UN climate chief Simon Stiell's warnings should be considered but not taken at face value
In their eagerness to beat Turkey to secure hosting rights to next year's COP31 climate conference, alongside Pacific Island neighbours threatened by rising seas, the Prime Minister and Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen know that Australia needs to step up with an ambitious target for Mr Albanese to take to the UN General Assembly in September. An overly ambitious target that would be seen to cause deindustrialisation would add momentum to the efforts of former Nationals leaders Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack, who are campaigning against the target of net zero by 2050.
Mr Albanese and the government also need the upcoming productivity roundtable to succeed in finding a policy pathway to lift productivity and living standards. The Climate Change Authority has previously said it was considering a 2035 emissions reduction target of between 65 and 75 per cent below 2005 levels – a big increase on Australia's existing pledge to reduce emissions by 43 per cent below 2005 levels by the end of the decade. But business groups remain wary of the CCA's suggested option, with Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry boss Andrew McKellar warning that a target of 65 to 75 per cent would be 'exceedingly challenging' for the private sector to achieve.
Whatever energy policy changes are enacted, higher power prices are a potent political issue. Federal and state taxpayers cannot subsidise them indefinitely. As it considers all factors, the government should be guided by two imperatives: the economy, and technology, which is the only affordable pathway to lower emissions and improved prosperity. Rather than portraying itself as a world leader in climate action, the Albanese government should not forget the goal of its productivity roundtable – to boost Australians' living standards. Affordable, reliable energy is central to that goal.
Mr Stiell, a true believer in radical climate action, presents an economic case that is at odds with orthodoxy and needs careful scrutiny by Treasury and objective experts. Doubling down on clean energy is an economic no-brainer, he claims, and failure to do so could cause a $6.8 trillion GDP loss by 2050, with living standards to fall by more than $7000 per person per year. Extreme weather would destabilise the nation and the neighbourhood, threatening security. Half measures, Mr Stiell warns, will destroy property and infrastructure, hammer households, bankrupt regions, and punch holes in public budgets.
In its upcoming 2035 target and policies, guided by economics and technological reality, the government cannot hope to please climate activists, net zero sceptics and UN officials at the one time – or any of them, necessarily. Its task is to be responsible and pragmatic, putting the national interest first. Read related topics: Climate Change
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
19 minutes ago
- ABC News
How Boundary Islet became Australia's shortest 'land border'
When Tasmania separated politically from New South Wales in 1825, it was decided that all islands south of Wilsons Promontory would belong to the new colony of Van Diemen's Land. But when the proclamation included more specific coordinates, it mistakenly put the border right through a 2-hectare granite island. The bungle created an 85-metre land border between Tasmania and what would later become Victoria. It is shown on official maps. The rocky island, 56 kilometres east of the southernmost point of mainland Victoria, is Australia's shortest land border. Maritime Museum Tasmania's Colin Denny said there was some skepticism about Boundary Islet and whether it was a legitimate border, so the organisation conducted its own research. "It's not as simple as it sounds, and we have to go right back to the discovery of Australia by Europeans to find out how the boundary came about," he told Joel Rheinberger on ABC Radio Hobart. Mr Denny said the issue arose when an order-in-council in the United Kingdom defined the new colony of Van Diemen's Land. "[The council] basically said the islands of Bass Strait would be part of Van Diemen's Land and north of there would remain New South Wales," he said. "It was very indeterminate." Governor Ralph Darling, who was overseeing New South Wales, wanted the border to be more definite and drew a line at 39 degrees 12 minutes latitude, based on it being below Wilsons Promontory. "The charting that had been done by various people was inaccurate," Mr Denny said. "When Governor Darling drew the line, it was found that it went through Boundary Islet." The blame lies with Captain John Black, who surveyed Bass Strait after Matthew Flinders and George Bass circumnavigated Tasmania and proved it was separate from the Australian mainland. Keeping in mind the technology used would have been sextants, circumferentors, and low-level theodolites, which led to wonky borders across the country. A spokesperson for the Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania (NRE Tas) said the parallel latitude of south 39 degrees 12 minutes had been accepted as the Tasmania–Victoria border. "Boundary Islet is known as the North East Islet Nature Reserve," the spokesperson said. "It was historically known as North East Islet. Its name change was gazetted in 1990. "There was some ambiguity in the description of the location of the border in the historical proclamations of the colony of Van Diemen's Land upon its separation from NSW in 1825." The spokesperson said there were several border anomalies between Australian jurisdictions. The island is part of the Hogan Group, with Hogan Island being the largest island in the group. Hogan Island, which is 232 hectares, has been leased to graziers in the past, but is now a conservation area. In terms of inhabitants, there has been one formally recorded sighting of an Australian fur seal according to NRE Tas. Veteran travel writer Tony Wheeler can confirm there are actually many seals, after flying low over the island by helicopter while writing his book Australia's Islands. "Captain John Black, in his survey of 1801, had slightly misplaced North East Islet and the boundary runs smack through the middle of the 2-hectare island," Mr Wheeler said. "The constitution would have to be amended to correct the problem, and neither Tasmania nor Victoria seems too concerned about their curious meeting point." It's unclear whether the seals are Victorian or Tasmanian residents and would depend on which side of the island they choose to inhabit.
