
The best surround sound systems in 2025, tried and tested
Best surround sound system: Sony Bravia Theater Bar 8, SA-SW5 Subwoofer and RS5 Speakers
Best budget surround sound system: Vizio 5.1 Soundbar SE SV510X-08
Best splurge surround sound system: Sonos Arc Ultra, Sub (Gen 4) and Era 300 Speakers While we all spend plenty of time choosing between the top TVs, picking the best surround sound system to complete your home theater might have skipped your mind. You're not to be blamed for hoping your TV's speakers are sufficient because that TV was pricey enough as it was.
Fortunately for you, I've wanted to upgrade the audio for my favorite shows, music and movies, as I build my perfect home entertainment setup. In that process, I've learned you need more than just one of the best soundbars, as compatible rear speakers (and possibly a subwoofer) are required for the complete package. And that's part of why I spent the better part of a year testing all of these surround sound system components to guarantee compatibility.
Over those months, I put some of the top competitors through their paces with a checklist that included streaming music, TV and movies, physical media and video games. I also used them off-hours as my personal home theater setup to ensure they're worth your time and money.
With testing (and troubleshooting) in the rearview, I've landed on three across various price points I consider the best at enabling quality surround sound audio. As much as I love going to the cinema, the convenience of a proper home theater is hard to argue with — so let's dive in to see which is right for you.
Sony BRAVIA Theater
This is the surround sound system most people will be happy with, regardless of their needs and preferences.
Vizio 5.1 Soundbar SE
Shockingly affordable for a whole surround sound system, Vizio's 5.1 system punches way above its price.
Best splurge surround sound system
Sonos Arc Ultra
The best solution for an ever-expanding home audio setup, Sonos packs awe-inspiring sound quality into its pricey gear.
Sonos Era 300
The Sonos Era 300 is a dream that helps complete this surround sound system package. It offers crystal clear audio, theater-like surround sound and a sleek aesthetic.
Sonos Sub 4
You can truly feel your home theater rumble with the Sonos Sub 4. It's expensive, yes, but it's the cherry on top of this excellent surround sound system. While surround sound audio decisions can be personal, Sony's kit does everything well enough that nobody would be disappointed. Combining this soundbar, subwoofer and rear speakers, you get strong, bassy audio out of the box, though your TV shows and movies still sound clear and immersive thanks to spatial audio. Whether I was fighting the reptilian Materia Defender in Final Fantasy VII Rebirth on the PlayStation 5 or watching Joel snipe out a threat in HBO's 'The Last of Us,' this Sony system ensured I heard 360 degrees of action.
The Sony speakers impressed on my audio testing playlist, producing clear strings and accurate vocals on Frank Ocean's 'Thinkin Bout You' ballad, crisp drums on Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross' 'Brutalizer' from the Challengers score and thumping, sturdy bass on everything from Steve Aoki's remix of Kid Cudi's 'Pursuit of Happiness' to the Talking Heads' 'Once In A Lifetime.' If that low-frequency audio is too much by default, you can easily lower the bass (or adjust any number of audio settings) using Sony's mobile app.
Design-wise, the Sony soundbar, speakers and subwoofer are all on the larger side, at least compared to Vizio, Bose and Roku's current offerings. Sony's soundbar is nearly as wide as the Sonos Arc, and its rear speakers are the second largest (again, right behind the massive Sonos Era 300).
This tech looks the part, too, as it will fit into your home setup elegantly provided your under-the-TV space is wide enough.
It's also my top overall pick because it supports every way I can listen and watch, with eARC HDMI (for your TV, streaming boxes and gaming consoles), AirPlay 2 for iPhones and other Apple devices and Bluetooth for everything else. It also won a fair bit of points for the simplicity of its setup, as it cuts the additional cords required to connect the rear wireless speakers for the Bose and Vizio setups.
