NHS England chief rules out big rise in health service funding
Ministers have 'maxed out' the amount of money they can give the NHS and it will no longer get big increases in its funding because of tight public finances, the health service's new boss in England has said.
Sir Jim Mackey, who took over as NHS England's chief executive last month, said the state of the public finances meant the country could no longer afford big increases in spending.
'We are pretty much maxed out on what's affordable. It is really now about [the NHS] delivering better value for money, getting more change, delivering on getting back to reasonable productivity levels,' said Mackey, who replaced Amanda Pritchard. 'The financial thing is always with us [in the NHS]. There's never enough money for healthcare. The NHS is such a big part of public spending now.'
His comments came in a speech to health journalists and a question and answer session at an event in London on Thursday organised by the Medical Journalists' Association.
The remarks by Mackey – an accountant before he joined the NHS – could indicate that the health service will not receive a substantial increase in next month's comprehensive spending review.
Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, will unveil the review – setting out government spending for the three years between 2026-27 and 2029-30 – on 11 June. In her first budget last October she gave the NHS in England an extra £22bn for 2024-25 and the current financial year.
Mackey's realism about the NHS's funding prospects may also foreshadow the amount of money the NHS has to fulfil ambitious plans to overhaul the service that will be outlined in the government's impending 10-year health plan.
The document, which is being drawn up by a team of advisers to the health secretary, Wes Streeting, is expected to be published in early July, close to the 77th anniversary of the creation of the NHS in 1948 by the postwar Labour government.
Mackey also defended the cuts to the budgets of the NHS's 215 trusts, which senior figures warned on Friday were 'eye-watering' and would lead to service closures and cuts to staffing. They are the result of a brutal 'financial reset' for the service that he ordered in March.
Without such tough action the NHS was likely to overspend by £6.6bn this year, despite its budget being about £200bn, Mackey told the MJA. '[There was] the shock that that was creating [in Whitehall], the worry that was creating, [and] the anxiety about what that meant for the economy, and [with] the international instability that we've got, what it meant for broader society.'
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
He also warned NHS leaders that while they obsess about the financial restraints within which they work, the plunge in public satisfaction with the service should be their primary concern. Only 21% of people are satisfied with the NHS, the latest British Social Attitudes survey revealed last month.
Mackey added: 'The thing we should all really bother about is the British Social Attitudes survey in all of this. It was really terrible last year [when satisfaction was 23%]. We all thought we'd bottomed out, and then it got worse in the latest one. So that was a really big shock; a really big sign that we're in danger of losing that connection with the public. [That] we'll lose that properly. We are in really serious trouble.'
Mackey also made clear he disagreed with Streeting's routine description of the NHS as 'broken' due to its inability to be able to continue provide prompt care due to years of neglect under the Conservatives. Mackey countered that while 'it's very, very easy to generalise that this is all broken and failed', in his view the service 'is still delivering genuinely world-class care', although there was a worryingly wide – and 'completely unacceptable' – variation in the quality of care patients received.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Threat to wild salmon as sea lice show resistance to chemical used to protect fish
The threat to wild salmon from sea lice could be worse than feared as a new study shows the parasite is building up resistance to the chemical used in fish farming pens to tackle it. Campaigners also believe emamectin benzoate – known as Slice – is leaking out and causing environmental damage and want the toxic compound banned. However, despite these concerns, the Scottish Government last year extended its use in Scottish waters to 2028. Now the Irish government has sounded a warning that Slice is becoming less effective in killing the lice that infest fish farms. New research shows young wild salmon passing coastal fish farms on their migratory routes are increasingly falling prey to lice coming out of pens. The report by the Inland Fisheries Ireland agency is based on almost 20 years of tagging wild salmon. It concludes: 'Results of the present analysis provide clear evidence of significantly reduced return of adult salmon linked to salmon lice infestation from salmon farms. Data also suggests the effects of lice from salmon farms on wild stocks are underestimated because of growing resistance to Slice.' Slice can damage human DNA, and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) has found it leaking from fish farm pens and harming sea life. Campaign group WildFish Scotland said the latest study's conclusions are 'exactly what we have been saying for years'. Interim director Andrew Graham-Stewart added: 'Successive Scottish Governments have enabled the salmon farming industry to expand rapidly without meaningful safeguards to protect the environment and wild salmon. It is permitted to use a host of highly toxic chemicals, including Slice, for the treatment of parasites and diseases. 'However, regulatory change has seen substantial watering down and delay, in response to heavy lobbying of Scottish ministers by the major salmon farming companies in Scotland. 'Make no mistake, this industry, as it is currently run, is driving many wild Atlantic salmon sub-populations inexorably towards extinction.' The ruling allowing the industry to continue using Slice came shortly after industry body Salmon Scotland treated Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon and her husband Baptiste to hospitality worth £1,500 as guests of chief executive Tavish Scott at Scotland's Six Nations rugby clash against France in February last year. There is no note of what was discussed but the Scottish Government has repeatedly stated that the Slice decision was not Ms Gougeon's to make and it was not discussed at Murrayfield. The industry is worth £760 million to the Scottish economy and employs 2,500 people, but in 2023 a total of 17.4 million fish died prematurely in captivity amid enduring concerns over animal welfare. A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'To protect wild fish, Sepa introduced a new framework to manage the risk of sea lice from fish farms in February 2024.' Salmon Scotland said: 'Fish farmers use Slice as a fully-licensed product, approved by vets and regulators.'
