logo
Energy Markets Confront Era Of Weakening Oil Consumption

Energy Markets Confront Era Of Weakening Oil Consumption

Forbes23-05-2025

For most of the past century, energy producers could count on steady oil demand growth. From industrial development in China to population booms in emerging markets, the global appetite for oil kept expanding like clockwork.
There were occasional exceptions, like the 2008-2009 recession and the demand slump from COVID-19, but global oil demand has increased at an average rate of about 1.2 million barrels per day (bpd) for nearly 60 years.
Global Oil Consumption 1965-2023.
Robert Rapier
But a recent forecast from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) suggests that the world may be entering a new phase—one where oil demand grows at a significantly slower pace.
This predicted change isn't the result of a single trend. Instead, it reflects a confluence of global forces—some structural, some temporary—that are reshaping how and where oil is used. For energy producers, investors, and policymakers, understanding what's behind this slowdown is critical to navigating the years ahead.
According to the EIA's most recent outlook, global oil consumption will rise by less than one million barrels per day in both 2025 and 2026. While any increase may sound like good news to the oil industry, that figure marks a significant drop from the historical average.
It's not that oil is going away anytime soon. But the days of strong, year-over-year demand growth—once seen as inevitable—may soon give way to something more measured, and in some cases, more uncertain.
At the heart of this slowdown is the global economy itself. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) now expects global GDP to grow just 2.8% in both 2025 and 2026. That's far from recession territory, but it's a reminder that we're operating in a world with tighter credit, more protectionism, and less global growth than in previous decades.
Much of the drag is coming from Asia, a region that has long been the engine of oil demand growth. In January, the EIA projected that Asia would contribute an additional 700,000 barrels per day to global demand in 2025. By May, that figure had been cut to 500,000 barrels per day. That may not sound like much, but in a market where supply and demand are often separated by razor-thin margins, the impact on oil prices could be significant.
The weaker outlook in Asia is a story of shifting priorities and lingering problems. In China, the property sector—a major source of industrial demand—is still mired in debt and overcapacity issues. With construction activity down, demand for diesel, fuel oil, and other fuels has taken a hit.
In India, oil consumption is still growing, but the pace is slowing. Government incentives for solar and wind power are beginning to chip away at growth rates that once looked unstoppable. India's pivot toward a more diversified energy mix is strategic, and it means that oil may no longer be a primary option for new energy demand.
Finally, supply chains are shifting. The COVID-19 pandemic led many companies to diversify manufacturing and logistics operations, which has reduced the sheer volume of goods crossing the Pacific Ocean. Less shipping translates into less bunker fuel demand, which is another factor tempering growth.
Geopolitics isn't helping either. The U.S. imposed a new round of tariffs in April 2025, sparking retaliatory measures and injecting fresh uncertainty into global trade. Early shipping data shows a measurable drop in container ship departures from major Asian ports—a likely reflection of cooling trade volumes.
That drop-off ripples across the energy markets. Fewer ships mean fewer trucks picking up cargo, fewer planes moving goods, and less industrial activity overall. It's a stark reminder of how quickly policy decisions can impact oil demand—even before those impacts show up in earnings reports or refinery throughput numbers.
For U.S. shale producers, slowing demand growth presents a familiar challenge: how to balance production with price. If supply keeps rising while demand growth cools, something has to give—and that something is usually price. Unless producers respond with discipline, we could see another cycle of oversupply and depressed oil prices.
OPEC+ faces a similar dilemma. The cartel's ability to manage prices depends on its ability to anticipate demand—and respond in kind. With demand growth weaker than expected, production cuts may be back on the table.
Refiners, particularly those with significant exposure to Asian markets, may also face narrower margins. If crude intake remains high but demand for refined products flattens, profitability will suffer.
For investors, the story isn't all negative. Slower oil demand growth is a headwind, but it's not a disaster. Energy companies that have diversified into natural gas, petrochemicals, or renewable energy may be better positioned to weather the shift.
It's also a good time to revisit how you assess oil companies. Earnings, cash flow, and debt management are always important—but so is strategic outlook. Companies that acknowledge the shifting landscape and adjust their capital allocation accordingly are likely to outperform those that stick to the 'drill, baby, drill' mindset.
Despite the slowdown, oil isn't going away. Sectors like aviation, shipping, and petrochemicals still rely heavily on oil-based products, and that's unlikely to change in the near term. But the era of near-automatic demand growth may be coming to an end.
What replaces it is a more balanced, nuanced market—one where efficiency, innovation, and adaptability carry more weight than sheer volume. For an industry long built on the assumption of constant growth, that's a profound shift. But it may also signal a transition to a more sustainable, diversified, and more resilient global energy system.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Implied Volatility Surging for Allegiant Travel Company Stock Options
Implied Volatility Surging for Allegiant Travel Company Stock Options

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Implied Volatility Surging for Allegiant Travel Company Stock Options