I love to be surprised during testing, so I'm excited to say how good Vizio's $250 surround sound system is — and that it often gets discounted to just under $200. Yes, Vizio offers a soundbar, rear speakers and a subwoofer for less than most standalone soundbars. Call me paranoid but I was almost expecting to open the box and find the sound of crickets with a note saying, 'The joke's on you!' Instead, I got gear whose performance is better than expected, as it even supports Dolby Atmos, the spatial audio standard (more on this below). This four-piece kit proved capable for a recent weekend of watching TV, movies and pro wrestling, and it provided adequate bass from its diminutive subwoofer.
For example, I noticed how pop punk band Charly Bliss' single 'Nineteen' sounded alright and that Daft Punk's live version of 'Touch It/Technologic' provided notable bass and immersed me in the sounds of the audience reacting to the beats. Watching George Miller's 'Mad Max: Fury Road' off of a Blu-ray in my home theater, I noticed that this Dolby Atmos-enhanced cut allowed the thumping drums, whirring blades and punchy explosions hitting throughout the caravan scene to all be heard from different places around me.
There are downsides, though, as you might expect at this price. During setup, I was a little annoyed to see how its rear speakers connect via wires to the subwoofer, leaving you with two long cords to tidy up to avoid an eye sore. Also, its sound isn't as strong as the Sony or Sonos, though you might not notice most of the time unless you've been spoiled by better surround sound tech before.
The biggest audio issue I encountered happened when my air conditioning unit was blasting and the dialogue was slightly hard to hear. The fix was to raise the dialogue setting in Vizio's app but at one point, the app had an issue with this dialogue clarity slider resetting. Thankfully, this issue has been fixed since I first encountered it.
Setting everything up and getting it to work was fairly straightforward. Vizio's hardware is smaller than most of the rest of the testing pool, which makes it great for those with limited space. You'll just want to find a way to get those wires out of your way so you can continue to be impressed by the value of this surround sound setup.
At $250, this setup has a shocking regular price for a surround sound setup that performs as well as this set does and it's the kind of product that makes you rethink what Vizio is capable of.
While Sony and Vizio can get the job done at two distinct and different price points, Sonos' pricier take on surround sound home audio has its own merits. First of all, I need to give Sonos the win on sound quality overall, as the massive Arc Ultra soundbar and Era 300 speakers earned their space by immersing me in full and pitch-perfect renditions of everything from rockers Screaming Females' power ballad 'Swallow the World' to a waves-soaked scene from FX's prestige series 'Shogun' where our heroes barely made it through the storm. The Arc Ultra and Era 300 also feature convenient touch controls for volume, pause/play and voice commands, so you don't always need to hunt for your remote.
And while I was pleased when I originally tested the Sonos Arc — which is increasingly unavailable, as the Arc Ultra replaces it — I've truly been wowed by the Arc Ultra. One of the Arc Ultra's main improvements is in low-end sound, thanks to Sonos' new Sound Motion Woofer that improves bass without making the soundbar much larger or heavier than the Arc. I heard that added bass throughout my testing, from explosions and drums in 'Mad Max: Fury Road' to the beats in Daft Punk's live mashup of 'Touch It/Technologic' and Frank Ocean's 'Thinkin' Bout You.'
While the Sony surround sound kit never stumbled either, Sonos just earned a bit more love from its impressive performance, including when I watched the LCD Soundsystem concert film 'Shut Up and Play the Hits,' and felt like I was back in the pit at Madison Square Garden during their performance of 'All My Friends' (and, yes, I was there). The Arc Ultra and Era 300 speakers allowed for strong guitar riffs and roars of the crowd, and the soundspace gave plenty of separation to hear Nancy Whang's keys and Pat Mahoney's drums clearly.
Sonos does have some downsides, primarily the prohibitive price of this kit (you could opt for the less expensive Era 100 rear speakers and Beam soundbar, though). It's also missing the DTS:X audio standard, which the Sony Bravia Theater Bar 8 offers. Thankfully, Sonos seems to have fixed much of what has plagued some of its hardware in the past. For instance, the Arc Ultra finally has the option to connect via Bluetooth, which is great for Android users. Android users also have the ability to use Sonos Trueplay to adapt their speakers to the acoustics of their room.
