
Colon cancer is rising in young people. Finally, scientists have a clue about why.
Colorectal cancer should be on your radar: Today, one in five people under the age of 54 is diagnosed with the disease, marking an 11 percent uptick in this age group over the past two decades. What, exactly, is fueling the surge in younger patients has perplexed scientists and medical professionals alike.
(Colon cancer is rising among young adults. Here are signs to watch for.)
For years, however, experts have suspected that colibactin, a toxin produced by E. coli and other bacteria that can damage DNA, could be involved. Now, a new study published in Nature has identified a strong link between childhood exposure to colibactin and colorectal cancer in patients under the age of 40.
Here's how the study expands scientists' understanding of the microbiome's influence on colorectal cancer development, plus how a focus on colibactin could pave the way for earlier detection and new prevention strategies. What researchers discovered in colon cancer patients
The researchers initially designed the study to broadly explore why people in different countries develop colorectal cancer at different rates, so the colibactin observation was 'somewhat incidental,' says lead study author Ludmil Alexandrov, a professor of cellular and molecular medicine at the University of California, San Diego.
He and his team analyzed blood and tissue samples from the tumors of nearly 1,000 colorectal cancer patients across 11 countries, including Canada, Japan, Thailand, and Colombia. They used DNA sequencing technology to identify cellular mutations, or genetic changes that can help cancer form, grow, and spread.
'Different carcinogens leave this characteristic pattern of mutations, which we call mutational signatures,' Alexandrov explains. 'The simplest example is if you smoke cigarettes, you get a specific pattern of mutations across your lung cells.'
Alexandrov and his team found that people diagnosed with colorectal cancer under the age of 50 had a 'striking enrichment' of mutations associated with colibactin. The younger the person was, on average, the higher the prevalence of these signatures. Those diagnosed with colorectal cancer under age 40 were about three times more likely to have colibactin-driven mutations than those diagnosed after age 70.
'When we sequence cancers, we see this archeological record of everything that happened in that person's lifetime,' Alexandrov says. Meaning, scientists can figure out the approximate timing of when specific mutations took hold in the gut.
The study's results suggest that the participants' colibactin exposure happened before they turned 10. This early 'hit' to the gut microbiome seemed to put people 20 to 30 years ahead of schedule for developing colorectal cancer, Alexandrov says. Rather than being diagnosed in their 60s or 70s, they faced the disease in their 30s or 40s.
Cynthia Sears, an infectious disease expert and professor of oncology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, who was not involved in the study, believes the study was done 'carefully and thoroughly,' but also leaves questions unanswered. 'We don't understand the biology of these organisms and the circumstances that allow them to be mutational,' she says.
Alexandrov agrees. He says this new study shows a 'strong association' between childhood colibactin exposure and early-onset colorectal cancer. However, proving that colibactin actually causes colorectal cancer would be 'very complicated.' How colibactin could lead to colorectal cancer
Colibactin is a genotoxin—think of it as a weapon certain bacteria deploy to protect themselves against other microbes. Experts theorize that, in some people, these bacteria become dominant and then start hurting their hosts, Alexandrov explains. Once they colonize the colon, they can latch onto healthy tissues, attack cells, and generate DNA mutations. Fluorescence micrograph of human colon cancer cells in a three-dimensional extracellular matrix, where the cells organize into cancer organoids as they would in human tissue. Micrograph by Dr Torsten Wittmann, Science Photo Library A colored 3D computed tomography (CT) scan of the colon of a 54-year-old male patient, showing extensive narrowing (stenosis) in the left colon (highlighted, upper right), suggesting the presence of a cancerous lesion. Image by Zephr/Science Photo Library
But not everyone with colibactin-producing bacteria winds up with colorectal cancer—estimates show 20 to 30 percent of people harbor these strains. So what's prompting the bugs to go rogue in certain individuals? 'We think something is happening to give them an advantage over the other bacteria,' Alexandrov says.
He cites previous studies that suggest people in Westernized countries (particularly urban areas), like the U.S. and parts of Europe, tend to have a higher prevalence of colibactin-producing bacteria in their guts than those in more rural or non-industrialized regions. 'To me, this is a window of opportunity to zero in on environmental influences in different sectors of the world,' Sears says.
In particular, evidence suggests that a Western diet—typically higher in red and processed meats, added sugar, and refined grains and lower in fruits and vegetables—is associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer. As for the reason why colibactin, specifically, could be more 'mutagenic' in the setting this diet creates in the gut? 'We just don't have this information,' Sears says.
The new study didn't analyze the participants' individual cancer risk or track changes in their environment or diet, so any combination of these components could be at play. Alexandrov and his team suspect factors that can substantially alter a person's immune system and microbiome in their earliest years, like whether they were born via a C-section or vaginally, took antibiotics, were breastfed or formula-fed, or were fed a lot of processed foods.
