logo
North Carolina judge challenging outcome of race wore Confederate uniform in college photo

North Carolina judge challenging outcome of race wore Confederate uniform in college photo

Independent28-03-2025
A judge challenging the outcome of his North Carolina Supreme Court race was photographed wearing Confederate military garb and posing before a Confederate battle flag when he was a member of a college fraternity that glorified the pre-Civil War South.
The emergence of the photographs comes at a delicate time for Jefferson Griffin, a Republican appellate judge who is seeking a spot on North Carolina's highest court. Griffin, 44, is facing mounting criticism – including from some Republicans – as he seeks to invalidate over 60,000 votes cast in last November's election, a still undecided contest in which he is trailing the Democratic incumbent by over 700 votes.
The photographs, which were obtained by The Associated Press, are from when Griffin was a student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill from 1999-2003 and a member of the Kappa Alpha Order, one of the oldest and largest fraternities in the U.S., with tens of thousands of alumni.
Griffin said he regretted donning the Confederate uniform, which was customary during the fraternity's annual 'Old South' ball.
'I attended a college fraternity event that, in hindsight, was inappropriate and does not reflect the person I am today,' Griffin said in a statement. 'At that time, like many college students, I did not fully grasp such participation's broader historical and social implications. Since then, I have grown, learned, and dedicated myself to values that promote unity, inclusivity, and respect for all people.'
One of the pictures, taken during the 2001 ball, shows Griffin and roughly two-dozen other fraternity members clad in Confederate uniforms. Another photograph from the spring of 2000 shows Griffin and other Kappa Alpha brothers in front of a large Confederate flag. He served in 2002 as his chapter's president.
Controversial fraternity
Kappa Alpha has proven to be a lightning rod for controversy over the decades, often due to the racist or insensitive actions of some of its members. A number of politicians have been forced to apologize for having worn Confederate costumes at the fraternity's functions or for being photographed in front of a Confederate flag.
Jesse Lyons, a spokesman for the fraternity's national office in Lexington, Virginia, said use of the rebel battle flag was prohibited in 2001 and displaying other Confederate symbols had been discouraged years before. The fraternity banned the wearing of the Confederate uniforms in 2010. It's unclear if the chapter at UNC banned the uniforms before the national organization did.
'We believe in cultural humility, we respect the best parts of our organization's history, and through education we challenge our members to work for a better future. These things are not mutually exclusive,' Lyons said.
The fraternity claims Robert E. Lee as its 'spiritual founder' and long championed the Southern 'Lost Cause," a revisionist view of history that romanticizes the Confederacy and portrays the Civil War as a valiant struggle for 'states' rights' unrelated to the enslavement of Black people. In decades past, some Kappa Alpha chapters referred to themselves as a 'klan,' a term that many viewed as an unsubtle wink to the Ku Klux Klan.
The photographs featuring Griffin were taken at a time when many other Kappa Alpha chapters were reevaluating their celebration of the Confederacy.
During Griffin's time in the fraternity, some in his chapter questioned the appropriateness of dressing up in Confederate uniforms for the ball. Griffin opposed abandoning the tradition, according to a person familiar with the situation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal. The uniforms stayed.
Griffin said he would 'not respond to unsubstantiated comments based on memories of 20-plus years past.'
In high school Griffin also expressed an affinity for Robert E. Lee, the Confederate general who led southern forces during the Civil War. In a 1998 feature on high school 'scholars of the week' in the Raleigh News & Observer newspaper, Griffin said Lee was his No. 1 choice to include on an 'ideal guest list' for a party.
Clinging to traditions
The Kappa Alpha Order was founded in 1865, not long after Lee surrendered to the Union Army, at a Virginia college where Lee served as president. At least one of the first members was a former rebel soldier who had served under Lee, who is revered by the fraternity as the ideal of gentlemanly Southern chivalry.
For more than a century, Kappa Alpha threw 'Old South' parties. They were formal affairs where the Confederate battle flag was flown and fraternity brothers dressed in replica Confederate gray uniforms and their dates wore antebellum-style hoop skirts. Sometimes they would ride through campus on horseback.
Some Kappa Alpha chapters, particularly in the South, clung to their traditions, including the wearing of blackface, even as they drew protests and public sentiment shifted.
A Kappa Alpha 'Old South' parade at Alabama's Auburn University in 1992 drew supporters waving Confederate battle flags, as well as counter protesters who burned them. In 1995, a group of Kappa Alpha members at the University of Memphis hurled racial slurs while beating a Black student who caused a disturbance outside a frat party, the Memphis Commercial Appeal reported at the time.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was no exception to the turmoil. Under pressure from student group's, the school's Kappa Alpha chapter in 1985 canceled its annual 'Sharecropper's Ball," which some attended in blackface. Fraternity members said blackface was worn because the event needed both Black and white attendees, but promised to discontinue the practice, according to a news story in the Daily Tar Heel student newspaper.
The Kappa Alpha chapter at North Carolina's Wake Forest University stopped allowing members to wear Confederate uniform and display the Confederate flag in 1987.
But other chapters held on longer. The national headquarters finally forbade confederate uniforms in 2010 after a wave of public blowback after Kappa Alpha members at the University of Alabama wore them during a parade that paused in front of the home of a black sorority.
Public officials face criticism over ties to fraternity
Griffin is not the first public official to draw unwanted attention for their college-age embrace of symbols drawn from the darker chapters of the South's past.
Virginia's then-governor, Democrat Ralph Northam, came under intense criticism in 2019 over a racist photo that appeared on his yearbook page of his medical school. The incident led reporters to scour the college histories of other Southern leaders, forcing a number of politicians to publicly address their time as Kappa Alpha brothers.
Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves, then the state's Republican lieutenant governor, dodged questions in 2019 about photos showing him wearing a Confederate uniform while he was a Kappa Alpha member at Millsaps College in the early 1990s. While Reeves was enrolled there in October 1994, other members of the fraternity were disciplined for wearing afro wigs and Confederate battle flags and shouting racial slurs at black students, the AP reported at the time.
Republican South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster declined to comment after yearbooks listed him as the leader of the fraternity's chapter at the University of South Carolina in 1969, along with photos of members wearing Confederate uniforms and posing with a rebel flag.
And Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, also a Republican, expressed regret for participating in 'Old South' parties as a student at Auburn University in the 1970s.
—-
Contact AP's global investigative team at Investigative@ap.org or https://www.ap.org/tips/
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US vice president JD Vance set to arrive in Scotland during family holiday
US vice president JD Vance set to arrive in Scotland during family holiday

