Govt to repeal oil and gas ban
The government is set to repeal the oil and gas ban this week, after a significant 11th-hour change handing discretionary powers to two ministers.
A 25-page amendment was published at 5pm on Monday, leaving opposition MPs less than 23 hours to prepare for the debate.
The change largely deals with the rules for decommissioning oil and gas fields, and who is responsible for paying for the clean-up.
Taranaki's Tui oil field was abandoned in 2019 after its Malaysian owner Tamarind Taranaki went bust, costing taxpayers a total $293 million to clean up, with work concluding just last month. The government initially set aside up to $343.4m for the project.
The Labour government in 2021 introduced a law to prevent the government being lumped with such costs again in future.
Resources Minister Shane Jones has vowed to restart the oil and gas industry.
He said the aim of the amendment was to close a loophole in that 2021 law.
"It did not seem correct or moral that the Crown should be left with that liability and the people [at fault] - with some very shrewd manoeuvrings of script - would escape liability. We have solved that problem," he told the House.
The changes replace the process of going through the list of previous permit-holders to figure out who pays for decommissioning, instead putting that decision in the hands of the Resources Minister and the Finance Minister.
The amendment also removes several clauses from a previous amendment the minister made to the bill, which itself amends the Crown Minerals Act.
Labour's Energy and Resources spokesperson Megan Woods led the 2021 law change in response to the Tui Oil Field debacle, and told the Parliament the changes showed the government capitulating to the industry's wishes.
"They have bowed to the suggestions of the oil and gas companies and done what they wanted. They have further bowed to the interests of the oil and gas companies in taking eight months to sit with them, find out what they wanted and then bring a bill back to the House. This is not a government that is putting New Zealand first."
Labour's Deborah Russell pointed out the Regulatory Impact Statement referred to consultation with affected stakeholders.
"Those consulted preferred ministerial discretion to the current act and approach in the bill. In other words, these shadowy participants in the oil and gas industry - a dying industry - who we don't know who they are, much prefer to be able to lobby a minister."
Jones was unapologetic about those he consulted with.
"Why would you not engage with the stakeholders, the risk-takers, the providers of what precious little gas we have, ruined by the cancel culture."
He was unapologetic about a lack of consultation with others, including iwi.
"So in the future the engagement will happen. This highly technical matter was not the subject of consultation in a detailed way, it was dealt with with a great deal of confidentiality. And in terms of providing a Māori dimension, I interviewed myself."
The amendment passed with the coalition parties in support, with the opposition parties opposed. The third reading, which would see the oil and gas ban repealed, is expected on Thursday.
A gas company warned investors would be cautious about coming back to New Zealand without broad political consensus - and with the opposition parties currently staunchly opposed that consensus seems vanishingly unlikely.
The government also has a $200m fund set aside in this year's Budget to allow the government to co-invest in new gas fields.
It last month pulled out of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, an international coalition for phasing out fossil fuels, in a move the local World Wildlife Fund called an "international embarrassment".
That was despite the Climate Minister, Simon Watts, previously saying New Zealand would not need to exit the group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
27 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
How NZ's tax system compares with other countries
By Susan Edmunds of RNZ In recent months, Treasury, Inland Revenue and an organisation representing accountants have suggested New Zealand needs a rethink of its tax settings. Inland Revenue said taxes would have to increase to cope with an ageing population and CPA Australia said a capital gains tax should be considered. But do you know how much the average person in New Zealand pays, and how that compares to other countries? Infometrics calculated the average tax bill of a household with two median income earners, earning $72,900 per person before tax, not including any Working for Families credits. Chief executive Brad Olsen calculated that they would pay $39,800 to the government, made up about $14,100 in income tax each, and $11,600 in GST. They might pay another $3800 a year in local government rates. "Central government still collects the vast majority of money from households - at still over 90 percent of total funds collected by central or local government going to the Beehive coffers. The proportions have shifted slightly, in 2023 when we ran this same exercise, around 93 percent of tax or rates collected went to central government, and 7 percent to local government. "In dollar terms, we estimate that our median household scenario would be paying around $985 more a year in rates than in 2023, but $3182 more in income tax and GST." Rates rises were more noticeable because households received a direct notice in the mail telling them what they had to pay, Olsen said. "In contrast, most households don't track - or get a demand for - their taxes from central government. For income taxes, PAYE workers never see their income tax as their employer withholds the tax and pays it to IRD. For GST, you don't directly tally up your GST and pay it to the government - it's all part of your daily spending. The difference in how you