I can carry them everywhere I go. I just need to charge, and it's ready,' she said. Another student from Lohegaon highlighted how easy it is to get hooked, 'I think it's the kick of nicotine that makes vapes so addictive. They are very easily available in every other smoke shop for Rs 2,000–Rs 3,000.' According to psychologists, vapes and e-cigarettes contain addictive chemicals that make quitting hard. 'Many young adults use vaping as a coping mechanism to deal with difficult emotions. Over time, it becomes a habit. They vape when bored, sad, or anxious. Vapes and e-cigarettes are also marketed as sleek and sophisticated, adding to the factor of increased peer-pressure among young adults, and driving them to use these devices,' explained Shreyash Chhajed, clinical psychologist. Health professionals have warned against the common misconception that vaping is a safe alternative. 'They deliver nicotine, which raises heart rate and blood pressure. E-cigarettes also release substances like formaldehyde and TSNAs, which can increase cancer risk. For the lungs, vaping can cause inflammation, oxidative stress, and even conditions like EVALI and 'popcorn lung,' said Dr Vivek Gaikwad, Pune-based cardiologist. The fact that the combination of easy access, peer influence, emotional dependence, and lack of awareness continues to fuel this growing trend is a matter of concern among health experts. Vaping may feel safer than smoking, but the risks are real and rising, they said. (Siddhi Patil is an intern with The Indian Express)
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
US restores some medical research grants, says top Trump official
Washington: A senior US health official on Tuesday admitted President Donald Trump's administration had gone too far in slashing biomedical research grants worth billions of dollars, and said efforts were underway to restore some of the funding. Jay Bhattacharya , director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), made the remarks during a Senate committee hearing examining both recent cuts to his agency and deeper reductions proposed by the White House in next year's budget. Bhattachartya said he had created an appeals process for scientists and laboratories whose research was impacted, and that the NIH had already "reversed many" of the cuts. "I didn't take this job to terminate grants," said the physician and health economist who left a professorship at Stanford University to join the Trump administration. "I took this job to make sure that we do the research that advances the health needs of the American people." The hearing came a day after more than 60 NIH employees sent an open letter to Bhattacharya condemning policies they said undermined the agency's mission and the health of Americans. They dubbed it the " Bethesda Declaration " -- a nod both to the NIH's suburban Washington headquarters and to Bhattacharya's role as a prominent signatory of the 2020 "Great Barrington Declaration," which opposed Covid lockdowns. Since Trump's January 20 inauguration, the NIH has terminated 2,100 research grants totaling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch. Affected projects include studies on gender, the health effects of global warming, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer. Trump has launched a sweeping overhaul of the US scientific establishment early in his second term -- cutting billions in funding, attacking universities, and overseeing mass layoffs of scientists across federal agencies.
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
NIH Scientists Publish Letter Criticizing Trump's Deep Cuts In Public Health Research
Washington: In his confirmation hearings to lead the National Institutes of Health, Jay Bhattacharya pledged his openness to views that might conflict with his own. "Dissent," he said, "is the very essence of science." That commitment is being put to the test. On Monday, scores of scientists at the agency sent their Trump-appointed leader a letter titled the Bethesda Declaration, challenging "policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe." It says: "We dissent." In a capital where insiders often insist on anonymity to say such things publicly, 92 NIH researchers, program directors, branch chiefs and scientific review officers put their signatures on the letter - and their careers on the line. An additional 250 of their colleagues across the agency endorsed the declaration without using their names. The letter, addressed to Bhattacharya, also was sent to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress who oversee the NIH. White House spokesman Kush Desai defended the administration's approach to federal research and said President Donald Trump is focused on restoring a "Gold Standard" of science, not "ideological activism." The letter came out a day before Bhattacharya is to testify to a Senate committee about Trump's proposed budget, opening him to questions about the broadside from declaration signers, and it stirred Democrats on a House panel to ask the Republican chair for hearings on the matter. Confronting A 'Culture Of Fear' The signers went public in the face of a "culture of fear and suppression" they say Trump's administration has spread through the federal civil service. "We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources," the declaration says. Bhattacharya responded to the declaration by saying it "has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions the NIH has taken in recent months," such as suggestions that NIH has ended international collaboration. "Nevertheless, respectful