Green groups fear business sector will dominate debate at Chalmers' roundtable at environment's expense
The current list of 24 invitees to next month's summit features only one representative from the environment movement: former Treasury secretary Ken Henry, in his capacity as chair of the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation.
In contrast, Australia's four peak business groups – the Business Council of Australia, Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Australian Industry Group and Council of Small Business Organisations of Australia – will each be represented as Chalmers attempts to build a broad consensus on economic reforms to lift living standards.
An invite has also been extended to Ben Wyatt, the former Western Australian treasurer who now sits on the boards of gas giant Woodside and miner Rio Tinto.
Basha Stasak, a nature program manager at the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF), said the views of green groups were critical to the debate given the link between environmental protection and economic prosperity.
'Over quite a long time now, we've seen nature as something that we can exploit and extract from, and [have] not considered the cumulative impacts of that, and not considered the importance of protecting nature to maintain a prosperous economy,' Stasak said.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'We will not have that perspective in this [roundtable] debate. We will not have a strong perspective about why protecting nature is so essential for our economic prosperity.'
Henry this week drew a direct link between nature and the economy, casting a long-awaited fix to federal environment protection laws as the 'most important' reform the Albanese government could pursue to lift stagnant productivity growth.
Stasak said there would be a 'lot of pressure' on Henry and independent MP Allegra Spender, another nature advocate invited, to use their presence at the forum to speak up for environmentalists.
Guardian Australia understands Henry secured an invitation to the summit because of his expertise in tax reform, as well as his environmental advocacy.
On Friday, Chalmers announced another 13 invitees to the three-day event in Canberra, including Henry, Spender and Wyatt.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
The Commonwealth Bank of Australia chief executive, Matt Comyn, the NSW treasurer, Daniel Mookhey, the Tech Council of Australia boss, Scott Farquhar, the ACCC chair, Gina Cass-Gottlieb, and the respective heads of the departments of prime minister and cabinet and Treasury, Steven Kennedy and Jenny Wilkinson, were also among the latest batch of invitees.
More invitations will be issued as the summit's agenda is finalised, Chalmers said, while noting that 'we can't invite representatives from every industry or organisation'.
In a statement to Guardian Australia, Watt did not directly address the green groups' omission from the roundtable but said the forum was a 'fantastic chance to achieve important reform' – including to the environmental approvals process.
Watt said he spoke with the ACF, WWF-Australia and Greenpeace as recently as Friday afternoon as part of his planned rewrite of federal nature laws.
'I look forward to more productive discussions in the future as we prepare to pass this important legislation,' he said.
The Greens assistant climate and energy spokesperson, Steph Hodgins-May, said the decision to invite a Woodside board member – Wyatt – showed the depths of 'Labor's toxic ties to the gas industry'.
Wyatt was appointed to the Woodside board less than six months after quitting WA parliament in March 2021.
In May, the gas giant was granted provisional approval to operate its North West shelf gas processing plant until 2070, subject to strict conditions.
The federal government is still awaiting Woodside's response to the draft decision, which was originally due 10 days after the 28 May ruling.
Guardian Australia sought an explanation from the offices of Chalmers and Watt for Wyatt's invitation but did not receive a response.
