Consumer advocates warn Aussies about ‘dangerous' wage advancing products and call for further regulation
Australian consumers have been warned about a 'dangerous' new financial product sending struggling people into debt spirals, and consumer advocates say urgent regulation is needed.
Wage advance services are advertised as offering a quick and easy way to borrow money before your payday, some offering the advances within a minute.
The products are under no obligation to assess a person's ability to service the debt or to give financial hardship assistance.
This has led to a chorus of consumer advocacy groups to call on the Albanese government to urgently regulate the services that they say make the cost-of-living crisis worse and are sending thousands into dangerous debt spirals.
Consumer Action Law Centre chief Stephanie Tonkin said she had heard from people who had taken multiple wage advance contracts and had ended up committing their whole income to repaying the loans.
'These products encourage people to borrow against their future income to meet their essential living needs, and this can cause serious harm when there's no extra money in the next pay cycle, only greater debt,' Ms Tonkin said.
'The fees add up very quickly if you're stuck in a cycle of borrowing now to pay more later.'
This fresh warning comes as buy now, pay later (BNPL) products are
brought under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act
, a long-time campaign goal for consumer advocacy groups.
'We want wage advance brought under the Credit Act as a priority to give people the same consumer protections as BNPL,' Ms Tonkin said.
'It's taken years for BNPL to be regulated – we can't wait that long again.'
Consumer Credit Legal Service principal solicitor Roberta Grealish likened the proliferation of this type of financial product to a game of 'whack a mole'.
'Wage advance products now need to be brought within the Credit Act to prevent the harms that the new BNPL rules hope to address simply shifting into this space,' Ms Grealish said.
Choice campaigns director Rosie Thomas said the work to close 'lending loopholes' was not yet finished.
'Consumers will continue to be harmed until wage advance is also regulated as credit,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
25 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Better bang for buck': NSW to cut battery subsidies as federal scheme kicks in
The NSW government will end its incentive to install a home solar battery from July in favour of an enhanced Commonwealth scheme, and use the savings to encourage households to allow their stored energy to be remotely accessed by the grid. Since last November, NSW consumers have been able to access a rebate of up to $2600 (depending on the size of the battery) to attach storage to their rooftop solar systems. The scheme resulted in 11,400 battery installations across the state in six months. The program will conclude at the end of this month, while the Australian government's $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program is set to start on July 1. The federal rebate, announced before the election, will reduce the cost of a battery by about 30 per cent, making it about double the size of the state scheme. The NSW government will redirect the money to its Peak Demand Reduction Scheme, a program designed to reduce electricity demand during peak periods. In particular, the government is doubling the payments to encourage solar households to sign up to a virtual power plant (VPP) – a group of solar-powered batteries linked by software, which are owned by households and small businesses that have consented for excess stored power to be sold to the grid. Smart Energy Council acting chief executive Wayne Smith said VPPs were important because it increased the stability of the grid and this lowered power bills for everyone, not just those households with solar panels and batteries. 'There's a private benefit and a public good,' Smith said. 'It's actually important to find ways to try to integrate the individual home batteries into a much bigger collective battery system.' The Smart Energy Council says a 6 kWh battery at $6000-$8000 would meet the needs of nine out of 10 homes. The federal subsidy would be about $2232 and the NSW incentive to connect to a VPP would be about $444. On an 11.5kWh battery, the federal subsidy would be about $4278 and the NSW support for a VPP connection would be $850.
The Age
25 minutes ago
- The Age
‘Better bang for buck': NSW to cut battery subsidies as federal scheme kicks in
The NSW government will end its incentive to install a home solar battery from July in favour of an enhanced Commonwealth scheme, and use the savings to encourage households to allow their stored energy to be remotely accessed by the grid. Since last November, NSW consumers have been able to access a rebate of up to $2600 (depending on the size of the battery) to attach storage to their rooftop solar systems. The scheme resulted in 11,400 battery installations across the state in six months. The program will conclude at the end of this month, while the Australian government's $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program is set to start on July 1. The federal rebate, announced before the election, will reduce the cost of a battery by about 30 per cent, making it about double the size of the state scheme. The NSW government will redirect the money to its Peak Demand Reduction Scheme, a program designed to reduce electricity demand during peak periods. In particular, the government is doubling the payments to encourage solar households to sign up to a virtual power plant (VPP) – a group of solar-powered batteries linked by software, which are owned by households and small businesses that have consented for excess stored power to be sold to the grid. Smart Energy Council acting chief executive Wayne Smith said VPPs were important because it increased the stability of the grid and this lowered power bills for everyone, not just those households with solar panels and batteries. 'There's a private benefit and a public good,' Smith said. 'It's actually important to find ways to try to integrate the individual home batteries into a much bigger collective battery system.' The Smart Energy Council says a 6 kWh battery at $6000-$8000 would meet the needs of nine out of 10 homes. The federal subsidy would be about $2232 and the NSW incentive to connect to a VPP would be about $444. On an 11.5kWh battery, the federal subsidy would be about $4278 and the NSW support for a VPP connection would be $850.
Sydney Morning Herald
41 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese's cautious approach risks a repeat of Turnbull's wasted majority. He must find a middle path
Anthony Albanese had a chance on Tuesday to expand the scope of his second-term agenda, following his thumping election win on May 3, and lay out a more ambitious reform plan. It was a chance he very deliberately chose not to take. Mindful of the uncertain international environment; a looming meeting with US President Donald Trump (the source of much of this uncertainty); the risks of exceeding his mandate so soon after the election; and conscious of the need to begin to rebuild faith in government, institutions and even the media, Albanese stuck to his narrowly defined path. In his first major speech to the National Press Club since the election, Albanese hewed closely to the policy script he took to the election campaign – cheaper childcare, making Australia a renewable energy superpower, developing advanced manufacturing, and expanding Medicare bulk-billing. There was a concession of a sort, in the form of a roundtable meeting in August that will bring together business, unions and government to discuss the government's growth and productivity agenda – an acknowledgement, at the very least, that major business groups are not exactly thrilled with the government's industrial relations changes, to see wages rising faster than inflation, and that (of course) they desire a cut to the company tax rate. Loading There was also an acknowledgement that Australia may well have to spend more on defence in the years to come, but Albanese made clear – as he has been saying privately for weeks – that he would not simply set an arbitrary target for defence spending as a proportion of GDP, but rather that 'we will always provide for capability that's needed'. But these are uncertain times. The Reserve Bank of Australia used the word 'uncertain' 21 times in the minutes of their most recent board meeting, compared to just twice seven months ago, on the day Trump was elected. Labor true believers hoping Albanese would unleash his inner Paul Keating in this second term, emboldened by a 94-seat stranglehold on the House and a progressive majority in the Senate, will have been left disappointed.
