Rachel Brosnahan marriage drama erupts after husband 'likes' shocking post about her and Superman costar
The alleged social media exchange came when a fan urged Ralph, 39, to 'stand up' for himself and leave his spouse, 35, if her connection with Corenswet had extended beyond acting.
The rest of the strange comment, which Ralph interacted with, read: 'It's genuinely sad to see your career being tucked out to be remembered as a cuckold because your wife couldn't handle herself with her co-actor.'
'Like bro.. let's have some self love and stand up for yourself man, leave her to be with him if she wants that much at the end of the day,' the Instagram user wrote.
Rather than replying or ignoring the post, Ralph, who starred alongside Brosnahan in The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, surprised some fans by hitting the 'like' button.
Brosnahan, 35, and Corenswet, 32, portray Lois Lane and Clark Kent in the new DC blockbuster.
DailyMail.com has reached out to representatives for both Brosnahan and Ralph for comment.
Reactions to Ralph's interaction were divided as some accused him of showing disrespect toward Brosnahan and Corenswet.
'Sorry but if u cant handle dating an actor/actress then dont date/marry one, what is up with ppl,' one TikTok user wrote.
Another agreed: 'Sorry but most people who marry actors know what they gotta deal with.'
Others questioned why he would engage with the post at all.
'I think regardless whether he feels that way or was highlighting how absurd it is, there was no need to engage with it,' one commenter observed. 'It is disrespectful to Rachel and through interacting with it, fans are now speculating etc about it. Whether or not the bts [behind the scenes] is bad, I think he made it very public and supported a very negative comment about his wife.'
A more sympathetic fan argued: 'It's just not fair to either of them, i feel for both of them in this situation and i hope people stop commenting on it bc it's none of our business to begin with. let them live their lives.'
Some suggested the 'like' may have been misinterpreted, pointing to Ralph's sense of humor.
'Have we not considered that he liked it because it's absurd?' one user asked.
Another suggested: 'I truly think this is him liking it because it's absurd, not because he's like….hurting deeply.'
Still, some fans opted to steer clear of the debate entirely.
'I'm just going to be minding my business,' one wrote, while another commented: 'I am not doing Superman drama now, or ever.'
Ralph and Brosnahan quietly married in 2016 and did not reveal they tied the knot until three years later.
In a 2019 interview with People, Brosnahan explained: 'I've been quite private about my personal life for a few reasons. The first being that it's just that: personal. Jason and I also noticed early on that, while we are both the leads of successful television series, he has almost never been asked about our relationship while I have been asked on almost every red carpet I have walked in the last two years. We both find this double standard problematic and frustrating and opted to redirect those conversations to our work.'
Meanwhile, Corenswet married Julia Warner in March 2023 and welcomed their first child, a daughter, in 2024.
In June 2025, the Superman actor revealed to People that Warner told him she was pregnant just two days after he learned he would be screen testing for the iconic role.
'She told me that she was pregnant two days after I found out I was going to screen test for Superman,' Corenswet shared.
He added: 'For the first several months of her pregnancy, as is sort of protocol, we weren't telling anybody. We had these two quite huge secrets that we just had between the two of us. And that was intense.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a few seconds ago
- The Independent
Like Prince Harry, I've been lobster-shamed
The big reveal in the new trailer for Netflix's With Love, Meghan – the second season of the Duchess of Sussex 's cookery and lifestyle show – is that Prince Harry won't touch lobster. In the clip, Meghan is seen preparing a seafood dish, in the rented California house close to her and Harry's Montecito mansion where the TV series is filmed, when she casually mentions to José Andrés, a celebrity Spanish-American chef, and says: 'You know who doesn't like lobster?' 'Who?' says Andrés. a helpless crustacean into a pan of boiling water. 