The roundtable will be held on 19-21 August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
NSW religious schools see 30% rise in enrolments in a decade – and not necessarily due to beliefs
When the Australian Christian college (ACC) in north-west Sydney began receiving a surge of enrolments after the pandemic, its principal, Brendan Corr, was not surprised. ACC is located in Marsden Park, a major growth corridor of Sydney identified by the state government as an area where a failure to factor in the pace and scale of development has left families without access to local public schools. ACC has more than doubled in size, from 667 students in 2019 to 2,155 in 2024, the strongest growth of any independent school in New South Wales. While 60% of families are Christian, 40% either have no religion or are from other faith backgrounds, predominantly Hindu. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The ACC is not an outlier. Enrolments in religious schools have increased by a record 30% in NSW in the past decade, new data shows – and not necessarily correlating with student beliefs. The Association of Independent Schools of NSW (AISNSW), the peak body for the state's 430 independent schools, released a new report on Wednesday finding independent schools have enrolled almost two-thirds of the state's additional students since 2000 – growing by 101,565. More new students were enrolled in NSW independent schools in the past five years than every state and territory government school sector combined. They now account for almost 20% of state enrolments, up from 13% in 2000. And religious independent schools, which represent more than 80% of the sector, have done the heavy lifting. Enrolments surged by 30% in a decade, compared with 2% in government schools and 6% in Catholic systemic systems. Growth was highest in Sydney's north-west and south-west, including Blacktown, Baulkham Hills and Hawkesbury, where 10 new low-to-medium fee independent schools opened over the past decade. The acting education minister, Courtney Houssos, says the former government 'neglected growing suburbs', leaving 'many families' in Western Sydney without a public school option. An audit of enrolment growth in NSW, released last year, found the top 10 student growth areas between 2018 and 2023, all located in Sydney's north-west and south-west corridors, collectively accounted for almost 40% of the state's student enrolment growth. Houssos says the state government is investing $9bn in new and upgraded schools, including $3.9bn in Western Sydney, to address the backlog, including new schools in Leppington, Tallawong, Box Hill, Gables, Gledswood Hills and Jordan Springs. Corr believes his school's success is not just down to geography. 'Spiritual nurturing is something that's important to our parents,' he says. 'It's not even just that people of non-faith are welcomed into the school, which they undoubtedly are. 'Regardless of the faith position of a family, the students gain benefit of being part of our Christian community, because of the way we see humanity and serve it.' AISNSW's chief executive, Margery Evans, says the face of independent schools is changing, led by low-to-medium fee Christian, Islamic and Anglican schools. 'In 2025, the typical independent school is co-ed, K-12, faith-based, located west of Parramatta and charging less than $6,000 a year,' Evans says. That's despite a decline in religious affiliation. The percentage of students who identified as having no faith in NSW almost doubled in the past decade, the report found, from 16% to 29%. But while affiliation with Christianity dropped from 55% to 38%, students identifying as Islamic increased from 8% to 12%. The findings aligned with the latest census data, which found religious affiliation had dramatically reduced overall, but non-Christian religions, including Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism, grew – from 3.5% of the population in 1996 to 10% in 2021, or 2.5 million people. Anglican schools enrolled the largest proportion of students in NSW independent schools (27%), followed by Catholic independent (18%) and Christian (16%), the AISNSW report found. They were among 15 different faiths represented in the state's schooling system, from Hare Krishna to Seventh Day Adventist, Pentecostal and Brethren. Islamic schools experienced the most rapid annual enrolment growth of any sector in the past five years (5.2%, or an additional 5,074 students), representing 9% of the state's religious schools overall. Four expanded by more than 20% in the past five years, placing them among the top 15 fastest-growing schools statewide. The religious schools sector has faced backlash in recent years for allowing staff and students to be discriminated against on the basis of sexuality and gender identity. Last year, the Australian Law Reform Commission recommended the blanket exemptions should be repealed, a view backed by the majority of Australians, but the prime minister has ruled out legislating new laws without bipartisan support. Emma Rowe, an associate professor in education at Deakin University, says religious schools can be 'very inclusive' towards different identities. But she is against private schools – disproportionately composed of religious schools – receiving taxpayer money. 'I'm not opposed to religious schools receiving government funding. I'm opposed to private schools receiving government funding,' Rowe says. 'If you want to practise a religion in school, but you're not charging tuition fees, and you are accepting everyone at the door – I think that's different.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Take a deep dive into the inflation numbers and the RBA's decision not to cut rates seems inexplicable