Finally, the biggest reason to splurge on a Sonos system is its multi-room audio support. The ability to wirelessly sync the sounds coming from speakers in different rooms can make mornings a bit easier, as podcasts and tunes follow me from my bedroom to my living room (which is within earshot of my bathroom and kitchen), so I don't miss a beat or a word. Is that worth another $500 or so? That's between you and your need for convenience, but I think the Sonos sound system life's pretty sweet if you have the cash and the space.
If you're looking for somewhere to save a few bucks, the new Sonos Sub (Gen 4) wireless subwoofer doesn't exactly feel like as much of a must-have for the Arc Ultra as it did before when the original Arc's bass output wasn't as strong.
User experienceEase of use: Multi-channel sound systems may be intimidating, but that shouldn't be the case. We tracked of the ease of setup.
Special features: Surround sound systems may pack bonus options, so we tried them all out and give bonus points based on how easy it was to discover them.
Living with these speakers: For multiple days, and many hours of testing, we relied on these surround sound systems for our home entertainment.
Similar placement: We tested wireless speakers and subwoofers from the same place unless their cords are too short to sit in our preferred locations.
Multiple seating points: While we have our favorite 'spot' in our living room, we listened from multiple spots to make sure the speakers fill the room. TV and moviesDifferent audio standards: We watched shows with and without the immersive Dolby Atmos standard, making sure to consume a range of how content is sent to viewers.
Multiple services: Shows were streamed across different service platforms, including (but not limited to) Hulu and Max.
Streaming and physical media: We watched films from the Apple TV 4K and a 4K Blu-ray player, and on-device platforms in the case of the Roku Streambar Pro
Consistency: While we watched various content on these surround sound systems, we replayed the same scenes across all equipment.
Audio sync: The same dialogue-rich scene of a sitcom was played on all test systems, to see if there's any delays in audio sync. We also kept track of which services offer controls to adjust audio/video delay. MusicConsistency: We played the same playlist of songs through each set of audio equipment. Since most speakers don't have a native operating system, we used Apple Music over the wireless AirPlay standard to listen to those songs. There were two exceptions: the Vizio hardware tested doesn't offer AirPlay, so we used the Apple Music app on the Apple TV, and since the Roku hardware has its own app ecosystem, we used the same app there.
Variety: That playlist ranges from alternative rock to electronica, with hip-hop and pop. First, you'll want to think about your needs, whether you care about specific streaming standards or simply want your shows, music and movies to come at you from all angles.
If you want powerful, detailed sound behind you, go for the Sony or the Sonos — which provided the top sound quality in our testing. If you're simply dipping your feet and want sound coming from behind and below you, the Vizio package is hard to argue with considering its dramatically low price. All three setups offer Dolby Atmos, but only the Sony and the Sonos calibrate their sound to your space, though it's difficult to ensure you'll be able to hear the difference.
If you want to send audio to your speakers from your phone, you'll find much more convenience with the Sony and Sonos, because they support Spotify Connect and Apple's AirPlay — which add a lot of convenience. Whenever I wanted to play podcasts or music from my phone onto the Vizio setup, I had to manually enable Bluetooth connections in their app and select that speaker as a Bluetooth output.
Lastly, deciding between Sony and Sonos can be tricky because the price jump to the latter is so steep. Both offer Atmos and room-tuned audio, but Sonos' gear is designed for multi-room audio, so you can bump the same jams wirelessly throughout your home. You can enable and disable specific speakers, without turning them off and on the way I do with the Bluetooth speaker in my shower.
In our testing, we also covered competing options from Roku and Bose. Both were acceptable overall, but each had their annoying flaws.
For example, Bose's wireless speakers may connect to its soundbar and subwoofer wirelessly but each requires two cords to plug into the wall, creating a lot of mess. Or as my testing notes simplified the problem to a single word: 'convoluted.' Sony and Sonos' wireless speakers are much simpler, while we'll accept the wires of Vizio's rears due to their hyper-affordable price.
