Startup CEO says Google had everything ..., yet OpenAI beat them to the LLM Gold Rush, Elon Musk's 'one-word' reply
An online debate over
AI race
of Silicon Valley reignited recently. Tesla CEO
Elon Musk
also presented his point of view on the debate with a one-word response. Recently, a US federal judge ruled that Anthropic and AI company did not break any copyright laws while training AI model Claude using books. The judge pointed out that the use of books was a fair step and an AI model does not copy or reproduce books but it learns from them and then generate original content.
Soon after the judgement, an online debate started on X (formerly known as Twitter). A startup CEO Luis Batalha has asserted that
Google
, despite possessing "everything" needed, was ultimately outmaneuvered by
OpenAI
in the burgeoning
Large Language Model
(LLM) "gold rush."
'Google had everything: the transformer, massive compute, access to data, even Google Books - yet OpenAI beat them to the LLM gold rush. Having the pieces isn't the same as playing the game,' wrote Batalha.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk also supported the sentiment with a one-word reponse 'True'.
Originally Google has been at the forefront of AI research. The company has published seminal papers and has also developed advanced models. However, with the launch of
ChatGPT
, OpenAI managed to capture imagination of millions and ignited the current "LLM Gold Rush," forcing other tech giants to accelerate their own public-facing generative AI initiatives. Critics suggest that Google's cautious approach, perhaps due to its established market position and the potential risks of deploying rapidly evolving AI, allowed a leaner, more focused entity like OpenAI to seize the early lead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Judge dismisses authors copyright lawsuit against Meta over AI training
A federal judge on Wednesday sided with Facebook parent Meta Platforms in dismissing a copyright infringement lawsuit from a group of authors who accused the company of stealing their works to train its artificial intelligence technology. The ruling from U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabri was the second in a week from San Francisco's federal court to dismiss major copyright claims from book authors against the rapidly developing AI industry. Chhabri found that 13 authors who sued Meta 'made the wrong arguments' and tossed the case. But the judge also said that the ruling is limited to the authors in the case and does not mean that Meta's use of copyrighted materials is lawful. Lawyers for the plaintiffs — a group of well-known writers that includes comedian Sarah Silverman and authors Jacqueline Woodson and Ta-Nehisi Coates — didn't immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. Meta also didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. 'This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta's use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful,' Chhabri wrote. 'It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one.' On Monday, from the same courthouse, U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled that AI company Anthropic didn't break the law by training its chatbot Claude on millions of copyrighted books, but the company must still go to trial for illicitly acquiring those books from pirate websites instead of buying them. But the actual process of an AI system distilling from thousands of written works to be able to produce its own passages of text qualified as 'fair use' under U.S. copyright law because it was 'quintessentially transformative,' Alsup wrote. Chhabria, in his Meta ruling, criticized Alsup's reasoning on the Anthropic case, arguing that 'Alsup focused heavily on the transformative nature of generative AI while brushing aside concerns about the harm it can inflict on the market for the works it gets trained on.' Chhabria suggested that a case for such harm can be made. In the Meta case, the authors had argued in court filings that Meta is 'liable for massive copyright infringement' by taking their books from online repositories of pirated works and feeding them into Meta's flagship generative AI system Llama. Lengthy and distinctively written passages of text — such as those found in books — are highly useful for teaching generative AI chatbots the patterns of human language. 'Meta could and should have paid' to buy and license those literary works, the authors' attorneys argued. Meta countered in court filings that U.S. copyright law 'allows the unauthorized copying of a work to transform it into something new' and that the new, AI-generated expression that comes out of its chatbots is fundamentally different from the books it was trained on. "After nearly two years of litigation, there still is no evidence that anyone has ever used Llama as a substitute for reading Plaintiffs' books, or that they even could,' Meta's attorneys argued. Meta says Llama won't output the actual works it has copied, even when asked to do so. 'No one can use Llama to read Sarah Silverman's description of her childhood, or Junot Diaz's story of a Dominican boy growing up in New Jersey,' its attorneys wrote. Accused of pulling those books from online 'shadow libraries," Meta has also argued that the methods it used have 'no bearing on the nature and purpose of its use' and it would have been the same result if the company instead struck a deal with real libraries. Such deals are how Google built its online Google Books repository of more than 20 million books, though it also fought a decade of legal challenges before the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016 let stand lower court rulings that rejected copyright infringement claims. The authors' case against Meta forced CEO Mark Zuckerberg to be deposed, and has disclosed internal conversations at the company over the ethics of tapping into pirated databases that have long attracted scrutiny. 'Authorities regularly shut down their domains and even prosecute the perpetrators,' the authors' attorneys argued in a court filing. "That Meta knew taking copyrighted works from pirated databases could expose the company to enormous risk is beyond dispute: it triggered an escalation to Mark Zuckerberg and other Meta executives for approval. Their gamble should not pay off.' "Whatever the merits of generative artificial intelligence, or GenAI, stealing copyrighted works off the Internet for one's own benefit has always been unlawful,' they argued. The named plaintiffs are Jacqueline Woodson, Richard Kadrey, Andrew Sean Greer, Rachel Louise Snyder, David Henry Hwang, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Laura Lippman, Matthew Klam, Junot Diaz, Sarah Silverman, Lysa TerKeurst, Christopher Golden and Christopher Farnsworth. Most of the plaintiffs had asked Chhabria to rule now, rather than wait for a jury trial, on the basic claim of whether Meta infringed on their copyrights. Two of the plaintiffs, Ta-Nehisi Coates and Christopher Golden, did not seek such summary judgment. Chhabri said in the ruling that while he had 'no choice' but to grant Meta's summary judgment tossing the case, 'in the grand scheme of things, the consequences of this ruling are limited. This is not a class action, so the ruling only affects the rights of these 13 authors -- not the countless others whose works Meta used to train its models.'