Investors in Allegiant Travel Company ALGT need to pay close attention to the stock based on moves in the options market lately. That is because the July 18, 2025 $120 Call had some of the highest implied volatility of all equity options today. Implied volatility shows how much movement the market is expecting in the future. Options with high levels of implied volatility suggest that investors in the underlying stocks are expecting a big move in one direction or the other. It could also mean there is an event coming up soon that may cause a big rally or a huge sell-off. However, implied volatility is only one piece of the puzzle when putting together an options trading strategy. Clearly, options traders are pricing in a big move for Allegiant Travel Company shares, but what is the fundamental picture for the company? Currently, Allegiant Travel Company is a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) in the Transportation – Airline industry that ranks in the Top 19% of our Zacks Industry Rank. Over the last 60 days, no analyst increased the earnings estimates for the current quarter, while five have dropped their estimates. The net effect has taken our Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current quarter from $2.28 per share to 84 cents in that period. Given the way analysts feel about Allegiant Travel Company right now, this huge implied volatility could mean there's a trade developing. Oftentimes, options traders look for options with high levels of implied volatility to sell premium. This is a strategy many seasoned traders use because it captures decay. At expiration, the hope for these traders is that the underlying stock does not move as much as originally expected. Check out the simple yet high-powered approach that Zacks Executive VP Kevin Matras has used to close recent double and triple-digit winners. In addition to impressive profit potential, these trades can actually reduce your risk. Click to see the trades now >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Lockheed Martin shares sank as much as 7% after a report that the Pentagon is halving F-35 requests for the Air Force
Lockheed Martin shares sank as much as 7% after a report that the Pentagon is halving F-35 requests for the Air Force

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Lockheed Martin shares sank as much as 7% after a report that the Pentagon is halving F-35 requests for the Air Force

Lockheed Martin shares initially fell 7% after a report that the US is reducing its F-35 requests. The Defense Department has reportedly dropped its ask from 48 fighters for the Air Force to 24, The request isn't final, but it could signify changing priorities within the Pentagon under Trump. Lockheed Martin shares dropped as much as 7% on Wednesday after news that the Pentagon is asking for half of the F-35s it initially forecast for the Air Force. The defense contractor's shares recovered to $456 at market close, or about 4.2% lower from $476, the price at the end of Tuesday's trading day. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that a procurement document sent to Congress indicated the Defense Department is requesting only 24 F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters for the Air Force, down from 48 that officials projected in the last fiscal year. Per the outlet, the document also proposed 12 F-35s for the Navy and 11 for the Marine Corps, down from 17 and 13 fighters, respectively. Business Insider could not independently verify Bloomberg's report. The Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment sent outside regular business hours. The US is by far Lockheed Martin's biggest customer for the F-35, with plans to buy 2,456 of the aircraft over several decades. The Air Force is supposed to eventually receive 1,763 of that total. When asked to comment on a possible reduction of local F-35 purchases this year, a Lockheed Martin spokesperson told BI in a statement that the fighter is "combat proven, offers the most advanced capability and technology, and is the most affordable option to ensure the US and allies remain ahead of emerging threats." "We will continue to work closely with the Administration, Congress, and our customers to deliver this game-changing capability as the budget process continues in the months ahead," the spokesperson added. A reduced ask for F-35s can potentially be changed by Congress, which is still deliberating on official defense funding for the 2025 fiscal year ending on September 30. Lawmakers have shown they're willing to fund the advanced stealth fighter beyond the Pentagon's requests. When the Air Force requested 48 F-35s from Congress last year, it was instead offered money for 51 of the planes. Doubling the requested budget, however, would be a huge jump from that smaller boost. The reported change could also signify an internal reshaping of the Pentagon's spending priorities under the Trump administration. In February, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth asked officials to slash 8% of expenses from existing programs over the next five years so the money could be directed to Trump-favored initiatives. His announcement highlighted 17 categories protected from cuts, and the F-35 was not one of them. All of this comes as those in Trump's circles have publicly criticized the F-35 for its cost and relevance amid the rise of drone warfare. Right-wing commentator Laura Loomer, for example, slammed the F-35 program in April as a "scandal that's been quietly draining our nation's resources." And last month, Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz posted on X that the fighter program was a "$1.7 trillion disaster." While some, like Elon Musk, have suggested that drones make crewed fighters obsolete, the US military says it wants to marry the two concepts instead of abandoning the latter. The Air Force has said combining crewed fighters with drone wingmen is a key priority for the F-47, its next-generation air dominance fighter. Lockheed was in the running to produce that fighter, but lost out to Boeing. However, Lockheed CEO Jim Taiclet has said that his firm wants to enhance the F-35 using the tech it created for the failed bid. Taiclet said that plans include automating the sixth-generation fighter and juicing it up to provide most of the capabilities of the F-47 for a fraction of the cost. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store