Jon Jones Responds to Dana White's Deadline with Blunt Update
The UFC heavyweight title scene remains in limbo, and the suspense is starting to wear thin. Jon Jones, arguably the most dominant force in MMA history, still hasn't given the green light on a showdown with interim champ Tom Aspinall. While Dana White has been working behind the curtain to make it happen, the champ's latest comments suggest the UFC might be left hanging. And if White's tone is any indication, patience is running out.
Advertisement
During a recent appearance on The Jim Rome Show, Dana White didn't sugarcoat the situation. The UFC president confirmed the clock is very much ticking.
Feb 15, 2020; Rio Rancho, New Mexico, USA; UFC fighter Jon Jones attends the light heavyweight bout between Jan Blachowicz (blue) and Corey Anderson (red) during UFC Fight Night at Santa Ana Star Arena.© Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports
'We'll see how this thing plays out over the next couple of weeks. If we can't get this fight done, we'll move on quickly … We'll have answers in the next couple weeks.'
When Rome pressed for a firm timeline, White held the line:
'A couple of weeks.'
That's not exactly vague. The UFC is ready to move with or without Jones. But 'Bones' doesn't sound like a man feeling the heat. Speaking with Full Send Podcast, Jones delivered a response that felt more like a retirement tease than fight hype.
'I don't want to say that I'm retired because fighting is in my blood... but right now, I could really care less about fighting.'
'If the itch comes back—and if it comes back—then I'll do it with my whole heart.'
On the subject of Tom Aspinall, Jones didn't mince words:
'He's just not in a position to excite me... If I whoop his ass, it's going to be the next guy. I've replayed this story so many times.'
Translation? He's not in a rush. And with a decision looming in less than two weeks, White may be forced to pivot if Jones stays noncommittal. Whether that means elevating Aspinall or creating another interim detour, the UFC's heavyweight division can't afford to stay frozen.
Advertisement
This next move will be massive—not just for Dana White, but for the future of a division that's been stuck in neutral far too long.
Related: UFC Abu Dhabi: Robert Whittaker Set to Face Fastest-Rising Middleweight Star in Legacy Fight
Related: UFC Star Wants Dricus Du Plessis in Historic Africa vs. Africa Showdown
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 19, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Breaking down the 10 Detroit Lions rookie performances vs. Dolphins
As the preseason rolls onward, the Detroit Lions are going to use every chance that they can get to evaluate the backend of their roster. Once again, the team's 2025 rookie class impressed. A total of 10 first-year players suited up in the preseason matchup against the Miami Dolphins, and many of them made quite the case for a roster spot once the regular season begins. Undrafted wide receiver Jackson Meeks put on a show for the second week in a row. The rookie who played for Georgia and Syracuse made the first reception of the game and went on to finish the day with a team-high 93 yards as well as a touchdown. He was used heavily on special teams as well, taking the field for nearly half of the unit's snaps. He did make one rookie mistake, getting flagged for an illegal shift later in the game. Third-round pick Isaac TeSlaa also had himself a day. The Michigan native was another big contributor on offense, hauling in four receptions for 41 yards and a trip to the endzone. He had some opportunities that were missed as well, including dropping an overthrown pass from Kyle Allen and having a first-down reception called back due to an illegal forward pass penalty. Dominic Lovett wasn't as productive on offense as he was in the previous preseason outings. His biggest contribution in this game came on special teams as a gunner. In the third quarter, he scooped up the ball off of a muffed punt by the Dolphins and returned it within a few yards of the endzone—although you aren't allowed to advance a muffed punt. Zach Horton got a significant amount of time on offense, taking the field for over 70% of the team's snaps. He displayed even more versatility than he has in the other preseason games, being used as an in-line tight end, fullback, slot receiver, and even lining out wide on a few plays. He caught his first two passes of his career, totaling 15 yards. He, too, couldn't escape the eyes of the referees, and was called for a holding penalty that negated a big run from Craig Reynolds. With many new faces in Detroit's secondary, undrafted cornerback Tyson Russell didn't make much of an impact as he had the week prior, but still recorded three tackles. Offensive lineman Mason Miller made the move from tackle to guard in this game, most likely due to the plethora of injuries that Detroit has in that position group right now. He played much better than he had earlier in the preseason, and even earned a shoutout from the broadcast crew for his blocking on long run from Jacob Saylors. Undrafted rookies Ian Kennelly and Keith Cooper both were named starters for this game and played on defense for a majority of Detroit's snaps. Cooper flashed some positional versatility, playing both as an interior defensive lineman and edge rusher. Wide receiver Jakobie Keeney-James had a quiet day, being targeted once but not recording any stats. Fan-favorite Ahmed Hassanein only played 10 snaps for Detroit before sustaining an injury that will cause him to miss some time this season. The following draft picks did not play: Tyleik Williams, Tate Ratledge, Miles Frazier (PUP), Dan Jackson (IR)
