Southern Isle of Man GP appointments suspended for training
However the practices would remain open to make future routine appointments, request test results or order repeat prescriptions.The healthcare provider said the Manx Emergency Doctor Service (MEDS) will also operate as usual from 18:00.Other medical services available include the minor injuries and illnesses unit at Ramsey Cottage Hospital, the minor ailments scheme run by community pharmacies and Specsavers' minor eye conditions scheme.Manx Care encouraged residents to "choose well" during the period and "attend the health and care setting that is appropriate for their condition".
Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour ‘misled' public over NHS waiting lists
Labour has 'misled' the public about the reasons why the NHS waiting list has fallen, two leading think tanks have warned. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, had said the 260,000 drop in the NHS backlog since the general election 'was not a coincidence', adding that it was because of 'record investment and fundamental NHS reform'. But a new Quality Watch report – a joint project between the Nuffield Trust and Health Foundation think tanks – found 245,000 appointments were being removed every month because patients died, had treatment elsewhere or moved abroad, rather than because treatment had finished. Some 2.4 million appointments and operations have been removed from the NHS backlog since Labour took power as part of a so-called 'validation process', which involves deleting any appointments for patients hospitals no longer think need to be seen. The researchers had to calculate the figures manually because they are not explicitly reported in NHS data, and said ministers should be more 'transparent' in their paper, first reported by the Health Service Journal on Wednesday. They calculated the total removals by looking at the number of appointments taken from the 'expected waiting list' that then did not appear in the 'reported waiting list' as either waiting or having finished treatment. The authors pointed out that even the NHS's 'own data shows it is still treating fewer patients than are being referred'. 'Government was not clear' For example, when Mr Streeting said the waiting list had fallen during April 'for the first time in 17 years', the researchers pointed out that on an average working day that month, there were 13,141 people being added to the backlog but 14,608 being deleted without undergoing treatment. The Quality Watch report said the Government does not make the impact of validation and other 'unreported removals' sufficiently clear. The research, authored by Georgia Watson and Dr Elizabeth Fisher of the Nuffield Trust, said: 'Until more transparent reporting is provided, accountability around unreported removals remains impossible and the planned care waiting list will continue to be a misleading indicator of how the NHS is dealing with demand. 'While the waiting list has started to go down, unreported removals have gone up. In fact, they have repeatedly outnumbered the additional incomplete referrals that join the waiting list every month,' they wrote. 'This tells us that, across several months, there were more [appointment referrals] being removed from the waiting list without being marked as complete than [new referrals] joining the list.' They said the monthly removals of almost a quarter of a million equate 'to around 3 per cent of the waiting list'. Patients who no longer need appointments have always been removed from the waiting list but they have recently had a 'more noticeable impact'. 'Since September 2023, this shift has helped the NHS get control of the waiting list, even while according to its own data it is still treating fewer patients than are being referred,' the report said. 'We are freeing up capacity' A Department of Health spokesman said: 'Our drive to clear the huge waiting list backlog we inherited includes making sure all patients are getting the right treatment as quickly as possible. 'That's why we are supporting GPs to seek specialist advice before making referrals, and screening existing waiting lists to check that all patients need to be on there, freeing up capacity to get more people seen more quickly. 'This is one element of our wider work to cut waiting times for patients and improve productivity through our Plan for Change, through which we have already delivered over 4 million extra appointments and cut the waiting list by 260,000.' An NHS spokesman said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year – down by more than 260,000 since June 2024 – and this is driven by the fact that 2,300 more patients are receiving treatment every day compared to last year. 'While the validation process has a small impact on the overall waiting list – as is made crystal clear in our published monthly waiting list data – it's right we regularly clinically review those waiting so hospitals can prioritise patients more accurately and deploy their resources efficiently.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
‘Contradiction' in figures makes health experts question NHS data
Health analysts have said they have spotted a 'contradiction' in NHS data as they called for more transparency in the way waiting list figures are reported. Experts suggest that more patients are being referred for treatment than leaving the waiting list, despite the overall waiting list coming down. Analysis found that in May, for every 100 referrals for pre-planned care, only 86 patient 'pathways' were complete – a scenario that would expect to see the waiting list getting bigger. But the official figures for May, published last month, show that the waiting list for routine hospital treatment in England had dropped to its lowest level for more than two years. 'There appears to be a contradiction in the data,' analysts from the Nuffield Trust think tank said. Writing a piece for part of the Quality Watch programme, the experts claim that an increase in NHS activity alone has not been enough to cause the reduction in the waiting list. Their new report examines so-called 'unreported removals', which occur when someone is taken off the waiting list for a reason other than that person having received their treatment that month. The report says that over the last two financial years there has been an average of 244,500 unreported removals a month. Though the waiting list has started to go down, unreported removals have gone up, they add. Officials from the Department and Health and Social Care insist that over the last 12 months, the number and percentage of unreported removals are lower than 2019. The new report points out that some of these unreported removals will represent patients that did get treatment but it was not recorded properly at the time. Another issue could be problems with NHS software and data management processes. The authors of the review wrote: 'Improving the data quality of waiting lists is important to ensure that people who should not be on the list, like people who have been treated privately or left the country, are no longer counted among those waiting to be seen. 'However, accusations of gaming the validation process, by removing referrals from the waiting list inappropriately without treatment, are likely to persist in the absence of transparency about what actions the unreported removals materially represent. 