logo
The Code Of Her Convictions: What My Mother Taught Me About Building Moral AI Architecture

The Code Of Her Convictions: What My Mother Taught Me About Building Moral AI Architecture

Forbes08-07-2025
Shekar Natarajan is the founder and CEO of Orchestro.AI.
When I think about the most advanced system I've ever seen, I don't think of an algorithm. I think of my parents. Growing up in the slums of India, I learned from my father's hand how systems work. I learned from my mother's heart that no system, no matter how entrenched, works without the engine of humanity.
My mother only finished 10th grade before she married my father to help raise her orphaned sisters, my aunts, as her own. She never studied engineering or computer science and had no formal training in logistics or AI, yet she built systems with nothing but will, compassion and quiet resolve. These systems shaped who I am and how I lead.
One of those systems began with a rule.
The Rule, Refusal And The Ring
Where I grew up, there was a policy: No more than two children from the same family could attend the city's top school. My two older brothers were already enrolled. I was the third. According to the system, I didn't qualify—not because I lacked the ability, but because I was born third.
My mother didn't fight the rule with outrage. She wore it down with persistence. Every morning, for nearly a year, she waited outside the education minister's office. She timed her arrivals with the daily mass schedule so she wouldn't miss him. She never raised her voice. She simply outlasted the system. Eventually, the headmaster relented.
But when admission came, the tuition—30 rupees, barely 50 cents—was still out of reach. So she quietly removed the silver toe ring that symbolized her marriage and pawned it. That was how I got my seat in that classroom.
Not only did she bend a system to make way for her child, she reassembled it with grace and grit. She didn't just endure the system. She made it work. And then she helped it work better. She hand-bound textbooks so they would last far beyond our family's needs. She turned scarcity into continuity and continually reused, repaired and repurposed. She didn't just endure the system. She made it work for people it wasn't built to serve.
When The System Breaks, Humans Step In
My mother's determination taught me about supply chain resilience long before I knew what the words supply chain and logistics meant. When I studied industrial engineering at Georgia Tech, I focused on learning, understanding and improving the global supply chain. What I learned most is that, although logistics seems to be about manufacturing and warehouses and trucks, it's actually a people-centric business.
When software crashes or delivery networks buckle, systems don't save us. People do.
• A warehouse associate reroutes pallets when the screen goes dark.
• A planner reshuffles shipments at 3 a.m. to meet demand that the forecast missed.
• A driver completes a route by memory when the app freezes.
• A seasonal employee works late, so your package arrives in time for Christmas.
It's human will that ensures continuity, not technology.
The Risk We Run With AI
There's no doubt that AI is an important and powerful tool that will help reshape the global supply chain. We celebrate AI's ability to optimize, predict and adapt, but we rarely ask: Can it care? Can it sacrifice? Can it pause when something just doesn't feel right?
AI doesn't yet understand what my mother understood instinctively: that fairness isn't always about equality, it's about equity, and that logic has its limits.
But that compassion belongs in decision-making.
If we aren't intentional, AI will reduce human will to a variable—something to eliminate, rather than elevate. The same spirit that saved my education, that ensures your holiday package arrives on time, could be written out of the equation altogether.
That's why we need a new kind of architecture for the age of machines.
Angelic Intelligence (AIx) A Moral Operating System For The AI Era
At Orchestro.ai, we're building what I call the Angelic Intelligence framework: a set of principles and tools designed to ensure technology preserves what makes us human.
1. Moral Cortex Layer (MCL): A programmable ethics engine that evaluates system decisions against principles like fairness and harm reduction. It introduces pause points when high-stakes outcomes arise.
2. CareNet – Empathy-as-a-Service: A real-time API capturing acts of care, peer-nominated compassion and frontline discretion. Think of it as a Fitbit for empathy.
3. Human Signal Intelligence (HSI): A learning model trained on the very edge cases traditional systems ignore—times when a human overrides the logic and gets it right.
4. Ethical Memory Vault: A secure story engine that records acts of moral courage—feeding these back into leadership training, AI models and onboarding systems.
5. Compassion As A KPI: A shift in performance metrics to reward care, context and human judgment—not just speed and scale.
6. Pause Protocol Interface: A frontline tool that lets workers flag questionable AI outputs—anonymously, without fear of reprisal—restoring agency to the edge of the system.
7. Human-Centered Governance: Executable layers of company values that act like guardrails around automation. Machines don't govern morality—people do.
This is the future of software design. The way we train it is the way it's going to behave. We must bring humanity into the equation. It's the moral code behind our code.
Building Systems That Mirror The Best Of Us
My mother's legacy wasn't her education or her job title; it was the will she encoded into the people around her. That's the real 'legacy code.'
In the supply chain, we say people are our greatest asset. But the moment metrics falter, we turn to cost cuts, not care. We call humans inefficient. But humans are the only reason systems move at all.
Culture doesn't live in KPIs. It lives in the planner who covers a shift. The associate who works through the storm. The mother who trades a wedding ring for tuition.
If AI is to play a central role in our future, then it must learn from the quiet strength of those like her—people who do not optimize, but endure. If we want AI to lead the future, it must be guided by the same code that moved my mother—not just logic, but love.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India overtakes China as biggest smartphone exporter to the United States, report says
India overtakes China as biggest smartphone exporter to the United States, report says

