Alleged Miznon restaurant protester Antwany Arnold refused bail
Antwany Arnold, 50, is alleged to have committed assault, affray, riotous behaviour and criminal damage after allegedly throwing food and chairs outside Miznon restaurant on Hardware Lane on July 4.
Mr Arnold, who was described in court as a 'familiar face' in Melbourne's pro-Palestinian protest movement, returned to the Melbourne Magistrates Court on Wednesday as magistrate Michelle Mykytowycz refused to grant him bail.
The accused man reacted by clapping his hands in a slow exaggerated manner as he beamed in to court from the Metropolitan Remand Centre.
A protester, alleged by police to be Antwany Arnold, is caught on camera throwing chairs outside Miznon restaurant on July 4, 2025. Picture: Supplied/ Magistrates' Court of Victoria.
Handing down her decision, Ms Mykytowycz found Mr Arnold represented a 'real and ongoing risk' to the welfare of the community, noting he had a history of not complying with bail conditions.
She said the father-of-five had already allegedly breached his bail conditions 'more than once' by attending a protest in the CBD, and she was not satisfied that he would follow bail conditions.
Antwany Arnold was arrested on July 8 alongside two women. Picture: Victoria Police.
The court was told the accused man had been arrested on July 8 over his alleged involvement in a protest outside the Israeli restaurant, which was targeted by 12 to 15 protesters in the evening of July 4.
In CCTV of the incident, played in court last week, protesters gathered in the outdoor dining area, chanting slogans including 'death, death to the IDF', 'out, out, Israel out' and 'Israel is a terrorist state'.
Ms Mykytowycz told the court it was alleged Mr Arnold was the person chanting on a microphone at the rear of the group and threw cauliflower and upturned chairs and tables after patrons had left.
A glass door at Miznon was damaged. Picture: NewsWire / Nadir Kinani
At one point footage allegedly showed a second protester sticking their finger in a diner's food, 'a frankly repugnant act', Ms Mykytowycz said.
'You risk alienating the very community amongst which you wish to be heard – arguably you already have,' Ms Mykytowycz said.
'Ultimately, a court will be required in each instance to assess the general character of your utterances and behaviour. This will also include an assessment of whether your behaviour on each occasion constitutes a lawful protest.'
He was supported in court by other activists. Picture: NewsWire / Diego Fedele
During a hearing last week, Mr Arnold's lawyer Tim Hutton told the court that his client had a long history of involvement in the pro-Palestinian protest movement in Melbourne.
He said the alleged offending was not driven by anti-Semitism but a 'most passionate condemnation' of the Israel Defence Forces and their actions in Gaza.
'It is a condemnation of the atrocities and war crimes they've committed,' Mr Hutton said.
'That chant is not specifically calling for the murder of individual IDF soldiers but calling for the end of that organisation.'
Mr Hutton flagged that the head charge of affray would be contested.