STV News

time17 minutes ago

  • STV News

US vice president JD Vance set to arrive in Scotland during family holiday

US vice president JD Vance is set to arrive in Scotland while on holiday in the UK with his family. Vance's appearance follows President Donald Trump's five-day trip last month, during which he hosted Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at his golf resorts at Turnberry in South Ayrshire and Menie in Aberdeenshire. Vance is holidaying in the Cotswolds but travelled to the foreign secretary's Chevening House retreat in Kent on Friday. The Republican joined David Lammy carp fishing at the countryside estate. Police Scotland confirmed it was planning for a potential visit by the vice president. STV News understands Vance is set to arrive at Prestwick Airport on Wednesday following a visit with US military personnel at a base in Gloucestershire. Airspace restrictions have been put in place at the Carnell Estate in South Ayrshire between August 12 and 17, according to air traffic service provider NATS. Vance and his family are not believed to be staying at Trump's Turnberry resort. A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'Details of any visit would be for the White House to comment on, however, it is important that we prepare in advance for what would be a significant policing operation.' In Kent, Vance said he had a 'love' for the UK but joked he had committed a diplomatic faux pas as he began his holiday. 'Unfortunately, the one strain on the special relationship is that all of my kids caught fish, but the foreign secretary did not,' he said. He described Lammy as a 'very, very gracious host'. Trump's visit to Scotland ended less than two weeks ago, after he met with both Sir Keir and First Minister John Swinney. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Some Democrats want to use gerrymandering. That's a bad idea
Some Democrats want to use gerrymandering. That's a bad idea

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Some Democrats want to use gerrymandering. That's a bad idea

