
Mark Zuckerberg says his ‘Superintelligence AI' will help people achieve personal goals but what does that mean?
'Meta's vision is to bring personal superintelligence to everyone. We believe in putting this power in people's hands to direct it toward what they value in their own lives,' he said in a blog post. 'This is distinct from others in the industry who believe superintelligence should be directed centrally towards automating all valuable work, and then humanity will live on a dole of its output.'
Zuckerberg's vision for AI involves 'personal superintelligence'
Zuckerberg has made it clear that his approach to artificial intelligence differs from others in Silicon Valley. The work that Meta's Superintelligence Labs and its newly recruited superintelligence team will focus on is developing AI to improve people's personal lives – not to automate work, which has become a growing concern as more companies lay off employees due to AI adoption in the workplace.
A post shared by Mark Zuckerberg (@zuck)
'I am extremely optimistic that superintelligence will help humanity accelerate our pace of progress. But perhaps even more important is that superintelligence has the potential to begin a new era of personal empowerment, where people will have greater agency to improve the world in the directions they choose,' Zuckerberg said.
Currently, superintelligence does not exist. But if it ever becomes a reality, it would be an AI capable of teaching itself, learning from mistakes, writing code as well as or better than humans, and potentially even making emotional or ethical judgments.
Superintelligence is fundamentally different from where AI stands today. The tools we currently interact with such as AI chatbots like ChatGPT are far from reaching that level of autonomy and capability.
The biggest question surrounding Meta's ambitious AI project is: How will it differ from the AI we are experiencing today? Will it move us closer to artificial general intelligence (AGI), or will it land somewhere between current AI capabilities and true AGI?
It's also unclear whether superintelligence will eventually power devices like smartphones and smart glasses, or if the next generation of AI models will evolve beyond current multimodal systems, which understand text, video, and images and focus instead on continual learning and deeper contextual understanding that extends beyond static datasets.
Imagine AI models capable of powering humanoids – machines that can adapt, reason, and interact like humans in the physical world. For now, however, none of the AI models from top labs have these capabilities.
As the CEO of a $1.75 trillion company, Zuckerberg did not outline specific products or applications Meta plans to launch, but he did hint at how the company will release its AI models as it pursues 'superintelligence.'
'We believe the benefits of superintelligence should be shared with the world as broadly as possible. That said, superintelligence will raise novel safety concerns. We will need to be rigorous about mitigating these risks and careful about what we choose to open source.'
Zuckerberg carefully chose his words and specifically emphasized 'open source,' signaling a shift in Meta's strategy. Like its competitors, Meta now appears to be moving toward keeping its AI models closed. While its existing models: Llama are partially open source, they are not fully open. Closed models give the company greater control over how it develops and monetizes its AI technology.
Although it remains unclear how Meta's superintelligence AI will differ from existing tools and chatbots, the focus on 'personal superintelligence' suggests the company may deliver the next chapter in AI through its own ecosystem, including apps like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, as well as hardware like smart glasses, AR devices, and mixed-reality headsets.
Zuckerberg has been bullish on artificial intelligence and is committed to spending billions of dollars on building both AI infrastructure and a global team of top AI researchers. In fact, he personally spent months assembling a list of elite AI engineers and scientists, recruiting them to join Meta Superintelligence Labs, the unit dedicated to creating world-class AI models that could surpass human intelligence.
Meta has been racing to keep up with competitors like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic.
To achieve its ambitions, Meta is aggressively poaching AI talent from rival companies, offering eye-popping compensation packages – in some cases as high as $200 million. The company is clearly trying to win the AI race with money.
Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, is leaving no stone unturned in its pursuit of AI dominance, investing billions in AI research and development. However, some industry observers question Meta's current AI strategy. Its Llama models aren't the best, and delays in launching its flagship model, known internally as 'Behemoth', have raised questions on Meta's AI development strategy. Meanwhile, OpenAI is expected to release GPT-5 as soon as August.
Also Read | Meta is experimenting with AI chatbots that might slide into your DMs
Earlier this month, Meta announced a $14.3 billion investment in Scale AI and hired its CEO, Alexandr Wang, to lead its Superintelligence team. The 28-year-old will now oversee a group composed of top-tier AI researchers, including alumni from PhD programs at UC Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon. Many researchers from Apple and OpenAI have already joined the team, including Ruoming Pang, who previously led Apple's AI models division and is reportedly earning a compensation package in the hundreds of millions over several years.