That said, I did like how the Bose's rear speakers were a bit small, providing decent sound without taking up a lot of space. Overall, this soundbar, speaker pair and subwoofer provided decent audio, immersing me in everything from my favorite songs to chaotic scenes in 'Shogun' and 'The Last of Us.' The Bose soundbar I tested has since been replaced with a new model, so I look forward to re-testing those speakers and subwoofers soon.
The Roku system I tested is no longer available, and that's for the better. Using Roku's since-discontinued Streambar Pro soundbar with its Wireless Bass subwoofer and Wireless Speakers was great until the rear speakers and subwoofer disconnected from the soundbar — which happened too often to recommend. I spent weeks troubleshooting this issue and found no real resolution.
In theory, Roku's value proposition is fantastic as it packs a 4K streaming device into the Streambar Pro (just like its Streambar SE and Streambar soundbars, though these don't support rear wireless speakers). When it worked, it worked well, with rumbling bass from the subwoofer and directionality in a gunfight on 'The Last of Us.' Oh, and the Dolby Atmos sound standard for immersive audio — which even the Vizio set includes — is missing. We hope Roku rolls out a new surround sound package that doesn't have the instability problem of the model we tested.
The following FAQs have been answered by the reviewer, Henry T. Casey, a veteran tech journalist who's covered electronics for over nine years.
What is Dolby Atmos and why does it matter?
What is Dolby Atmos and why does it matter?
Dolby Atmos and varying multi-channel surround sound specs aim for the same thing but in different ways. To best understand Dolby Atmos, let's first talk about multi-channel audio since it came first. Both of these standards seek to provide audio in ways that make you think the sound is coming from multiple directions, including the 5.1 and 7.1 surround sound specs that produce the main sound from multiple audio channels (the first number) at different parts of your room, while their low-frequency sound comes through the subwoofer, represented by the '.1' above). In your room, a soundbar could emit three to five (or more) of the audio 'channels' in the front of the room, while your rear speakers account for the other two. That's multi-channel audio, which is a system of fixed output points.
Dolby Atmos, however, is a spatial audio standard, where sound is mapped to many more points — think of a whole sphere of audio around you. Dolby Atmos and spatial audio, therefore, aren't as dependent or limited to setups with a specific number of speakers — it's more about how the sound moves to different points.
Where should I place my surround system speakers?
Where should I place my surround system speakers?
The best rule of thumb for a soundbar is to place it underneath the TV and have it centered and parallel to the bottom bezel of the TV. Not only is that the most visually pleasing position, but it will have your audio blasting from the position your eyes are drawn to, putting your ears in the right place to hear everything.
Rear speakers are tricky because we don't all have power outlets and room for cords that go everywhere. The best advice I have is to have the speakers at least a foot (if not two) behind you and at ear level. Your mileage may vary on what's comfortable for audio near your head.
Lastly, the subwoofer goes on your floor in the most convenient spot. I like to place mine right behind the couch, so the low-end rumble hits my seat.
Do I need a subwoofer?
Do I need a subwoofer?
While you might feel compelled to buy your system all at once — especially based on bundled discounts — not everyone needs a subwoofer, as soundbars begin to pack more and more low-frequency sound. You can answer this question simply by asking 'Have I ever tried to turn the bass up or down?' If you're bass-friendly, especially if you watch movies with booming scores and listening to music with tons of low-end, get that subwoofer. If not, spend your money on better soundbars and speakers.
CNN Underscored thoroughly tests all the products we cover, and we provide full transparency about how these products are tested — so you know they'll meet your standards. Our experienced team of writers and editors have many years of testing experience and work to ensure each article is carefully edited and all recommended products are properly vetted.