CNN

time4 hours ago

  • CNN

India overtakes China as biggest smartphone exporter to the United States, report says

Tech giants Asia China IndiaFacebookTweetLink Follow For the first time India has overtaken China as the No. 1 exporter of smartphones to the United States, following Apple's tariff-driven manufacturing pivot to New Delhi. India-made devices accounted for 44% of smartphone imports in the US during the second quarter, up sharply from 13% during the same period last year, according to a new report published Monday by research firm Canalys. The total volume of smartphones made in India jumped 240% year-over-year, Canalys wrote. Meanwhile, the share of the devices exported to the US that were assembled in China fell to just 25%. That marks a significant decline from the 61% share China logged during the same quarter a year ago — and it means China has dropped all the way to third place, behind Vietnam. India's newfound lead is 'largely driven' by US tech giant Apple (AAPL) accelerating its manufacturing shift to the country, away from China, given the 'uncertain trade landscape' between Washington and Beijing, said Canalys principal analyst Sanyam Chaurasia. 'Apple has scaled up its production capacity in India over the last several years… and has opted to dedicate most of its export capacity in India to supply the US market so far in 2025,' he wrote. That said, Apple is still 'dependent' on its established manufacturing bases in China, Chaurasia noted. Smartphones and other electronics containing semiconductors are exempt from US President Donald Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs, sparing China-made iPhones from the harshest levies. But Apple CEO Tim Cook said in May that these devices still faced a minimum 20% tariff. At the time, Cook said that he expected that 'the majority of iPhones sold in the US will have India as their country of origin.' Trump hopes to fuel a resurgence in US-based manufacturing by hiking tariffs on America's trading partners, leaving products made in foreign factories more expensive for US consumers. China has arguably taken the biggest hit. Earlier this year, Trump imposed a whopping 145% overall tariff on China, prompting Beijing to retaliate with its own 125% across-the-board levy on US goods. Both sides agreed in May to drastically roll back 'reciprocal' tariffs for a 90-day period. US and Chinese trade negotiators are meeting in Sweden this week for talks aimed at extending that truce, which could allow time to hammer out a lasting deal. But despite the recent détente, months of Trump's rollercoaster on-and-off tariffs have encouraged manufacturers to look beyond China. It extends a longer-running trend of companies attempting to diversify their supply chains away from China, the world's second-largest economy. In recent years, fast-growing Asian economies like Vietnam and India have emerged as alternative locations for manufacturers as ties between Beijing and the West have frayed. During the pandemic, too, China's strict zero-Covid policy scrambled global supply chains and highlighted the risks of concentrating production in a single location. 'The uncertain outcome of negotiations with China has accelerated supply chain reorientation,' analysts at Canalys wrote in their report. Lisa Eadicicco, John Liu, Nectar Gan and Auzinea Bacon contributed reporting.

Meta Q2 2025 Earnings Preview: AI Spend in Focus
Meta Q2 2025 Earnings Preview: AI Spend in Focus

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Meta Q2 2025 Earnings Preview: AI Spend in Focus

Meta reports after the bell on July 30, 2025. Consensus implies gains of roughly 15% in revenue versus last year's $39.07 billion and 14% in EPS versus $5.16. Shares are up 21% year-to-date and 5% below the Jun 30 intraday record $747.90. Investors will watch CapEx discipline, with guidance now sitting between $64 to $72 billion for 2025, an increase from the prior outlook. Holding that range or outlining offsetting OpEx cuts would ease FCF worries. Still, Meta's aggressive hiring packages aimed at top AI talent could inflate expenses and offset any savings. Investors will also focus on the core ad engine. Maintaining ad-impression growth near Q1's 5% and price-per-ad gains around 10% YoY is critical to validating the nearly $44 billion ad-sales target and protecting Family-of-Apps margins. Reality Labs' losses of about $4 billion are expected, and any traction from smart-glasses or mixed-reality headsets could temper the bleed. A beat combined with positive commentary from CEO Mark Zuckerberg on AI trends would support the stock's 28 forward P/E, but another spending hike or signs of ad-demand fatigue may outweigh earnings upside. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Dear Supply Chain: Consumers Want Love, Not Logistics
Dear Supply Chain: Consumers Want Love, Not Logistics