(How your fiber intake impacts your colon cancer risk)
Some colibactin-producing bacteria may also trigger an immune response that further injures the cells. Those are the strains that 'get us into trouble,' Sears says. But it's 'extremely complex' to figure out what makes these bacteria stick in different parts of the gut. 'The rectum is different than the sigmoid colon,' she explains. 'Each of these regions has a somewhat different biology and predilection to tumor formation.' Where the research goes from here
Alexandrov and Sears agree that longitudinal data is needed. Ideally, researchers would follow people in early life, give them probiotics designed to target colibactin-producing bacteria, and then track whether participants develop the associated mutations, and thus, early-onset colorectal cancer.
'If we can create the right probiotic that would bump off the bad actors, that might be a prevention strategy that would be easy and not harmful to people,' Sears says.
Alexandrov and his team are looking into future studies that explore this possibility. He also believes they could design a stool test that pinpoints colibactin-related mutations. If this DNA damage is detected in the test, then the individual would be encouraged to start colorectal cancer screening earlier—say, in their 20s versus their 40s.
(Will a new colon cancer blood test replace your colonoscopy?)
All that said, Sears believes focusing on colibactin alone likely isn't the 'holy grail' solution to the rise in early-onset cases. 'We don't want to be too short-sighted about the spectrum of the research that we do,' she says.
Until we have more data, focusing on the lifestyle changes you can control is key; Sears points to eating a Mediterranean-style diet, staying active, quitting smoking, and cutting back on alcohol.
Awareness is also paramount: Young adults—as well as many medical professionals—are quick to brush off colorectal cancer symptoms like persistent abdominal pain, unexplained weight loss, and rectal bleeding. As Alexandrov stresses, 'they should be aware that it may be something quite serious,' because the sooner the tumors are detected, the easier they will be to treat.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Found a Hidden Trigger That Could Make Your Eyes Regenerate
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Many groups in the animal kingdom have the remarkable ability to regenerate their eyes, but mammals are not one of them—at least, not yet. A new study analyzed the genetic mechanisms behind the ocular regenerative ability of the golden apple snail to see if a similar technique could be used in human eyes. Although separated by hundreds of millions of years of evolution, human eyes and apple snail eyes retain remarkable similarities, both physically and genetically. Talk to most freshwater biologists, and you likely won't find much love for the golden apple snail. An invasive species outside of South America, this freshwater snail (Pomacea canaliculata) is both extremely resilient and what is known as a prolific organism, meaning it makes a lot of babies. This is a one-two punch of bad news for conservationists. But in a strange twist of fate, these particular attributes of the golden apple snail—along with its impressive ability to regenerate its eyes when damaged—made it the perfect test subject for Alice Accorsi, an assistant professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California (UC) Davis. So much so, in fact, that Accorsi was surprised no other study had yet detailed exactly how these snails wield such impressive powers of regeneration. 'When I started reading about this, I was asking myself, why isn't anybody already using snails to study regeneration?' Accorsi, the lead author of the new study, said in a press statement. 'I think it's because we just hadn't found the perfect snail to study, until now. A lot of other snails are difficult or very slow to breed in the lab, and many species also go through metamorphosis, which presents an extra challenge.' In the experiment, Accorsi and her team developed methods to tweak the apple snail's genome, hoping to better understand why it can regrow its eyes—an enviable ability that vertebrates (including humans) can't seem to achieve. Although separated by more than 600 million years of evolution, humans and apple snails both have camera-type eyes that make use of a system of corneas, lens, and retinas. Accorsi also said that many of the genes that participate in human eye development can be found in these snails as well. An apple snail's ocular regeneration process takes a month from start to finish. In the first 24 hours, the amputated wound heals and unspecialized cells congregate in the area before building new ocular hardware. By day 15, all parts of the eye's structure (including the optic nerve) are present, but the snail requires a few more weeks to fully mature. During this incredible process, scientists analyzed gene expression in the snail's genome, and found that immediately upon amputation, 9,000 genes expressed themselves at different rates than they did in a normal apple snail. The team then used CRISPR/Cas9 techniques to edit a snail embryo's genome—specifically, a gene known as Pax6, which is also known to control the development of the brain and eye in humans. 'The idea is that we mutate specific genes and then see what effect it has on the animal, which can help us understand the function of different parts of the genome,' Accorsi said in a press statement. When the snail embryo had two non-functional copies of the gene—one from each parent—eyes didn't develop at all once the snail reached maturation. Future studies will investigate if the manipulation of the gene in adult snails similarly impacts regeneration. 'If we find a set of genes that are important for eye regeneration, and these genes are also present in vertebrates, in theory we could activate them to enable eye regeneration in humans,' Accorsi said in a press statement. The idea of regenerating human eyes isn't new. A study published earlier this year in the journal Nature Communications showed evidence of the 'first successful induction of long-term neural regeneration in mammalian retinas,' according to the researchers, by inhibiting the PROX1 protein that can block retinal cell types in animals, including ones that could help restore vision to those suffering from retinitis pigmentosa. Similarly, this research was inspired by the amazing eye-regenerating abilities of the zebrafish. We humans may be the one with the big brains of the animal kingdom, but the varied biology of Earth's incredible creatures still has so much to teach us. Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue You Might Also Like Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss? Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50 Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Survey reveals ‘poor' summer bathing water quality in parts of Windermere
