GLM-4.5 vs DeepSeek: China's AI Cost War Just Got Personal
At the World AI Conference in Shanghai, Z.ai (formerly Zhipu AI) launched its new open-source large language model , GLM‑4.5, and shook the market with a bold promise - cheaper, faster, and leaner than even China's current cost-leader, DeepSeek . In a global race dominated by compute efficiency and token economics, this move marks a turning point.GLM‑4.5 is built with agentic intelligence in mind, able to autonomously break down and complete multi-step tasks with less redundancy. It requires just eight Nvidia H20 chips and is half the size of DeepSeek's R1 model, which was already considered a breakthrough in operational efficiency. Z.ai CEO Zhang Peng claims no further chip scaling is needed, a sharp contrast to the GPU-hungry practices of Western competitors.The cost efficiency is what's drawing the spotlight. Z.ai has priced dramatically undercutting DeepSeek's model, and slashing costs compared to OpenAI's GPT‑4 or Gemini. That unlocks game-changing affordability for startups, product teams, and AI-driven platforms.Z.ai's launch plays into China's broader strategic bet on open-source AI dominance. With over 1,500 LLMs developed to date, China is leveraging lower-cost compute, government support, and model-sharing culture to put pressure on U.S. and European players.Whether you're a startup building a SaaS tool, a product team testing conversational AI, or an enterprise scaling internal automation, GLM‑4.5 offers a high-performance, low-cost alternative to traditional Western LLMs. Developers can easily integrate it into chatbots, agents, document summarizers, or AI copilots using open-source APIs, without burning through compute budgets. Its agentic design means you can offload complex multi-step workflows, such as code generation, customer support, or data analysis, with higher efficiency. The lean GPU requirement lowers the barrier for self-hosting or deploying in resource-constrained environments. Ultimately, GLM‑4.5 enables rapid iteration, reduced inference costs, and greater flexibility, especially for teams operating under tight margins or looking to scale without vendor lock-in.Even so, GLM‑4.5 raises a pivotal question: if high-quality AI can be built and deployed at a fraction of today's cost, what happens to the premium pricing strategies of the West? For budget-conscious developers and enterprises, the message is clear, value is shifting eastward.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Burgers vs Vada Pav: A clash or coexistence?
In a country where food is not just nourishment but nostalgia, the debate between Western fast food and desi street bites is one that never goes stale. Is the burger replacing the vada pav? Or are they serving up a more inclusive culinary culture together?Neelam Singh, the Founder and CEO of The Burger Company, believes it's not a rivalry, it's a remix. In an interview that reveals much about India's evolving eating habits, Singh shares why she believes the two can thrive side by don't see it as a clash—it's more of a conversation,' she begins with clarity. 'Both burgers and vada pav are essentially quick, handheld comfort foods that cater to a fast-paced lifestyle. What's different is the packaging; what's common is the purpose.' And Singh's statement holds weight in a post-Zomato-era India, where convenience often trumps convention, but only when it feels authentic.'Our founder Neelam Singh often says, 'Burger is the new samosa for India'—it's familiar, filling, and flexible enough to take on any flavour profile,' says the brand's internal philosophy, now echoed across its 40+ Burger Company, which started with a single outlet and now caters to both metropolitan hubs and Tier 2 and 3 cities, has leaned heavily into this Indo-global identity.A GENERATIONAL REFRAMING, NOT REPLACINGAre burgers pushing Indian snacks to the sidelines? Singh disagrees.'Not replaced—reframed,' she says. 'Traditional snacks still hold an irreplaceable place in Indian hearts. What's changed is how young India consumes food. They crave bold flavours, faster formats, and something that feels global but tastes local.'At a time when a Gen Z consumer might reach for a burger but still crave the chutney from their grandmother's kitchen, Singh points out an important evolution.'Neelam often shares how she was inspired by watching customers pick a burger over a samosa—not because they liked it more, but because it felt more 'now',' she The Burger Company went local. From Tandoori Paneer to Bombay Masala Burgers and the ever-popular Aloo Tikki Burger, their menu doesn't run from Indian flavour—it dives straight in.'It's not about abandoning the samosa or vada pav—it's about evolving them into something that matches the energy and expectations of today's India.'One Size Doesn't Fit All—Especially in IndiaIn a nation where dialects and dinner plates change every few hundred kilometres, Singh has embraced the regionalisation of the burger.'One thing we've learnt very early at The Burger Company—India doesn't eat the same burger twice,' she laughs.'Even in cities like Indore or Guwahati, we've had to tweak spice levels, crunch profiles, even how we serve the burgers,' Singh reveals. 