Is South Africa's coalition government about to fall apart?
South Africa's coalition government is on shaky ground, with the sharp divisions between its two biggest parties - the African National Congress (ANC) and Democratic Alliance (DA) - exposed in a crucial vote on the national budget.
The centre-right DA voted against the fiscal framework - a key part of the budget - after rejecting an increase in VAT, and demanding a cut in spending across all government departments.
The ANC, which positions itself as a centre-left party, refused to bow to what it called the DA's demand for an "austerity budget".
It demonstrated its political acumen by winning the support of a slew of smaller parties - both inside and outside government - to get the fiscal framework through parliament by 194 votes to 182.
The DA filed papers in court to challenge the vote, saying it was "procedurally flawed" while its top leadership is due to meet later to decide whether or not to remain in what South Africans call a government of national unity (GNU).
Professor William Gumede, an academic at Wits University's school of governance in Johannesburg, told the BBC it was unclear whether the DA would quit the government at this stage.
"It will be asking itself whether this is the tipping-point or whether it should wait - at least until the outcome of the court case," Prof Gumede said.
The coalition government was formed less than a year ago after the ANC lost its parliamentary majority in elections for the first time since Nelson Mandela led it to power in 1994 at the end of white-minority rule.
South Africa's business sector lobbied the two parties to enter into a coalition, seeing it as the best option to guarantee economic stability.
South Africa in 'uncharted waters' as budget splits coalition government
A landmark moment in South Africa for a humbled ANC
Is it checkmate for South Africa after Trump threats?
But hinting that the DA's participation was no longer certain, DA spokesman Willie Aucamp accused the ANC of a "serious infraction" and said the party had "crossed a line in the sand".
DA federal chair Helen Zille said the party would consider all its options, and not rush into a decision.
"We know that being in a coalition requires compromise. You can't get it all. But the ANC also can't get it all, and they are refusing, point blank, to share power," Zille added.
The ANC took an equally tough stand, with its parliamentary chief whip, Mdumiseni Ntuli, accusing the DA of "complete betrayal" by breaking ranks with its partners in the GNU.
"The DA is a member, or was a member," Ntuli said.
"I don't know what is going to happen with them now, but the GNU remains," he added, referring to the fact that other parties in the 10-member coalition remain committed to it.
President Cyril Ramaphosa's spokesman Vincent Magwenya also threw down the gauntlet to the DA, saying: "You can't be part of a government whose budget you opposed."
The DA found itself voting alongside South Africa's two biggest, and most populist, opposition parties - former President Jacob Zuma's uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party and Julius Malema's Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).
Advocating the nationalisation of key sectors of the economy, these two parties are the impeccable foes of the pro-business DA.
But the three parties were united in opposing a VAT increase, believing it would hit the poor hard.
As DA leader John Steenhuisen put it: "The ANC is out of touch with the people, and if they bought their own groceries or filled their own tanks, they would know how expensive life already is."
But the ANC argued that a VAT increase - set at 0.5% this year and a further 0.5% next year - was necessary to raise revenue, and to offer public services such as health and education.
Crucially, the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) voted with the ANC, signalling the end of the alliance it formed with the DA in the build-up to the election in a failed bid to keep Ramaphosa's party out of power.
ActionSA - a small opposition party which broke away from the DA - helped the ANC clinch the vote.
It said it had reached a deal with the ANC that would see the VAT increase scrapped, while alternative ways of raising revenue for the government are explored.
"Yesterday's [Wednesday's] adoption of the report on the fiscal framework was merely one step in a multi-stage budgeting process before the final budget is approved," ActionSA said in a statement.
Prof Gumede said the ANC would find it difficult to convince the public to pay more taxes when public services were crumbling.
"The optics don't look good for the ANC," he told the BBC.
"The DA has taken the budget as an opportunity to make a big impact, and to show it is pro-poor."
The dispute over the budget is the latest sign of the sharp differences between the two parties, with the DA also challenging in the courts three other pieces of legislation - including the land expropriation act.
This law was one of the issues that led to US President Donald Trump's administration cutting aid to South Africa.
The Trump administration has now imposed tariffs of 30% on all South African imports, in a move that is likely to be a huge blow to its already floundering economy.
"They have got some bad things going on in South Africa. You know, we are paying them billions of dollars, and we cut the funding because a lot of bad things are happening in South Africa," the US president said, before going on to name other countries.
In a statement, Ramaphosa's office condemned the new tariffs as "punitive", saying they could "serve as a barrier to trade and shared prosperity".
But for many South Africans, the tariffs signal the need for the two biggest parties to resolve their differences and work together - or risk seeing the nation sink into a deeper economic crisis at a time when the unemployment rate is already at more than 30%.