Zuckerberg told analysts Wednesday during a second-quarter earnings that its newly setup Superintelligent AI team are 'the absolute best and most elite talent-dense team' that can access the resources they need from a 'leading compute fleet.' Meta made it clear that winning the AI war comes with a heavy price tag.
'When we take a technology, we're good at driving that through all of our apps and our ad systems,' Zuckerberg said. 'There's no other company that is as good as us at kind of taking something and getting it in front of billions of people.'
The company said it expects its total expenses for 2025 to come in the range of $114 billion and $118 billion. Meta's strong Q2 earnings surpassed Wall Street's estimates, sending the stock soaring in after-hours trading. The company reported revenue of $47.52 billion, compared to expectations for $44.3 billion.
Investors, however, are not in a panic mode with Meta's expensive endeavors. The company previously bet heavily on the metaverse, investing billions of dollars but the metaverse never truly took off.
Meta's grand vision for AI dominance also includes building hardware designed around artificial intelligence. Its Ray-Ban smart glasses, AI-ready eyewear that allows users to make calls, take photos, and perform other functions, have performed well commercially.
'I think personal devices like glasses that can see what we see, hear what we hear, and interact with us throughout the day will become our main computing devices,' Zuckerberg said in a social media video posted on X.
Ray-Ban maker EssilorLuxottica reported in its most recent earnings report that sales of Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses more than tripled in the first half of the year.
Anuj Bhatia is a personal technology writer at indianexpress.com who has been covering smartphones, personal computers, gaming, apps, and lifestyle tech actively since 2011. He specialises in writing longer-form feature articles and explainers on trending tech topics. His unique interests encompass delving into vintage tech, retro gaming and composing in-depth narratives on the intersection of history, technology, and popular culture. He covers major international tech conferences and product launches from the world's biggest and most valuable tech brands including Apple, Google and others. At the same time, he also extensively covers indie, home-grown tech startups. Prior to joining The Indian Express in late 2016, he served as a senior tech writer at My Mobile magazine and previously held roles as a reviewer and tech writer at Gizbot. Anuj holds a postgraduate degree from Banaras Hindu University. You can find Anuj on Linkedin.
Email: anuj.bhatia@indianexpress.com ... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Elon Musk shares damning evidence that he is 'more trustworthy' than Sam Altman
Elon Musk has decided to stir things up again as he posted a screenshot of himself asking ChatGPT AI, 'Who is more trustworthy: Elon or Sam Altman?' And ironically, the AI chose Elon. That little move kicked the already simmering feud between him and OpenAI's Sam Altman into the stratosphere. Elon Musk shares a screenshot of GPT asking who is more trustworthy, him or Sam Altman.(Reuters) ChatGPT chooses Elon Musk Elon Musk's rant against OpenAI continued as he shared a screengrab asking the AI to choose between him and Sam Altman. In a surprising turn of events, the AI bot chose Elon. Sharing the conversation, the tech mogul wrote, 'There you have it.' Elon Musk- Sam Atlman feud explained This is not just playful rivalry. The tension started way back, when Elon and Sam co-founded OpenAI in 2015. But by 2018, Elon left the board as he was not happy with OpenAI ditching its nonprofit roots for a for-profit path. He even tried (and failed) a nearly $97 billion takeover in 2025. Sam laughed it off, calling it a clever distraction tactic, and threw shade right back, hinting that Musk pushes his tech ventures from a place of insecurity, The Guardian reported. Also read: ChatGPT beats Grok in AI chess final, Gemini finishes third, Elon Musk said… The latest sparks flew when Elon accused Apple of playing favorites, pointing out that ChatGPT was dominating the App Store while his own Grok chatbot was being pushed aside. He threatened legal action, accusing Apple of antitrust violations. That set Sam off, who shot back accusing Elon of using X's algorithm in shady ways to promote himself and bury rivals. To prove it, Sam dared Musk to sign an affidavit swearing he's never tweaked X to benefit his own companies. Musk's response? A blunt: 'You liar,' pointing out that Altman's post got three million views, despite Elon having way more followers. Sam's charm offensive continued in the news: he downplayed Musk's relevance amid GPT-5 buzzing and OpenAI's broader mission of advancing safe, beneficial AI. Meanwhile, Elon retorted that his Grok model beats GPT-5 any day, and called Altman 'Scam Altman." FAQs Q: What did Elon Musk ask ChatGPT? A: He asked, 'Who is more trustworthy: Elon or Sam Altman?'—and the AI picked Elon. Q: Why are Musk and Altman feuding? A: Disagreements over OpenAI's direction, Musk's departure, the failed takeover, and competing AI ventures fueled years of tension. Q: What did Musk accuse Apple of? A: Favoring ChatGPT in App Store rankings and sidelining his AI app, Grok, raising antitrust concerns.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman 'challenges' Elon Musk after his LIAR post: I will apologise if...
