&w=3840&q=100)
Women's labour participation in India far from matching G20 peers: Poll
Overall job creation is falling short of the needs of India's mostly young, rapidly-growing working-age population. Women, who make up half of that pool, are largely absent from the workforce and most women with jobs are not formally employed on payrolls.
The official female labour force participation rate (FLFPR) rose to 31.7% from 27.8% in the latest 2023-24 Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), but is well short of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 2047 development goal to raise it to 70%, putting it more in line with advanced economies.
India is at the bottom of the G20 table, behind Saudi Arabia and Turkey, and lower than even neighbouring Bangladesh and Bhutan, according to World Bank data. The G20 average is around 50%.
A majority, 80%, of top independent economists and policy experts surveyed over the past month, 32 of 40, said it would take at least 20 to 30 years for India to reach a rate comparable to other G20 economies, including 18 who said it would take more than three decades. The remaining eight said it would take 10-20 years.
"The kind of work women are involved in is not really what we call good jobs or good quality work. It's really just bottom of the ladder, survivalist kind. It's good they're participating but it's not the kind of transformational participation you might imagine," said Ashwini Deshpande, a professor and head of the department of economics at Ashoka University.
"The job crisis is much more acute than in countries with similar levels of GDP...And when jobs are scarce, men get the first priority everywhere," added Deshpande.
Only 15.9% of working women are in regular wage or salaried jobs, the kind that come with contracts, steady pay or benefits.
While officials have noted the recent rise in female labour force participation as a sign of progress, the latest PLFS survey showed 73.5% of rural working women and over 40% with jobs in urban areas are self-employed.
Asked what they make of the official data over 70% of economists surveyed, 32 of 43, said it masked the real picture.
"Ideally...you should see household earnings also go up when women are participating and that has not happened, which is a very big marker that this is potentially not the best kind of employment. It's potentially distress-driven," said Rosa Abraham, assistant professor at Azim Premji University.
Asked if the recent rise in FLFPR signals real progress, she said: "That level of shift is still nowhere near what you would expect at this level of economic development that we are in and there's still a long way to go."
Over 70% of experts said the Indian government's overall unemployment data was inaccurate and masked the severity of joblessness and underemployment.
Even when jobs are available, safety concerns and unpaid care work prevent many women from applying. They spend nearly five hours daily on household duties, over three times as much as men, according to the 2025 Time Use Survey.
"For women the productive and reproductive age coincide. Hence childcare and lack of suitable facilities serve as a constraint," said Sangeeta Shroff, former professor at the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics. "To address such issues, it will require aggressive policy intervention which will require considerable time and resources."
Asked what the government should prioritise, respondents highlighted expanding childcare, safer workplaces and stronger anti-discrimination measures.
Bina Agarwal, professor of development economics and environment at the University of Manchester, said young women need safe hostels in cities and small towns, safe transport to work and enforcement of workplace sexual harassment laws.
"These are among many ideas feminist economists in India have been advocating for years. Is anyone listening?" she asked.
(Reporting by Devayani Sathyan and Veronica Khongwir; Polling by Pranoy Krishna, Rahul Trivedi and Susobhan Sarkar; Editing by Hari Kishan, Ross Finley, Alexandra Hudson)
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Colombia's former president Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest
Former Colombian President Álvaro Uribe has been sentenced to 12 years of house arrest after being found guilty of bribing a public official and abusing the legal process, according to a court document seen by Reuters and a source familiar with the case. Uribe, 73, was convicted on Monday by Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia in a long-running case that began more than a decade ago. The sentencing will be officially announced in court on Friday. The document, also reported by local media, states that Uribe will pay a fine of $578,000. This is the first time a former Colombian president has been found guilty in court. The ruling comes ahead of Colombia's 2026 presidential election, in which several politicians close to Uribe are expected to run. The case could also affect Colombia's ties with the United States. This week, US Senator Marco Rubio said the ruling shows the 'weaponisation of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges,' according to Reuters. Some analysts have warned the decision could lead to a reduction in US aid. Uribe has always denied wrongdoing. He and his supporters argue the case is politically motivated. 'This is a persecution,' they have said. But critics say the conviction is significant, as Uribe has long faced allegations of links to right-wing paramilitary groups but had never been convicted until now. The case centres on accusations that Uribe tried to manipulate witnesses in a case against him.


