Interiors: Good design is as much about what you leave out as what you put in
home
redesign
, it's easy to focus on what to add: a bigger kitchen island, an L-shaped sofa, a walk-in wardrobe. But often, what makes the biggest difference is what you leave out. Circulation space, the clear floor area that lets people move naturally and comfortably, is one of the most essential ingredients of a well-designed home, yet it's often overlooked. Here are some key areas where space is commonly forgotten and how to give each area the breathing room it needs to work well.
Open-plan living
When planned well, an open-plan space becomes the heart of the home – a place where cooking, dining and everyday life work in perfect harmony. But one of the most common pitfalls is trying to squeeze too much in, which quickly makes the space feel cramped and awkward to use.
The key is to be realistic about what the room can comfortably accommodate, while preserving enough clear floor area to move easily from one zone to the next. Not every open-plan room has enough room for a full kitchen, dining and living area. If space is tight, it's often wiser to prioritise a generous kitchen and dining zone and, if possible, include a single armchair or a quiet reading corner. It's far better to get two zones right than force in a third and lose the open, airy feel that makes this layout so appealing in the first place.
Around a dining table, allow at least 800mm to 1m between the table edge and any walls or furniture behind it. This means people can sit down and stand up comfortably, and there's still room to pass by without asking everyone to shuffle in.
READ MORE
When positioning your sofa in the living area, think about how far back you sit from the TV – a good guide is to sit about one and a half to two and a half times the diagonal size of your screen away from it. For a 50-inch TV, that's roughly 2m to 3m – close enough to enjoy it without feeling overwhelmed.
Kitchens
The kitchen is one of the busiest spaces in any home, so having enough room to move around comfortably makes all the difference to how practical and enjoyable it is to use.
In a galley kitchen or any narrow layout, allow at least 900mm for the main walkway. This is just enough for one person to pass through without feeling hemmed in. Where possible, aim for more. If you're including an island, it's best to leave about 1.1m to 1.2m between the island and surrounding counters or appliances. This extra bit of space means two people can work side by side or pass behind someone at the hob or sink without bumping elbows.
If you plan to have stools at your island, leave at least a metre of clear space behind them so there's plenty of room to sit comfortably and for others to pass by without disruption.
[
Seek the pattern: how to infuse your outdoor space with summer staycation style
Opens in new window
]
At all costs, try to avoid layouts where the kitchen doubles as a main circulation route – for example, if people need to walk through it to reach the garden or another part of the house. This can make meal prep and busy family times feel chaotic and frustrating, with constant interruptions just when you need space to work.
Utility rooms
Utility rooms are another space where people underestimate the importance of clear floor area. As a guide, aim for a minimum width of about 1.6m. This allows for a standard counter or appliance depth of 600mm, plus at least a metre of standing space in front. Always leave at least a metre of unobstructed floor space in front of appliances so you can bend down with a laundry basket without banging elbows on walls or doors.
Bedrooms
Bedrooms can quickly feel cramped if circulation space isn't properly planned. Start by ensuring there's enough room to move comfortably around the bed. Allow at least 500mm to 600mm on each side of the bed for bedside tables and easy access. At the foot of the bed, aim for at least 800mm so you can walk by without needing to shuffle sideways.
[
Renovations: An interior designer's advice on how to make them easier
Opens in new window
]
If you have wardrobes opposite the bed, leave 800mm to 900mm between the wardrobe doors and the bed edge so you can open them fully and step back while choosing what to wear. An ideal size for a double bedroom with built-in wardrobes is around 3.8m by 2.8m.
Walk-in wardrobes
Walk-in wardrobes appear on nearly every wish list, but without enough space, they can feel more like a cramped corridor than a luxury. For a walk-in to work well, allow at least 1.6m in width if you have storage on one side only. For hanging space on both sides, you'll need closer to 2.2m for two rows of wardrobes and about a metre of clear walkway. Opting for open shelving without doors helps make the most of every millimetre.