Mr Arnold was remanded into custody and will return to court next month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
DEWR, Services Australia unlawfully cancelled 964 JobSeeker payments, Commonwealth Ombudsman finds
The administers of JobSeeker have been savaged in a report by the Commonwealth watchdog, which found actions taken by the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) and Services Australia likely had a 'catastrophic impact' on vulnerable Aussies. Between April 2022 and July 2024, 964 JobSeeker recipients had their payments automatically cancelled under a specific clause in the Target Compliance Framework (TCF) after it was amended in 2022. The framework is an automated system to get JobSeeker recipient to undertake compulsory tasks such as attending job appointments and actively search for work, with those who repeatedly fail to meet the mutual obligations subjected to financial penalties. Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson was scathing of DEWR secretary Natalie James and Services Australia, saying they 'failed to take adequate steps to ensure the TCF was implemented in accordance with the 2022 amendment,' resulting in an 'unlawful decision' to cancel income support payments. The move was done 'without consideration of the job seeker's circumstances' and the 'failure to exercise … discretion … (posed) potentially significant, if not catastrophic, consequences for vulnerable job seekers', he wrote. It also noted a further 45 job recipients had their payments automatically cancelled despite Ms James' decision to pause cancellations on September 2024 – the fifth IT error catalogued by the department. 'We also found that the agencies failed to take all of the steps required under those amendments to safeguard job seekers,' the report set to be released on Wednesday found. Critically the report also states a Digital Protection Framework, despite having the legal requirement to do so. Mr Anderson also noted the automation failures happened after the Robodebt Royal Commission which highlighted the 'serious impact' automated processes can have on 'highly vulnerable people'. Ms James also took nearly 10 months between April 2022 to September 2023 to pause the automated cancellations after it was raised by external legal advisers, with Mr Anderson questioning the 'apparent lack of urgency' over the 'significant issue'. As of March 21 this year, reductions and cancellations in income support payments have been paused pending ongoing legal and IT reviews. 'We do not consider a delay of over three years, coupled with an indefinite commitment to future action, is reasonable,' the report said. 'It does not satisfy the legislative requirement in the SPROM Act that the Secretary establish the DPF. 'In our view, if parliament imposes an obligation on an agency head without specifying a time frame (as was the case here), the agency head should aim for implementation as soon as reasonably practicable.' While the department has accepted all seven recommendations issued by Mr Anderson, the ombudsman issued an urgent warning to all government agencies, calling on them to ensure all 'automated decision-making is aligned with law and policy and is subject to ongoing testing and assurance'. 'Implementation of the recommendations is an important step towards restoring the confidence of the public, parliament and above all the people affected, that automated decisions are being made responsibly and according to law,' he said. Antipoverty Centres spokesperson Kristin O'Connell urged more action, including the permanent removal of the TCF. 'It is not enough for the government to implement the Ombudsman's recommendations and move on,' she said. 'The release of this damning report is a significant moment for every person who has been subjected to compulsory activities while on a Centrelink payment and for those who have spoken up about the abuse they experienced. 'For the first time, welfare recipients may feel their experiences are being taken seriously and their lives being treated as valuable by someone in a position of power.' Greens' social services spokeswoman Penny Allman-Payne said the report should be a 'wake up call for change'. 'Despite clear warnings that the TCF is cruel and unlawful, Labor has continued to allow suspensions of payments to be used as a weapon against welfare recipients, to the benefit of so-called employment service providers who profit from poverty,' she said. 'It is clear that the TCF is an expensive hangover from a conservative government which has been heartlessly prolonged by this Labor government for far too long.' During Senate estimates in February, Ms James apologised and took full responsibility for the IT outages which resulted in the cancellations. 'I absolutely and unreservedly apologise on behalf of the department that we cannot have full confidence in this system delivering what it's intended to deliver,' she said. 'It's not acceptable, and it is my responsibility and not the minister's (Murray Watt), in this respect, although he may wish to add his own commentary but I will say that I am responsible, legislatively and administratively, for overseeing this process.' At the time her comments resulted in welfare advocates calling for a half to the TCF framework, with Australian Council of Social Service chief executive Cassandra Goldie lashing the system as 'overly punitive and in need of a complete overhaul'.
