logo
Honda's EV delay shows how Canada's new Industry Minister has her work cut out for her

Honda's EV delay shows how Canada's new Industry Minister has her work cut out for her

Globe and Mail14-05-2025

On the day that Mélanie Joly was sworn in as Canada's new Industry Minister, one of the world's largest automakers served warning that she has her work cut out for her, when it comes to maintaining any momentum for this country's nascent electric-vehicle sector.
The announcement by Honda Canada that it is delaying its $15-billion plans to make EVs and EV batteries in Ontario, by at least two years, is on its face less damaging than some other recent setbacks for the industry.
Nobody is being laid off, as when General Motors last month halted production of its BrightDrop electric delivery vans, because Honda is maintaining its existing (non-electric) vehicle assembly. Nor is Honda equivocating (for now, at least) about its commitment to Canadian EV-making in the long run, in contrast to the uncertain futures of everything from Umicore's plans to make battery materials in Ontario, to the Quebec battery plant that was under construction by troubled Northvolt AB.
'We have determined that the EV value chain initiative in Canada is essential to our electrified future,' Honda spokesperson Ken Chiu said on Tuesday. 'There are no plans to cancel or relocate the project at this time.'
But in terms of what it says about how Canadian industry will weather the storm caused by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war, and by the impact of his anti-EV policies on an already slow-growing North American EV market, Honda's decision to pump the brakes may be more unsettling than any of those other developments.
That's because of both the nature of Honda's plans, and the nature of the company itself.
Among the major government-backed EV-making investments announced in the past few years, Honda's stands to be both the biggest and the best value from a Canadian perspective.
Whereas Stellantis NV and LG Energy Solution demanded up to $15-billion in cumulative production subsidies for a roughly $5-billion capital investment in a battery factory in Windsor, and Volkswagen Group similarly required up to $13-billion in production subsidies for a $7-billion battery plant, Honda settled for a comparatively modest $5-billion in subsidies for an investment that promises to be worth more than the other two combined.
Equally important as the dollar figures are what they cover. Honda's plans are by far the broadest – encompassing not just battery-making but also vehicle assembly and a pair of partnerships, with Japan's Asahi Kasei Corp. and South Korea's POSCO Future M Co. Ltd, to produce battery materials.
For a federal government – and an Ontario provincial government – whose stated intention is to capitalize on Canada's combination of natural resources and manufacturing expertise to build a start-to-finish EV supply chain, there could hardly be a better anchor investment. Nor is there one they could less afford to lose.
As for why Honda was willing to commit to it in the first place, without demanding that Canada match subsidies that were then available in the U.S. as Stellantis and Volkswagen did, a common refrain within the industry is that its corporate culture is different.
As with Toyota Motor Co., the other Japanese car-making giant with a long-time presence in Ontario, Honda has a reputation for being more patient and conservative in strategic decision-making than its North American or European competitors. It tends to stay and expand where it already has a footprint, and is less inclined to just follow whatever money governments are putting on the table.
That's cause for some reassurance, about the postponement being just that, and not a sign that Mr. Trump's war on the Canadian auto sector will cause Honda to pull up stakes and head south.
But when the least kneejerk of companies feels compelled to significantly adjust course, it's a sign of how strong the headwinds are.
In the here and now, Honda is forecasting a 70-per-cent drop in its net profit globally in the 2025-26 fiscal year, which it attributes largely to Mr. Trump's tariffs.
In plan-making for the rest of this decade, it's the uncertainty – about the ability to export into the U.S., about the extent to which North American EV demand will be throttled, about whether economic chaos affects purchases and investments of all sorts – that's the obvious cause for adopting a wait-and-see attitude. Honda alluded to as much on Tuesday, apropos the investment in Canadian EV-making, when it said it will 'continue to carefully monitor market conditions and reassess as needed.'
For Prime Minister Mark Carney's new government, and to some extent Ontario Premier Doug Ford's provincial one, the challenge will be to somehow mitigate that risk as much as possible, even if there is no way to eliminate it as long as Mr. Trump holds office.
There were a few hints of how they will attempt to do so during this spring's federal election campaign, including Mr. Carney's promise to explore purchase subsidies for EVs produced in Canada. But his government may have to move more decisively and expansively than those commitments suggested.
At the same time, Ottawa and the provinces (not just Ontario) now have all the more reason to try to expedite the mining of raw battery materials that are supposed to be one of the biggest draws for automakers that have committed to Canadian battery plants. The more completely the supply chain is taking shape, the more that starting or expanding production here will make sense, and the more that Canada will benefit.
That imperative is not a surprise, exactly.
At the end of last year, shortly before ending his tenure as industry minister – during which he had led Canada's successful courtship of automakers' EV-making commitments – François-Philippe Champagne told The Globe and Mail that the next step would be consolidating those investments.
It will now be up to Ms. Joly to make good on that, in a more urgent and fraught environment than Mr. Champagne or anyone else fully anticipated even a few months ago.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mayor ‘confident' property tax increase will come in below target— and then some
Mayor ‘confident' property tax increase will come in below target— and then some

