Mistral AI CEO says AI's biggest threat is people getting lazy
Mistral AI CEO Arthur Mensch says warnings about AI's impact on white-collar workers are overblown.
He says the biggest risk AI poses to humans is "deskilling."
Mensch said humans needed to remain actively involved in reviewing AI output to keep learning.
As tech leaders continue to debate the potential impact of artificial intelligence on the job market, one CEO says the technology's biggest risk may be "deskilling."
In an interview with The Times of London, Arthur Mensch, the CEO of the Paris-based firm Mistral AI, dismissed the idea that AI would lead to huge cuts to white-collar jobs, saying the bigger risk was that people may become progressively lazier as they increasingly rely on the tech to search for information.
Speaking to the outlet at the VivaTech conference in Paris earlier this month, Mensch, who cofounded the open-source large language model developer alongside Guillaume Lample and Timothée Lacroix in April 2023, said that a key way to avoid this would be to ensure humans remained actively involved in reviewing and critiquing AI output.
"It's a risk that you can avoid, if you think of it from a design perspective, if you make sure that you have the right human input, that you keep the human active," he said, adding that he believed it was important humans did not take AI output as the "truth."
"You want people to continue learning," he continued. "Being able to synthesize information and criticize information is a core component to learning."
Mensch, a former Google DeepMind researcher, also responded to recent warnings that AI poses a threat to white-collar jobs, including from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who recently said that AI could replace half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years.
"I think it's very much of an overstatement," Mensch said, adding that he believed Amodei liked to "spread fear" about AI as a marketing tactic.
Instead, Mensch said he thought AI would change white-collar jobs. "I do expect that we'll have more relational tasks because that's not something you can easily replace," he said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dollar Confidence Is Waning, Bitwise CIO Warns—Is Bitcoin The New Safe Bet?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Confidence in the dollar and the fiat system, in general, is breaking down, and central banks are turning to gold while individuals are turning to Bitcoin, according to Bitwise investment chief Matt Hougan. Hougan said in a June 17 note that 54 years after the U.S. left the gold standard, the world is waking up to the reality that the fiat system may not make sense. 'Maybe printing money out of thin air, as we started to do in 1971, is actually a wild idea,' he said. "Maybe sound money requires limits. Put differently, people are starting to look around and ask: What the hell is fiat?' Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Hougan cites a recent Financial Times report, which said that gold was once again becoming the anchor of the global economy as people questioned the core assumptions of the present system. Central banks have been rapidly accumulating gold in recent years, with spikes following the 2008 financial crisis and Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Amid this buying spree last year, gold surpassed the euro as the second most widely held reserve asset by central banks, behind only the dollar. Hougan said the flight back to gold came as governments started abusing fiat and accelerated after they began seizing it. He said the desire by central bankers to hedge their bets has only grown with the increasing temptation for the U.S. to devalue its way out of its ballooning $37 trillion debt. He notes that they are turning to gold because it is scarce, global, resistant to manipulation and non-sovereign. These characteristics, he points out, also apply to Bitcoin, which he says has become the alternative for individual investors. He cites the large capital inflows into Bitcoin exchange-traded funds since they started trading in January 2024 compared to gold. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. Bitcoin ETFs have attracted $45 billion in net inflows. By comparison, gold ETFs have attracted only $34 billion. 'I see these as two sides of the same trade,' he said, comparing the flight of central banks to gold and the individuals to Bitcoin. Hougan said the main reason central banks still preferred gold boiled down to market size. At $2 trillion, Hougan said the Bitcoin market did not yet have the liquidity to support the entry and exit of central bankers at scale. But he said this might be changing as government demand grows. To be sure, several countries have started considering Bitcoin reserves following President Donald Trump's move in March to establish a U.S. reserve from seized assets. According to Hougan, whether it is gold or Bitcoin, the message is clear: investors are rethinking their portfolios to hedge against fiat risks. 'For the last forty years, we've been taught to diversify our portfolios by combining stocks and bonds,' he said. 'But no matter how you calibrate that—60% stocks and 40% bonds, or 70/30, whatever—you are still 100% exposed to fiat currency. People are realizing that those are rather risky waters to be swimming in.' Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Image: Shutterstock This article Dollar Confidence Is Waning, Bitwise CIO Warns—Is Bitcoin The New Safe Bet? originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EXCLUSIVE: Prada CEO Gianfranco D'Attis to Exit the Brand
