logo
Opinion - Trump is imposing martial law in DC on the flimsiest pretext

Opinion - Trump is imposing martial law in DC on the flimsiest pretext

Yahoo2 days ago
However you slice it, President Trump has implemented de facto martial law in the District of Columbia. He declared an emergency, seized control of the 3,100-member Metropolitan Police Department, unnecessarily called out the National Guard — and no one except the federal courts can stop him.
With crime down in the District, the takeover is a grotesquely incompetent pretextual policy that sets a bad precedent, and perhaps a chilling dry run for things to come in other blue cities such as Baltimore, Oakland and even New York City.
Implementing Trump's executive order, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed D.C.'s mayor to recognize Terrance Cole, head of the DEA, as 'emergency police commissioner.'
Trump's action was so at odds with the 1973 Home Rule Act that D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and D.C. Attorney General Brian L. Schwalb sued to enjoin the unprecedented takeover. 'The Administration is abusing its temporary, limited authority under the law,' Schwalb tweeted on Aug. 15. 'This is the gravest threat to Home Rule D.C. has ever faced, and we are fighting to stop it.'
Following a hearing before D.C. District Judge Ana Reyes, the court directed the Justice Department to revamp Trump's order. The DEA administrator will be demoted from police chief to a liaison to the D.C. government, but the distinction is without a difference. The Trump administration remains in control of the Metropolitan Police Department.
Although the judge said Trump might enlist local officers to help enforce immigration laws, the court did not definitively rule on what is the real guts of the case: whether Trump can commandeer D.C. cops to enforce immigration violations despite District laws and policies to the contrary. That issue is likely to be resolved this week. Depending on which way Judge Reyes goes, the D.C. government could comply with Trump's crusade to enforce immigration law or just give it lip service, stirring the bubbling cauldron of District home rule.
Trump's assertion of raw police power diverts attention from his soft spots: the mysterious Epstein files, the failed summit with Vladimir Putin and a sputtering economy. But his action also projects autocratic rule, and one does not preclude the others.
To be sure, crime must be stopped, particularly juvenile crime. We still have a rule of law. But Trump's approach doesn't pass the laugh test.
What is there about street crime committed by juveniles, or crimes of trespass and disorderly conduct involving the homeless for just camping out, that requires military action and a federal takeover? And aren't there enough billions for ICE in Trump's big, beautiful budget to do the trick?
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt left no doubt that the takeover will target the homeless, who 'will be given the option to leave their encampment, to be taken to a homeless shelter, to be offered addiction or mental health services. If they refuse, they will be subjected to fines or jail time.'
The weight of the takeover falls on members of the Black community, who make up roughly half of the District's population.
National security scholar Lindsay P. Cohn told reporters that while National Guard units are commonly deployed for emergencies within their own states, this 'is really strange because essentially nothing is happening, Crime is going down. We don't have major protests or civil disturbances. There is no significant resistance from states to federal immigration policies. There is very little evidence anything big is likely to happen soon.'
Trump's army of MAGA fearmongers are lining up to back him to the hilt. Far-right political commentator Benny Johnson tweeted, 'When D.C. Defunded their police, the city turned into a deadly war zone. Every resident was terrorized.'
Surely, he jests.
And Kari Lake, the defeated Arizona politico charged with dismantling the Voice of America, posted a picture of a discarded syringe she encountered while taking her dog on a morning walk. She added that her dog was unharmed by the experience — not even eaten by migrants.
As though federal takeover of the police is not enough to streamline District law enforcement, about 800 National Guardsmen arrived at the D.C. Armory to report for duty. It is unclear whether they will be armed.
Humvees and troops have appeared along the National Mall, a day after Trump issued officers a far-reaching mandate to 'do whatever the hell they want' to curb crime. Joining the party will be a number of additional Guardsman from four red states, just in case the D.C. Guardsman find the juveniles, migrants and homeless people overwhelming.
Journalist Philip Bump reported that 43 cities in the states sending troops to D.C. have higher violent crime rates than Washington does. The appearance, if not the reality, of martial law is complete.
Under the court-brokered stipulation, the White House has clear control. 'We plan to work with the D.C. police,' said Leavitt, 'but … ultimately the President is in charge of' the police department and is 'working with the chief to ensure that law enforcement officers are allowed to do their jobs in this city.' But who has ever been standing in their way? Must be the Democrats.
Of course, much of what Trump has said is false, inaccurate or overblown. How will the National Guard, untrained in law enforcement, enforce the law? Trump controls Congress — if things are as bad as he says, why doesn't he ask it to act? Need he be reminded that we have three branches of government?
In D.C., the mayor seems to acknowledge that there is serious work to be done, demanding a holistic approach to juvenile crime. But fearmongering, federalizing the police force and putting troops on the streets of our nation's capital is surely executive overreach. As the old saying goes, when the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.
It is unclear whether Trump's takeover order will be in place for 30 days as the law limits it or indefinitely. Meanwhile, Americans will have to live in fear of their own government, which strangely appears to be training its sights on them.
James D. Zirin, author and legal analyst, is a former federal prosecutor in New York's Southern District. He is also the host of the public television talk show and podcast Conversations with Jim Zirin.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump plans ride-along with troops in Washington, D.C., crackdown
Trump plans ride-along with troops in Washington, D.C., crackdown