The Australian
3 hours ago
- The Australian
Pauline Hanson's wild claim on why she rejects Welcome to Country ceremonies
One Nation senator Pauline Hanson believes teaching children to acknowledge country in school will condition people not to feel like they are part of Australia, and leave the nation defenceless in the face of war. Speaking on 10 News+, Senator Hanson said she wouldn't defend the country if she felt like the land belonged to one race of people. The One Nation leader defended her decision to reject Welcome to Country ceremonies in the Senate when she was questioned why her party's senators were present during ceremonies when they did not have to be there. One Nation senators were called out by their Labor and Greens counterparts over 'childish stunts' and 'hurtful' behaviour when they turned their backs during proceedings. Senator Hanson said they had a right to be there and the new senators wanted to experience the opening of the Senate. 'But it's also to be a voice for the Australian people that have had a gut full of it and don't want to hear Welcome to Country anymore,' she said. 'It is showing leadership, that you don't have to go along with this. 'When our kids have been taught in school to put their hand on the ground and say, you know, acknowledge the land is Aboriginal, we're not making people feel part of this country. 'And I'll ask the question, if we ever have war that touches our shores here and we've conditioned the people think this is not our land, it belongs to another race of people, how many Australians are going to get up and fight to defend it? 'I won't.' The Queensland senator hopes her legacy will be that people thought she did her best to stand up for a fair go for all Australians, without fear or favour, and promised to run again in three years time. 'I think that's important, people want that from their politicians,' she said. 'But I'm a conviction politician and I've had so much thrown at me – I've have been to prison, had everything bar the kitchen sink thrown at me. 'Guess what, I'm still standing, the problem is people have underestimated me.' NewsWire An influential body has urged against over-regulating the new technology that could boost the economy by $116bn over the next decade. NewsWire Aussie travellers are being warned rabies infections are on the rise in Bali with popular tourist spots identified as red zones.
The Australian
3 hours ago
- The Australian
Chalmers' economic reform summit downgraded to red tape focus
Jim Chalmers has put a lot of effort into an economic reform roundtable that his government is now talking down as an ideas vehicle to cut red tape and drive housing productivity. Both the Treasurer and Anthony Albanese are lowering expectations to a point where major tax reform and proposals to rein in structural spending will be thrown in the 'too hard' basket. Chalmers can't be faulted for his energetic approach to the Prime Minister's productivity roundtable, which the Treasurer rebadged as an economic reform roundtable open to big tax, investment and growth policy ideas. By Friday, Chalmers would have met 75 chief executive and senior industry representatives. After meeting the Business Council of Australia this week, he would have met the BCA and ACTU twice since his June 18 National Press Club speech outlining Labor's priorities for 'economic reform in our second term'. From July 8 to August 15, Albanese government ministers will have held 41 ministerial roundtables that will feed in to Chalmers' three-day economic reform summit at Parliament House between August 19 and 21. There have been 900 submissions to Treasury ahead of the roundtable, which won't be publicly released. In addition to messaging the PM almost every day about the roundtable, Chalmers has also spoken with Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson for about 30 to 40 hours about ideas being floated to lift sluggish productivity. Despite Chalmers slaving away on what could have been a seminal moment for the second-term government's economic reform agenda, the roundtable is in danger of becoming a talkfest with generic promises of action. The 23 'core attendees', who include CBA chief executive Matt Comyn, former Treasury secretary Ken Henry, Tech Council of Australia chair Scott Farquhar, NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, ACTU secretary Sally McManus, BCA chief Bran Black and opposition Treasury spokesman Ted O'Brien, will be joined by 24 others invited to specific sessions. New invitees include ATO commissioner Rob Heferen, Tesla chair Robyn Denholm and Macquarie Group managing director Shemara Wikramanayake. At the end of three days of talks – which will not be subject to Chatham House rules, meaning participants can speak their minds – Chalmers is not expected to unveil a communique or secure broad agreement across a range of economic reform proposals. Instead, he will give the nation an update on the top issues and commit to going away and working on them. Major tax reform is expected to play second fiddle to a new primary focus: deregulation, cutting red tape, and sparking productivity in the housing sector. There is no doubt all levels of government need to axe red and green tape that is stifling productivity and stalling economic activity and investment. But that surely could be progressed without so much rigmarole. An alliance of up to 30 business and industry groups is calling for the government to match decisive action taken by British Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer and slash red tape by as much as 25 per cent by 2030. Without speeding up approvals, Labor's housing, renewables, emissions reduction and net zero targets will fall short. After one term of not moving aggressively enough, Chalmers must bring governments with him and rid the country of red tape and slow bureaucratic processes.