Good design is as much about what you leave out as what you put in. Prioritising generous circulation space throughout every room ensures your home looks beautiful and feels calm and is a joy to live in.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘How are you holding up?': I don't know if I have the words to describe how I am
There is a question I have not been able to properly answer since my wife Tracy passed away last year in August. And it is the one asked most often. 'How are you holding up?' Most of the time, this is asked out of genuine concern. Family, friends, church members, hospital staff who have become a sort of family over the years. People who would actually be willing to take the time to listen to the answer, and would care what I have to say. [ Death and grief in the digital age Opens in new window ] Obviously not everyone falls into that category. There are some who do not really want an answer; they are simply asking as a sort of polite obligation, a social custom that must be observed before we can get down to more pressing matters. Something like a handshake. READ MORE But for the people who do care, and for those who have shown their love for me in a thousand ways over this past year, I often find myself wishing I could offer more than my usual response. 'I'm okay. Thanks for asking.' Tracy Keogh passed away last year in August So why do I not say more? Well, it is partly because I do not want to hear what people might say to me if I do. And I know that is probably unfair to those closest to me, but I was burned early on by 'advice' from individuals who had no experience with grief, yet somehow were experts in the field. Experts who traded mainly in clichés. 'It's going to take time.' Well, maybe. But that doesn't change how I'm feeling now. 'You need to get out of the house.' Okay, and then what? Go and do something without my best friend? Try to enjoy myself without her? Do you have any idea what you're saying? And another word of 'wisdom' I have heard more times than I can remember: 'Grief comes in waves'. But if they knew anything about grief, they'd know it doesn't just come in waves. It comes in tsunamis. Great, big catastrophic tsunamis that can wipe you out without warning. [ How I coped when grief became my new reality Opens in new window ] [ Seán Moncrieff: Funeral sandwiches are part of the Irish grieving process Opens in new window ] This was the kind of thing I was hearing in those early days, and it always made me feel like my sorrow was being casually invalidated. And so I shut down completely, isolated myself, hid away for fear I would hear some awful advice. And in fear of how I might respond, if I did. That's one reason I tend to keep my answers short now. Why I don't say how I really am. But mostly, it is because I don't know if I can. I don't know if I have the words to describe how I am. Certainly not in conversation, where I struggle to express myself even half-coherently at the best of times. When it comes to talking, some vital transmitters in my brain refuse to show up for work. Can I do it in writing? I don't know. Not in any way that will do more than scratch the surface. But maybe that's better than nothing. Tracy spent her last few weeks in Milford hospice, Limerick So, how am I holding up? I'm a little better than I was. Keeping busy helps – another of those dreadful clichés, though it turns out there is a grain of truth in it. And there are days when I feel I can see the faintest glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel. Though I say that cautiously, because I felt the same thing a few months ago, only to be knocked out all of a sudden by a sucker punch of grief that hit me almost as hard as the initial loss. As I said, it comes in tsunamis. But some days are okay. And then there are days when the weight of Tracy's absence is crushing. When I come home and she's not here. When I make dinner for one. When she's missing from family occasions. When friends invite me to do things and I realise I'll be going alone. And even when I'm driving and she's not there beside me, telling me what I'm doing wrong. On those days, I feel utterly lost. And sometimes horribly guilty that I'm going places and doing things without her, making plans that she can't be part of and betraying her, somehow, by continuing to live. This guilt can be unbearable, and it's been the most unexpected of all the turbulent emotions I've experienced. I still cry most days, often out of the blue. A word can set me off. A picture, a memory, a song she used to love. Carolina in My Mind by James Taylor maybe, a song she used to play when she felt homesick. I still put her picture at her end of the table when I eat. And when I'm finished I wipe her end of the table too, and ask her how in the name of God she managed to make such a mess. I still sometimes send myself texts from her phone, so that when I pick up my phone later, just for a second my heart will skip when I see her name. I don't wash her clothes any more, but I did for a while, like I used to do when she wasn't able for it. Just to feel like I was still taking care of her, like maybe when I finished putting the clothes away she'd be waiting in the living room for her cup of tea. [ Grief constantly takes on different shapes and forms. It is never quite what you expect Opens in new window ] But I do still feel the strong urge to take the exit for Milford hospice every day that I'm on the motorway in and out of Limerick , just to somehow feel close to her. It is where she spent her last few weeks, where we last had time together, last laughed together, had our last midnight snack, and where we had our last dance. It is where I last held her hand. It is also where we last talked. This is what I want to do more than anything. Just talk to her. Tell her the news. Hear what she has been up to and hear the latest scandal. Chat about the kids and the grandkids. Hear her laugh when I tell her something funny, or something stupid somebody said. Not being able to talk to her is the hardest thing of all. In truth, Tracy is the only one I want to talk to about everything that's happened since she died. About the funeral, about how much she was loved, about the oceans of tears that have been shed. About how empty life is without her and how pointless it feels now that she's not here. I could tell her how I really am. How I'm holding up. But in her absence, at least for now, I'll probably stick to my standard response. 'I'm okay. Thanks for asking.'