Forbes

time4 hours ago

  • Forbes

Dear Supply Chain: Consumers Want Love, Not Logistics

Shekar Natarajan is the founder and CEO of If you've ever ordered a package online only for it to end up lost, you know how frustrating the experience is. You're left wondering where your package disappeared to, and when you contact the company, the best answer they might be able to give you is, 'We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience. We're actively investigating your missing package by tracking it through our system and coordinating with our shipping carrier. Please wait until the end of the week to see if the package arrives.' So, you wait until the end of the week. The package seems to have disappeared into the ether. You contact the company again and push for a reshipment or refund. Lost packages are one of the many examples of poor customer experiences resulting from the siloed, reactive and disconnected state of supply chains. Wrong packages being delivered and package tracking issues are other examples of poor customer experiences. These issues already leave a bad impression on customers, but they're often magnified, I've observed, by poor, inconsistent, impersonal customer service. The mistake I believe many supply chain leaders make is thinking that logistics alone will improve the lives of their customers—that as long as the right package is delivered to a customer within the correct time period, then everything is fine. But these days, consumers arguably want love in the form of personalized customer experiences, not merely logistics. By leveraging AI, supply chain leaders can personalize the customer experience. Why Many Supply Chains Still Haven't Caught Up To Consumer-Centric Thinking From my observations, many supply chains are still behind when it comes to customer-centric thinking, and in my view, that lag stems from the business-to-business (B2B) origins of the supply chain world. Before Amazon entered the scene, many of the stakeholders in the supply chain world were primarily geared toward serving other businesses, not individual consumers. FedEx, UPS and DHL, for instance, originated as B2B companies. In the B2B supply chain world, unit economics and efficiency are king. And part of driving down unit economics? Offering standardized services, including a one-size-fits-all approach to the customer service experience. This tends to work well in B2B contexts but less so in business-to-consumer (B2C) ones. For instance, when a business reports a missing package, it expects to work through standard channels to resolve the issue, such as filing claims and waiting for an investigation. However, when a consumer reports a missing package, they typically want an immediate response and a faster resolution. Research has shown just how much a good customer experience matters. A 2022 survey of 1,000 Americans by omnichannel solutions provider Mitto found the following: 'In the past year, 80% of respondents said they experienced at least one delivery delay. A majority (55%) of consumers have canceled a delayed shipment because of a bad customer experience. And when asked whether bad CX or a product delay is worse, over three-quarters (76%) of respondents indicated bad CX.' How AI Can Help The Supply Chain World Move Toward B2Me Today, many stakeholders in the supply chain industry have adapted their customer experiences and services to the B2C context. But the pace of change is fast, and I believe that a B2C approach to the customer experience no longer cuts it. To keep up with consumers' preferences, the supply chain world should take another big step—shift to a business-to-me (B2Me) mindset for crafting customer experiences. B2Me is about personalization at scale. It's about catering to the unique needs of individual customers, rather than offering the same product or service to segments of customers over and over again. It's the difference between going to a tailor to get a custom-made outfit versus buying one off the rack at a department store, the difference between getting a stilted, rote customer service message and one that's specifically crafted to address your needs and concerns. Achieving personalization has historically been easier said than done, because, overall, it's been a costly and friction-filled process. However, that's where AI can step in. AI can help supply chain leaders create personalized, predictive and proactive customer experiences. Specifically, leveraging AI, leaders can bridge the gap between their customers and their supply chain systems, thanks to real-time tracking, personalized communication and automated issue resolution. For example, say you order a package from a company that uses AI to refine the customer experience. Your package gets lost. You go to the company's website and enter your tracking number. On the backend, the AI-powered technology can gather various data points, such as the carrier assigned to the package, geographic data and traffic conditions to determine what likely happened to your package. The AI-powered solution can also highlight your purchasing history with the company—you happen to have a high customer lifetime value, having made 100 different purchases in the past two years. With that information, the AI-powered solution can begin investigating the issue with your package and working toward the correct resolution. Simultaneously, through the AI-powered customer service interface, the company can send you an apology, acknowledge that it knows you're a long-time customer and offer you the option of either shipping you a new package or giving you store credit worth the value of the missing package. Moreover, it can adjust its communication style based on its inference of your preferences from past interactions. In turn, you, the customer, receive a more streamlined, friendlier experience that's likely to leave you with a good impression of the company. How Companies Can Navigate The Risks AI Poses AI, however, is not without its risks. Supply chain and other company leaders need to consider data privacy concerns, the potential for AI solutions to hallucinate and the possibility that their teams will misapply AI. Rather than viewing AI as an all-encompassing solution, supply chain and other company leaders need to carefully think through its limitations and risks and ensure they're in compliance with all applicable regulations. Additionally, given that implementation is often expensive and time-consuming, it's important that supply chain and other company stakeholders carefully think about the problems they're trying to solve, rather than focusing on potential solutions. By doing so, leaders can evaluate potential vendors through the lens of those problems. When I look at the world today, I'm seeing more and more factors become commoditized. I predict that in the future, companies will have little but their reputations to differentiate themselves on. And in a world where a brand can be destroyed with just one post online, it's vital that companies strengthen their reputations by offering consumers great experiences. Despite the risks that AI poses, I believe it stands to help positively change the customer experience in the supply chain world—and by extension, help companies strengthen their reputations. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store