BBC News
42 minutes ago
- BBC News
Doctors use poo pills to flush out dangerous superbugs
UK doctors are attempting to clear dangerous superbug infections using "poo pills" containing freeze-dried stool samples come from healthy donors and are packed with good data suggests superbugs can be flushed out of the dark murky depths of the bowel and replaced with a mix of healthy gut is a new approach to tackling infections that resist antibiotics, which are thought to kill a million people each year. The focus is on the bowels which are "the biggest reservoir of antibiotic resistance in humans" says Dr Blair Merrick, who has been testing the pills at Guys and St Thomas' superbugs can escape their intestinal home and cause trouble elsewhere in the body – such as urinary tract or bloodstream infections."So there's a lot of interest in 'can you get rid of them from the gut?'," says Dr idea of poo-pills isn't as far-fetched as it might seem. Faecal transplants – also known as a trans-poo-tion - are already approved for treating severe diarrhoea caused by Clostridium difficile scientists noticed hints that faecal transplants for C. difficile also seemed to get rid of superbugs. New research has focused on patients who had an infection caused by drug-resistant bacteria in the past six were given pills made from faeces which people had donated to a stool stool sample is tested to ensure it does not contain any harmful bugs, undigested food is removed and then it is freeze dried into a is stored inside a pill that can pass through the stomach unscathed and reach the intestines where it dissolves to release its poopy powdery payload. The trial has taken place on 41 patients at Guy's and St Thomas' hospitals in London to lay the groundwork for a large-scale study. It showed patients were up for taking a poo pill and the donated bacteria were still being detected in the bowels at least a month Merrick says there are "really promising signals" that poo pills could help tackle the rising scourge of superbugs and that donor bacteria could be going to microbial war with the superbugs as they compete over food and space on the lining of the gut and either rid the body of them completely or "reduce them down to a level that doesn't cause problems".The study also suggests the array of gut bacteria becomes more varied after the therapy. This is a sign of good health and "may well be promoting colonisation resistance" so it is harder for new infectious bugs to get in."It's very exciting. There's a real shift from 20 years ago where all bacteria and viruses were assumed to do you harm; to now where we realise they are completely necessary to our overall health," says Dr this week scientists showed the good bacteria our bodies meet – in the hours after we are born – seem to halve the risk of young children being admitted to hospital with lung infections. Our body's own human cells are outnumbered by the bacteria, fungi and others that live inside us - known as the has led to research implicating the microbiome in everything from Crohn's disease to cancer to mental health. If poo pills are proven to work against superbugs in larger studies then the researchers think they could be used for both treatment and prevention in people at risk. Medical procedures that suppress the immune system - including cancer therapies and organ transplants - can make the body more vulnerable."A lot of these individuals come to a lot of harm from drug resistant organisms," Dr UK's drugs regulator – the Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency – said there were more than 450 microbiome medicines currently in development."Some of them will success, so I do think we will seem them coming through quite soon," said Dr Chrysi Sergaki, the head of microbiome research at the MHRA."We could potentially, in the future, replace antibiotics with microbiome [therapies] - that's the big picture, so there's a lot of potential."
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: A serious outbreak of old-fashioned class war hits the NHS
When a child needs medical help in an advanced wealthy country with a comprehensive health service, it ought to be a simple matter. The help will be provided. The child will be treated. So how can it be that the parent of such a child in a London suburb was told by her GP that the boy is not eligible for important therapy – because he does not attend a state school? Despite the rather ridiculous wriggling of the local NHS authorities, when confronted with this fact, we know beyond doubt that this was the reason given. Surely this is the most blatant discrimination against a social group, the significant minority, many of them far from rich, who pay school fees? Why should they not qualify for the NHS? They pay the same taxes as everyone else, and indeed reduce the burden on the state by allowing it to maintain fewer school places. After all, we are always told that the NHS is our proudest achievement, open to all, free at the point of use. It now has a 'constitution' in England, a document which proclaims that the service 'has a duty every individual that it serves and must respect their human rights'. Similarly, a Charter of Patient Rights in Scotland pledges that all will be 'treated fairly and equally and will not be discriminated against'. Look carefully at these documents and you will find them especially concerned with the 'protected rights' which preoccupy modern Left-wingers, listed in England as 'gender, race, disability, age, sexual orientation, religion, belief, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity or marital or civil partnership status' – though the pledge about age is perhaps less honoured than the others. The original sin of British discrimination, social class, does not even get a mention. Perhaps it is time it was included, even though the old-fashioned sort, top-down snobbery, is now very much in retreat. For we are seeing a growth in anti-private-school sentiment across the public and charitable sector. This begins to look very much like an outbreak of old-fashioned class war, especially since the VAT raid on private schools. This is quite obviously aimed at hurting the fee-paying classes. The large numbers of children who have since switched to state schools will surely have wiped out any notional gain. The class war goes wider and deeper. Few now seriously doubt that private school students face discrimination at the hands of Oxford and Cambridge Universities. Not long ago, the anti-bullying charity named after Princess Diana amazed fee-paying schools when it told them that it would no longer allow them to take part in events or host them – because of 'newly defined funding priorities'. Even more recently, sick children who attended private schools, including cancer patients, were refused a free education on the wards of one of Scotland's leading children's hospitals. Their parents were told to pay for the tutoring that state-school children received free. The authorities were quite unashamed and replied bossily to protests, telling one family 'as you have chosen to privately educate your son, he cannot be supported by this team, you have effectively opted out of state-funded education and supports'. Why would that be so? It is not as if parents who go private are given back the taxes they have paid, which support state schools. What we are seeing here is a revival of the anti-middle-class loathing and discrimination that used to be practised by Communist states in eastern Europe. It has no place in a free country and the Government should put a stop to it, now.