What big business wants for South Africa's future
South Africans still battling 'economic apartheid' 30 years on
Race policies or Israel - what's really driving Trump's fury with South Africa?
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
MetaVia Announces Poster Presentation on DA-1241 at the ADA's 85th Scientific Sessions
CAMBRIDGE, Mass., June 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- MetaVia Inc. (Nasdaq: MTVA), a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on transforming cardiometabolic diseases, today announced that an abstract highlighting pre-clinical data on DA-1241, a novel G-Protein-Coupled Receptor 119 (GPR119) agonist, has been accepted for a poster presentation at the American Diabetes Association's 85th Scientific Sessions, taking place June 20-23, 2025 at the McCormick Place Convention Center in Chicago, Illinois. Title: Additive Hepatoprotective Effects of DA-1241, a GPR119 Agonist, in Combination with Efruxifermin in a Diet-Induced Obese and Biopsy-Confirmed Mouse Model of MASH Presenting Author: Yuna Chae, Lead Research Scientist, Dong-A ST Research Center Abstract Control Number: 2025-LB-6450 Session: 22-C Integrated Physiology—Liver Presentation Date: Sunday, June 22, 2025 Presentation Time: 12:30-1:30 pm CT A copy of the poster will be available on the Posters section of the MetaVia website after the presentation. Additionally, the poster will be published online on the journal, Diabetes®, website. About DA-1241DA-1241 is a novel G-Protein-Coupled Receptor 119 (GPR119) agonist with development optionality as a standalone and/or combination therapy for both MASH and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Agonism of GPR119 in the gut promotes the release of key gut peptides GLP-1, GIP, and PYY. These peptides play a further role in glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism and weight loss. DA-1241 has beneficial effects on glucose, lipid profile and liver inflammation, supported by potential efficacy demonstrated during in vivo preclinical studies. The therapeutic potential of DA-1241 has been demonstrated in multiple pre-clinical animal models of MASH and T2D where DA-1241 reduced hepatic steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and improved glucose control. Furthermore, in Phase 1a, 1b and 2a trials, DA-1241 was well tolerated in both healthy volunteers and those with T2DM. In a Phase 2a clinical study, DA-1241 demonstrated direct hepatic action in addition to its glucose lowering effects. About MetaViaMetaVia Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on transforming cardiometabolic diseases. The company is currently developing DA-1726 for the treatment of obesity, and is developing DA-1241 for the treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH). DA-1726 is a novel oxyntomodulin (OXM) analogue that functions as a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1R) and glucagon receptor (GCGR) dual agonist. OXM is a naturally-occurring gut hormone that activates GLP1R and GCGR, thereby decreasing food intake while increasing energy expenditure, thus potentially resulting in superior body weight loss compared to selective GLP1R agonists. In a Phase 1 multiple ascending dose (MAD) trial in obesity, DA-1726 demonstrated best-in-class potential for weight loss, glucose control, and waist reduction. DA-1241 is a novel G-protein-coupled receptor 119 (GPR119) agonist that promotes the release of key gut peptides GLP-1, GIP, and PYY. In pre-clinical studies, DA-1241 demonstrated a positive effect on liver inflammation, lipid metabolism, weight loss, and glucose metabolism, reducing hepatic steatosis, hepatic inflammation, and liver fibrosis, while also improving glucose control. In a Phase 2a clinical study, DA-1241 demonstrated direct hepatic action in addition to its glucose lowering effects. For more information, please visit Contacts: MetaViaMarshall H. WoodworthChief Financial Officer+ Rx Communications GroupMichael Miller+1-917-633-6086mmiller@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE MetaVia Inc.

Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
Gov. Jared Polis signs bill to increase number of young people Colorado can hold in pre-trial detention
DENVER - Gov. Jared Polis on Monday signed a bill into law that will increase the number of young people Colorado can hold in pre-trial detention facilities. Current law allows the state to detain up to 215 teens at any one time. House Bill 1146 increases that number to 254 in the next fiscal year. In subsequent years, a formula will determine the maximum bed count, based on the average daily population. The bill also removes the most serious type of felony charges from counting toward the cap, and creates 39 emergency beds that wouldn't count toward the total bed cap. The Colorado District Attorneys' Council spearheaded the bipartisan bill, sponsored by Reps. Shannon Bird, D-Westminster, and Dan Woog, R-Frederick, and Sens. Barbara Kirkmeyer, R-Brighton, and Judy Amabile, D-Boulder. The DA group originally wanted to bump the number of detained youth up to 324, a hike that received forceful pushback from juvenile justice advocates. Prosecutors argued the state doesn't have enough beds to house violent youth offenders awaiting trial. Since fiscal year 2021, detained youth admissions with violent charges have increased by 49%, and admissions for homicide or manslaughter have risen by 80%, state figures show. As a result, prosecutors say, authorities have been forced to release teens who might otherwise be deemed a danger to the public to free up spots for someone else. Critics countered that the lack of safety in these facilities - highlighted by The Denver Post in March - proves the state should not be dramatically increasing the bed count. The legislation also includes a body-worn camera pilot program for juvenile detention and commitment staff. The test program in one youth detention facility and one commitment facility requires every staff member who is responsible for the direct supervision of youth to wear a body camera while interacting with them. The program will be implemented from January 2026 through December 2028. The Colorado Department of Human Services will then recommend whether to continue and expand the program, or eliminate it. The body-camera addition comes after a Post investigation found widespread allegations of excessive force by staff in the state's 14 juvenile detention facilities. A year's worth of internal incident reports reviewed by The Post showed teens suffered broken bones, sustained concussions and overdosed on drugs in these secure centers. Colorado's child protection ombudsman, tasked with investigating child safety concerns, has been calling since last year for the state to add body-worn cameras for staff in juvenile detention. Currently, facilities are equipped with video but no audio, making it impossible for investigators to determine whether verbal altercations contributed to excessive force or restraint incidents. -------------- Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.


Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
Should Afrikaners be accepted over other refugees? What Americans said in a poll
Most Americans take issue with the U.S. government's policy on Afrikaner refugees, according to new polling. A YouGov/Yahoo News survey found that, while a plurality of Americans are open to welcoming Afrikaners — white South Africans descended from European settlers — there is widespread opposition to prioritizing them over all others. The poll comes after President Donald Trump's administration accepted 59 Afrikaner refugees into the U.S. in early May — claiming they were discriminated against at home — while the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program has remained suspended. It also comes after Trump met with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the White House on May 21, during which he said Afrikaners were victims of genocide — a claim that has been widely disputed by experts. Views on refugees generally The poll — which sampled 1,560 U.S. adults May 22-27 — began by asking respondents for their general views on refugees, who typically flee their home country due to violence or persecution. A majority, 61%, said they approve of the U.S. accepting refugees from other nations, while 19% said they disapproved. With that said, a plurality, 43%, said they think the U.S. has welcomed too many refugees in recent years. Twenty-three percent said it accepted the right amount, and 13% said it didn't take in enough. In recent years, the U.S. has admitted between 11,000 and 60,000 refugees, according to data from Statista. Views on Afrikaners When it came specifically to accepting Afrikaners, Americans were divided. The survey posed the following question: 'Afrikaners are the descendants of white Europeans who came to South Africa centuries ago and later created its system of apartheid. Today, South Africa is more than 80% Black and some Afrikaners say they are being denied jobs and targeted with violence because they are white. Do you think the U.S. should accept Afrikaners as refugees?' A slim plurality, 36%, said yes, while 31% said no and 32% said they were not sure. A plurality, 47%, also said Afrikaners are about as deserving of refugee status as people from other countries. Twenty-four percent said they were less deserving, and 10% said they were more deserving. Views on singling out Afrikaners When respondents were informed that Afrikaners were being prioritized over other refugees, views became more negative. In late January, Trump issued an executive order that suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, which indefinitely paused the arrival of refugees, except 'on a case-by-case basis.' A plurality of respondents, 42%, said they disapproved of this decision, while 38% said they approved of it, and 20% were not sure. Further, 52% said the U.S. should not accept Afrikaners — who were fast-tracked — 'before resuming acceptance of refugees from other countries.' A much smaller share, 22%, agreed with this policy, while 26% said they were not sure. 'White genocide' claim The poll — which has a margin of error of 3.2 percentage points — also asked respondents whether they believed Afrikaners were victims of 'white genocide.' A plurality, 40%, said they were not, while 26% said they were and 34% said they were not sure. During his Oval Office meeting with Ramaphosa, Trump showed videos and news articles alleging large-scale killings of white farmers, claiming 'a genocide' is 'taking place that you people don't want to write about.' Ramaphosa disagreed with this claim, responding, 'if there was Afrikaner farmer genocide, I can bet you these three gentlemen would not be here,' referencing white individuals on his team, including his minister of agriculture. Multiple organizations — including news outlets and nonprofits — have debunked Trump's claims of a genocide. Fact-checking by Reuters found that some of the images Trump shared with Ramaphosa were not from South Africa but came from unrelated conflicts, including in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. 'The idea of a 'white genocide' taking place in South Africa is completely false,' Gareth Newham, the head of Justice and Violence Prevention at the Institute for Security Studies, told PBS News. 'If there was any evidence of either a genocide or targeted violence taking place against any group based on their ethnicity,' he added, 'we would be amongst the first to raise (the) alarm and provide the evidence to the world.'