NCC takes action against 45 suppliers for Consumer Protection Act violations
Image: Picture: Lebogang Maile/X
The National Consumer Commission (NCC) has launched a significant crackdown on 45 suppliers across South Africa for serious violations of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA). Following a comprehensive series of inspections, the NCC uncovered alarming practices that raise urgent concerns about consumer safety in the marketplace. From selling expired food products to failing to provide proper labelling, these violations threaten the well-being of consumers and undermine trust in the food supply chain.
During the inspections, the NCC identified numerous instances where suppliers were found selling unsafe goods, including dairy products, meat products, maize meal, eggs, snacks, biscuits, and noodles. Alarmingly, some items lacked essential expiry or best-before dates, which violates Section 55(2) of the CPA. This critical regulation is designed to protect consumers by ensuring that they are provided with safe, usable, and quality goods. The absence of date markings hinders consumers from making informed decisions about the safety of their purchases.
Further violations were uncovered as inspectors noted that suppliers were offering items such as wors and chicken pieces without the required proper labelling. This lack of compliance contravenes Section 24 of the CPA, which mandates that all goods must have trade descriptions applied, ensuring that labels do not mislead consumers about the products sold.
Of particular concern was the discovery that numerous suppliers in rural and peri-urban areas displayed everyday goods like noodles, sugar, soup, and canned foods without any visible pricing. This practice violates Section 23(3) of the CPA, which stipulates that all products for sale must be clearly priced, enabling transparency and informed consumer choice. The lack of visible pricing can lead to confusion and exploitation, particularly among vulnerable consumers.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The NCC also observed a troubling trend of suppliers failing to issue complete sale records or receipts, contravening Section 26(2-3) of the CPA. Consumers are entitled to receive accurate sales records that include pertinent information such as the supplier's name and address, product description, quantity, price, and total amount paid, including VAT. Without these records, consumers may find themselves at a disadvantage, lacking essential documentation for their purchases.
In response to these violations, the affected suppliers have been ordered to rectify their practices immediately. They must remove and destroy non-compliant goods from their shelves, label all products appropriately, ensure visible pricing, and provide accurate sales records with every transaction. The NCC is currently conducting advanced investigations into other suppliers to ensure adherence to the CPA.
For those businesses that neglect to comply with the terms of the Compliance Notices, the NCC has made it clear that it may escalate the matter to the National Consumer Tribunal. Suppliers could face administrative fines of up to R1 million or 10% of their annual turnover, a significant penalty aimed at enforcing compliance and protecting consumer rights.
Mr. Hardin Ratshisusu, the NCC's Acting Commissioner, highlighted the agency's commitment to consumer safety, stating, 'Food safety remains our top priority. This enforcement is part of targeted action to stem the sale of unsafe products to unsuspecting consumers. The NCC will continue collaboration with other regulators to ensure compliance with the CPA and related legislation.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Joy at last for first successful land restitution claimants
Elandskloof CPA committee members outside the Western Cape High Court. Image: Supplied AFTER more than two decades, the Elandskloof community, South Africa's first successful land restitution claim involving over 300 families, is set to regain full control of their land. The Western Cape High Court on Thursday lifted the administration order placed on their Community Property Association (CPA) in 2005. 'The administration order granted by this court on 18 October 2005 under the hand of her Ladyship Ms Justice Ndita in terms of the provisions of section 13(1) of Communal Property Associations Act 28 of 1996 be rescinded with immediate effect,' the court ruled. In 1996, Elandskloof, a rural village in the Cederberg made history as the first successful land restitution case in a newly democratic South Africa. It also became home to the country's first CPA, established and registered under the newly enacted Communal Property Association Act of 1996. The history of the Elandskloof community dates back to the early 1800s. In 1962, as a result of apartheid forced removals, families who had lived on the land for generations were displaced and resettled in various parts of what was then the Cape Province. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Although the resettlement process began in 1998, it soon stalled due to financial constraints. In the years that followed, the shortcomings of the restitution process became increasingly evident: land was returned without the capital or support needed to develop it, and many beneficiaries disconnected from rural livelihoods after decades of displacement continued to carry the deep scars of apartheid. The process was marked by ongoing tensions and conflict within the community. The Department of Land Reform and Rural Development eventually applied to the Western Cape High Court to place the Elandskloof CPA under administration, steps the government deemed necessary to address persistent mistrust, internal conflict, non-compliance, and a lack of skills and capacity within the CPA. The department then this year approached the court to have the administration rescinded, to relieve the government of its administrative role and return full control of the CPA's affairs to its duly elected committee, allowing the community to govern itself. Some of the steps taken by the department during the administration period included a local committee being established consisting of the members of the community occupying the land to assist the officials with the management of the day to day issues of the residents. Basic services such as the provision of electricity, water and refuse collection were restored by the local municipality. A mediator was appointed to mediate the dispute between the members of the CPA. 'The annual general meetings (AGM) of the (CPA's) members were restored with attendance of the majority of the members of the community. The committee of the respondent was duly elected by its own community members to resume an independent management of its own affairs for the benefits of Its members and by themselves,' the department's court application for the rescission read. 'The committee is positive and dedicated and fully capable of executing its tasks and responsibilities. The environment in the community has less mistrust, tension and conflict and is conducive for the respondent to regain full ownership of its processes, roles and function. The (CPA) is confident that they are ready to take full ownership of its processes, whilst it may be (with) continued support from the department and other institutions on an ad hoc basis.' Beneficiary Ansie Visagie travelled from Worcester to be at the high court on Thursday. 'We feel very excited about the milestone we've reached today. It's a big moment, especially after what happened in 1996 and the setback that followed in 2005. Many beneficiaries have since passed away, which makes this moment even more special. "My vision for Elandskloof is that it should be a developed farm where people can function independently, where individuals can do something for themselves and truly operate independently. The most important thing that must happen is that people must get proper housing. Especially for the elderly, they deserve the joy of having a real house they can call their own.' Committee chairperson, JP George added: 'I spoke with a lump in my throat when I spoke to the committee. Words cannot describe it, we fought something like 34 years to get Elandskloof back and we were under administration for 20 years. We are grateful, now we can regroup and build Elandskloof into what we know it can be. It's a milestone in our history. It shows if we work together and believe in each other, we can reach success.'
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Mel Viljoen has a new partner in the US and 10 Afrikaner ‘girls' on the way
It seems to be going swimmingly for the Viljoens in Miami, with a new partner for their nail business and staff from South Africa on the way. Mel Viljoen of Tammy Taylor fame has found a new partner in the US who 'contributed' $3 million, while she also says that the 'first 10 Afrikaner girls' are on their way to do 'the nails'. Viljoen announced this with a video on Facebook where she is giving a manicure to her new partner, Sheila Martin, who owns the Lilymac Spa & Boutique in Palm Beach, Miami. Viljoen writes: 'I just want to say thank you to Sheila Martin, owner and founder of Lilymac Spa & Boutique for her contribution of $3m. This is such an exciting time. All the queens coming on board. What she (Martin) loves most about this partnership is the haters, she says. The more bad news about someone, the more Americans want to invest. Very counterintuitive but great for business!' 'America is good to us!' she gushes. ALSO READ: Did the Viljoens of Tammy Taylor-fame skip the country? Viljoens vs Tammy Taylor also started with an agreement Viljoen's widely publicised troubles with Tammy Taylor also started with an agreement with a US beauty business owner. It ended with allegations of fraud and with Tammy Taylor suing them for using her trademark without her permission. A California court recently barred the Vijoens from using it. Viljoen and her husband, Peet, met the real Tammy Taylor on a trip to the US and in 2017 entered into an international distribution agreement that granted the Viljoens the right to distribute Tammy Taylor Nail products in Australia and Africa, according to the judgment in a California court when Taylor sued them for using her trademark without her permission. Eighteen months later, Tammy Taylor entered into a master licence agreement with the Viljoens, giving them rights to use Tammy Taylor's US registered trademarks as well as her system for operating nail salons to enable the Viljoens to open their own salons in Africa under the Tammy Taylor name. However, the relationship between Taylor and the