MILAN — Changes are afoot at Prada. WWD has learned that chief executive officer Gianfranco D'Attis is exiting the Italian luxury brand. More from WWD Coco Gauff Competes in Berlin Wearing Miu Miu x New Balance Kit and Co-branded Sneakers Prada Introduces Juicy 'Banana Yellow' Lip Balm Inspired by Archive Fruit Motif Priyanka Chopra Jonas Keeps It Classic on 'Jimmy Fallon' With Shiny Black Pumps Milan-based sources said disagreements over strategy caused D'Attis' relations with Prada's owners and with the top brass to become strained. D'Attis was not present at the men's spring 2026 show on Sunday in Milan, and, asked to comment, Prada confirmed the group is parting ways with the executive 'by mutual agreement,' effective June 30. Prada Group CEO Andrea Guerra will succeed him on an interim basis. D'Attis joined Prada in January 2022, reporting to Guerra. He arrived as the group — which also comprises Miu Miu, Church's and Car Shoe — was going through a managerial reorganization. He was the first executive outside of the family to hold the CEO role of Prada. Chairman Patrizio Bertelli and Miuccia Prada were previously co-CEOs of the group and of the signature brand. D'Attis was previously president of Christian Dior Couture Americas. Earlier, he was international managing director of Jaeger-LeCoultre. In an interview with WWD last year, D'Attis, who brought his experience in retail and knowledge of the American market to Prada, said that among the priorities for the brand was a focus on China and the U.S. He aimed to integrate new categories, home and jewelry made with recycled gold in the brand's flagships, and to attract new and younger consumers. He is said to have changed the merchandising and retail structure. Prada Group sales in the first quarter of the year were up 13 percent to 1.34 billion euros, mainly propelled by Miu Miu. The Prada brand's retail sales were relatively flat at 827 million euros compared with 826 million euros last year, while Miu Miu revenues climbed 60 percent at constant exchange rates to 377 million euros, growing across categories and regions. After months of speculation, Prada Group in April confirmed it was acquiring 100 percent of Versace from Capri Holdings for 1.25 billion euros. Best of WWD EXCLUSIVE: Maje Names Charlotte Tasset Ferrec CEO Nadja Swarovski Exits Family Company Amid Ongoing Corporate Shakeup Aeffe MD Exits Fashion Group
Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
What The June 28 European Accessibility Act Deadline Means For Brands
This photograph taken on March 19, 2025 shows European flags outside the EU headquarters in ... More Brussels. (Photo by Nicolas TUCAT / AFP) (Photo by NICOLAS TUCAT/AFP via Getty Images) In less than a week from now, on June 28, 2025, the requirements of the European Accessibility Act come into force. The intention behind the EAA is to provide fair and equitable access to digital products to the more than 100 million consumers with disabilities living across the European Union. One of the key things to keep in mind about the EEA is that it doesn't just affect European companies. It applies to any organization from around the world selling into the EU market. It goes beyond standard web accessibility and e-commerce, incorporating areas such as computers and operating systems, smartphones, digital TV services, ATMS, ticketing machines and other digital kiosks within its remit. The legislation requires companies to do more than simply make digital products and content accessible. Instead, it seeks to embed accessibility commitments and best practices at a more fundamental organizational level through requirements like official accessibility statements and providing specialized training to staff. Non-compliance with the EAA can lead to fines and ultimately the termination of EU market access. The proximity of the deadline may for some be a cause for panic but cutting through the noise, here are what some digital accessibility specialists are urging organizations to keep in mind with less than a week to go: It's still not too late to get started 'It's not too late to start addressing accessibility. Starting now is better than not doing anything about EAA compliance,' says Jon Avila, Chief Accessibility Officer at Level Access, one of the leading providers of digital accessibility services in the United States. Avila continues, 'For organizations just getting started, the most important