
True crime fans can't look away from Australia's ‘Mushroom Killer' case
In July 2022, Erin Patterson invited her former in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, her ex-husband's aunt Heather Wilkinson, and Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson, to her home in the town of Leongatha. On the menu: homemade beef Wellington. But within days, three were dead and one critically ill. Authorities later confirmed that the dish had contained death cap mushrooms, among the most toxic fungi in the world.
Now, three years later, Patterson, once known online as a keen true crime enthusiast, has been convicted of murder and attempted murder. But even as the legal chapter closes, public fascination with the case is only intensifying.
For years, Erin Patterson was just another name behind a keyboard in online sleuthing forums. She was particularly active in a Facebook group centred around the case of Keli Lane, a woman convicted of killing her newborn daughter. Patterson was admired there for her sharp digital research skills.
'She was a bit of a super sleuth,' said online friend Christine Hunt, as per BBC. 'She was highly regarded in that group.'
Now, however, true crime fans have turned their focus on Patterson herself. The details of her own life, and alleged lies, have become the subject of endless speculation, memes, online theories, and even bingo cards tailored to her trial.
The trial took place in Morwell, Victoria. Over 11 weeks, documentary crews and journalists from around the globe flooded the Latrobe Valley Law Courts, where only six media seats were available each day. Spectators, many of them true crime devotees, queued before dawn and braving rain, fog, wrapped in sleeping bags and beanies. Some laid out scarves, water bottles, or notepads to reserve their place at the door.
One regular, Tammy Egglestone, travelled more than an hour each day to attend. 'I'm a bit of a true crime fanatic,' she said, according to BBC.
Online, Patterson's case ignited a firestorm. Thousands dissected her behaviour, speculated about her motives, and commented on details ranging from CCTV footage to her choice of trousers.
'What really gave her away was wearing white pants when she had 'gastro' and needed to go to hospital for it!' one person posted, reported BBC, referencing footage shown at trial of Patterson's movements in the days following the meal. Others questioned whether someone who intended to poison family members would have done so in such an obvious or traceable way.
In Australia, jurors are legally barred from discussing their decision-making process, unlike in the United States where post-trial interviews are common. This silence has only fuelled public speculation about what happened behind closed doors.
Even before the jury handed down its verdict, the Patterson case had already inspired a slew of media content, including a TV special, a planned drama series, podcasts, documentaries, and several books in the works.
'It has those typical cliché things that make true crime sell,' Egglestone said, as per BBC. 'Poison's the weapon, the fact that she did take out family members… [she's] white, female, financially stable, you know. And they're all church people.'
'The world has long been fascinated by women who kill,' said criminologist Dr Brandy Cochrane, according to BBC. 'She's expected to act in a particular way, and she's not… The legal system in and of itself treats women very differently.'
Yet amid the true crime mania, many in South Gippsland, where the victims lived, feel the real loss has been overlooked. According to BBC, local councillor Nathan Hersey said, 'This has been an extremely high-profile case that's brought a lot of attention, often unwanted, to our local community.'
He added, 'Some people haven't had that humanity… they've certainly lost focus that for people, there is a loss, there is grief.'
(With inputs from BBC)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Rajan Khobragade, Tinku Biswal to probe charges against suspended IAS officer N. Prasanth
The Kerala government has ordered an inquiry by a two-member panel of IAS officers into the charges levelled against N. Prasanth, the IAS officer who has been on suspension since November 2024. Rajan N. Khobragade, Additional Chief Secretary, Health and Family Welfare, has been appointed the inquiring authority. Tinku Biswal, Principal Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management, will act as the Presenting Officer, according to a July 22 order issued by the government. Mr. Prasanth was placed on suspension on November 11, 2024, on charges of levelling serious allegations against A. Jayathilak, the then Additional Chief Secretary who is now Chief Secretary. The suspension has since been extended. Mr. Khobragade and Ms. Biswal will inquire into the charges against Mr. Prasanth, a 2007 batch officer, in the Articles of Charges and Statement of Imputations served on him in December 2024. The officers have been directed to submit their report to the government within three months. The government has decided to carry out a 'detailed enquiry' into the matter as Mr. Prasanth has not admitted to any of the charges against him. Also, the government has not accepted his reasons for denying the charges. The entire issue is related to an inquiry report allegedly prepared by Dr. Jayathilak blaming Mr. Prasanth for the disappearance of files related to the Unnathi project, when he was its chief executive officer (CEO), and anomalies in his attendance record. As the issue snowballed, Mr. Prasanth had also served a legal notice on Dr. Jayathilak; K. Gopalakrishnan, another IAS officer; and the then Chief Secretary Sarada Muraleedharan for 'fabrication of documents, criminal conspiracy, abetment and violation of criminal laws. Mr. Prasanth, in an apparent response to the government move, remarked in a Facebook post that serious offences cannot be kept under wraps forever.


Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Idaho murders: Did Bryan Kohberger have any connection to the 4 victims? Investigators reveal details
Following the sentencing of Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger, investigators revealed that he had no apparent real-world or online connection to any of the victims – Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves. The 30-year-old former PhD student of criminology stabbed the four University of Idaho students to death in the early morning hours of November 13, 2022, at a rental home near their campus in Moscow, Idaho. Idaho murders: Did Bryan Kohberger have any connection to the 4 victims? (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, Pool, File)(AP) Also Read | Bryan Kohberger sentencing: Victim's sister rips suspect in scathing statement, 'The truth is, you're basic' | Watch 'We have never, to this day, found a single connection between him and any of the four victims or the two surviving roommates,' Idaho State Police Lt. Darren Gilbertson said during a news conference after the hearing, the New York Post reported. 'We had every resource possible and we worked that tirelessly.' Various theories emerged after the murders Several theories surfaced after the murders, one saying Kohberger dined at a local restaurant where Mogen and Kernodle worked, and saw them there. However, the restaurant owner dismissed these claims, saying Kohberger never entered the place. Another claim was that Kohberger repeatedly messaged one of his victims on social media, but she did not respond, which made him furious. However, on Wednesday, July 23, investigators said there was no social media connection whatsoever between Kohberger and the victims. Read More | Idaho murders: Bryan Kohberger sentenced to life in prison without parole Investigators also dismissed claims that after the murders, Kohberger discussed the case in Facebook groups under the name Pappa Rodger. They said it was determined that Papa Rodger was not Kohberger. The user seemed to have had intimate knowledge of the case, and group administrators said the user argued with commenters in 'creepy' posts. Kohberger has provided no explanation at all. Judge Steven Hippler asked him before the sentencing, 'Mr. Kohberger, you have an opportunity to make a statement. I take it you are declining?' 'I respectfully decline,' Kohberger replied. Kohberger was sentenced to life in prison without parole for the murders. The sentencing took place in a Boise court on July 23.


Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Himachal Pradesh HC grants bail to man accused of sharing derogatory videos about PM Modi, Army
The Himachal Pradesh High Court on Tuesday granted bail to a man who was arrested in May for sharing videos on Facebook that made allegedly derogatory remarks about Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Indian Army. The court said that while the videos may have been in bad taste, they would not 'incite any person to violence or create disturbance in public peace'. Justice Rakesh Kainthla said that on a preliminary reading, it was 'highly doubtful' whether Sections 152 and 196 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which deal with sedition and promoting enmity between groups, were applicable in this case. The man, Farooq Ahmad, was arrested on May 9 on charges of sedition, promoting enmity between groups and making assertions against national integrity, Live Law reported. The prosecution alleged that Ahmad shared content online that was deemed to be anti-national and against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which had hurt the sentiments of common people. The police also alleged that one video featured a Pakistani citizen making insulting comments about Modi, while another clip from a Pakistani news channel contained derogatory remarks about the Indian Army. However, the court said that the investigation had not shown any evidence that Ahmad's posts incited violence or disturbed public peace. The court also took into account that Ahmad's mobile phone had already been seized and sent for forensic examination, and that the prosecution was yet to obtain the required sanction for the trial to proceed.