Viljoens quickly disintegrated and Tammy Taylor terminated both agreements by April 2022. But the Viljoens continue to use her trademarks. Their troubles continued in South Africa too, as a number of prospective franchisees wanted their money back after paying for a licence fee upfront until the Viljoens could find a venue for the salon, but receiving nothing in the end. One of them paid for two salons and a stake in the business, but lost R5.8 million. ALSO READ: Tammy Taylor Global Franchising gets a big hiding in South African high court Viljoens get hiding in last Tammy Taylor case in SA In April, in the last case before they left the country, Judge Joseph Raulinga declared the transaction between Tammy Taylor Global Franchising, the Viljoens and Lebohang Hlathuka unconscionable, unjust and unreasonable in terms of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA). It was also declared void. In addition, he ordered that Tammy Taylor Global Franchising must refund Hlathuka the R600 000 she paid for a salon with interest. He also ordered that Tammy Taylor Global Franchising, as well as both the Viljoens immediately cease representing that they have the legal authority to sell Tammy Taylor nail franchises in South Africa without permission under the Trade Marks Act and without authorisation or a licence. He also ordered that they must remove all references to Tammy Taylor from their websites, stationery, forms, marketing material, salon products and social media platforms within 30 days from 25 April. Nothing was removed or changed. ALSO READ: Hawks investigating Peet and Melany Viljoen for fraud with Tammy Taylor franchises Judge got the Hawks involved Raulinga also ordered the registrar of the court to forward a copy of the order and all the papers to the NPA and that Tammy Taylor Global Franchising and the Viljoens must pay Hlathuka's legal costs. The lawyer acting for Tammy Taylor Global Franchising and the Viljoens informed Hlathuka's lawyer that they will appeal the order but have since informed all the parties that they are withdrawing from the case. Meanwhile, the Hawks confirmed that they are investigating various matters against the Viljoens for fraud. Just after the Viljoens confirmed the news that they left South Africa in May, the real Tammy Taylor struck. ALSO READ: US court rules Viljoens must pay real Tammy Taylor R71 million Real Tammy Taylor awarded about R71 million She already announced a year ago that she intended to sue the Viljoens for $100 million. However, when the case was heard in April, the Viljoens did not contest it. Tammy Taylor was awarded $4 million (R71 million) for statutory damages caused by their use of her trademark and breach of contract. Mel said in a subsequent video that Taylor got a 'default judgment', seemingly inferring that it carries less authority than the judgment in a defended case. Peet pointed out that he already read in the media last year that Taylor wants $100 million from them. In the video, he laughs and says she might as well have sued the moon. After the latest case, the Viljoens left the country for Miami, where they started posting videos on Fakebook and Instagram, filled with comments about how much they hate South African blacks and how much they love the US. They also promised to help Afrikaners to go and settle in the US, saying it is very cheap to live there – even on a waiter's salary. Viljoen also invited nail technicians who she trained to go to the US to do nails as there is not much training there, with Vietnamese girls doing nails at night after, as she puts it, 'making flied lice'. Their posts are filled with nasty comments about other races and nations. Their responses to their critics who ask what happened to the money they took from South African franchisees are almost playground bully behaviour. Responses include calling them gay or fat or saying, from a racist point of view, that they had a child with a black person. ALSO READ: Did the Viljoens leave Tammy Taylor Nails franchisees in the lurch? Is this the Viljoens' business advice after Tammy Taylor debacle? In another post Viljoen posted pictures of what looks like her business advice. According to the first tip, titled 'Attention is currency': In the US, being talked about is often more valuable than being liked. Media outlets, influencers and brands are in constant competition for clicks, views and engagement – controversy guarantees those. The saying 'there's no such thing as bad publicity' is taken much more literally in 'Marican' pop culture than in many other countries. According to 'celebrity and 'outlaw' branding': The US has a long history of glamorsiging (sic) the rebel, the underdog, and the outlaw – from cowboys and rock stars to controversial CEOs and reality stars. People who 'break rules' are often seen as bold, authentic or fearless – even if what they do is morally questionable. And explain the 'entertainment culture': Americans don't just consume news; they consume drama. A controversial figure can cross over into pop culture simply because they make for good TV, viral TikToks, or heated debates on talk shows. Many reality shows and influencers deliberately manufacture conflict to boost ratings and follower counts. The Viljoens did not respond to a request for comment on the new partner and the franchisees left behind in South Africa.