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Why does your heart feel so bad? It may be the midlife happiness slump
Lately I've been thinking a lot about the U-shaped happiness curve. You probably already know it – this theory posits a dip in happiness in midlife, one so universal that even primates are thought to experience it (though I have no idea how they measure that). According to the data, wellbeing peaks in our 20s and again in older age, but slumps somewhere in the middle – with 47 often cited as the most abject age. The slump can be more pronounced in men. For women, it's often accompanied by more emotional volatility and higher rates of anxiety and depression . There's lots of reasons put forward for declining happiness among women in their 40s, from increased responsibility, to unmet expectations to hormonal biology – oestrogen goes offline at about age 45, inducing an upheaval worse than puberty for some women. The graphs feel grim; they promise nothing good. But maybe, with unhappiness on the horizon, it's time to interrogate what happiness is, what it's for and ask whether choosing to be 'unhappy' might not be the worst thing. In The Promise of Happiness, the queer theorist Sara Ahmed claims that happiness is framed as a moral or social good, something we all should want and pursue. But who gets to define happiness? And how might those definitions serve power in a society where certain lives, choices or identities are often framed as unhappy, or as blocking the happiness of others? Happiness behaves like a promise, Ahmed writes. It's the reward that follows the 'right' life choices, like getting married, having children or building a successful career. But this happiness payout is endlessly deferred. People – women especially – can find themselves at the end of a road of all the right choices, wondering why they are (still) not happy. In fact, we might attribute much of the unhappiness of the U-shaped curve, not with goals unmet or roads not taken – not even with hormones that have fled the building – but with this gulf between what women are promised and what they actually get. READ MORE To be a happy woman, Ahmed argues, is to adapt yourself to a world that has already taken shape. We're told that if we live the right kind of life by the right social script, happiness can be ours. For women, these scripts arguably include acts such as abdicating your own desires, dedicating yourself to others, or even the impossible condition of 'having it all'. If you can do these things without feeling conflicted, you might just be happy. [ Health takes a back seat when working and raising young children. We just get on with it Opens in new window ] Other identities have scripts too – the good man, the male provider – but I wonder if this gulf isn't particularly keen for women, who may have more to lose by following the scripts society writes for us. Society still frames motherhood and marriage as essential tenets of the good life for women. And yet the reality of this path often includes not just compromises, but a bad deal – financially, emotionally, physically. According to the social script, single women in their 40s are lonely and sad. But the graphs tell a different story – childless, single women actually report the greatest life satisfaction, more than their married cohort. Could it be that happiness keeps us attached to things that are ultimately bad for us? It seems I'm not alone in asking these questions. Lately a whole range of stories, from Taffy Brodesser-Akner's hit TV Show Fleishman is in Trouble to Miranda July's novel All Fours explore women and middle-aged malaise. Miranda July: her All Fours has been hailed as the perimenopausal bildungsroman. To me, it felt like a distillation of every conversation we'd ever had over lukewarm prosecco. Photograph: Elizabeth Weinberg/The New York Times In July's All Fours, the protagonist (who reads like a version of July herself – a 40-something artist with a public profile, a loving partner and a young child) plans a solo vacation to New York with money she's earned from an ad campaign. Instead, she turns off the highway into a small town 30 minutes from her house, rents a room in a motel and begins a kind of affair. On finishing the novel I was straight on to my book club (like middle-class perimenopausal women the developed world over, I'd imagine). All Fours has been hailed as the perimenopausal bildungsroman. To me, it felt like a distillation of every conversation we'd ever had over lukewarm prosecco. All Fours is, at heart, a novel about the U-shaped happiness curve. It contemplates what happens to women in their mid-40s – when oestrogen falls off a cliff, when society suggests they're worth less and when life choices made solidify into what they now must live with. But it's not all gloom. July offers the possibility of midlife unhappiness as a space for personal growth and change – but only if we're brave enough to reject what's supposed to make us happy. Throughout, the character builds a getaway, outfitting a motel room in sumptuous fabrics and in a truly revolutionary scene (why?) has a rapturous sexual experience with a woman old enough to be her mother. These explorations aren't framed as a crisis or a woman throwing away all she has built to chase a thrill, but as a U-turn into new territory. [ Róisín Ingle: Middle aged? Embrace it, there's plenty to enjoy and appreciate about it Opens in new window ] 'You had to withstand a profound sense of wrongness if you ever wanted to get somewhere new,' July writes. As I approach the supposed happiness dip, I want to ask what unhappiness can do. What if women embraced 'unhappiness', not as a personal failing or even a fact of our biology, but as a chance to live more authentically – to reject the roads that promise women so much but sometimes (often) fail to deliver? What if we rewrote the script? Bring it on. Do you think mid-40s is tricky time for women? What can be done to help? Tell us your thoughts using the form below