pay - and how noticeable that payment demand is or not - does behaviourally contribute to how we talk about these various increases. "We spend a lot of time, fairly, on rates increases. That's reasonable scrutiny. But we spend a lot less time on tax payments than rates payments, even though tax payments are 10 times larger than rates payments. "That's also true, in my mind, around current discussions on rates capping. Presumably if it's good enough for central government to impose on local government, it would be good enough for central government to tax-cap itself? For every dollar of additional rates paid in the last three years, tax paid by a household has increased by $3.23." As people earn more through the PAYE system, their income tax bill increases. A report by consultancy OliverShaw in 2023 said those in the top two tax brackets at the time made up 21.2 percent of taxpayers and paid 68.5 percent of income tax in the 2021 tax year. Those earning $180,000 to $300,000 constituted less than 2 percent of taxpayers, but paid 9.3 percent of income tax. But while the dollar value of GST paid is higher for wealthier people, it may make up a smaller proportion of their income because they may save more, or put money into financial assets that do not incur GST. Some wealthier people may also be able to earn income in ways that does not attract as much tax. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said people might be surprised to see that New Zealand is among the lower-taxed countries in the OECD. On a measure of tax-to-GDP, in 2023, New Zealand had a ratio of 34 percent compared to the OECD average of 33.9 percent. He said the country was only on the higher side of average because many countries had some significantly lower taxes on specific things, such as Ireland's low corporate tax rate. On an income tax wedge basis, New Zealand was third-lowest in 2024, behind Chile and Colombia on a comparison of total tax as a percentage of labour costs. This reflects the impact of Working for Families credits. "There is no right or wrong number when it comes to taxes," Eaqub said. "If we want less public service, we pay less tax, if we want more public services, we pay more." He said many countries had much higher tax bills - France has tax at almost 44 percent of GDP, Denmark at 43.4 percent and Italy at 42.8 percent. "Italy has to but that's why younger people are leaving. There's a cost - if you tax a lot and make younger people poor they might go somewhere else. You can't arbitrarily increase taxes if you're not giving the value people are looking for. You need to maintain the legitimacy of the tax system." New Zealand workers tend to shoulder more of the tax bill than those in other countries, because income tax on individuals makes up such a large proportion of the total tax take. "We have big areas where we don't have any tax," said Council of Trade Unions policy director and economist Craig Renney. "There are no capital taxes, no social security taxes. It means New Zealand's taxation structure looks very different to the majority of developed economies around the Western world. We tend to over-emphasise GST and PAYE. Labour is a smaller share of tax in other jurisdictions." Any conversation about tax changes needed to get away from winners and losers and instead encourage people to consider what outcomes could be gained from higher revenue, he said. "The way we historically structure tax conversations does not help." New Zealand's corporate tax rate is now one of the highest in the OECD, at 28 percent. NZ Initiative chief economist Eric Crampton said reducing the government's structural deficit would require a mix of reducing spending, boosting economic growth and increasing taxes. "I would focus on spending before looking at taxes. Increasing revenue to cover the cost of current spending should depend on decent evidence that current spending delivers substantial value. "If the government demonstrated that higher tax revenue was needed, increasing GST while shifting income tax rates and thresholds to compensate could make sense. Inland Revenue has been looking at different options for ensuring lower-income households would not be made worse off if GST increased. GST captures spending that comes from income that is harder to tax when it is earned, including income from capital gains, as well as spending by tourists. "But first priority ought to be ensuring value-for-money in spending, especially where an ageing population increases fiscal pressure."
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Tycoon who brought F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in corruption case
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Already a subscriber? Sign in here Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen. Tycoon who brought F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in corruption case Malaysian hotel tycoon Ong Beng Seng leaves the State Court in Singapore. Photo / AFP A Malaysian hotel tycoon who helped bring Formula One to Singapore has pleaded guilty to abetting the obstruction of justice, in a rare corruption case in the city-state that saw a former transport minister jailed last year. Singapore-based billionaire Ong Beng Seng, 79, was charged in October last year with helping former transport minister S Iswaran cover up evidence in a graft investigation. He was also accused of showering Iswaran with lavish gifts, including tickets to the 2017 Singapore Formula One Grand Prix, flights on a private jet, business class travel and a luxury hotel stay. Ong entered his guilty plea from a glass-encased dock at a district court in downtown Singapore. Prosecutors sought a two-month jail term after Ong agreed to plead guilty. He will be sentenced on August 15.
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Could Christchurch's new stadium host State of Origin?