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
‘Military veterans' born in the 90s banked R3.5 million in business support
The Gauteng provincial government had a 3% budgeted target for military veteran support programmes in the 2024-25 financial year. Funds earmarked for businesses owned by military veterans have been given to companies headed by directors who had not yet started school when the new South Africa was born. A budget allocation meant for military veterans exists within the Gauteng government, but the opposition has called the past two financial years' payments 'questionable'. The Department of Sport, Art, Culture and Recreation (SACR) recently confirmed its expenditure on military veteran support programmes via a written response to questions posed in the provincial legislature. Eligibility questioned SACR MEC Matome Chiloane signed off on a response that listed the payments made to companies owned by military veterans for services to the government, including the ID numbers of the relevant directors. The Democratic Alliance noted the definition of military veteran listed in the Military Veterans Act is someone who served in a military organisation during apartheid or in the army before 27 April 1994. 'This excludes individuals born after this period or who were still children during the years of military service eligibility,' stated the DA. The Gauteng government gave R8.5 million to companies owned by military veterans in the 2023-24 and 2024-25 financial years, but at least R3.5 million of that went to directors born in or later than 1990. One payment of R147 700 was made to a company for language services whose director was born in 1995, while R45 000 was spent on a transformation programme provided by a company whose owner was born in 1992. The department gave R966 000 to a company for tablets, R405 000 to another for eventing services, and R486 000 to a third for a sports competition, with these owners being born in 1990, 1991 and 1996, respectively. Five other payments of a combined R1.5 million were made to directors born between 1990 and 1995 for logistics and capacity building, among others. Socio-economic support Finance MEC Lebogang Maile's budget speech reaffirmed the provincial government's commitment to assisting selected groups with business funding. 'We will continue to support provincial socio-economic transformation initiatives by monitoring the 60% spend on Gauteng township-based suppliers; particularly SMMEs owned by Africans, women, people with disabilities, the youth and military veterans,' stated Maile in July. Chiloane's response clarified the payments were not for contracts, but part of a larger support programme. 'The department supports these companies through requests for quotations in line with the annual performance plans indicators, that is, percentage spent on military [being] 3%,' stated Chiloane's response. Targeted spend on military veterans was 3% in the last financial year, up from 1% in the 2023-24 financial year. 'The department further notes the improvement in the 2024-25 financial year on the military veteran support,' concluded Chiloane. 'Far too young' DA Shadow SACR MEC Kingsol Chabalala accused the department of neglecting job creation initiatives, stating some beneficiaries were 'far too young to be categorised as military veterans'. Chabalala said the DA will urge Chiloane to investigate the payments 'transparently and without bias', to ensure the funds reach their intended targets. 'This reeks of a blatant abuse of procurement processes to secure lucrative contracts. 'It stands as a glaring example of how people in this department will stop at nothing, even exploiting the legacy of veterans, to divert public resources for personal enrichment,' Chabalala concluded. NOW READ: R34.2 billion of defence and military budget to go to salaries