dissent in science is productive," he said in a statement. "We all want the NIH to succeed." Named for the agency's headquarters location in Maryland, the Bethesda Declaration details upheaval in the world's premier public health research institution over the course of mere months. It addresses the termination of 2,100 research grants valued at more than $12 billion and some of the human costs that have resulted, such as cutting off medication regimens to participants in clinical trials or leaving them with unmonitored device implants. In one case, an NIH-supported study of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in Haiti had to be stopped, ceasing antibiotic treatment mid-course for patients. In a number of cases, trials that were mostly completed were rendered useless without the money to finish and analyze the work, the letter says. "Ending a $5 million research study when it is 80% complete does not save $1 million," it says, "it wastes $4 million." The Mask Comes Off Jenna Norton, who oversees health disparity research at the agency's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, recently appeared at a forum by Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., to talk about what's happening at the NIH. At the event, she masked to conceal her identity. Now the mask is off. She was a lead organizer of the declaration. "I want people to know how bad things are at NIH," Norton told The Associated Press. The signers said they modeled their indictment after Bhattacharya's Great Barrington Declaration in 2020, when he was a professor at Stanford University Medical School. His declaration drew together likeminded infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists who dissented from what they saw as excessive COVID-19 lockdown policies and felt ostracized by the larger public health community that pushed those policies, including the NIH. "He is proud of his statement, and we are proud of ours," said Sarah Kobrin, a branch chief at the NIH's National Cancer Institute who signed the Bethesda Declaration. Cancer Research Is Sidelined As chief of the Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Kobrin provides scientific oversight of researchers across the country who've been funded by the cancer institute or want to be. Cuts in personnel and money have shifted her work from improving cancer care research to what she sees as minimizing its destruction. "So much of it is gone - my work," she said. The 21-year NIH veteran said she signed because she didn't want to be "a collaborator" in the political manipulation of biomedical science. Ian Morgan, a postdoctoral fellow with the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, also signed the declaration. "We have a saying in basic science," he said. "You go and become a physician if you want to treat thousands of patients. You go and become a researcher if you want to save billions of patients. "We are doing the research that is going to go and create the cures of the future," he added. But that won't happen, he said, if Trump's Republican administration prevails with its searing grant cuts. The NIH employees interviewed by the AP emphasized they were speaking for themselves and not for their institutes nor the NIH. Dissenters Range Across The Breadth Of NIH Employees from all 27 NIH institutes and centers gave their support to the declaration. Most who signed are intimately involved with evaluating and overseeing extramural research grants. The letter asserts "NIH trials are being halted without regard to participant safety" and the agency is shirking commitments to trial participants who "braved personal risk to give the incredible gift of biological samples, understanding that their generosity would fuel scientific discovery and improve health." The Trump administration has gone at public health research on several fronts, both directly, as part of its broad effort to root out diversity, equity and inclusion values throughout the bureaucracy, and as part of its drive to starve some universities of federal money. At the White House, Desai said Americans "have lost confidence in our increasingly politicized healthcare and research apparatus that has been obsessed with DEI and COVID, which the majority of Americans moved on from years ago." A Blunt Axe Swings This has forced "indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science," the declaration says. Some NIH employees have previously come forward in televised protests to air grievances, and many walked out of Bhattacharya's town hall with staff. The declaration is the first cohesive effort to register agency-wide dismay with the NIH's direction. The dissenters remind Bhattacharya in their letter of his oft-stated ethic that academic freedom must be a lynchpin in science. With that in place, he said in a statement in April, "NIH scientists can be certain they are afforded the ability to engage in open, academic discourse as part of their official duties and in their personal capacities without risk of official interference, professional disadvantage or workplace retaliation." Now it will be seen whether that's enough to protect those NIH employees challenging the Trump administration and him. "There's a book I read to my kids, and it talks about how you can't be brave if you're not scared," said Norton, who has three young children. "I am so scared about doing this, but I am trying to be brave for my kids because it's only going to get harder to speak up. "Maybe I'm putting my kids at risk by doing this," she added. "And I'm doing it anyway because I couldn't live with myself otherwise."