New York Times
4 minutes ago
- New York Times
Mandel's Mailbag: Wrapping up the Michigan scandal and Week 0 Big 12 stakes
Are you ready for some football? Good, because on Saturday, we have a Week 0 big-network tripleheader. Noon ET on ESPN: No. 17 Kansas State vs. No. 22 Iowa State in Ireland 6:30 ET on Fox: Fresno State at Kansas 7:30 ET on CBS: Stanford at Hawaii But first, let's put a bow on the whole Michigan-NCAA thing. (Note: Some questions have been lightly edited for length and clarity.) Advertisement With Michigan's light-tap-on-the-wrist 'penalty,' why don't more major programs just cheat and dare the NCAA to do anything about it? — Mia-Do' A Call me crazy, but I don't consider a $30 million-plus fine to be a tap on the wrist. In fact, if you gave Michigan AD Warde Manuel truth serum, he'd probably tell you he'd rather be banned from the Citrus Bowl this year than add that considerable expense to an athletic department already projecting a $15 million deficit in the first year of revenue sharing. But I get it. If you're someone who wanted blood over the sign-stealing scandal, you've been conditioned for decades to expect postseason bans and vacated wins when a school gets in trouble. Personally, I'm glad the membership has finally realized that the people most affected by postseason bans are athletes who weren't even on the team at that time and had nothing to do with the infractions. Some of the players on the 2010 and '11 USC teams who got banned over Reggie Bush's extra benefits were in junior high when Bush played there. Which is why USC fans — and Ohio State fans, and Miami fans, and any other fan base that suffered through a postseason ban — may be furious Michigan didn't get one. However, even though I think an eight-figure fine is plenty punitive, it's not exactly a deterrent. That money is not coming out of Jim Harbaugh's, Sherrone Moore's or Connor Stalions' pockets. And generally speaking, it's not 'programs' that cheat, it's individuals. I wonder how differently this would all feel if Harbaugh weren't already long gone to the NFL. The guy is effectively banned from college coaching for 14 years. That's unheard of. In this case, it doesn't matter because the guy wasn't coming back to college regardless. But if this were a college-only guy (Dabo Swinney, Kalen DeBoer, Josh Heupel) or someone still early in their career (Dan Lanning, Marcus Freeman, Kenny Dillingham), it would be devastating for them. Advertisement As for Stalions himself, if you read that report, he is the clumsiest saboteur since the 'Home Alone' burglars. I can't say his eight-year show cause will be a deterrent to fellow GAs and analysts as much as it will be comical reading material around their offices. Stewart, why can't Michigan's fans understand why we all think they have no integrity left anymore? They all claim to be so much better than every other team when they obviously aren't. Signed, your friends in SEC country. — Bob D. No idea what you're talking about, Bob. Haven't most Michigan fans accepted the punishment and expressed ample disappointment in the stain this story brought on their university? Do you and The Athletic refer to the Michigan 'situation' as the sign-stealing scandal to sensationalize and draw engagement, or because it is easy (and a bit lazy)? — Todd D. Oh, I see. Several prominent coaches have the 'can't win the big game' label, like James Franklin. However, it would seem that if you keep getting close consistently, you eventually break through (e.g. Ryan Day last year). Tom Osborne couldn't win the big game … until he did. Now we only remember the dominance and the titles. Are there any coaches who have consistently had winning top-10 programs yet never broken through? — Cullen The first guy that comes to mind in my time covering the sport was Georgia's Mark Richt. For most of his 15 seasons (2001-15), you could count on the Dawgs to field a top-10 team and compete for SEC titles. However, they never climbed that last rung to the national title game and suffered some pretty bad luck along the way. The 2002 team went 13-1, but it just so happened Miami and Ohio State were undefeated. In 2007, they were No. 4 heading into championship Saturday. No. 1 and No. 2 both lost, but they got passed by LSU when the Tigers won the SEC title game. And in the 2012 SEC championship