'Govt needs to be cautiously optimistic'
Listen to article
ISLAMABAD:
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Tuesday advised Pakistan to stay on course and show some patience amid growing demand from the private sector to open up the economy to create jobs and reduce unemployment.
Pakistan "needs to stay on course, remain committed to programme objectives and at the same time needs to have a little bit of patience," remarked Mahir Binici, IMF Resident Representative in Pakistan. Binici was speaking during the "Dialogue on Economy", organised by the Pakistan Business Council (PBC).
The resident representative, who recently took over, said that Pakistan had to be optimistic cautiously and had patience to stay on course in order to deliver on reforms so that people could benefit from that.
The government has been facing increasing pressure from within and the business community to further ease monetary policy, open imports and let the economy grow. However, many voices are opposing such demands as the country is still passing through a phase of relative stability and its economic fundamentals are weak.
Economic growth in the first quarter stood at only 0.92%, which was far lower than the optimism created by the government.
"There is no automatic switch from stability to growth and we need to change the DNA of the economy to avoid any new balance of payments crisis after any new spurt of economic growth," said Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb at another session during the dialogue.
He did not promise any relief for the salaried class but admitted that "salaried persons were paying taxes disproportionate to their incomes". He appeared helpless in reducing tax rates, saying it was not possible until other sectors started paying their due share in taxes.
Mahir Binici said that Pakistan's economic recovery had been in place and "we expect that the positive growth momentum will continue in this and the next fiscal year." Inflation has receded and a significant progress has been the improvement in the external sector. The SBP is building external buffers, Binici added.
The finance minister anticipated a further cut in interest rate following the easing of inflation in January. He said that the Karachi Inter-bank Offered Rate (Kibor) was already trading below the 12% policy rate.
The foreign exchange reserves of $13 billion by June this year would provide comfort to international credit rating agencies to improve Pakistan's rating to B, he projected.
Mahir Binici said that unlike the typical IMF programmes that started with a crisis, the crisis situation and the stabilisation were already partially addressed during the last nine-month programme.
The objective of the new programme was to maintain and cement economic stability with structural reforms, said the resident representative, adding that focus should be on reform agenda rather than achieving stability without adjustment. The objective is to have stronger, sustainable and more inclusive growth.
Sustainable growth could be achieved through reducing distortions, ending state interventions and removing a variety of concessions, which would "enable us to have more resilient growth," said the IMF local head.
Speaking at another session, Pakistan's former ambassador to the United States, United Kingdom and United Nations Dr Maleeha Lodhi said that without economic strength, Pakistan could not play a major role on the global front.
Pakistan had to navigate its foreign policy challenges in a global geopolitical environment that was marked by five important features – growing multipolarity but weakening multilateralism, US-China competition, rising East-West tensions, increasing importance of middle powers and advanced technology, she added.
She said that Pakistan could not be a middle power until it had economic strength and made technological advancements.
There were six priority areas for Pakistan's foreign policy in the months and years ahead, said Lodhi. They are relations with China and the US, while avoiding getting into the crosshairs of their confrontation, although that might be easier said than done, dealing with an increasingly testy relationship with Afghanistan, managing the adversarial relationship with India, balancing ties between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and keeping relations with the EU on a positive track.
She said that China remained Pakistan's top foreign policy priority. While relations remain strong, a number of problems need to be resolved.
"China's three main concerns are lack of political stability in Pakistan, security of Chinese personnel working here and the public manner in which requests are made for loan rollovers and debt relief as this has implications for lending to other countries," she said.
Regarding the US, Maleeha Lodhi said that the big unknown was how relations with Trump's America would shape up especially as Pakistan's geopolitical importance had diminished for Washington after its exit from Afghanistan.
She said that America's top strategic priority was to contain China but Pakistan could not be part of any anti-China coalition. Another limiting factor is Washington's growing strategic and economic relationship with India, in a strategy to project Delhi as a counterweight to Beijing.
"The challenge is to find space for Pak-US relationship between these two strategic realities. This will not be easy as Pakistan doesn't figure in Trump's foreign policy priorities," she added.