This guide's writer, Henry T. Casey, used this opportunity to figure out the right surround sound system for himself, and what to recommend to friends and family. This way, he can share the link when someone asks why a specific system is right for them. He's spent several years of experience testing all sorts of electronics, including headphones, laptops and phones. He is currently planning future updates, based on new versions of products he's tested here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I review TVs for a living and these are affordable back-to-school TV deals I'd actually buy for my dorm room
When looking for back-to-school TVs, price means absolutely everything. You don't need to splurge on one of the best OLED TVs if you're not going to use it for more than four years, especially if most of your time will be spent (hopefully) studying, researching, or sitting in classrooms. Still, if you're here, you obviously want to find a TV with good-enough picture quality and not settle for the cheapest TV you can find. While the TV you take to college doesn't have to be a top-of-the-line set, one with a good amount of features and reliable picture performance should be your goal. As someone who tests TVs (and someone who's not too far out of college that I can't remember dorm life) I've tried to narrow the list of TVs down to fit most budgets. So, if you're heading back to school yourself, in search of a new TV for your child, or want a budget display for your off-campus apartment, these are the six TVs I recommend. This Roku display is the perfect back-to-school TV selection, especially if you're on a budget. You will have to make some compromises, like going with a non-4K TV, but that doesn't make the Roku Select any worse of an option. It's limited on specs but high on value, making itself a steal at under $200. Roku just updated its TV lineup, meaning the Select is totally revamped. I got to see the new Roku Select in action earlier this year and was blown away by how slim the design was. The great thing about Roku, too, is the wide selection of free content you have at your fingertips, so you don't even need to subscribe to any streaming services to get quality content. This Roku Select Series TV is one of the newest Roku TVs on the market. Its picture quality won't blow you away, but for a sensationally low price, you're getting access to one of the best streaming platforms on the market. This is a great opportunity to save money on a 65-inch smart TV with simple, easy-to-use features. Sony's commitment to designing some of the best TVs even extends to its budget models. You'd be right in equating Sony TVs with premium, but it also has some cheaper sets that could work well in a dorm room setting. One such model is the Sony Bravia 3 LED TV. Again, given the price range set under $600, you'll have to live with something other than an OLED, which is fine because the Bravia 3 has some pep in its step. It's not pushing out any record-breaking numbers by any means, but it does have some quality color coverage. In our testing, the Bravia 3 hit 95.88% of the UHDA-P3 gamut and sports a Delta-E of 3.5. The Delta-E score deals with color accuracy, with lower numbers being better. In this case, the Bravia 3 has some great color accuracy, as anything under a 4 is quite good. Brightness is another matter entirely. You're not going to see metrics that mirror a Hisense Mini-LED model here, but that's what you get at this price. At least the Bravia 3 does have an input latency of 9.2ms, so on the off chance you end up gaming in your spare time, this TV won't disappoint. The Bravia 3 isn't as impressive as the higher-end Bravia 7, but if you're in the market for a 75-inch TV for under $1,000, you can't go wrong with Sony's budget-friendly LED TV. It doesn't offer a robust set of gaming features, but the Bravia 3 comes with Google TV baked right into the software. We were also impressed with its implementation of Sony's excellent picture processing. So 1080p and bare-minimum LED TVs just aren't really for you? That's okay, because TVs are getting cheaper these days and both TCL and Hisense have some incredible picks for you in the lower-rungs of their lineups. Case in point is the TCL QM6K, a well-rounded, gaming-centric Mini-LED TV that does its best to eke out as much value as is possible on a sub-$500 sticker price. In our review of the TCL QM6K Mini-LED TV, we raved about its sleek design and picture performance. Again, this isn't