Put up or shut up: US warns Europe on China tariffs, hints at higher India duties over Russian oil
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The US has warned European nations to be ready to support steep tariffs on Chinese goods and signaled that India could face higher duties over its purchases of Russian oil, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said. Speaking to Bloomberg TV, Bessent urged Europe to 'get on board' with tougher trade measures, saying he was disappointed by the tepid response when he floated the idea at a Group of Seven (G-7) meeting earlier this year.Bessent said sanctions on Russia 'can go up' or 'can be loosened' depending on the outcome of a meeting scheduled for Friday between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'The Europeans need to join us in these sanctions. They need to,' he said. 'It's put up or shut up time. We put secondary tariffs on the Indians for buying Russian oil. And I could see if things don't go well, then sanctions or secondary tariffs could go up.'Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the US, European nations, Japan and other allies have imposed multiple rounds of sanctions. The European Union adopted its 18th package in July, which included restrictions on Russian energy.Bessent's remarks appeared to refer to Trump's use of so-called secondary tariffs targeting purchases of Russian energy. Trump has imposed a 25% tariff on goods from India, due to take effect later this month, over New Delhi's Russian oil imports , in addition to a 25% base tariff, effectively doubling the rate to 50%.At the G-7 meeting in Canada, Bessent recalled asking fellow leaders: 'Is everyone at this table willing to put a 200% secondary tariff on China?' He said the question was met with silence: 'Everybody wanted to see what kind of shoes they were wearing.'Bessent added that Trump 'will make it clear to President Putin that all options are on the table' during their upcoming meeting.With inputs from Bloomberg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
Russia Ukraine War Ukrainian Drone Strikes Hit Russia Ahead of Trump-Putin Alaska Summit
A wave of Ukrainian drone strikes has hit multiple cities in southern Russia, leaving at least 16 people injured just one day before the high-stakes Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska aimed at ending the Russia-Ukraine war. News18 Mobile App -
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HT Archive: Building an equitable for our tribals
When Independence came, the leaders should have given it some consideration that the British were here to exploit India, and not to make it a flourishing economy. The leaders should have started everything from scratch, like strict enforcement of land reforms, land distribution to the landless, preservation and enlargement of forest areas, setting up of schools, laying roadways, ensuring drinking water and Irrigation facilities. electricity, housing, etc. These should have reached the people living below the poverty line all over India, and this should have been achieved by 50 years. But, regrettably, only 10% may have been achieved. Jawaharlal Nehru addresses the nation from Red Fort on Independence Day (HT Photo) We can well surmise that the tribals have borne the brunt of this laid-back attitude. In making big projects, the Government of India is always taking away tribal land. The evicted tribals are increasing in number, becoming rootless and swelling the number of migrant workers. They have been chiefly left at the mercy of contractors entrusted with the construction of such big projects such as the Narmada dam or the Heavy Engineering Corporation (HEC) at Ranchi. The DVC dams in West Bengal and Bihar saw thousands and thousands of Santhals evicted. We find that to meet the ever-growing need for land of non-resident Indians or residential non-Indians, agricultural land is being taken away. As a result, both tribal and non-tribal peasants have suffered. In the Sunderbans, hundreds of acres of tribal land have been converted into fisheries for prawn cultivation. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, after the tribal revolt in the Chhotanagpur plateau, countless Santhals, Oraons, Mundas, Bedias and other tribals became landless. They were recruited by middlemen for cleaning the jungle and preparing large tracts for tea gardens as well as cropland. That is how these tribals came to West Bengal. On making an objective survey of Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and other places, we find that the story remains the same. Even before Independence, tribal and non-tribal peasants in Kakdwip in West Bengal and Telangana in Andhra Pradesh were deprived of land. By 1955, the Zamindari Abolition Act came into force. But the zamindars had pre-empted this move by 1952-53. So, they felled forests, kept benami land and evicted tribals who had lived there for hundreds of years. In most cases, they held the ownership rayati patta. In the tea gardens in the 19th century, tribals were given large areas of land, but no patta. As the returns from the gardens increased, the tribals were evicted. The 1946 Tebhaga movement