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump plans ride-along with troops in Washington, D.C., crackdown

President Trump said he's planning to ride along Thursday night with troops patrolling Washington, D.C., as part of his federal crackdown. 'I'm going to be going out tonight, I think, with the police and with the military,' Trump told conservative commentator Todd Starnes. 'So we're going to do a job. The National Guard is great. They've done a fantastic job.' Trump gave no additional details of which law enforcement or military units he might join or when and where. Trump's move to personally join the controversial crackdown, which has lasted for two weeks, would amount to a new escalation in the show of force from the White House. Hundreds of federal agents and National Guard soldiers have surged into the streets of the nation's capital this month, leaving some residents on edge and creating tense confrontations in the streets. Although the city has historically struggled with high crime, crime rates were sharply declining before Trump declared a putative emergency that required urgent federal intervention. Troops and agents from an alphabet soup of different agencies have set up checkpoints on busy city arteries, injecting their authority into daily life. Immigration enforcement has been a core part of the crackdown, rattling immigrants and Latino American citizens in many of the city's diverse neighborhoods. Since Aug. 7, when Trump began surging federal agents into the city, there have been 630 arrests, including 251 people who are in the country illegally, according to the White House. Trump has been ratcheting up the pressure since then, claiming control of the D.C. police department on Aug. 11 and deploying more National Guard troops from Republican-led states. Soldiers have been largely stationed in downtown areas, such as monuments on the National Mall and transit stations. But federal agents have started to operate more widely through the city, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser acknowledged Thursday. 'The surge of federal officers is allowing for different types of deployments, more frequent types of deployments, like checkpoints,' Bowser said. Democrats have denounced the federal crackdown as a political stunt. The law that permits the feds to exercise wide authority over law enforcement in Washington, D.C., says the crackdown can only last for 30 days unless Congress approves an extension. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has said Democrats will block any effort to extend Trump's emergency. _____

S&P Flags Risks Even As U.S. Keeps 'AA+' Rating
S&P Flags Risks Even As U.S. Keeps 'AA+' Rating

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

S&P Flags Risks Even As U.S. Keeps 'AA+' Rating

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. S&P Global is keeping America's credit standing intact. The agency reaffirmed its 'AA+' sovereign rating for the U.S. on Thursday, saying Trump's new wave of tariffs should generate enough meaningful revenue to cushion the fiscal hit from his tax-and-spending plan. The outlook stays stable, a nod to the economy's underlying resilience even as deficits remain stubbornly high. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with INTC. Is QQQ fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Growth, though, is expected to slow. S&P sees GDP rising just 1.7% in 2025 and 1.6% in 2026, before inching back toward 2% later in the decade. Debt is on track to climb near 100% of GDP, squeezed by swelling interest costs and the pressures of an aging population. Tariffs are already showing up in the numbers. Customs duty collections jumped $21 billion in July, though the monthly deficit still grew 19% year-on-year to $291 million. Longer term, estimates suggest tariffs could raise $2.9 trillion from 20262035, adding about $2,700 to the average taxpayer's bill in 2026 alone. Still, S&P warned of downgrade risks if deficits spiral or politics erode confidence in U.S. policymaking and the Fed's independencejeopardizing the dollar's role as the world's reserve currency. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's GOP on verge of big Texas win, but battle for power is only starting: 5 takeaways
Trump's GOP on verge of big Texas win, but battle for power is only starting: 5 takeaways

USA Today

time9 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump's GOP on verge of big Texas win, but battle for power is only starting: 5 takeaways