a premium display, but it still ticks all the right boxes, netting you good color accuracy and tons of gaming features. It wrangles all of the HDR formats, too, making it particularly ideal for anyone with HDR streaming subscriptions. You can also expect to get somewhat middling audio out of this TV, but that's to be expected across the board with most displays. While it might say it's audio system is made by Onkyo, that doesn't quite mean it will have as bombastic an audio output as conventional Onkyo speakers. Need a TV that can also double as a computer monitor? One in particular that I really love on TCL TVs is its 240Hz mode, which lets you drop the TV to 1080p and play games in the higher refresh rate. It's a bit niche and works best when paired with one of the best gaming PCs... just don't let it distract you from your schoolwork. The QM6K represents one of the most affordable ways to land a Mini-LED TV that can double as a computer monitor. Google TV is available right out of the box, and the TV's relatively modest Mini-LED backlight keeps scenes visually appealing. Samsung's The Frame isn't the cheapest TV on the market, but you can find it at lower prices, especially in smaller configurations. It's great for college students who want their room to have some real personality. It comes with access to tons of artwork from galleries across the world, which will certainly make any art history majors out there very happy. It's obviously a good TV, with solid picture performance, but Samsung's The Frame also has incredible audio for a smaller display. You'd expect Samsung to put all of its effort into designing the look and aesthetic of the TV, but the speakers actually offer some kick unlike other options in its weight class. In our Samsung The Frame (2024) hands-on, we said the TV looks great in art mode and we also liked that the Samsung Art Store now offers a monthly curation of artwork users can display for free. The TV also features HDR10 Plus support, 120Hz refresh rate, built-in Amazon Alexa, Samsung's Tizen operating system, and four HDMI 2.1 ports. While it might sit at the bottom of Hisense's 2025 TV lineup, the U6QF still has some quality features and performance that makes it stand out. We don't have an official review of the TV just yet, but we went hands on with the Hisense U6QF Mini-LED TV several months ago and saw some promising results. At 144Hz, the U6QF makes a name for itself with some serious specs at a budget price. On top of its high refresh rate, the U6QF also boasts gaming features, like VRR and ALLM, plus two HDMI 2.1 ports. Hisense also has a special AI Smooth Motion technology, which should enhance motion clarity on the display. Finding a solid 65-inch TV for under $600 is tough, but the U6QF delivers. It's a brilliant TV for this price, but you might have to contend with some blooming and poor off-axis viewing, which is common for Mini-LED TVs at lower prices. This is the lowest price ever offered for the Hisense 55" Class U6 Series Mini-LED 4K UHD Smart Fire TV. It's a newer TV (a 2025 model, in fact), which means you'll have all the most current technology and features. Between the Native 144Hz, HDR10+ support, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and Amazon's stellar Fire TV OS, you have everything you need for a great entertainment experience. We've been singing the praises of the Panasonic W95A ever since the 75-inch variation hit an all-time low price of $797. One of its biggest drawbacks upon debut was the premium price, and now it's one of the cheapest Mini-LED TVs you can buy — even if it's a year old. Don't let its age fool you, though. I tested Panasonic W95A Mini-LED TV last year and was pleasantly surprised by its brightness, HDR performance, and anti-glare mitigation. Again, this TV won't quite match the same high brightness metrics available on Hisense models, but with just over 1,400 nits in both HDR and SDR, it's plenty bright for any dorm room. With its sticker price down to its lowest point, the W95A makes the perfect budget pick for any student looking to get exceptional picture performance without a hefty investment. Panasonic's fantastic Mini-LED TV has never been more affordable, so it's worth pouncing on this deal before it disappears. You're not just getting a great sale price with the W95A, you're also getting a superb, 55-inch Mini-LED TV loaded with extra features. We dug this TV when it was over a thousand bucks, and we really dig it now that it's below $500.