game, they were four yards and six seconds short against Alabama from advancing to the BCS title game and playing overmatched Notre Dame. Advertisement Most of all, his bad luck was that only two teams reached the 'playoff' back then. Contrast that with successor Kirby Smart, who began his tenure with a 'can't win the big one' run, specifically with Nick Saban and Alabama. There was a second-and-26 in the 2017 national title game, the infamous Justin Fields fake punt in the next year's SEC title game, a blowout loss in 2020 and the inexplicable 2021 SEC title game meltdown. Then the Dawgs won the rematch, and all anyone mentions about Smart now is the back-to-back championships. (And lots and lots of player arrests.) I do believe the 'getting close consistently' theory is correct. Franklin is a particularly extreme case, though, as his big-game record is truly atrocious (1-15 against top-five teams), and even with five top-10 finishes in 11 seasons, even after reaching the CFP semifinals last year, it doesn't feel like he's come close to the top yet. The Nittany Lions have been consistent, but not dominant. However, in most, if not all, of those top-10 losses, he did not have the better team. Simple as that. This year, he may well have the best team in the country. How does a Farmageddon loss this weekend shape either Iowa State's or Kansas State's season outlook? — Jon S. It'd be bad! We're only one season in the expanded CFP era, but I think you can assume for now that anyone other than the Big 12 champ is going to face tall odds to be a CFP participant. The loser of this game will not have the same margin for error as the losers of Texas-Ohio State or LSU-Clemson. An 8-1 Big 12 record likely gets you to Arlington, but it's asking a lot to win eight straight in a conference with more parity than any of the other P4 leagues. However, you could also have a situation like last year, where everyone goes 7-2 and it's tiebreakers galore. Advertisement I've noticed over the years that these big Week 0 games tend to foreshadow the rest of the teams' seasons. Nebraska's season-opening loss to Illinois in 2021 was the moment you began to realize, this isn't getting better, is it? And the 2022 loss to Northwestern, coupled with a Week 2 loss to Georgia Southern, led to Scott Frost's firing. (That was also Pat Fitzgerald's last Big Ten win at Northwestern before he, too, was fired the following offseason amid a hazing scandal.) In 2023, Sam Hartman threw it all over Navy in his Notre Dame debut. The Irish went 10-3, the Midshipmen 5-7. And Georgia Tech running all over Florida State last year was the most telling Week 0 precursor yet. Doubtful either Matt Campbell or Chris Klieman will lose their job anytime soon, but they need this win. And whoever loses might become a bit nervous about the rest of the season. The coverage of Michigan's sign-stealing scandal has been bad journalism all around. Michigan has been the victim of at least two known instances where their previous week's opponent deciphered all of their signals by game's end and then handed that information over to the next opponent. On a scale of 1 to 10 in the cheating department, this is a 10, and what Michigan did is a 3. — Adam L. Oh, those poor victims. Will no one think of the innocent children whose signs were stolen? Which do you think is the most likely reason for the Big Ten/Tony Petitti pivoting to their new proposed 28-team Playoff? A. They think it's the best way to maximize revenue. B. It's a ploy to make the original 16-team proposal seem better or C. Spite for everyone making fun of him for his last proposal. — Tyler S. At this point, I'm beginning to think it's D: Petitti is making his own elaborate Borat-style troll documentary and we're all unwitting subjects in it. Behind the scenes, folks are insistent this latest version is just an 'idea,' not a formal proposal. However, many important people around the sport are still ticked about it, given that they found out through the media and the entire operation looks buffoonish by association. 'We sound like immature children throwing garbage against the wall,' a CFP executive told CBS Sports. Advertisement Somehow, the lesson Petitti took from the 4-4-2-2-1 backlash wasn't 'people hate the idea of predetermined Playoff berths'; it's 'maybe they'd accept it if we just gave out more of them.' Rather than 'Jeez, people aren't as fired up about play-in games as I thought they'd be,' it's 'OK then, what if we just did more of them?' Whatever his motives, it's clear Petitti views college football not as a fixer-upper but a full-on teardown project. Where most of us see a wonderfully unique and charming home with room for improvement, Petitti sees an archaic structure in desperate need of a refresh. The same guy who put the final nail in the Pac-12's coffin would apparently be fine doing the same to the 120-plus-year tradition of bowl games. Bye-bye, college football. Hello, NFL Junior. To be clear, he's not on a total island. There are