'People may try a burger out of curiosity, but they stick around when it feels like home—but in a bun.'advertisementIn many ways, it's the burger's versatility that's made this coexistence not only possible, but profitable.'If India's eating habits are diverse, why should burgers be one-size-fits-all?' she asks rhetorically. And the data backs her up. The Burger Company's expansion into smaller towns is a testament to how localised global food can hit the sweet (and spicy) FOOD VS STREET FOOD? THERE'S ROOM FOR BOTHFor purists wondering whether fast food is a threat to traditional Indian street food, Singh offers reassurance.'There is, and always will be, room for both,' she states with confidence. 'Indian consumers don't operate in binaries—they love choice. One day it's pav bhaji, the next day it's a burger meal.'She continues with a sentiment that captures India's hybrid food culture perfectly:'It's not about East vs West—it's about East meets West, in a bun.'Unlike multinational chains that often export foreign formats wholesale, The Burger Company has made it a point to adapt—leaning into desi flavours while maintaining global aesthetics. Their positioning is clear: not just another burger joint*, but a desi comfort food not trying to outshine traditional snacks—we're inspired by them,' she says. 'Our goal is to elevate the burger into something that feels rooted, relevant, and real to Indian consumers.'- Ends
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
In face of US tariffs, global volatility, India must maintain a steady hand
US-India trade relations — anchored in democratic values and growing strategic convergence — have entered a more challenging phase. The recent imposition of 25 per cent-plus tariffs on Indian exports by the US adds stress to trade negotiations. While the two nations continue to underline their commitment to a strong partnership, evolving geopolitical dynamics and economic nationalism are reshaping the context in which the partnership operates. The core of the dispute lies not just in tariffs or market access. While India's prudent refusal to open its agricultural and dairy markets remains a sticking point for Washington, a deeper unease stems from India's energy and defence ties with Russia. As India expanded its crude oil imports from Russia — from around 2 per cent of total imports in FY22 to around 36 per cent in FY25 — largely due to wartime discounts, Western discomfort has grown. However, with those discounts now shrinking, India has fresh room to diversify its sources — including LNG and crude from the US — potentially turning friction into an opportunity for recalibration. On the trade front, the impact of tariffs cannot be ignored. Indian exports to the US constitute just over 2 per cent of GDP — a modest share by global standards — but their composition matters. Sectors such as textiles, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and auto components will face the brunt. The tariff shock could cost India up to $30 billion in export earnings, affecting supply chains, employment and GDP momentum in the short term. Yet India's economic structure — rooted in strong domestic consumption — offers it a cushion many export-heavy economies lack. Still, the broader global environment remains volatile. A slowdown in emerging markets, ongoing capital outflows and rising financial uncertainty are contributing to short-term pressures. July saw foreign portfolio investors pull more than $1.4 billion from Indian markets, and the Rupee weakened nearly 2 per cent, ranking among the weaker emerging market currencies in the month. A depreciating currency feeds into imported inflation, raises the cost of foreign debt and adds complexity to monetary policymaking. This leaves the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) with a delicate balancing act. Inflation is benign —expected to average around 3 per cent in FY26 — but the case for rate cuts is not straightforward. The RBI must weigh global interest rate trajectories, volatile capital flows and exchange rate dynamics while ensuring domestic growth remains on track. In this climate, the central bank's credibility, communication and consistency become as important as its policy tools. While Washington's growing dissatisfaction with India's defence procurement — still dominated by Russian-origin systems — is understandable, India's position is pragmatic. Legacy dependence is being steadily addressed through increased