Tom's Guide
3 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Sony WH-1000XM6 3 months later: here's my honest verdict on how Sony's flagship cans hold up
Despite their ever-presence on best lists all over the internet, I wasn't actually all that much of a fan of the Sony WH-1000XM5. Don't get me wrong, I completely understood why so many users and reviewers were enamoured with Sony's flagship over-ears, but there were a number of reasons that they didn't hit right with me. Their extremely narrow headband that dug into my head, and I wasn't a fan of their weird, squishy protective case and their extremely plasticky build. It added up to a pair of headphones that didn't match up to the similarly priced competition. So when Sony announced the XM6, I was ready for a new pair of headphones that could take their place upon my melon. Their release specs were exciting. It looked like Sony had thought about all my issues and fixed the problems. A wider headband, a new sturdy case, a folding frame. And then I got them in my hands. The WH-1000XM6 are a good pair of headphones—they deserve their 4-star review, after all—but they're not the best headphones around. I've now had my hands on the XM6 to really make a solid opinion beyond the review of the cans — here's what I've found. Sony's headphones have always featured excellent ANC — I can't knock them for that. When you turn it on, the world seems to melt away into your music. Recent models have negated some of the pressure and claustrophobia that older versions created, and new features have been introduced to rank them amongst the best noise-canceling headphones you can buy. Perhaps we're now reaching peak noise canceling. The point where the only improvements firms can make are negligible, the top of the curve as it flattens itself out. Maybe the fact that the XM6 aren't all that much more effective at noise canceling than the previous headphones is down to some cosmic ANC limit that we've now reached. They are better than the XM5, and in my testing time, I've found that they are, indeed, very good. But I was hoping for more. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones are undefeated. They still block out more noise than Sony's headphones, and they've been out for a full year by the time that Sony launched the XM6. To counteract, Sony created an algorithm that changes the ANC depending on where you are, measuring the noise of your environment to change the ANC on the fly. I understand this decision, but it also sounds a lot like ANC's chief purpose reworded for a specs list. I've stacked the XM6 up against their nearest rivals in a range of different environments and I've seen little difference in 'max ANC' in any of them. The feature, it would appear, doesn't make much sense. The ANC is very good, there's no doubt about that. But considering how good the Bose competition is at blocking noise, I was really hoping for more — and time hasn't done them any favors. One of my main complaints with the XM5 was just how flimsy they felt. Their all-over matte finish and plastic build made them feel cheaper than they actually were, and the squishing case was novel but ultimately too large and annoying. Then there was the headband — a thin, padded affair that pressed down in one spot on my head to make for an unfortunate pressure point. The XM6 have ironed out a whole bunch of these issues. The case, for example, is much sturdier and its magnetic clasp has grown on me in my time with the headphones. I'm still not entirely convinced as to this mechanism's longevity, but it feels secure and tactile as of right now. I miss the magnetic cable store door inside, but I appreciate the folding mechanism that means the case can be more compact. I've found it easy enough to port the headphones around as a result, as they take up less space in a backpack. That folding mechanism does raise a continued issue with the most recent XM designs, however. The XM5's plastic armatures were a key weakness and failure point, so to add a folding mechanism into what appear to be similarly sized points feels... interesting. Nothing has broken in Tom's Guides XM6s as yet, but it's something I know I'll be keeping an eye on as my testing continues. Over my time with the headphones, I've had mixed experiences with the new padded headband. It is much better than that found on the XM6, but it has to sit just right to not cause any comfort issues on your crown. Too far forward or too far back and the same problem persists. Even then, for longer periods of wear, the XM6 aren't as comfortable as the far better-padded Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 or QuietComfort Ultra Headphones. Overall build remains the bugbear. I still don't like the matte finishes that seem to conjure skin grease and fingerprints from thin air, or the overly simplistic style of the XM series. I particularly don't like how light and hollow the headphones feel — while the lightness makes them more comfortable, it also makes them feel much cheaper than their $449 price tag would suggest. That feeling has only been exacerbated over my extended use of the headphones. I want something expensive to feel expensive, and the fairly non-descript looking XM6 neither look or feel the part. They're not badly built, I should re-iterate. They just don't feel expensive. I'm not going to sit here and tell you that the XM6 sound bad. I can't. That wouldn't be true — the XM6 sound good. There's solid balance on display, as well as some top-notch vocal clarity that AV Managing Editor Nick noted in the review. But, when you compare them to some of their similarly priced and even cheaper competition, there are significant chinks in their sonic armor. Sony's typical overemphasis