pockets of ADs and coaches around the country, including in the SEC, that quietly love the idea of their 8-4/7-5-type programs becoming annual CFP contenders. They likely assume there's a golden pot of TV revenue waiting for them as well. (In reality, TV doesn't want this, either.) Fortunately, there are far more people in important positions who don't want any part of this tomfoolery. Because they happen to think college football is pretty great as it is. Will you refund my subscription money? The Athletic CFB coverage is becoming an outrage click farm. Ironic that you are lambasting Michigan about lacking integrity. Surely it isn't lost on you. — Ian S. @Ian S.: Because the trending questions are all Michigan-related. Michigan has a huge fan base because it's a great school *and* the all-time winningest program, so anything Michigan-related gets eyeballs and anti-UM outrage provokes engagement. Stew's strategy is Internet Trolling 101. —Steve S. Stew's strategy is to write about the topics readers care about most. And the readers have universally told me, 'It's not the sloppy espionage and the cover-ups that interest me about this Michigan story; it's their academic reputation and all their wins from 1902.' In the last 40 years, no coach has gone more than six years between two national titles (Barry Switzer is the last coach to do so, winning his third title in 1985 after winning his second a decade earlier). Dabo Swinney last won a title in 2018. Has his window closed? — Brian I think so. But many, many people disagree. Advertisement It feels like the entire narrative around Clemson's program has shifted over the past eight months, starting with, strangely, a two-touchdown loss to Texas in the CFP first round. The Tigers head into this season with the sixth-best odds to win the national championship, and they got the second-most votes in The Athletic's staff survey predictions behind only Texas. While that wasn't my vote (I cast one of the three Penn State ballots), I did have Clemson No. 3 in my post-spring Top 25. That was because Dabo has more high-level players returning than at any time since the last Trevor Lawrence-Travis Etienne team in 2020. Quarterback Cade Klubnik, receiver Antonio Williams, defensive linemen T.J. Parker and Peter Woods and cornerback Avieon Terrell are all projected first-round picks. And new defensive coordinator Tom Allen should be a big upgrade from Wes Goodwin. But once it came time to make 'official' picks, I backed off a little. I picked the Tigers to win the ACC, but with an 11-2 record, including a home loss to LSU in the opener. Which would put them more like the low top 10. The main reason: What evidence has Clemson given us recently to suggest it can still compete at the highest level? Clemson got drilled by Georgia 34-3 to open last season. The Tigers went on to lose to two more SEC foes, South Carolina (17-14) and Texas (38-24). To their credit, the Tigers beat CFP team SMU in the ACC title game, but no one thought SMU could win the national championship. Over the past four seasons, Clemson has had one 'big' non-conference win: at home against Notre Dame in 2023. And as those struggles mounted, many others and I criticized Dabo for stubbornly steering clear of the transfer portal. He relented a little this offseason, landing a couple of possible key contributors, but his lineup will still be comprised almost entirely of homegrown guys
New York Times
4 minutes ago
- New York Times
Fernando Tatis Jr.'s power is missing. His contact point may be to blame
The San Diego Padres need more power in their lineup to put them over the top. The team is 25th in the league in slugging, and would be in a worse spot if it didn't make so much contact. The Padres could use some more oomph from Fernando Tatis Jr., in particular. Though the 26-year-old outfielder is having a fine season based on patience, contact, base running and defense, the power isn't there. In fact, he's having the worst slugging season of his career. Advertisement So where's that power for Tatis? Why is it down from the level he established early in his career and even the past couple of years? After Tuesday night's game, Tatis has now gone a career-worst 106 consecutive plate appearances without a homer. His previous high was 94, which was set earlier this season. 'I'm just trying to be a good hitter, get on base, and yeah, I'm not hitting homers,' he said this past weekend regarding his lack of over-the-fence power. 'He's hit the ball hard. It's a lot of things that you want to see,' Padres hitting coach Victor Rodriguez said recently. 