'The NHS is delivering more planned care, but still not enough to keep up with demand. 'The planned care that is reported is not enough to explain the reduction in the elective waiting list, and the publicly available data provides little more insight.' Officials estimate that 85% of the reduction in the waiting list is because of increased NHS 'activity' and suggest that 15% is because of unreported removals. According to the latest NHS figures, an estimated 7.36 million treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of May, relating to just under 6.23 million patients, down from 7.39 million treatments and just over 6.23 million patients at the end of April. These are the lowest totals since March 2023 for treatments and April 2023 for patients. The list hit a record high in September 2023, with 7.77 million treatments and 6.50 million patients. The size of the list had been on an upward trend for much of the last 10 years, passing three million treatments in 2014, four million in 2017, five million in 2021 and seven million in 2022. In February 2020, the last full month before the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the list stood at 4.57 million treatments. The authors of the latest review add: 'The information available in the public domain is insufficient for independent scrutiny of the elective waiting list, and consequently for holding government to account. 'Removals from the waiting list should be described in publicly available data in a meaningful way; the current process is unduly obscure. 'Until more transparent reporting is provided, accountability around unreported removals remains impossible and the planned care waiting list will continue to be a misleading indicator of how the NHS is dealing with demand.' It comes as the NHS in England is to reveal its latest waiting list figures on Thursday. Commenting on the analysis, an NHS England spokesperson said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year – down by more than 260,000 since June 2024 – and this is driven by the fact that 2,300 more patients are receiving treatment every day compared to last year.' 'While the validation process has a small impact on the overall waiting list – as is made crystal clear in our published monthly waiting list data – it's right we regularly clinically review those waiting so hospitals can prioritise patients more accurately and deploy their resources efficiently.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson added: 'Our drive to clear the huge waiting list backlog we inherited includes making sure all patients are getting the right treatment as quickly as possible. 'That's why we are supporting GPs to seek specialist advice before making referrals, and screening existing waiting lists to check that all patients need to be on there – freeing up capacity to get more people seen more quickly. 'This is one element of our wider work to cut waiting times for patients and improve productivity through our Plan for Change, through which we have already delivered over four million extra appointments and cut the waiting list by 260,000.'
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mom is stunned after son's 15-minute trip to the ER results in $100,000 bill
A mother has shared her shock after receiving a $100,000 bill for a 15-minute ride to the ER for her six-month-old baby. In 2022, Jessica Farwell's son Brody was severely burned after a rice cooker fell off the kitchen counter, so she rushed him to the hospital. What she wasn't aware of was that long after her son had healed, she'd still be suffering years of bureaucratic pain whilst dealing with her insurance company. When Brody was first injured, the mom recalled her baby 'screaming' in pain with doctors initially giving him fentanyl through his nose to try and ease it. 'His skin, it just instantly bubbled up,' the Northern Californian mom recalled in a recent interview with ABC7. 'I was just like, is his face going to start bubbling?' 'Seeing your baby in so much pain was just like the worst feeling as a mom,' she admitted. However, the hospital lacked a burn unit so Brody needed to be transferred to a children's hospital in Sacramento, which is 58 miles south of Antioch, where they live. Jessica was then told they had no ambulances available to transport Brody to a hospital that was equipped to handle his injury. 'There wasn't going to be an ambulance for seven hours,' she explained. Wanting to get her son help as soon as possible, she asked if she could make the one-hour and 20-minute drive with Brody herself, and was told no. "They said, "No, sorry, you can't - I can't let you leave with him. I've already called the helicopter." [They] basically told me there was nothing I could do,' Jessica recalled. As getting an ambulance wasn't an option, the only way to get to Sacramento was a 15-minute helicopter ride that would cost nearly $90,000. However, Jessica was reassured that she would not receive the bill since the hospital requested the helicopter and she had insurance. 'I was just absolutely terrified to fly, I'm breaking down. He's screaming. It was just awful,' the scared mom recalled. The costs weren't over once they got to the hospital with the mom being told an ambulance was required to get to the hospital entrance from the heliport, which was only 0.3 miles away. 'You can see the hospital. You literally can walk across the street to the hospital quicker than that ambulance, and they charged me [another] $10,200,' Jessica said, outraged. Once they got to the hospital, Brody was treated for his burns and discharged the next day. For Jessica, the nightmare wasn't over with the mom receiving a bill for $100,032 months after Brody had been discharged. 'I couldn't believe my eyes,' she said. 'You look at the bills, and it's absolutely enraging. We got hit for a $600 waiting fee; there's a fee for it being a nighttime service. There's just every single fee you can think of.' Despite being told the transport to the hospital wouldn't be a problem because she has insurance, Jessica later found out that her insurance would only cover less than half of the cost of the helicopter, and a fraction of the ambulance. This left her having to pay $57,929.80 for the helicopter and another $7,327 for the ambulance. 'I've called the hospital, ambulance company, my insurance numerous times,' she said. 'It's been three years, and then they wouldn't listen to me or talk to me. They just kept giving me the runaround.' Jessica wasn't aware that after her son had healed, she'd still be suffering years bureaucratic pain whilst dealing with her insurance company After years of trying to get the bill waived, Jessica reached out to investigative reporters at ABC 7's On Your Side in San Francisco. With the help of the reporters, she was able to get both bills waived and said the insurance company called her back assuring her she'd never be billed again. 'They almost sounded apologetic,' Jessica said, adding that she was in disbelief and immediately told her husband. 'It's a miracle!' she said enthusiastically. California passed the law AB 716 in January 2024, which protects people from receiving surprise bills for ground ambulance services. However, as Brody's accident happened before the law was passed, the ambulance bill was not waived. The Daily Mail has reached out to Pro Transport-1, Blue Cross Blue Shield, and Shriners Children's Hospital for comment.