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Sundar Pichai met his IIT batchmate-turned monk who looked 'younger'. His reply: 'You deal with Google, I with God'
Monk Gauranga Das, an IIT Bombay graduate was in the same batch as Google's Sundar Pichai. (Pic courtesy: Agencies) In an age where CEOs are chasing productivity hacks to stay youthful and stress-free, one IIT graduate says he's already cracked the code—and it has nothing to do with tech. At the India Global Forum 2025 in London, ISKCON monk Gauranga Das shared a fascinating personal story involving none other than Google CEO Sundar Pichai, sparking conversations about stress, spirituality, and the digital crisis. Speaking on the final day of the event, Gauranga Das—an IIT Bombay graduate who left behind a promising engineering career to pursue a spiritual path—recalled his meeting with Pichai, who was part of the same IIT batch, albeit in a different branch. The two never crossed paths in college, but when they met years later, Pichai was quick to compliment the monk's youthful appearance. The spiritual leader attributed the difference in their looks to the contrasting lives they lead. Pichai, 53, who navigates the fast-paced, high-pressure world of global tech, apparently told Das, that the monk looks younger than him. To which Gauranga Das responded that Sundar Pichai deals with Google, 'which creates stress,' whereas he deals with God, 'who releases stress.' The anecdote quickly resonated with the audience, serving as a segue into the monk's broader message about digital addiction and its impact on mental health. Das warned about the growing psychological crisis being amplified by excessive screen time and social media use. Quoting alarming statistics, he said that 230 million people around the world are addicted to social media. He further claimed that in India alone, 70% of teenagers spend seven hours daily online and that one in seven people around the world is suffering from mental health issues. Gauranga Das, an alumnus of IIT Bombay, is a spiritual leader, environmentalist, and educator. Currently a member of ISKCON's Governing Body Commission, he serves as the director of Govardhan Ecovillage (GEV), a model of sustainable living founded by Radhanath Swami. Under his leadership, GEV received the UN World Tourism Organization Award in 2017 and gained accreditation with major UN bodies, including UNEP, ECOSOC, UNCCD, and CBD. Beyond environmental efforts, Gauranga Das plays a significant role in education and leadership development. He is on the board of the Govardhan School of Public Leadership, which prepares aspirants for the civil services, and he heads the Bhaktivedanta Research Centre, which preserves ancient Vedic manuscripts and offers postgraduate programs in is also the author of Art of Resilience and Art of Pichai was born on June 10, 1972, in Madurai, Tamil Nadu. He became the CEO of Google in 2015 and later took charge of Alphabet Inc., Google's parent company, in 2019 from co-founder Larry Page. Pichai spent his early years in Chennai and pursued a degree in metallurgical engineering at IIT Kharagpur, where he received a silver medal for academic excellence. He then earned a master's degree from Stanford University and completed his MBA at the Wharton School. Before joining Google in 2004, Pichai worked with Applied Materials and the consulting firm McKinsey & Company. At Google, he played a key role in the development of major products such as Google Chrome, ChromeOS, Gmail, Google Drive, and Android. As CEO, he has led the company's focus on artificial intelligence, cloud technologies, and infrastructure. His influence has been widely recognized—he was named among Time magazine's 100 most influential people in both 2016 and 2020 and received the Padma Bhushan, one of India's top civilian honors, in 2022. ( Originally published on Jun 24, 2025 )
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Nvidia share price: Nvidia stocks jump to record high, AI chip giant becomes more valuable than Microsoft, Apple
Nvidia surged to a fresh record amid continued artificial intelligence bullishness even as US Stock market indexes finished mixed on Wednesday. The broad-based S&P 500 was flat at 6,092.16, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index gained 0.3 percent to 19,973.55. The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished down 0.3 per cent at 42,982.43. Nvidia share price shot up 4.3 per cent to $154.31 giving it a market valuation of around $3.76 trillion -- more valuable than Microsoft , Apple and other tech giants. The rise came as CEO Jensen Huang presented the company's latest technologies at Nvidia's annual meeting, AFP reported. Among other companies, FedEx fell 3.3 per cent after the shipping company did not provide a full-year forecast, citing uncertainty about the global trade outlook and tariffs. Tesla dropped 3.8 per cent after the company's car sales sank again in Europe last month, the latest poor result from Elon Musk's company in the region. General Mills dropped 5.1 per cent on disappointment over the company's forecast. The food giant expects a drop of 10 to 15 per cent in operating profit. But large banks had a good day with JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup winning one percent or more as the Federal Reserve proposed easing capital rule requirements. The mixed session followed two strong days for equities after conditions in the Middle East stabilized on Monday and Tuesday, with Iran and Israel agreeing to a ceasefire. "Investors are sort of catching their breath, since we had a very strong move on Monday and Tuesday," said Sam Stovall, chief investment officer at CFRA Research. Stovall also noted that markets are approaching new all-time highs and "usually it takes a couple of attempts" before breaking through. Live Events FAQs Q1. Which are top three indexes of US Stock Market? A1. Top three indexes of US Stock Market are S&P 500, Nasdaq, Dow Jones. Q2. What is share price of Nvidia? A2. Nvidia share price shot up 4.3 percent to $154.31.