Trump's Texas fight is aimed at giving the GOP an advantage in 2026 and a lame-duck president more power while in office. Democrats have other plans. A partisan battle in Texas over who holds power in Washington during the final two years of President Donald Trump's second term has unfurled into a nationwide debate drawing in top political figures as voters brace for another divisive election in 2026. The Lone Star State's GOP lawmakers are poised to send new congressional maps to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott on Aug. 21 that Trump and his allies hope will give them a strategic advantage in holding onto their majority in the U.S. House of Representatives. But the fight in Austin has spread beyond the state's borders and created significant uncertainty about who will be in position to govern during the second half of the Trump administration and after the next race for the White House. 'Game on,' New York Gov. Kathy Hochul wrote Aug. 20 in a social media post. She is one of several Democratic leaders considering their own steps like the Texas Republicans to re-draw congressional district borders inside their state. Here are five takeaways on the fast-spreading redistricting wars: Republicans have the upper hand if the redistricting war expands. States typically redo their congressional boundaries for voters every decade, specifically in the two years that follow a new census. But Trump has encouraged redistricting to happen ahead of the 2026 U.S. House elections. His motivation? The tendency of the party in the White House to lose seats in the U.S. House during the congressional elections that happen between presidential elections. Recent examples include the 1994, 2010, 2018 and 2022 political cycles. Trump and the GOP are hoping to break that trend or increase their 219-212 U.S. House majority through states with Republican legislatures that can draw congressional maps. By contrast, many Democratic states have passed laws and constitutional amendments creating independent commissions to draw their congressional district maps instead of politicians. That's part of why states such as Missouri and Indiana have discussed redistricting for Republican advantage, but the Democratic stronghold of Washington has ruled it out completely. Additionally, Ohio needs to re-draw its own congressional maps under a constitutionally-mandated process that would happen regardless of today's political climate, and Florida has created a special committee to re-draw congressional maps. Taken together, that means that there are three high-population states actively pursuing Republican seats, and so far California is the only major state likely to redistrict for Democrats ahead of 2026. A legal fight over the new Texas maps is brewing What's happening this week in Texas won't be the final say on whether the maps are permanent. That's for the courts to decide, though fights like this can take years to work their way through the system. Both Democrats and Republicans previewed their legal arguments during the Texas legislature's Aug. 20 House floor debate that ended in the House's approval of the Republican-favored new maps. Democratic lawmakers accused their GOP colleagues of 'packing' Hispanic voters into some districts and 'cracking' or 'diluting' their representation. Those are all key terms referring to practices that opponents have used when challenging maps in the past. They also asked Republicans whether they drew maps based on voters' Hispanic ethnicity since race-based gerrymandering is still illegal. Texas state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Republican author of the bill that changes the maps, explained that an outside law firm drew the maps, not members of the legislature or their in-house staff. He said he asked the firm to re-draw the maps to improve his party's 'political performance' in the state, using a term that he said was backed up by a recently decided federal court case. Hunter used the term repeatedly during hours of questioning by Democrats. Americans still don't like gerrymandering Americans haven't historically liked it when politicians draw maps in their favor, but they may support the practice when it benefits the party they agree with. A nationwide Reuters/Ipsos poll that ran from Aug. 13 to 18 found that a small majority of respondents thought the ongoing redistricting plans were 'bad for democracy,' and Democrats were more likely to think this than Republicans. A poll by the market research firm YouGov that ran Aug. 1 to 4 found that three-quarters of adults saw it as a 'major problem' when states draw maps to intentionally favor one party, and another one-fifth saw it as a 'minor problem.' These proportions, too, higher among Democrats and lower among Republicans. But in California, where Democratic lawmakers wants voters to decide in a Nov. 4 special election whether to redraw their own maps in favor of Democrats, a majority of voters support the initiative. The proposal has support from 57% of California voters, according to Gov. Gavin Newsom's own polling, as reported by Axios, including overwhelming support from Democrats and overwhelming opposition from Republicans. A Politico-UC Berkeley Citrin Center poll of nationwide voters that ran through Aug. 20 found about one-third of respondents said Democrats in California should 'fight back' with their own maps. That broke down to almost two-thirds of Democrats, one-third of independents, and about one-tenth of Republicans. New Democrats are getting their time in the spotlight Americans are seeing new faces emerge from the Democratic Party as they make national headlines fighting back against often better-known Texas Republicans. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, widely seen as a frontrunner for his party's presidential nomination in 2028, is one of them. His decision to go toe-to-toe with Texas and leverage his position in the only state with more congressional seats than the Lone Star State has meant an introduction to Americans all over the country and a national spotlight on his ideas. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, one of the names floated for vice president in 2024, got his name out there when he hosted Texas Democrats who fled their state for nearly two weeks. But the ongoing fight has also highlighted what anti-gerrymandering advocates have called an unfair map tilted toward Democrats in Illinois. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who says she wants to retaliate against Texas, is also gaining some attention. Another new face is Texas Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth, who slept on the floor of the legislature. Texas Republican leaders have been requiring the Democratic lawmakers who broke quorum earlier this month to sign permission slips to leave the chamber and have a state police escort follow them around 24 hours a day to make sure they don't attempt to leave the state again. 'Today is not the end,' Collier said after the House passed the bill Aug. 20. 'It is the beginning, the start of a new Democratic party where we won't back down. … And we will push and push and push until we take over this country.' Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are all involved Trump kicked off the firestorm when he called on Texas lawmakers to redraw the maps and provide five more Republican-leaning congressional districts. Now he's going toe-to-toe with Democratic Party standard bearers who have come into the fight. Former President Barack Obama posted on X that the attempt to re-draw districts in Texas was an 'assault on democracy,' and praised Texas Democrats. Now he's endorsed Newsom's plan to redistrict California's congressional maps in retaliation. Former Vice President Kamala Harris also called Collier while she stayed in the legislature: 'You really are inspiring so many people, and I just want you to know that you are among those who history will reveal to have been heroes of this moment. So you just stay strong and do what you are doing.' Harris ruled out a run for governor of her home state of California in 2026, leaving Americans to wonder whether she'll run for president in 2028. Contributing: Kathryn Palmer, USA TODAY

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store