The latest inflation figures confirm that the Reserve Bank wrongly kept interest rates steady at its meeting earlier this month as the official measure of inflation fell to 2.1%, while the monthly indicator dropped outside the RBA target band at 1.9%. The one thing you won't hear from the Reserve Bank after the release of the June quarter inflation figures is an apology. Because, to give credit to the RBA, in its May statement on monetary policy, it predicted inflation of 2.1%. That it did predict this inflation and yet still kept interest rates steady tells you something about how punishingly timid it has been. In June, not only was the official CPI at 2.1%, meaning it has now been below 3% for a year, but the core measure of inflation (the trimmed mean) fell from 2.9% to 2.7%: If the graph does not display click here Even more astonishing is that in a majority of capital cities, inflation is now below 2% – yep, below the Reserve Bank's target range: If the graph does not display click here And if you want even more confirmation of just how low inflation is at the moment, the monthly measure of inflation – which in November will take over as the official measure once a few more items are added – rose just 1.9%: If the graph does not display click here All of this is very good news for those who were struggling with rising prices in 2022 and 2023. Sign up: AU Breaking News email It is less good news for the opposition. The shadow treasurer, Ted O'Brien took to the parliament on Monday and told the treasurer that 'inflation remains too high'. If that is the case then we need to change the English language as well as economics to redefine 'high'. Even when you compare our core inflation with those in other major economies, Australia is doing well. If the graph does not display click here Core inflation is the measure that the RBA mainly focuses on because it gives a less erratic view of what is happening. What it does is top and tail (or 'trim') the 15% biggest price rises and falls. This time around, that means, for example, the trimmed inflation measure does not include fuel or lamb prices which fell the most, and at the other end of the scale it mostly ignores the jump in secondary education cost and also electricity prices which jumped 8.1% this quarter. The reason electricity jumped was the end of state-based subsidies – especially in Western Australia and Queensland. If the graph does not display click here The Bureau of Statistics notes that without these subsidies electricity prices across Australia would have risen just 0.4% in the June quarter. But even still, electricity costs on average 14% less than it would without the subsidies. So you can bet the government will be very happy it extended its scheme: If the graph does not display click here That the RBA did not cut rates earlier this month is even more inexplicable when you dig deeper into the figures. The RBA always looks at the price increase of services rather than goods, because services are more closely linked with wages (because you need workers to do the services). In the year to June service prices rose just 3.3% – that is back at the level they rose in 2011 to 2014 – a period when the RBA cut interest rates eight times: If the graph does not display click here And the level of inflation is also very broad. The prices of about two-thirds of all items counted in the CPI basket rose less than 3% – that's a very solid level: If the graph does not display click here This of course does not mean all things are hunky dory and life is a sweet basket of chocolates and strawberries. Pleasingly the prices of non-discretionary items – those things we have to buy, such as food, petrol or insurance – are now rising the slowest, but there is still a lot of catching up to do after the past four years. Since June 2022, which was about the same time the RBA began lifting rates, wages have risen 14% – well behind the 22% increase in the price of those necessities. That makes for a lot of people still feeling worse off than they were then: If the graph does not display click here But overall, the story is very good. Inflation should no longer be such a concern that the RBA holds off on cutting rates until it gets more information. But unemployment is now rising above 4%; when you combine that with inflation falling close to 2% that equals an interest cut. And even though they won't, when they do cut in August, the RBA also should apologise for making everyone wait six weeks longer than they needed to. Greg Jericho is a Guardian columnist and policy director at the Centre for Future Work
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
An unlikely group of protesters fear Victoria's power bill is a threat to private landowners. Here's what we know