The public feud between tech billionaires Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has escalated into a war of words on X. The dispute began when Musk accused Apple of manipulating its App Store rankings. In a swift counter-attack, Altman fired back, alleging that Musk himself manipulates his social media platform to benefit his own companies and attack rivals. Musk retaliated by calling Altman a liar, only for Altman to throw a challenge. 'Will you sign an affidavit that you have never directed changes to the X algorithm in a way that has hurt your competitors or helped your own companies?' Altman asked Musk, adding, 'I will apologize if so'. How public spat between Elon Musk and Sam Altman started The conflict was ignited when Musk announced his company, xAI , would take legal action against Apple. His frustration stemmed from the fact that OpenAI's ChatGPT holds the top spot among free apps on the App Store, while his own Grok chatbot ranks fifth. 'Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation. xAI will take immediate legal action,' Musk said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Altman fired back at Elon Musk, alleging the billionaire manipulates his social media platform Twitter to benefit his companies and harm competitors. "This is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like," Altman wrote in response to Musk's accusations. Musk quickly retaliated against Altman, writing in a post: "You got 3M views on your bullshit post, you liar, far more than I've received on many of mine, despite me having 50 times your follower count!" How and Why Trump's New Tariffs Will Not Make Your iPhone More Expensive AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Troubles mount! One in six NRIs on H-1B visas feel threat of US deportation; many thinking of returning to India: Poll
Representative AI image H-1B visa trouble: A growing number of Indian professionals in the US on H-1B visas are facing an unexpected and alarming threat of deportation landing on their doorsteps before the official 60-day grace period even runs out. Laid off and staring down the barrel of a possible permanent US ban, many say it feels like a ticking time bomb. According to a poll of 1,584 verified professionals conducted on the anonymous workplace app Blind between August 6 and August 8, 2025, one in six (16%) said they or someone they know has received a Notice to Appear (NTA) within the grace period after being laid off. Under normal rules, H-1B workers have 60 days to find a new employer or change visa status after job loss. But since mid-2025, reports have emerged of NTAs being issued within as little as two weeks, labelling recipients 'out of status.' 'Multiple cases where NTAs were sent in 2 weeks.' a Meta user wrote on Blind. 'Immigration lawyers now advise leaving as soon as possible after [the] job ends otherwise you risk a permanent ban from the US,' the user added. This sudden escalation is forcing many to rethink long-term plans. Between July 28 and August 8, 2025, workplace community app Blind surveyed 2,089 verified Indian professionals in the US on work visas such as H-1B and L1, revealing deep concerns about job security and the future of US immigration. In the survey of 2,089 verified Indian professionals, 45% said they would return to India if forced to leave, 26% would move to another country, and 29% were unsure. What are NRIs biggest concerns about leaving US? When asked about their biggest concerns over leaving the US, respondents cited a significant pay cut (25%), lower quality of life (24%), cultural or family adjustment (13%), and fewer job opportunities (10%). Interestingly, 28% said they would have no concerns and would be open to leaving. On whether they would still opt for a US work visa if given the chance again, only 35% said 'yes.' While 27% were unsure and 38% said 'no,' pointing to a clear shift in how Indian professionals view the long-term value of immigrating to the US. What is driving this change? Real experiences are driving this change. More than one in three respondents (35%) said they or someone close to them had been forced to leave the US after losing a job while on a work visa, often under the looming threat of deportation during the brief grace period. The findings suggest a growing openness to leaving the US, with many indicating they would return to India if it came to that. Trump's recent call sparks sharp divide US President Donald Trump's recent call for US companies to 'stop hiring in India' has sparked a sharp divide in opinion. Among US-based professionals, 63% felt the move could benefit their companies, while 69% of India-based respondents believed it would hurt their firms. When asked if they or someone close to them had ever been forced to leave the US after being laid off, 10% said it happened to them directly, 25% said it happened to someone close, and 65% said no. The growing anxieties reflect a broader shift in the perception of the H-1B pathway, once seen as a golden ticket to American opportunities, now increasingly viewed as a high-risk gamble. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .