logo
Ukraine halts Russia's advance in the Sumy region, commander says

Ukraine halts Russia's advance in the Sumy region, commander says

His claim could not be independently verified.
Russian forces have been slowly grinding forward at some points on the roughly 620-mile front line, though their incremental gains have been costly in terms of troop casualties and damaged armour. The outnumbered Ukrainian army has relied heavily on drones to keep the Russians back.
Months of US-led international efforts to stop the war have failed. Amid the hostilities, the two sides have continued swaps of prisoners of war (POW) agreed on during recent talks between their delegations in Istanbul.
Ukrainian servicemen attend military training (Andriy Andriyenko/Ukraine's 65th Mechanized Brigade via AP)
Russia's Defence Ministry and Ukrainian authorities said another exchange took place on Thursday.
Ukraine's co-ordination headquarters for POWs said the swap included injured soldiers and those with health complaints. The youngest is 24 and the oldest is 62, it said, adding that more exchanges are expected soon.
Sumy, the city which is the capital of the Ukrainian region of the same name, had a pre-war population of around 250,000. It lies about 12 miles from the front line. Russia's push into the region earlier this year compelled Ukraine to strengthen its defences there.
A special defence group has been formed to improve security in Sumy and the surrounding communities, Col Gen Syrskyi said, with a focus on improving fortifications and accelerating construction of defensive barriers.
In March, Ukrainian forces withdrew from much of Russia's neighbouring Kursk region, parts of which they had controlled after a surprise cross-border attack in August.
That retreat enabled Russia to launch a counter-offensive that advanced between one to seven miles into Ukrainian territory, according to different estimates.
Ukrainian officials say fierce fighting is also taking place in the eastern Donetsk region.
The Russian Defence Ministry said on Thursday that its forces have captured two villages, Novoserhiivka and Shevchenko, in Donetsk.
Capturing Shevchenko marked an important stage in Russia's ongoing offensive that is trying to break into Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, which borders Donetsk and is a major industrial centre, according to the ministry.
Meanwhile, the two sides continued to launch long-range strikes.
The Russian ministry said 50 Ukrainian drones were downed over nine regions overnight, including three over the Moscow region.
Ukraine's air force said that Russia deployed 41 Shahed and decoy drones across the country overnight, wounding five people. It said that 24 drones were either intercepted or jammed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Economic self-harm' leads to closure of UK's biggest bioethanol plant
‘Economic self-harm' leads to closure of UK's biggest bioethanol plant

Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Times

‘Economic self-harm' leads to closure of UK's biggest bioethanol plant

Britain's biggest bioethanol plant is shutting down with the loss of 160 jobs after the UK-US trade deal opened up the market to cheaper imports from America. Vivergo Fuels, which is owned by Associated British Foods, said it had no choice but to close its site on the Saltend Chemicals Park near Hull after the government took the 'deeply regrettable' decision 'not to support a key national asset'. It had been seeking taxpayer support for the plant, which has been losing £3 million a month. Ben Hackett, the managing director of Vivergo Fuels, said: 'The government's failure to back Vivergo has forced us to cease operations and move to closure immediately. This is a flagrant act of economic self-harm that will have far-reaching consequences. This is a massive blow to Hull and the Humber.' The fate of a second bioethanol factory, Ensus UK, which operates at the Wilton International site near Redcar and is owned by Germany's CropEnergies, is also hanging in the balance. However, it remains in talks with the government over whether the plant, which employs about 100 workers, can continue as the UK's maker of CO₂ — a byproduct of bioethanol production that is used in everything from fizzy drinks to NHS operating theatres. Both companies have been warning of the risk of closure since Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with President Trump in May cut to zero the UK's 19 per cent tariff on up to 1.4 billion litres of US bioethanol imports a year. That is roughly equivalent to the UK's entire annual consumption. On the insistence of the US president, who is keen to preserve American farming jobs, the prime minister agreed to a last-minute concession, blindsiding the two companies that make up Britain's bioethanol industry. They produce green fuel from non-food grade wheat that is used in E10 petrol — which is fossil-fuel petrol containing up to 10 per cent renewable ethanol, to lower its emissions. The companies also make animal feed. • Alistair Osborne: Unexpected extras in US trade deal The trade deal prompted months of negotiations over a potential bailout but Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, has now decided that he cannot justify propping up the sector with taxpayer subsidies. The news was broken to the companies in a meeting with Sarah Jones, the minister for industry. In a statement, the government said that it always took decisions in the national interest: 'That's why we negotiated a landmark deal with the US which protected hundreds of thousands of jobs in sectors like auto and aerospace.' It said it had 'worked closely' with the two companies since June 'to understand the financial challenges they have faced over the past decade, and have taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces'. Paul Kenward, chief executive of ABF Sugar, has long said, even before the trade deal, that the sector's difficulties have been caused by government regulation that favoured US exporters. A spokesman for ABF said: 'We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the government's own green industrial strategy. The government has thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber and a sovereign capability in clean fuels that had the chance to lead the world. Jobs in clean energy will now move overseas.' • Tariffs blamed as Britain's exports to US drop to lowest since 2022 ABF, which has invested more than £700 million in Vivergo over the past decade, added: 'This plant should always have been profitable under the right regulatory environment, as similar plants in western Europe demonstrate.' The company, which said that its supply chain supports '4,000 livelihoods', was also 'hugely disappointed' that 'the press was informed of this decision before we were told — and before we had a chance to communicate to our staff'. Supporters of the government's decision pointed out that ABF, which also owns the retailer Primark, is controlled by the billionaire Weston family, who could have put in more funds. The government offered a possible reprieve to Ensus, which is ahead of Vivergo when it comes to CO₂ production, saying: 'We also continue to work up proposals that ensure the resilience of our CO₂ supply in the long term, in consultation with the sector.' Grant Pearson, chairman of Ensus UK, said that at the meeting with Jones, she confirmed that the government values 'our production of biogenic CO₂ which is a product of critical national importance. They are therefore looking at options to secure an ongoing supply of CO₂ from the Ensus facility.' He said, however, that it will 'take time' to agree 'an acceptable long-term arrangement'. The closure of Vivergo Fuels in Hull is more than the loss of a plant (Paul Kenward writes). It is a warning about how Britain risks closing itself off from the future fuels revolution, and how, in the process, UK PLC risks squandering a real opportunity to create high-quality green industrial jobs. For Hull, bioethanol should have been the start of a green industrial revolution: a hub for low-carbon fuels serving UK transport, shipping and aviation, with skilled employment, investment in infrastructure and growth for the region's farmers and suppliers. Instead, that future will now happen overseas — in countries with which Britain competes for increasingly scarce investment and growth. I am, of course, deeply saddened for our 160 colleagues who are losing their jobs, and for the thousands more across the supply chain — from the farmers at the 12,500 farms supplying our wheat to the hauliers, engineers and contractors whose livelihoods depend on the plant. They will no doubt be deeply frustrated, as I am, at the ministerial inaction that has led us to this point. • Sharon Graham: Path to green energy should not be littered with job losses Over the past decade ABF has invested more than £700 million in Vivergo, sustaining it through extended losses caused by policy distortions unique to the UK. Under competitive and stable market conditions, bioethanol could and should be a hugely profitable sector. All we needed from the government, since the shock of the trade deal that gave away the entire market to subsidised US competitors, was time-limited support to bridge the period until regulatory changes, already in line with the government's stated direction, were in place. For several years a UK-only regulatory loophole gave foreign producers an artificial price advantage in our own market. No other country applies such a rule to its domestic producers. Then, in May, the surprise removal of the 19 per cent tariff on US ethanol imports as part of the trade deal, done with no notice and no transition plan, made it impossible for UK plants to compete in their own market. If Vivergo had been in Rotterdam, where these distortions do not exist, it would be successful. The result of the refusal to support Vivergo is a message to investors that the UK is willing to cede sovereign fuel capabilities to overseas competitors, even in sectors directly aligned with its growth and net-zero priorities. The cost of doing business in UK regulated sectors is becoming too high, not because the industries lack potential but because unpredictable policy shifts and regulatory inconsistency make it too risky to commit long-term capital. This is about more than one plant. Future fuels, from sustainable aviation fuel to advanced biofuels, are a huge global growth opportunity. Other countries are locking in their share. In the US, a clear policy framework has driven record bioethanol output and exports, underpinned rural economies and attracted billions in private investment. Across the EU bioethanol production is growing. • Taxpayer will subsidise industry energy bills to help firms compete The UK could have been part of this story. Saltend Chemicals Park, where Vivergo is based, has the potential to generate £24.2 billion in GVA (gross value added) by 2050, rising to £50 billion with planned investments. That included a signed memorandum of understanding with Meld Energy for a £1.25 billion sustainable aviation fuel facility, projected to add £7.3 billion to the economy over its lifetime. But with Vivergo gone, the domestic ethanol supply this project depended on will no longer exist. That means the investment may now go abroad, along with the jobs, skills and growth it would have brought to the UK. The government had a clear window to safeguard a strategic industry and chose not to take it. Failing to act now sends the wrong message: that Britain is content to become an import-only market for the very fuels and technologies it will depend on to hit net zero. It signals to investors that they must factor in the risk that future policy changes or trade deals could abruptly undermine entire sectors — making every emerging clean energy industry, from sustainable aviation fuel to hydrogen, a more uncertain and risky investment. Vivergo's closure should not close the conversation, but unless the government acts now, the UK's green industrial future will be built abroad. The investment, jobs and skills that could have been anchored in places like Hull will instead flow to countries with clearer, more consistent regulatory regimes. Britain will end up importing fuels and technologies it could have produced at home, paying a premium for the privilege, and watching the economic opportunity of a generation slip through its fingers. Paul Kenward is the chief executive of ABF Sugar, parent company of Vivergo Fuels

UK stands with Ukraine, says David Lammy ahead of Trump-Putin summit
UK stands with Ukraine, says David Lammy ahead of Trump-Putin summit

Western Telegraph

time11 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

UK stands with Ukraine, says David Lammy ahead of Trump-Putin summit

The Foreign Secretary spoke with his Ukrainian counterpart Andrii Sybiha on Friday and 'reiterated' the UK Government's 'commitment to work with the US and Ukraine to secure a just and lasting peace'. Mr Trump and Russian president Mr Putin are flying to Anchorage, Alaska, where they will meet to discuss ending more than three years of fighting in eastern Europe, which began after Russian forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022. A previous meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump (Evan Vucci/AP) Writing on X, Mr Lammy said: 'The UK stands with Ukraine on what will be an important day for the future of Ukraine and Euro-Atlantic security. 'Speaking to Andrii Sybiha today, I reiterated our enduring support and our commitment to work with the US and Ukraine to secure a just and lasting peace.' Mr Sybiha praised the UK for its 'principled stance on supporting' his country. After speaking with Mr Lammy, he said the pair had 'a meaningful conversation' about 'securing a just and lasting peace for Ukraine'. Mr Sybiha wrote on X: 'I value the UK's leadership in the Coalition of the Willing and its principled stance on supporting Ukraine. The UK stands with Ukraine on what will be an important day for the future of Ukraine and Euro-Atlantic security. Speaking to @andrii_sybiha today, I reiterated our enduring support and our commitment to work with the US and Ukraine to secure a just and lasting peace. — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) August 15, 2025 'We focused on joint diplomatic efforts to bring closer a real peace for Ukraine and all of Europe. 'We also discussed ways to further enhance assistance to Ukraine, including long-term financial aid. 'We stand united in defending our shared security and democratic values.' Mr Trump boarded Air Force One to head to the summit at around lunchtime UK time on Friday. He had earlier posted the words 'HIGH STAKES!!!' on his Truth Social platform. A meaningful conversation with UK Foreign Secretary @DavidLammy on securing a just and lasting peace for Ukraine. I value the UK's leadership in the Coalition of the Willing and its principled stance on supporting Ukraine. We focused on joint diplomatic efforts to bring closer… — Andrii Sybiha 🇺🇦 (@andrii_sybiha) August 15, 2025 In an interview aboard the presidential jet, Mr Trump told Fox News Channel his meeting with Mr Putin would 'work out very well'. He added: 'And if it doesn't, I'm going to head back home real fast.' Speaking to reporters, the US president said he wanted 'to see a ceasefire rapidly' and continued: 'I don't know if it's going to be today but I'm not going to be happy if it's not today.' He has previously said the US could offer security guarantees to Kyiv alongside European leaders, but 'not in the form of Nato', and added it would be up to the Ukrainians to decide whether to concede land to Mr Putin. Other UK Cabinet members have backed Ukraine in the build-up to Friday's summit. 'The UK's role is to stand with Ukraine on the battlefield and in the negotiations, and prepare, as we have been, leading 30 other nations with military planning for a ceasefire and a secure peace through what we call the Coalition of the Willing,' Defence Secretary John Healey told BBC Breakfast. Asked about lessons from the Second World War on the 80th anniversary of VJ Day, he said: 'The first lesson is that military and fighting solves nothing in the end, and that the end to war must come through talking, must come from diplomacy. 'So today in Alaska is what I hope, we all hope to see, a first step towards serious negotiations.' At a VJ Day reception this week in the Downing Street garden, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was 'fighting for the same values' as the British-backed Allies were during the Second World War.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store