A two-year study has provided the most detailed picture to date of water quality in Windermere and its catchment. The Big Windermere Survey, led by the Freshwater Biological Association (FBA) and Lancaster University, involved 350 citizen scientists who collected more than 1,000 water samples from 110 locations across 10 sampling events over two and a half years. Many of the locations had not previously been tested. The report analysed 15 water quality parameters, focusing on phosphorus, Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Intestinal Enterococci (IE) – key indicators of ecosystem health and suitability for recreation. READ MORE: Lake District resident renews calls for action to save 'world famous' view Results showed that concentrations of E. coli and IE were highest in summer months, when the lake is most used for bathing and watersports. During this period, bacterial levels in the northwest, northeast and southwest areas of Windermere were consistent with standards for 'poor' bathing water quality. In spring, autumn and winter, lower concentrations of bacteria were consistent with 'Excellent' or 'Good' bathing water quality across all areas. Phosphorus concentrations across the lake met the UK's 'moderate' status under legislation, which is higher than the threshold required for 'good' status. READ MORE: Historic Lake District town named in UK's top three locations to buy a holiday let Dr Ben Surridge, senior lecturer at Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University said: "The Big Windermere Survey is a unique collaboration between professional scientists and members of various communities with an interest in the water quality of Windermere and its catchment. "This collaboration has generated an unprecedented dataset which offers new insights into the spatial and temporal patterns of water quality in Windermere, built on exactly the same robust, scientific approaches used in water quality research. "We look forward to working with partners within the catchment to ensure that evidence generated by the Big Windermere Survey informs action that leads to real improvement in the water quality of this iconic lake." The study also highlighted localised hotspots for phosphorus or bacteria around Waterhead, Bowness Bay, Belle Isle, Millerground, Mitchell Wyke Bay, the south-western shore and near the River Leven outflow. Streams and rivers including Stock Ghyll, Black Beck, Mill Beck, Wilfin Beck and the River Rothay also showed elevated concentrations. Beyond the main lake, the survey gathered additional information on rivers and lakes across the wider Leven catchment. READ MORE: Lake District: Rescue crews scrambled to 'wrong Bowness' after call mix-up Simon Johnson, executive director of the Freshwater Biological Association, said: "We are incredibly grateful to the hundreds of volunteers who have given thousands of hours of their time to gather the scientific data in this report. The evidence is clear and must lead to decisive action to improve water quality. "We must all work together to transform the future of Windermere and deliver a cleaner, healthier and safer waterbody for all life to thrive. "Windermere is home to a number of rare and increasingly threatened freshwater species including Arctic charr. Without decisive action to improve water quality, this species and potentially many more will face a steady and devastating decline. "We hope these findings will not only advance scientific understanding of Windermere's water quality but also play a pivotal role in shaping future strategies to protect and enhance the health of the lake and its surrounding catchment." Subscribe for just £6 for 6 months in our Summer Flash Sale The data from the Big Windermere Survey is being actively shared with a range of organisations both locally and nationally, as part of ongoing conversations about the water quality of Windermere. The report released today, alongside all the underpinning data, is freely and openly available for anyone with an interest in Windermere to examine. The full report, link to the data and an overview of the Big Windermere Survey is available online at


The Hill
10 hours ago
- The Hill
Promising vaccine may prevent certain cancers from returning
An experimental cancer vaccine has shown promising results in keeping pancreatic and colorectal cancers from coming back. In a clinical trial led by the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California, Los Angeles, researchers tested the vaccine on 25 patients who had previously been treated for pancreatic and colorectal cancers. Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States, according to the American Cancer Society, and pancreatic cancer accounts for about 3 percent of all cancers in the country. Researchers found that the vaccine, named ELI-002 2P, could trigger lasting immune responses and may help prevent or delay cancer recurrence in high-risk patients whose tumors are driven by KRAS mutations, which are responsible for half of colorectal cancers and more than 90 percent of pancreatic cancers, researchers noted. When they followed up with patients after more than a year, they found the average relapse-free survival was 16 months and the average overall survival was 28 months — both exceeding historical norms — with the greatest benefit seen in patients who developed strong mKRAS-specific T cell responses after getting the vaccine. Dr. Thomas Marron, an oncologist who was not involved with the study, told NewsNation the results are 'extremely promising,' as both cancers typically have a high risk of recurrence. 'This vaccine is about teaching patients' immune systems how to recognize and attack those tiny amounts of cancer cells so that they keep them from coming back, increasing the likelihood that we can cure patients with surgery and chemotherapy or radiation,' Marron said. Marron said UCLA's vaccine could become available within the coming years.