When Texas Republicans unveiled yet another contorted congressional map last week – one that would all but erase Austin's Latino-led seat and increase the Republican party's federal House tally by up to five seats in total – the outcry from Democrats was immediate and justified. But beyond the Democratic state legislators' brave effort to stymie the proposal by boycotting the vote, a different refrain has also been heard by leading Democrats in other states: if they do it, why can't we? Governor Gavin Newsom of California has vowed to 'fight fire with fire', advancing a proposal that would redraw California's own congressional map to offset Republican gains in Texas. New York's Kathy Hochul has also embraced the prospect of aggressive gerrymandering in Democratic-controlled states, sidestepping the independent commissions that Democrats themselves had once championed and successfully implemented in both California and New York. It is an understandable impulse, but it is the wrong one – for both strategic and principled reasons. To begin with, Democrats are destined to lose a gerrymandering arms race. They control fewer state legislatures and the very nature of electoral map engineering currently favors Republican power-grabbing, since most Democratic voters live in densely populated urban areas, which makes it easier to concentrate them in fewer electoral districts. A simulation conducted through 538's Atlas of Redistricting in which every state is aggressively gerrymandered to maximize the House seats of the party in power at the state level results in a notional House of 262 Republicans and 173 Democrats: a 30-plus seat jump for the Republican party compared with a non-partisan map that maximizes for district compactness. Nor is this a far-fetched scenario. Rather than forcing the other side to back down, retaliation appears more likely to lead to further escalation, in this as in other domains of all-out binary conflict. When running for governor of Illinois in 2018, JB Pritzker had initially pledged to back an independent districting commission but subsequently signed one of the most brutal Democratic gerrymandering plans in the country, which has yielded just three Republican districts out of 17 in a state where Donald Trump won 43% of the votes in 2024. That precedent is now being pointed to by Texas Republicans to justify their own gerrymandering plan. But there is also a deeper reason why 'fighting fire with fire' is a bad idea when the goal is to protect democracy from purported challenges to it: the 'fire' in question amounts to a violation of one of democracy's core values – ultimately, the principle of voting equality – and would therefore end up doing the work of democracy's enemies for them. The metaphor of 'fighting fire with fire' can in fact be traced back to the thought of the German émigré scholar to the United States, Karl Loewenstein, who in the 1930s recommended the use of self-consciously 'anti-democratic means' – such as party bans and restrictions of voting rights – to fight fascism, in the name of what he called 'militant democracy'. Far from achieving their intended goal, such measures were instrumental in the consolidation of the Nazi regime in Germany, given that Adolf Hitler was first nominated chancellor through an emergency presidential decree intended to forestall the prospect of a socialist takeover (construed as a greater threat for German democracy than nazism itself), and that the ban on other political parties Hitler quickly imposed was justified on the grounds that it was necessary to protect the German constitutional order in the aftermath of the Reichstag fire of 1934. Similarly perverse uses of the logic of 'militant democracy' have since become a standard component of the authoritarian playbook – from Augusto Pinochet's 1973 coup in Chile to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's 2016 counter-coup in Turkey, both of which undid democracy in their countries under the guise of protecting it against purported enemies. A fully gerrymandered congressional map in the United States would thus not just be bad for Democrats. It would also be terrible for American democracy since it would effectively disenfranchise local minorities across the country, yielding an overall competition between two mirroring forms of authoritarianism: Democratic or Republican one-party rule at the local level. If Democrats want to continue to portray themselves as the party of democracy against the Trump administration's thinly veiled authoritarian ambitions, they should begin by practicing on own their turf the same principles of democratic civility and self-restraint they accuse their opponents of violating. Crucially, this doesn't mean 'doing nothing' in the face of Republican gerrymandering. The point is rather that (big and small 'D') Democrats should use democratic rather than authoritarian means to protect democracy against its enemies – which is to say, win elections by advancing more attractive policy platforms and mobilizing voters more effectively in support of them, rather than by changing the rules to their own benefit. That the Trump administration's substantive policy decisions – from its inflationary trade wars to the fiscally regressive One Big Beautiful Bill Act – seem destined to do most harm its own electoral constituencies offers plenty of opportunity for fair-and-square political comeback. Ultimately, however, the Democrats' chances of success in upcoming electoral cycles will depend on their capacity to present a more attractive political alternative to the current Republican party's brand of populist authoritarianism. Instead of mirroring their opponents, Democrats should therefore seek to differentiate themselves from them, which at present can only mean: strict adherence to democratic norms and forthright advocacy of a more progressive policy platform. When a house is on fire, more fire won't help. What is needed is water – which is to say, something different, that is at the same time an antidote against fire's damaging effects. Carlo Invernizzi-Accetti is an associate professor of political science at the City University of New York, City College

Grizzly bears, 32k troops & one reclusive emperor… inside isolated ‘last resort' base where Trump will host Putin
Grizzly bears, 32k troops & one reclusive emperor… inside isolated ‘last resort' base where Trump will host Putin

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Grizzly bears, 32k troops & one reclusive emperor… inside isolated ‘last resort' base where Trump will host Putin