CTV News

time26 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Mayor ‘confident' property tax increase will come in below target— and then some

It took some budget wrangling, but Mayor Morgan believes next year's tax increase will be under 5 per cent. CTV London's Daryl Newcombe reports. It took some budget wrangling, but Mayor Morgan believes next year's tax increase will be under 5 per cent. CTV London's Daryl Newcombe reports. Mayor Josh Morgan is now expressing confidence he can get the 2026 property tax increase below 5 per cent, and that doesn't include an additional $8.45 million available from last year's massive surplus. On Wednesday, members of the Budget Committee wrangled over a number of proposals intended to reduce next year's tax increase that currently stands at 7.4 per cent in the multi-year budget. Coun. Susan Stevenson's request for a business case about reducing the size of the Heritage Planning Department sparked a lengthy debate about Civic Administration's internal service review process. 'When it comes to the service review, council doesn't play a role,' argued Stevenson. 'When do we get to look (at department budgets) line by line? When do we get to hear about the departments? What they're doing, what they're focused on, and why the numbers are up?' A number of councillors emphasized that staffing levels are part of Civic Administrations ongoing service review process. 'When they've done the review and when they do it again next year, if they identify that there are some changes needed in the Heritage Department that's the appropriate time for that to come forward,' explained Coun. Skylar Franke. 'I have full confidence and trust in staff to be able to do that in a transparent and regular manner.' But Stevenson suggested the tax relief being demanded by many Londoners will require a deeper dive into municipal spending, 'We are going to have to find areas to cut costs. That is just for sure. What [cuts] are we going to look at if we don't want to look anywhere?' Mayor Josh Morgan Mayor Josh Morgan presenting a report to the Budget Committee on June 11, 2025. (Daryl Newcombe/CTV News London) During 2024-2027 Municipal Budget deliberations, Civic Administration's internal service reviews have provided savings of $14 million in 2024, $6.8 million this year, and $6 million (so far) for 2026. The mayor defends the internal process that includes right-sizing municipal departments and services, 'In 2016, council developed the robust service review process that has returned well over $250 million to Londoners and avoided tax increases. This is the department by department review [and] zero based budgeting.' The Budget Committee meeting also included a presentation by the mayor about mandatory Development Charge (DC) exemptions for affordable housing and other qualifying developments. A letter from Ontario's Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing confirms that the City of London is not required to continue setting aside millions of dollars each year to offset the exemptions. Savings to the property tax supported budget, water budget, and wastewater budget will total $10 million in 2026—and avoid a $32 million projected shortfall in 2027. 'This is very positive! I really appreciate the lobbying work that you (the mayor), the folks at AMO (Association of Municipalities of Ontario), and our staff have done,' said Coun. Sam Trosow. However, Stevenson said provincial policies have not changed since budget deliberations a few years ago when she tried to convince colleagues that offsetting the DC exemptions was unnecessary. 'The fact that this was available to us, the fact that clarity is coming so late, I think is a little bit concerning,' she asserted. 'You can say this is fact, but those aren't facts,' responded Morgan, who added that the province's clarification was necessary for London and other municipalities to discontinue backfilling the exemptions. 'The only people who can interpret the [Development Charges] Act with the authority that gives us the courage to take these sorts of actions are the people who pass that legislation, which is the provincial government,' he told Stevenson. Achieving the mayor's tax target of below 5 per cent will require about $13 million in new revenue and/or savings. Morgan said his target is now within striking distance, 'We've got boards and commissions who have said they're looking for savings, so with their help, the continued work of our staff, [and] the continued work of this council through the budget process, I'm confident that we can get under five [per cent] now.' In addition, council set aside $16.9 million from last year's massive budget surplus for tax relief purposes in 2026 and 2027. Utilizing $8.45 million each of those years would further reduce the 2026 tax increase by about another 1 per cent. Morgan will release his draft budget Oct. 27. The public will then be asked to provide input prior to budget deliberations by council in late November.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store