indigenous production, joint ventures and expanded purchases from Western partners, including the US. This evolving defence landscape can, in fact, serve as a strategic bridge rather than a barrier. India is not alone in facing US tariff actions. Even close allies such as the UK, EU, Japan, and Vietnam have faced similar measures. The pattern suggests a larger trend — Washington's push to narrow its current account deficit through selective protectionism and reduced import dependence. In such a world, economic diplomacy is becoming more tactical than rule-based. India's approach must be anchored in smart bargaining — leveraging its strategic relevance without compromising its domestic priorities. Any 'mini-deal' that emerges will have to go beyond symbolic relief to address structural irritants across agriculture, energy access, and technology transfer. Despite near-term volatility, India's market fundamentals remain sound. Key drivers such as financial services, consumer goods and technology are relatively insulated from trade tensions. However, short-term market volatility is inevitable, driven by high valuations and policy uncertainty. Sectors like auto components could even gain, as US tariffs on Chinese and Mexican parts create demand for alternatives. Pharmaceuticals and electronics — so far exempt from US tariffs — also continue to perform well. Recent earnings softness and valuation concerns may create short-term noise, but long-term investor confidence remains intact. India's lower export dependency gives it strategic room but it must not foster complacency. As global trade dynamics shift — shaped by US-China tensions, evolving WTO norms and mounting economic nationalism — India must respond with agility, diversification, and diplomatic foresight. By carefully balancing its energy sources, defence partnerships and trade positions, India can emerge not just as a resilient economy but as a shaping force in the evolving global order. In this fluid environment, India's steady hand and long-term vision are not only essential for its own growth but increasingly important for global economic stability. The writer is professor of Finance, XLRI Xavier School of Management and is with the BJP
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Indian state refiners halt Russian oil purchases amid narrowing discounts and US tariff threats
India 's state-owned oil refiners have paused purchases of Russian crude over the past week, a significant shift attributed to narrowing price discounts and mounting pressure from the US President Donald Trump, reports Reuters. India, the world's third-largest oil importer and the largest buyer of seaborne Russian crude, is now turning to alternative sources to meet its energy demands. Sources familiar with the refiners' procurement plans told Reuters that major state entities including Indian Oil Corp (IOC), Hindustan Petroleum Corp (HPCL), Bharat Petroleum Corp (BPCL), and Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemical Ltd (MRPL) have not sought Russian crude in approximately the last seven days. These refiners typically purchase Russian oil on a delivered basis and are now actively exploring spot markets for replacement supplies, primarily focusing on Middle Eastern grades like Abu Dhabi's Murban crude and West African oil. While private refiners such as Reliance Industries and Nayara Energy remain significant buyers of Russian oil in India, state refiners collectively manage over 60 per cent of the country's substantial 5.2 million barrels per day refining capacity. This pause by state-owned companies could significantly impact Russia's oil revenues. The decision comes in the wake of a stern warning issued by US President Donald Trump on July 14, where he threatened 100 per cent tariffs on countries that continue to buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Earlier this week, Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on all goods imported from India, effective August 1, along with an unspecified "penalty" for India's trade with Russia, including energy and military equipment. He expressed frustration with India's tariffs and its continued energy and defense ties with Russia. This development adds a new layer of complexity to India's energy procurement strategy. India had significantly increased its imports of discounted Russian oil following Western sanctions imposed after the conflict in Ukraine, with Russian crude comprising 35-40 per cent of India's total oil imports at its peak, up from a mere 0.2% before the war. Neither IOC, BPCL, HPCL, MRPL, nor the federal oil ministry have immediately responded to requests for comment on this evolving situation. The move highlights the geopolitical pressures influencing global energy markets and India's balancing act between its energy security needs and international relations.