By Adam Burns of RNZ The government appears receptive to supporting a move to bring rugby league's State of Origin to New Zealand's shores in two years' time. Speculation has resurfaced over the weekend of potential plans by the game's administrators to bring a game to New Zealand in 2027, with the government and tourism officials here reportedly involved in talks with the NRL. Rugby league legend Sir Graham Lowe has raised the matter with Sports and Recreation Minister Mark Mitchell, Auckland's Eden Park and Christchurch's forthcoming One New Zealand Stadium (Te Kaha) contenders to host a game. It comes as efforts to flesh out the future events calendar for Christchurch's new $683 million central city stadium continue ahead of its scheduled opening in eight months time. Whether its modest 30,000 capacity would appease rugby league administrators for an Origin game, as opposed to Eden Park, is doubtful. Lowe, who coached Queensland across consecutive Origin series in 1991 and '92, told RNZ both venues were worthy of consideration. "The stadium in Christchurch I think would be absolutely fantastic. The NRL might say there's not enough seats in there because they like the bigger stadiums for that kind of event. "There's always more than one way to skin a cat. I think the NRL make more revenue from Origin in Brisbane, than they do from the one in Sydney." As reported by The Courier Mail, Australian Rugby League Commission (ARL) chairman Peter V'landys said an "Anzac Origin" clash in 2027 would be timely, marking the 40th anniversary of the 1987 Origin match played in Long Beach, California. V'landys said a neutral venue for 2027 was yet to be confirmed. "Next year we're going to the MCG and then 2027 is available, so Origin in New Zealand is on our hit list," he said. Mitchell said he had spoken to Lowe about the idea. "We are a great destination for games and events and any proposal brought forward to host a State of Origin match here would be worked through the Major events team." The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has been approached for comment. Tourism and Hospitality Minister Louise Upston said she had not been part of talks, but the government was open to the possibility. "The government is always open to considering opportunities to host major events across sports and the arts from local and international organisers and will support them where appropriate," she said. "Any prospective events must meet the Major Events Fund criteria and deliver outcomes aligned to the Government's Major Event Strategy." Will the All Blacks play Te Kaha in 2026? As its imminent opening draws nearer, venue operators for Te Kaha have been toiling to secure events amid a highly competitive entertainment market. RNZ spoke to several locals in central Christchurch about what they were most looking forward to. Alongside big concerts, the Crusaders, Warriors and the long-awaited return of All Blacks tests to Christchurch were popular drawcards for the arena. Red-and-black clad Canterbury rugby fans would be catered for, with the Crusaders and the Canterbury NPC team the main anchor tenants once the arena opened. There could be less NPC games played at Te Kaha long-term, as the cash-strapped provincial competition explored more games in the regions, at smaller venues. There were also plans for Te Kaha to host a rebooted Super Rugby Super Round over Anzac weekend. For other codes, the Wellington Phoenix and Warriors were bringing one of their respective away games to Christchurch, with multi-year agreements ensuring both franchises would play at least one game at Te Kaha until 2027 and 2028 respectively. When asked if he felt his club was worthy of Te Kaha's first event, Warriors chief executive Cameron George said the honour should go to the Crusaders. "Out of respect, I think the Crusaders should be afforded that opportunity." Venues Otautahi chief exeuctive Caroline Harvie-Teare said the scrap for other events, including concerts, remained a big task. "We're obviously working on attracting other guaranteed and consistent content, which would be bringing other teams' away games here," she said. A total of five All Blacks tests have been played at Christchurch's makeshift Addington venue since the earthquakes, including two in the past decade. Although the bidding process for All Blacks tests remained competitive, Harvie-Teare expected "one to two" tests in Christchurch each year. "There's a desire to return the All Blacks to Christchurch, we've had a limited amount of games here. "I know New Zealand Rugby are excited about the venue and excited about them being back here in Canterbury." It is understood the All Blacks calendar for next year and 2027 is still being finalised. In a statement, New Zealand Rugby said it was "incredibly excited" about potentially returning tests to Christchurch with Te Kaha being considered. "Canterbury is a passionate rugby region, and we know fans are incredibly eager for international rugby to return." There have been multiple bids to set up a second New Zealand NRL club based out of Christchurch. At least three of the bids were rejected last year with new teams out of Perth and Papua New Guinea green-lit. Amid a geo-political backdrop, the Papua New Guinea proposal was bankrolled to the tune of $600m by the Australian government. Lowe, who was leading one of the South Island bids, said nothing more could have been done to make their proposal more compelling. "It's basically on hold at the moment. "We're super confident, totally confident. "[The NRL is] still 100 percent commited to having another team out of New Zealand. It's just obvious that Christchurch is the place." A separate bid led by former Kiwis coach Frank Endacott previously forecast an annual boost of $50m for the city if an NRL club was founded. A strength in numbers approach appeared to be off the table with no plans for the consortiums to unite.