in Jalpaiguri was a result of the grievances of the landless tribals, and 12 of them became martyrs while fighting for their cause. The Naxalite movement originated from the land-grievance of the tribals. There are legal provisions to preserve tribal land. But neither the tribals nor the government can do anything as land revenue officers are generally corrupt. For a tribal to approach them and get redress is almost impossible. To make matters worse, no land reform has been attempted in the rest of the country. Even in a state like Kerala, the assembly passed a bill the other day which said outsiders could acquire any tribal land anywhere. The worst sufferers among them are the so-called criminal tribals. In 1871, the British notified many forest tribes as criminal ones along with some Scheduled Caste groups. In 1952, the Government of India declared them as denotified tribes, meaning they would no longer be treated as criminals. But for years the neighbouring people and the police have grown into believing that such tribes comprised born criminals. We have Lodhas in Midnapore district and the Kheria-Shabars in Purulia in this category. On December 20, 1996, five Lodhas rescued a forest beat officer from some miscreants who had attacked him when the officer caught them red-handed felling trees. The Lodhas not only saved him, but also took him to hospital, risking their own lives. Four days later the forest officer lodged an FIR with the local police naming the culprits and speaking eloquently of the Lodhas. But the district police submitted a charge sheet in which the five Lodhas were named as the accused. The Lodhas have fled their homes in terror. That there exists a bias against these people cannot be denied. Another example highlighting the same situation involves Lalit Shabar, a Kheria boy, who was sent to work in a neighbouring village. There he was bound to a tree and his right hand chopped off by none other than the local panchayat pradhan. The Lodhas and Kherias bear the stigma of being branded criminals to this day as the people and the police refuse to change their attitude. But there has emerged a silver lining. Women's organisations are coming up. Women have become conscious of the discrimination against them and are protesting. In Nellore district in Andhra Pradesh, women rose in protest against country liquor and forced the government to ban it, though the move has not been totally successful. The point to remember is that the protesting women belonged to the poorer strata of society. Women are also increasingly joining the decision-making process at the grassroot level. Edited except of an article written by author and activist Mahasweta Devi that appeared on August 15, 1997.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How India's demographic profile has changed over last 8 decades
Independent India turns 78 today with an estimated 1.46 billion population compared to just 346 million in 1950. To be sure, it's not just the number of Indians which has changed in the last almost eight decades. The demographic profile of Indians has also changed significantly. Here is how. How India's demographic profile has changed over last 8 decades The median age of an Indian is nine years higher than in 1950 The median age of India's population is estimated at 20 years in 1950 (the earliest estimate from UN's World Population Prospects report) and is 29 years in 2025. In fact, there's more to the change in India's demographics than just ageing. In 1950, each five-year age group had a lower share in population than the preceding five-year group. In other words, children under the age of five were the most populous five-year age group. In 2025, the 20-24 age group is the most populous. It is because of this shift towards the middle that India is said to possess a demographic dividend, where the share of the working-age population is much higher than the children and elderly, both of whom need care. But there are certain dynamics at play here. India's dependency ratio has fallen despite a rising population share of elderly The dependency ratio, which is defined as the population outside the 15-64 age group as a percentage of the 15-64 population, has decreased from 70% in 1950 to 46% in 2025. However, this decline is completely on account of children. The 65 years and older population is now 11% of the 15-64 age group compared to 5% in 1950. How will these trends change in the future? With declining fertility, the ageing of the population is expected to continue. The largest age-group in 2050, for example, is expected to be the 45-49 age group. As expected from this ageing, the dependent population will shift further towards the 65 and older group. This is expected to increase the dependency ratio from 46% in 2025 to 48% in 2050, with slightly less than half of that dependent population coming from the 65 and older group. This is what makes the period from now till 101st Independence Day in 2047 crucial for India's economic fortunes. This demographic sweet spot will not come back. To be sure, despite peaking in absolute terms in 2049, India's working age population will fall below the 2025 number only in 2082.