India Today
13 minutes ago
- India Today
Is US economy nearing recession? July jobs report shows rise in unemployment rate
US job growth in July 2025 fell short of expectations, delivering a sharp blow to economists and unsettling financial markets. According to a closely watched Labor Department report released on Friday and cited by Reuters, nonfarm payrolls added just 73,000 jobs last month, well below expectations, while employment gains from May and June were revised downward by a staggering 258, unemployment rate also ticked up to 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent, signalling that the once-resilient labor market may finally be cracking under market strength had been a main support for the U.S. economy, helping it hold up against high inflation and tough policies from the Trump administration, such as new tariffs and strict immigration measures. But the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data paints a troubling picture of a cooling job market, raising the specter of a looming the most startling revelation in the report wasn't July's weak job creation alone, but the massive downward revisions to previous job gains were cut from 144,000 to just 19,000, and June's numbers were slashed from 147,000 to a paltry 14, Freeze Signals Broader SlowdownThe three-month average for job gains has now dropped to just 35,000, a sharp drop from monthly averages exceeding 240,000 in like retail, tech, and manufacturing are reporting either stagnant hiring or outright layoffs. Wage growth is also slowing, job openings are declining, and the unemployment uptick marks a critical turning point for analysts who had seen labor data as a key measure of economic resilience.'This is the slowdown we've been bracing for,' said Luke Tilley, chief economist at Wilmington Trust. 'Firms are adjusting to a very different cost structure and holding off on hiring.'Trump's Tariffs: A Major Obstacle to GrowthPresident Donald Trump's sweeping 2025 tariff agenda is emerging as a key factor weighing down job creation. The average US tariff rate has surged to between 18 per cent and 21per cent, the highest in over a to the Penn Wharton Budget Model, the long-run effect could be a 6 per cen reduction in GDP and a 5 per cen decline in real wages. Middle-income households may lose an estimated USD 22,000 in lifetime Tax Foundation compares the tariffs to a stealth tax hike, estimating they could shrink 2025 GDP by 0.8% and cost households between $1,200 and $1,600 this year alone. Higher input costs—up 2% to 4.5% in some sectors—are pressuring businesses to scale back hiring or cut jobs Under Pressure to PivotWith inflation still stuck between 2.6 per cent and 2.8 per cent, the Federal Reserve has been trying to strike a careful balance. But the sudden slowdown in the job market may push it to to CME Group data, investors now see a 75.5 per cent chance the Fed will cut interest rates in September—up from just 40 per cent the day before the jobs report came central bank had been using strong employment numbers to justify holding rates steady. Now, the dramatic slowdown in hiring may compel policymakers to act to prevent a deeper economic all sectors fared equally. Healthcare, construction, and government continued to post modest job gains, but at a slower pace. Meanwhile, tech, retail, and manufacturing either stagnated or saw declines in hiring.A Turning Point for the Economy?The July jobs report may mark the moment when a soft landing slipped out of reach. With hiring slowing, jobless claims ticking upward, and consumer spending dampened by inflation and higher costs due to tariffs, many economists believe the second half of 2025 could see the US slipping closer to, or even into a recession.'This report is a gamechanger,' said Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, via CNBC. 'The labor market is deteriorating quickly.'- Ends
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Brazil's Supreme Court judge Moraes defies US sanctions, vows to continue Bolsonaro trial
Moraes, who is overseeing a criminal case against Trump ally Bolsonaro, told a court session on Friday that he will continue to do his job and 'ignore the sanctions' imposed by the US that effectively block him from the country's wide-reaching financial system read more Brazil's Supreme Court Minister Alexandre de Moraes talks during Brazil's Supreme Court trial over an alleged coup attempt, in Brasilia, Brazil on June 9, 2025. Reuters File Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing a criminal case against an ally of President Donald Trump, told a court session on Friday that he will continue to do his job and 'ignore the sanctions' imposed by the United States that effectively block him from the country's wide-reaching financial system. On Wednesday, the US imposed sanctions on Moraes for overseeing the trial of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, accusing the judge of authorising arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Justice Moraes has presided over the criminal case against Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup to overturn Brazil's 2022 presidential election after his supporters violently stormed government buildings following the election victory of leftist Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The US sanctions were accompanied by an executive order imposing a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods, which was also tied to the case Moraes is overseeing against Bolsonaro, an unwavering supporter of the US president. Bolsonaro, a far-right former army captain, and several of his closest allies were charged with plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 electoral loss, in a case that was in many ways similar to accusations against Trump. Moraes said the court would not submit itself to foreign coercion or what he likened to new coup attempts by Bolsonaro's allies. Moraes said the Federal Supreme Court will continue to exercise its role as guardian of the Constitution. 'It will continue to exercise its role in criminal proceedings so that it can provide a final answer to all Brazilian society regarding who was truly responsible' for the attempted coup, he said, adding that there will be due process of law with no internal or external interference. Congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro, a son of the former president who moved to the U.S. to persuade the White House to intervene in his father's favor, has claimed credit for Trump's policies on Brazil. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This criminal organization's insistence on implementing measures harmful to Brazil, by encouraging the imposition of these tariffs and making spurious and illegal attacks against Brazilian public officials, is aimed at creating a severe economic crisis in the country,' he said. 'But to the dismay of these traitorous Brazilians, that crisis will not happen.' Moraes added that the court would conclude the trial of those accused of attempting a coup d'état before the end of the year.