Irish Times
6 days ago
- Irish Times
‘My fiancee's family want a full religious ceremony – I come from a long line of lapsed Catholics and am an atheist'
Question Our issue is a fundamental difference on spirituality, and I never thought that this would be an issue for me, but it turns out that it is. I met my partner two years ago and fell headlong in love and we are now planning to get married, but it has brought up a lot of unexpected issues. She is generous, kind, thoughtful and funny – essentially everything I ever looked for in another person (not to mention beautiful), but since deciding that we are going to spend our lives together, we've hit roadblocks. She comes from a very strong Christian tradition, and she believes fully in it, while I come from a long line of lapsed Catholics and am an atheist. I like her moral compass and the philosophy with which she views the world and her purpose in it, but I cannot believe in what she believes. The crux has come in the form of the wedding and the discussion of raising children (which we both want). Her family, not necessarily her, want a full religious ceremony and the idea of a non-religious ritual is a big issue for them. My family are more flexible and would be happy with whatever we decide. The divide on schooling and children is now like a chasm and we have stopped having any real conversation about it as we try to negotiate the wedding. I find I am confused and more than a bit worried about the prominent role her religious beliefs play in her life, and on the effect all of this will have on me and my future children. READ MORE Answer The basis for a good relationship between you and your partner is there, but spirituality is a core aspect of our lives and therefore it is a serious issue for your future. There is a need for both of you to fully understand each other's position and for this to really work, you may need to seek help from those who have knowledge of both your outlooks. Perhaps there is a representative of her Christian tradition who might be willing to help you tease out the issues, and likewise, you may have access to books, courses or philosophies that might help you express your position more succinctly. However, it seems that trying to please families is a bit of a block in that you feel pressured to make decisions about your wedding that one of you might find to be problematic, so perhaps it is best to start here. Your wedding is where you commit to each other in front of your communities and this commitment is something you both want to stand over for the rest of your lives. What can you both commit to that is authentic and powerful and how can you shape a ceremony that is inclusive of both your positions? If you can agree on this, then your families can support you in living out your commitments and you can engage with a celebrant to assist you with this. What seems clear at the moment is that your conversations about the meaning of life have been stifled by expectations and this is creating anxiety and fear in you. That both of you are interested in spirituality and meaning should be a source of interesting conversations and investigations for many years to come, but the current pressure is turning this exciting prospect into a potential rift or break. You say that what you admire in your future partner is fundamental and deep, and this may be how her values are expressed in behaviour and action. If you admire these things, then they are also values that are important to you, so there is a basis for supporting each other in your approaches to life and death. Being able to tolerate difference is an essential component in a lifelong relationship; and openness and curiosity are the characteristics that support wisdom. Your families will take their lead from you and if you propose inclusivity and tolerance at the core of your life together, and if the ceremony can reflect that, then your path will be set to reflect your values. As for the question of children and what faith or philosophy you would like to raise them, there may not be enough time or calmness to come to a definitive answer before the wedding, so you might agree that this will be given all the time it needs to be fully explored over the next year or so. As this may be a topic that parents want to get involved in, you and your partner may need to have a joint statement so that it holds firm while the pressures of the wedding are being felt. As a couple, you will both have a huge influence on each other: use it for growing what is already great about the relationship and know that you have your life to reach its potential. To send your question to Trish Murphy, fill in the form below, click here or email tellmeaboutit@ .form-group {width:100% !important;}