'Controlling his effort level, swinging at good pitches and being able to hit the ball to all fields.' It's true that Tatis is swinging the bat fast and hitting the ball hard, as his hard-hit rate is 15th-best among qualified hitters. But that hard contact is not coming in the air. And that may have something to do with where he's making contact with the ball. Throughout a swing, the bat has different angles with respect to the ball approaching the plate. As the bat comes down from the shoulders, through the hitting zone and then back up, it creates different 'attack angles.' Here's an animation, courtesy of Baseball Savant, showing Alex Bregman hitting a home run — look at the angles of the bat throughout the swing. As you can see, if Bregman had made the contact later in the path of the ball (deeper), his bat would not have had the same loft. If he'd made the contact earlier in the path of the ball (out in front more), it may have had too much loft. This concept is why getting the ball out in front of the plate has been associated with power — the bat is more likely to have a good attack angle on the ball that will lead to power. Advertisement This contact point is now tracked on Baseball Savant as the 'intercept point,' and Mike Petriello showed on that the best overall production and the best power production is at 36 inches out in front of the batter's center of mass. The best intercept point for contact is 30 inches. Since baseball started tracking the intercept point, Tatis has not had a lower intercept point in any month than the 27.6 inches he's showing this August. In other words, he's letting the ball travel deeper into his bat path more than ever. That has been great for putting the ball in play, and so his contact and strikeout rates are the best of his career, but it's also pushed his power production down to the lowest point of his career. It's clear from the numbers and the eye test that he's been tinkering with his stance and his approach all year. 'I'm still searching and just trying to compete every single day,' Tatis said. The difference between his stance and intercept point late last year (left) and this past month (right) shows just how much more open his stance is now, and how much further he's letting the ball travel in the zone. He's standing more spread out this year, with a more open stance, closer to the plate and further back in the box. Even recently, he's made more changes, as he's gone from an average of 41 degrees open before this past weekend to 10 degrees open, more like he was last season. He's still letting the ball travel four inches further before making contact, which may just be robbing him of power. 'Anything that you hit the other way and you get results (on) is always a good sign,' said Rodriguez, who has a different take on the subject. 'You let it travel, and you just went with it, instead of trying to do too much with it.' Looking at comparable players, Tatis has top-quartile bat speed and a 30-degree swing tilt — a swing that's on the flatter end but not as flat as the swings for Randy Arozarena or Corbin Carroll. We can look for comps based on those two aspects alone, and we'll find a list of 25 players that run the gamut from Seiya Suzuki and Bobby Witt Jr. to Nathaniel Lowe to Christian Walker. Advertisement Now, let's separate that group by who lets the ball travel (lower intercept point) and who goes and gets the ball out front (higher intercept point). The entire group averages a 30-degree tilt and a 73 mph swing speed like Tatis, but the difference in results between the 'let it travel' and 'go get it' groups is fairly stark, given how much else they have in common. To recap, all of these players swing equally fast and have similarly shaped swings, but the hitters who go get the ball out in front get 25 points more slugging by hitting the ball at the right angles more often. As a group, the 'go-getters' pull the ball more, hit the ball in the air more, barrel the ball more and have better overall production. It's one thing to say that Tatis needs to get the ball out in front more, and another to do that successfully, as his hitting coach points out. Tatis is pulling the ball in the air less than ever, but could the problem be that he wants to pull the ball in the air more often? 'I think a lot of times it's because you want to,' Rodriguez said of the desire to lift and separate. 'You want to. And when you want to, what do you do? You open up and you cheat. But when you don't want to and you're in a good direction, you let the ball and your hands do the work. When you're trying to pull, that's when you get into trouble. But when you're in a good position … and the ball is inside, you react the right way — you lift it. So it's a matter of staying with a good approach to the big part of the field and letting his ability — his quickness — take over.' Letting the ball travel has been good for Tatis' strikeout rate so far this year, but has dampened his power production. Even getting the ball out in front another three inches, as he did last season, could get him back the power he's been missing this year. Perhaps it's wise to embrace a few more swings and misses if that aggression out front brings back the homers. But the trick might be, somehow, to go get that ball without opening up, attacking within ideal mechanics. Controlled aggression. So simple when you say it that way. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