On Wednesday, an unlikely group of protesters gathered on the front steps of Victoria's parliament to oppose a piece of legislation that, at least on the surface, appears unremarkable. For this motley collective, which included farmers, prospectors, volunteer firefighters and animal advocates concerned about the plight of the wedge-tailed eagle, the National Electricity (Victoria) Amendment (VicGrid Stage 2 Reform) bill is a major concern. They fear the bill will give the government power to access their land without their consent to build transmission towers as tall as 85 metres. If they resist, they could be fined thousands. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Standing behind a makeshift cage made from farm gates, the rally organiser Andrew Weidemann slammed the bill, saying it made farmers and their families 'feel like we're behind bars'. He blasted the government's 'stupid push for this renewables agenda'. In another cage, a man stood holding a sign that read: 'I disagreed with Jacinta.' Also in attendance was the Victorian opposition leader, Brad Battin, who criticised the government for acting like a 'dictatorship' with 'draconian measures' that 'take away your rights'. When Battin said the Coalition would oppose the bill and repeal it if elected next year, the crowd cheered. So is this bill as alarming as some believe and what does it mean for Victorian property owners? Here's what we know. Introduced to parliament last month, the bill hands responsibility for planning the state's transmission network from the Australian Energy Market Operator (Aemo) to the government agency VicGrid. It also gives VicGrid the responsibility for developing renewable energy zones. The bill creates two new funding streams to support communities impacted by the construction of energy infrastructure and legislates financial incentives for landholders, who will receive $8,000 per kilometre of infrastructure on their land annually. But it also provides VicGrid and their contractors power to access private land without consent when required to construct energy infrastructure. The bill states authorised officers can 'use reasonable force to gain entry' to private land 'if it is reasonably necessary to do so'. It also prohibits landowners 'obstructing, hindering, or delaying the entry of the authorised officer'. Individuals who resist face fines of up to $12,000, while body corporates could be slapped with fines of up to $48,000. Refusing to provide your name or proof of ownership could result in fines up to $4,000, while interfering with a notice of entry could attract a fine of $1,221. Only authorised officers can access land and the bill sets strict rules for them. They must give written notice of entry to the landowner or occupier at least 30 business days before entry and again 48 hours before. If the officer can't find the owner of the land, the notice can be published in a newspaper and posted near the property entrance. Only if an officer has been blocked or disrupted from accessing a property are they able to use force, and only after applying to the magistrates court for an entry order. The court order allows the officer and other approved people to enter, use reasonable force if needed, bring equipment and be accompanied by police. If at this point you attempt to block their access, the larger fines apply. A government spokesperson said these powers are intended to be used as a last resort – only when all avenues to reach agreement for voluntary access have failed. The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, has defended the bill. She said the government and private companies already have the power to forcibly access and acquire land. 'Whether it's for transport projects, for energy projects, for other projects, there are already arrangements in place for access to land. What this is providing is landowners – through VicGrid – a place where they can work through the these issues,' Allan said. She conceded some private companies' dealings with landowners had been 'not up to scratch' but said the new legislation would improve coordination. Allan said more high-voltage transmission lines were needed to connect homes and businesses to 'reliable, cheaper and more secure renewable energy' as it comes online and ahead of the closure of 'ageing coal-fired plants'. Battin responded: 'We're not anti-renewable energy but you can't do it by bulldozing through people's properties.' Yes and no. All levels of government – local, state and federal – have the power to compulsorily acquire private property in certain circumstances. In New South Wales, the government similarly set up its own body, EnergyCo, to lead the development of renewable energy zones and the transmission infrastructure needed to support them. EnergyCo holds compulsory acquisition powers but they are only exercised after at least six months of attempted negotiations for voluntary acquisition. The Victorian government says NSW, South Australia and Tasmania have fines for landowners for denying entry to authorised officers. In late 2024, VicGrid released a draft plan that identified seven renewable energy zones in the state that could host renewable projects, including wind turbines, solar farms and battery storage. Several travel through agricultural areas, angering farmers, who have also been subject to an increased emergency services levy in recent weeks by the Allan government (though it has been paused this year due to drought). That levy has also been criticised by volunteer firefighters, who joined Wednesday's rally, as well as animal activists who say windfarms pose a deadly risk to endangered wedge-tailed eagles. The VicGrid plan will be finalised later this year and will also include proposed transmission line routes. It includes projects already committed to or expected by Aemo, such as the Victoria to NSW Interconnector West and the Western Renewables Link, a 190km transmission line from Bulgana in western Victoria to Sydenham in Melbourne's north-west. Both projects have faced substantial delays, in part due to community opposition. But the government appears determined for them to press ahead. The bill is expected to pass the lower house on Thursday and then move to the upper house next sitting week.