steps to take now to mitigate risk are demonstrating that you're taking action to make sustained progress, and beginning to put processes in place aligned with EAA requirements. One of the biggest gaps we observe is third-party content. Companies often assume that embedded tools or plugins are outside their responsibility, but under the EAA, they're very much in scope. We recommend that organizations make accessibility a requirement during the procurement process and request documented proof of accessibility (e.g., a completed VPAT report) from vendors prior to making a purchase.' Eric Portis, a Developer Evangelist at Cloudinary, a software company that helps organizations manage their visual content online, also agrees that it's still not too late to get started with EAA compliance. 'The best time to consider the accessibility of a project was before you shipped it, but the second-best time is today. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines are just a big checklist. And while checking every item off the list before June is not a realistic goal for many teams, everyone can start tackling an item or two and begin building momentum towards full compliance. All progress is good progress,' Portis says. The AI landscape has changed Back in 2020, when AI website accessibility overlay widgets hit the market, they were met with a degree of skepticism. That's because the marketing claims were bold – buy a software subscription and let AI do its magic in both spotting and fixing accessibility fails, saving you time and money. It quickly became widely accepted that the technology was, in fact, nowhere near ready to entirely replace human oversight for accessibility remediation. Fast forward five years, and the same remains true but the technology has undoubtedly gotten a lot better meaning that, though AI won't solve all digital accessibility issues, it can now do a lot more of the heavy lifting which genuinely allows teams to focus more precisely on the more nuanced human elements related to user experience. What this ultimately means for the market was recently brought into sharp relief in a report authored by AAAnow, leading digital compliance benchmarking specialists based in London. AAAnow's report looked at the websites of organizations comprising The Valuable 500, a collective of some of the most profitable companies on the planet with long-standing pledges to accessibility and inclusion, including the likes of Apple, Google and BP. According to the V500 scorecard, the average member organization manages around 178 websites, each comprising around 211 pages. To remediate accessibility on the average of 85% of pages where it is required would take 3,480 workdays, or 13 full-time staff working for a year (per org). In terms of cost, this equates to $767,000 per company just for initial compliance, let alone maintenance. Scaled across the full Valuable 500, that's over $380 million and 9 years of full-time work at current capacity. 'We argue that only a risk-managed, AI-powered approach can address the scale, cost, and operational complexity. It's not a 'nice-to-have' - it's fundamental,' commented AAAnow CEO Lawrence Shaw in an earlier interview. Regulation is not something to fear Instinctively, when any type of new regulation comes into force, particularly one that potentially involves fines and other punitive measures, fear and trepidation tend to be the most common reactions off the bat. Yet, it can be argued that brands should welcome the new regulations from the EU as they provide clarity and a roadmap into areas of technical compliance that have previously been murky. In a recent company press release, Amit Borsok, CEO of Italy-based Accessiway, which takes an end-to-end approach to accessibility remediation involving both automation and human testers, said, 'European regulations have shifted the narrative around accessibility from a compliance issue to a strategic investment. Until now, regulatory fragmentation across member states has prevented companies from fully capitalizing on this potential, increasing compliance costs and limiting competitiveness. 'Now, instead of being a hurdle, the new framework provides clarity that encourages companies to invest in accessible technologies and services to expand their market reach. For many organizations, accessibility has evolved from a nice-to-have to a competitive necessity. With regulation now offering predictability and standardization, uncertainty is reduced for investors, and new opportunities for innovation are unlocked.' Though the word deadline usually implies finality, whether, as an organization, you are right at the start of your digital accessibility journey and anxiously playing catch-up, or significantly further down the line, June 28 will surely be the opening of a new chapter for all involved. The story about to unfold will be one of whether human intention layered onto ever more advanced technology can ultimately help make access to the digital realm an equitable experience for everyone.