on the low-end is still very much present here. For most listeners, that's not going to be a problem, but it does mean they lose out when compared to the more controlled and tighter sound profile of the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3. There's more detail out of the Brits as well, and an all-around more complete audio experience. I've found the EQ helpful in my testing, but there's still a strange hollowness that I can sense no matter how much work I put into the sliders. It feels like "good sound by numbers" as opposed to a passionate team of audio engineers creating a unique sound profile. Most people aren't going to have a bad time with the XM6. They'll put them on and say, "Wow, those sound great!" and then go about their day. But put them side by side with their closest rivals price-wise, and things get trickier for Sony's flagship. If you put the XM5 next to the XM4, I think that most would be able to fairly quickly work out the differences between the two pairs of headphones. Do the same with the XM5 and the XM6, and things would go differently. Much like the minimal physical differences, the updates inside make the XM6 feel a bit like de ja vu. The battery life remains the same at 35 hours, and the touch controls and app features are pretty much identical. The color-matched cables from the old models are gone, and the ANC key is the same. Dive further in and the XM6 separate themselves out, but this still feels like less of an update than we might have hoped for. As a result, this is not a must-update for XM5 owners. I've found an experience that is almost entirely the same as the XM5 during my extended testing. If your XM5s are still going strong, don't upgrade — wait and see what the XM7 has in store for us in a few years. As for those looking to buy a new pair of flagship headphones, I think you should consider the competition. The XM6 don't sound as good as the PX7 S3 and don't block out as much noise as the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones. I don't hate the XM6 by any means. They're a very good pair of headphones. But when the competition are 'excellent', 'very good' doesn't quite seem to match up.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Billy Joel to close beloved New York motorcycle shop after diagnosis
Billy Joel is closing his beloved motorcycle shop on Long Island, New York, after nearly 15 years, and will auction off his extensive collection of bikes later this year. The decision to close 20th Century Cycles in late September was made after he was diagnosed with a rare brain disorder, according to a spokesperson, Claire Mercuri. In May, Joel announced that he was cancelling upcoming concerts after learning he has Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, a fluid buildup in his brain that can affect thinking, concentrating, memory, movement and more, according to the Cleveland Clinic. The 76-year-old singer, composer and pianist was having trouble with his balance but otherwise felt good, he said in an interview last month on Bill Maher's Club Random podcast. Joel, who grew up in nearby Hicksville, opened 20th Century Cycles in late 2010 as a place to maintain and repair his motorcycles, restore and customise ones he bought and showcase his collection for the public at no charge. 'It's basically promoting an aesthetic here," he said in a 2013 YouTube video filmed at the shop. "I like the older style. I like the automotive style from the '30s to the '60s. I wanted to collect a whole bunch of those kinds of bikes, put 'em in one place and let people see what that era of bikes looked like. Because it's starting to be a lost aesthetic.' He said he also wanted to bring foot traffic and business to downtown Oyster Bay — a ritzy waterfront community about 25 miles (40 kilometres) east of midtown Manhattan — where part of the street that includes 20th Century Cycles was renamed Billy Joel Way in 2023. 'I've been living in this community for a long time,' he said in the video. 'I actually grew up not far from here. And I'd like to get a little interest going into the town and the village.' Joel's nearby home in Centre Island is listed for $29.9 million, and he has been living in South Florida, while keeping a home in Sag Harbor on Long Island. The shop became a popular stop for motorcycle enthusiasts and tourists. It was home to Joel's collection of more than 75 bikes, dating back all the way to the 1940s and including Harley-Davidsons, Triumphs, Ducatis, Moto Guzzis, Indians and BMWs. One of the most valuable, he said, was a 1952 Vincent Rapide, which can sell for tens of thousands of dollars and sometimes more, according to auction sites. 'I think everybody in Oyster Bay would agree that it's a big loss," said Ted Bahr, who owns a vintage rock poster gallery next to 20th Century Cycles. 'Billy's place is visited on weekends by dozens and dozens of people, typically on motorcycles but also people in cars. People come up and look at the window all the time. I mean, it's a real destination. Billy Joel is a real superstar, and he is a hometown boy, so it's really unfortunate." The motorcycles that were in the shop have already been moved out. But it has been open on recent weekends, selling new, used and vintage motorcycle parts that were still in stock there. Joel's enthusiasm for motorcycles dates back decades. In 1982, he was riding a motorcycle on Long Island when he was struck by a car that ran a red light, injuring his left thumb and dislocating his right wrist. He spent about a month in the hospital. He has also ridden motorcycles in various benefits for 9/11 first responders, breast cancer and other causes over the years. A date for the auction of his collection has not been set.