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) AN ISOLATED ice military base has been named as the setting for one of the most important superpower summits of our times. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will sit down "one-on-one" at the Elmendorf-Richardson base in Alaska on Friday - the Russian's chance to prove he wants peace. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 11 Elmendorf-Richardson base in Anchorage, Alaska, has been named as the setting for Trump's meeting with Putin Credit: DVIDS 11 Trump and Putin will fly touch down on the massive military runway on Friday Credit: DVIDS/USAF Airman First Class Mario Calabro 11 Trump and Putin will sit down for what the White House calls a 'listening exercise' Credit: Reuters 11 The base, near Anchorage, is bristling with troops from the US Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine Corps - as well as National Guardsmen and Reserves. In all, over 32,000 military personnel and their families live there - ten percent of the population of Anchorage, Alaska's largest city - alongside grizzly bears, moose and wolves. It played a "particularly important" role in defending the US against the Soviet Union during the cold war, according to the Library of Congress. The White House apparently wanted to avoid the sight of a Russian leader being welcomed into a US military setting - but concluded there was no other option. Elmendorf-Richardson is reportedly considered the only site in Alaska which could be locked down to the required level of security for the high-stakes meeting. Putin will fly the nine hours from Moscow and Trump the seven-and-a-half from Washington, with ample room on the runway for both their presidential aircrafts. This will not be the first crucial coming together of world leaders at Elmendorf-Richardson. In 1971, President Nixon held an historic 30-minute discussion with Emperor Hirohito of Japan. It marked the first occasion that a reigning Japanese monarch had "stepped foot on foreign soil," according to Nixon. Putin's visit is likely to last longer than Hirohito's, who was only in Alaska for 100 minutes, though proceedings are not expected to roll over into Saturday. First time a reigning Japanese Emperor had set foot on foreign soil Trump is reportedly planning to arrive and leave on Friday in order to emphasise the limited timescale. That could also be because there "nowhere to stay" at the base, according to a Republican speaking to The Times. Joe Biden also picked Anchorage to backdrop a meeting with the Chinese in 2021. But Trump will be hoping for a better result after that one turned sour - with the Chinese delegation accusing the Americans of 'condescension and hypocrisy'. 11 The same base hosted President Richard Nixon and Emperor Hirohito of Japan for an historic meeting in 1971 Credit: Getty 11 Alaska's largest base houses tens of thousands of troops and their families Credit: Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson 11 Member of the US Army, Air Force and Marine Corps live at Elmendorf-Richardson Credit: Alamy Alaska was selected as the general location for the meeting before officials knew exactly where it would happen. America's largest state is a strategic spot, lying at the intersection between North America and Russia. You can even see Russian territory from Alaskan soil - if you stand on the island of Little Diomede and look out to Big Diomede. And it's a very long way from Europe and its leaders - whom Putin would much rather forget about. It also means Russian power is making a return to the territory once owned by the Tsardom. Putin's distant predecessor, Tsar Alexander II, sold Alaska to America in 1867 for $7.2 million — or two cents per acre. Vladimir Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said: "It seems entirely logical for our delegation to simply fly across the Bering Strait, and for such an important and anticipated summit of the leaders of the two countries to be held in Alaska." 11 Russian drones and missiles have continued to terrorise Ukrainian cities in the lead-up to the meeting Credit: Reuters 11 The world waits with bated breath to discover whether Putin has any intention of moving towards peace Credit: AP 11 Elmendorf-Richardson is Alaska's largest military base Credit: Reuters Security expert Hamish de Bretton-Gordon explained why Alaska was indeed a logical choice - and a crucial one for Putin. The Russian leader was slapped with an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2023 so would in theory be cuffed if he were to visit any of 125 countries around the world - including the UK, France, Germany and Canada. The United States, however, is among the minority of countries which does not recognise the rule of the ICC - alongside Russia, China, Pakistan and a handful of others. This means that, unlike most nations, the US is not bound to arrest Putin when he visits. De Bretton-Gordon said: "He can roam around the world, in theory, in any countries that are not members of the ICC. "A warrant from the ICC means nothing in those countries that are not signatories to it. "And the Americans aren't, so - he can go to Alaska. "That is the loophole. He can operate exactly how he sees fit. He wouldn't have gone anywhere where potentially he could be arrested." 11 It was thought Zelensky might also attend - though that looks increasingly unlikely De Bretton-Gordon added: "President Putin is absolutely fixated about his own security, and his desire not to wander out of friendly airspace. "There's not much of that to Alaska - he will only be in international airspace for a few miles." Mike Dunleavy, the Republican governor there since 2018, posted on X: 'Alaska is the most strategic location in the world, sitting at the crossroads of North America and Asia, with the Arctic to our north and the Pacific to our south. 'A mere two miles separating Russia from Alaska, no other place plays a more vital role in our national defence, energy security, and Arctic leadership.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store