ABC News
19 minutes ago
- ABC News
Diggers and Dealers panel questions Australia's energy future and emissions target
Duelling perspectives on Australia's transition to renewables and whether it is dead in the water have played out on the floor of one of the country's major annual mining conferences. More than 2,300 delegates are in Kalgoorlie-Boulder, 600 kilometres east of Perth, for the annual Diggers and Dealers Mining Forum, bringing the industry's practical and financial arms together for the 34th time in Western Australia's gold mining capital. While this year's gathering comes amid a surging gold price, questions over housing the industry's local workforce, and shaky futures for nickel and rare earths, organisers chose to shine a spotlight on the future and feasibility of Australia's shift to renewables. While miners, particularly in remote parts of Western Australia, have followed the state's smaller communities in setting up their own independent renewable energy infrastructure, the forum's keynote panel questioned the likelihood of renewables meeting the nation's total energy needs. The panel, featuring Canadian nuclear energy advocate Chris Keefer and Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) director of energy research Aidan Morrison, urged attendees to question the assumptions being made by industry and political leaders. "There is no serious intellectual defence for the prospect we'd meet net-zero targets in 2050," Mr Morrison said. He told the forum that the transition to a fully renewable grid was only being propelled by increasingly generous state and federal subsidies. "Forcibly intubated and resuscitated by government subsidies," he said. "It shows what it looks like to have a resuscitated zombie coming to life, the dead starting to walk again." Dr Keefer said nations such as Australia and Canada were getting caught up in a geopolitical fight over energy between China and the United States that they had no part in. "The levers of emissions reduction are not really in the hands of countries like Canada and Australia anymore," he said. "In Inner Mongolia, [China is] building what they call 'energy bases' — something like 6 gigawatts of solar, similar amounts of wind and batteries. "But also coal, mine-mouth coal, 4 to 5 gigawatts." The panel, moderated by broadcaster and CIS executive director Tom Switzer, also questioned the feasibility of renewables powering Australia's enormous grids on the largest possible scale. "As if we're some singular, big bucket where if it's sunny somewhere, it's immediately shareable somewhere else on the continent," Mr Morrison said. "If you think about that from a cold, hard engineering perspective, it is absolutely bonkers." Others at the conference were more positive about renewables and pointed to smaller, localised successes. Australia's first "net-zero" gold mine was announced at the forum late on Tuesday. Bellevue Resources managing director Darren Stralow said the mine, 40km north of Leinster in the northern Goldfields, recorded net-zero carbon emissions for the first half of 2025. "It's allowed us to work with some like-minded partners, to see if there's a benefit to that in terms of revenue, and to look to sell our gold in a bit of a different way." The mine is forecast to be 80–90 per cent powered by renewable energy, the highest penetration in Australia. For Regis Resources managing director Jim Beyer, renewables were a question of economics rather than advocacy. "For a remote mine site, renewables make good economic sense," Mr Beyer said. "At Duketon [1,000km north-east of Perth] we put in a solar farm and it saved us diesel. It is a similar story with wind and solar infrastructure at the remote Tropicana Gold Mine, about 1,000km east of Perth. "Power there runs off gas," Mr Beyer said. "But when the blades are turning and the sun's out … it's cost-sensible as well as carbon reduction." Resources Minister Madeleine King pointed to heavy renewable energy investment at the Kathleen Valley Lithium Mine and the Bellevue Gold Mine, while reiterating the government's position. "I don't mind people having an opinion; I don't share that opinion," she said, in response to the keynote panel's comments. Her West Australian counterpart, David Michael, said there would be no shift in the government's position on uranium mining, ruling out any further approvals following those granted by the Barnett Liberal Government in 2017. Deep Yellow's project at Mulga Rock, estimated to be Australia's third-largest untapped uranium resource, is the only project in WA free to proceed under current laws.
News.com.au
27 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Donald Trump threatens pharmaceutical tariffs of 250 per cent
Donald Trump has threatened to slap tariffs of up to 250 per cent on foreign-made pharmaceuticals – a move that would hit Australian producers hard. The US President last month flagged his administration was planning imposts of up to 200 per cent on pharmaceuticals, giving drugmakers up to 'a year and a half to come in'. But in an interview overnight, he said he wanted to tighten the timeline. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals,' Mr Trump told US business news channel CNBC. 'In one year, 1½ years maximum, it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because½ we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' He did not say what the initial rate would be, but earlier in the year he said duties on the sector would start from 25 per cent. Mr Trump caused a stir in Canberra when he first announced he was mulling over tariffs on pharmaceuticals, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers saying the Albanese government was 'urgently seeking' details. Australian pharma exports to the US were worth more than $2bn in 2024. Exports are mostly blood products and vaccines but also include packaged medicines and miscellaneous products, such as bandages. But Mr Trump's threat to hit the industry with steep levies is driven by ire over high prices in the US rather than animosity towards allies. A RAND Corporation report found that Americans pay nearly four times than Australians for medicines and about three times more than the average in other developed economies. In Australia, that is largely due to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, which compels drugmakers to negotiate prices with the federal government if they want to sell their products. Similar mechanisms exist in New Zealand, Canada, the UK and Europe. Mr Trump last week wrote to 17 major pharmaceutical firms demanding they lower their prices for American consumers and bring them in line with prices overseas.