'And you married him?' the chef retorts, while Meghan falls about laughing. But don't worry, Harry, you're not alone. I, too, have been shamed for not eating lobster. Last week, during a Greek getaway, I was invited to dinner at a fancy beach restaurant in Zakynthos when a huge specimen was brought out of the tank to our seafront table, the waiter presumably thinking he'd spare us the trouble of walking to pick one ourselves. But he made a terrible faux pas. As it tried to move its legs and claws, which had been bound tightly, my kids screamed. Our meal quickly descended into a horror show with floods of tears. As diners at nearby tables turned around to watch, I could tell they thought my children were just badly behaved. I tried to calm the kids down as the waiter retreated, sending the lobster back to the tank. My friend had wanted to order lobster for us all as a treat, but the whole episode only left a bad taste. I'd always thought that lobsters screamed when they were boiled, which was also off-putting. However, the reality is far worse. They suffer in silence. That shrill, high-pitched sound you hear if you're close enough to the kitchen – often mistaken for a scream – is steam escaping through pores in the shell as the organs boil. But this was not the first time I've been looked down on for not eating lobster. I always feel embarrassed when I say 'No, thanks' – lobster-shamed, you could say. When I politely refuse, other diners assume I'm just a picky eater – but I'm doing it on principle. My local fish shop in Notting Hill sells 'Live Scottish Native Lobster' from £59, which you can take home alive, to do whatever the hell you like with, no questions asked. It's barbaric. According to a 2023 YouGov poll, 61 per cent of the British public think it is unacceptable to cook decapod crustaceans, such as crabs and lobsters, by boiling them while they are still alive. For Harry, it's unclear whether his aversion to lobster is on moral grounds, or – more likely – a long-accepted family tradition: the royals usually steer clear of shellfish to avoid the possibility of food poisoning. But it's not a hard and fast rule. Former royal chef Darren McGrady offered confirmation that the royals 'do actually eat shellfish' when he shared on social media a royal menu from a 1989 banquet at Windsor Castle that shows that the late Queen dined on soufflé de homard, for starters. Whatever Harry's reasons for not eating lobster – and, as a friend of Sir David Attenborough, he will doubtless be aware of it being a cruel culinary practice – he shouldn't be made to feel like a misfit. In countries like Switzerland, Norway, and New Zealand, it is illegal to boil lobsters without stunning them first, usually either by an electrical shock or by chilling them in cold air or an ice slurry to minimise suffering. In the UK, lobsters and other decapod crustaceans are now recognised as sentient beings, under the Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022. The law was introduced after a report by the LSE found compelling scientific evidence of the levels of pain and distress these creatures can experience. Yet, somehow, boiling them alive remains legal. It's a cruelty we can no longer ignore – and we should thank Meghan for inadvertently drawing our attention to it. If one good thing comes out of her Netflix series, let it be that she has given poor crustaceans a voice.
Metro
30 minutes ago
- Metro
This Nobody's Child dress has sold 32,000+ times - and it's a summer staple
Metro journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission – learn more An easy, breezy, one-and-done summer dress is exactly what the doctor ordered for the summer months and holiday dressing. We have found a whole host of stylish summer dresses, from mini, midi to maxi, but there is one design in particular that is really causing a storm – Nobody's Child's Charlie Dress. The Charlie Dress has been recognised as the sustainable fashion brand's seventh bestselling item as it has sold over 32,000 units this season alone. So, what is all the hype about? Crafted from 100% organic cotton, this one-and-done dress is flattering, lightweight, breathable and versatile. It features a round neck, it is sleeveless, and features a shirred and elasticated bust before the midi skirt billows out. It also features concealed zip fastening and deep pockets. Available in 16 colours. BUY NOW FOR £89 The Charlie Dress has been crafted from 100% organic cotton, which is comfortable, floaty and breathable. The design boasts a round neck, shirred upper that spans across the bust to the waist before the skirt billows out. The A-line skirt has a tiered hem and is midi length, which provides just enough coverage. This dress also features a concealed zip fastening for a secure fit. It is available in 16 colours, and quite frankly, we want every single one. From the bold red tone, to the classic white option, and the gingham variation, there is a design to suit every shopper's style preference. The dress is available in UK dress sizes 4 to 18, and retails for £89. What we also love about this number is it is a versatile piece you can easily dress up or down. Pair with ballet pumps, flip flops, flat sandals or trainers for the daytime, and layer a cardigan or denim jacket for those breezy summer evenings. Alternatively, slip into a pair of thong kitten heels, or wedges, amp up the jewellery and wear for rooftop drinks with the girl gang. According to the website, this Charlie dress is flying off the shelves, though this is unsurprising given the glowing reviews, More Trending Ingrid shared: 'I love this dress. It's perfect for me, very flattering and I felt really nice in it. Understated but a bit special at the same time. Easy to wear and light so great on its own when it's hot or with a cardigan or jacket when it's not.' Susanne added: 'I wore this straight away and people thought that it looked very nice. It feels very nice. I also love the fact that the dress has pockets.' Lisa gushed: 'Love, love, love this dress – very comfortable to wear – washes well and the added bonus is that it doesn't need ironing.' *Adds to basket…* Follow Metro across our social channels, on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram Share your views in the comments below MORE: Nobody's Child now has a whole page dedicated to dresses with pockets MORE: The best-selling butter yellow midi dress from Nobody's Child is finally back in stock MORE: Poppy Delevingne teams up with Nobody's Child for gorgeous boho-inspired collection
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Long Story Short: this Jewish family comedy from the creator of BoJack Horseman is painfully beautiful
Like schoolboys, my friend Charlie and I send each other coded messages. One of these is 'Am back on the horse', which means 'Rewatching BoJack Horseman', which means 'Having a mental health crisis'. The recipient knows to go to the other's house with Danish pastries and some grass to touch. That show changed my life. The Simpsons had redefined what a cartoon could be, Ren & Stimpy and South Park were transgressive thrill-rides. But Raphael Bob-Waksberg's tale of a washed-up actor chasing redemption wasn't just adult; it was profound. So I was worried, approaching the new animated series from that show's creators. It's not about celebrity. There are no talking dogs or porcupines, or underwater worlds. No Will Arnett. How could I watch without expectation? It feels unfair yet unavoidable to keep an artist's previous work in mind. Isn't that like comparing a current partner with an ex? While it lacks a famous horse, Long Story Short (Netflix, from Friday 22 August) is its own beast, and no less ambitious. It's a family saga told in multiple timelines. The Schwoopers are an argumentative, chaotic Jewish household. Each episode focuses on a character or relationship, swooshing back and forward in time, from the 1950s to the 2020s, as they navigate romance, coming of age, marital breakdown, parenting, old wounds, joy, death and purpose. Basically, it's Bluey meets Tolstoy. The Jewishness is not incidental. The show is Jewish inside and out, defiantly, delightedly so. Naomi Schwartz is presented as a classic Jewish matriarch, impossibly critical yet overbearingly proud of her children. Daughter Shira is more modern. ('We're a lesbian couple with biracial, Jewish sons. We're impressive,' as her partner Kendra puts it.) In the episode Yoshi's Bar Mitzvah, teenager Danny (voiced by Dave Franco) celebrates his friend's public speaking. 'Dude, your davening was on point!' he hypes. 'Mr Leibowitz was kvellin' like a felon!' It almost goes without saying: melancholy. Most dramas have a primary time and place, flashing back in a limited way. Long Story Short doesn't privilege any of its periods or people. There is only the equalising process of decades passing or rolling back. The time-hopping is extraordinarily effective, bringing characters back from the dead, fleshing out relationships, grounding us in moral complexity. We feel the painful beauty of our bounded lives. It almost even more goes without saying: funny. Long Story Short delights in language games, subversion, absurdity and surprise. Hapless Yoshi gets conned into becoming a salesman for explosive mattresses in a tube. (Yes, there's a soft launch.) Avi's daughter Hannah's school has been invaded by wolves, but no one seems concerned. Kendra and Shira have a dog, named the Undeniable Isadora Duncan. I guess there are animals in this one. Characters talk a mile a minute, particularly at the Schwoopers' dinner table, and it takes a while to key into the frenetic pace. But BoJack Horseman also took a minute to find its hooves. (In fact, the first season improved so drastically in its second half, website IndieWire changed its reviewing strategy to only award scores after watching entire seasons.) Here, I was locked in by the second episode. It's rare for me to actually LOL, watching comedies. But I did, repeatedly – such as when Shira is flummoxed by a reCAPTCHA asking her to pick out squares containing bisexuals. ('How am I supposed to …?') Kendra is unimpressed. 'Where are your glasses? It says bicycles.' But above all, it's beautiful. The show is interested in the moments when one's heart splits open. The final scene of an episode in which Kendra attends shul for mercenary reasons pierced me with its humanity. The poignancy is baked into its innovative structure, reminding me of the Sondheim musical Merrily We Roll Along, perhaps a little of Pachinko and the film Boyhood. It wears its formal brilliance lightly, and at 10 episodes of 30 minutes, Long Story Short doesn't outstay its welcome. It's rewarding company, even if you don't catch every Fiddler on the Roof reference. I'm glad it's already been renewed. As with loved ones I have lost, I want more time.