With India, resumption of formal dialogue is not in sight but a backchannel is needed to manage tensions. At the moment, there is no framework for crisis management, said the former ambassador.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Twilight of the Empire
US President Donald Trump gestures, as he departs for Pennsylvania, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, U.S., May 30, 2025. Photo: Reuters Listen to article As a series of trends and shocks cumulatively strain the old order, US President Donald Trump, even his critics must admit, possesses the fatal gift of locating the aching pulse of the nation, only to inflame it further with self-destructive measures while eroding Washington's global credibility. He sees the symptoms of American decline clearly: deindustrialisation, a brittle middle class, bloated trade deficits, and the political cost of endless wars. But he metabolises crisis into spectacle, grievance into doctrine, and interdependence into betrayal. For decades, the US has functioned as the imperial core of a global capital-recycling apparatus. The system has depended on the continuous inflow of surplus capital from export-heavy economies, including China and Germany, to America's debt-saturated financial architecture. The US trade deficit reached an eye-watering $1.1 trillion in 2023, a figure that dwarfs those of other peripheral or semi-peripheral economies like India. In this light, Trump's populist howl against the 'indignity' of the American people, dispossessed in the very belly of global wealth, is not entirely misplaced. His instinct that endless wars serve as spectacles to obscure the real mechanism of American hegemony – the global dollar-debt regime – is accurate in a crude, pre-theoretical sense. Since the late 1960s, when America ceased being a surplus nation, its geopolitical muscle has rested not on production but on its control of the dollar as the global reserve currency. The military-industrial complex is merely the theatrical wing of a deeper financial imperialism. However, Trump is radically mistaken in his belief that punitive tariffs and protectionist swagger will resurrect 'Middle America.' Tariffs, in the late neoliberal stage, cannot revive industrial capacity gutted by decades of offshoring and rentier capitalism. Instead, they risk destabilising the very mechanism whereby America's status as a debtor empire is transformed into an asset: the recycling of dollar-denominated debt into US capital markets. If that circuit is broken, the paper wealth of Wall Street and the speculative empires of Trump's own class will collapse. To materially uplift the working and lower-middle classes that fuelled his electoral resurgence, Trump would have to declare war not on China or Brussels, but on Manhattan and Malibu, hedge funds, private equity, and speculative real estate. 'Asymmetric interdependence' For much of the post-World War II period, what was marketed as 'globalisation' was, in fact, an imperial project cloaked in liberal universals. It was the projection of American state-capitalist hegemony through a scaffold of multilateral institutions – the IMF, World Bank, WTO, NATO – and the sacrosanct status of the dollar as the planetary currency-signifier. These were not neutral frameworks but instruments of asymmetric interdependence: the United States exported capital, debt, and ideology, while importing dependence, discipline, and surplus labour from the periphery and semi-periphery. The so-called "Washington Consensus" was never a consensus but a diktat. The system also functioned through a deeper ideological fantasy that free markets and global rule-based order were apolitical, universal, and benign. However, even most liberal-internationalist critiques warn the fantasy is fraying. The very interdependence that sustained US primacy is in retreat. Firms and governments worldwide need American consumers, capital markets, and alliances, giving Washington soft coercive power. Trump's tactics have upended that balance. By 'assailing interdependence,' the administration is chipping away at the very basis of American advantage. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye argue that order depends on stable power balances, shared norms, and sustaining institutions. Trump has shaken all three. What follows is a deeper drift into disorder, one that won't resolve until Washington either reorients itself or is overtaken by a new dispensation. The plunge may already be underway. 'In his erratic and misguided effort to make the United States even more powerful, Trump may bring its period of dominance—what the American publisher Henry Luce first called 'the American century'—to an unceremonious end,' they write in a Foreign Affairs essay. The weaponisation of the global economy hollows out the very symbolic order the US once used to legitimate its rule. By shrinking its adversaries' strategic space, Washington also corrodes the interconnected lattice that once lent credibility and allure to its empire. A tariff here, a blacklist there, and the freezing of foreign bank reserves – each may win tactical advantage, but at the cost of eroding the trust that underpinned the liberal international order. After all, what merchant or government would dare anchor long-term plans to a system where every node can be severed by a presidential signature? Trump's disruption is risky for the US precisely because new economic blocs are emerging from the wreckage of Western hegemony. Many leaders of the Global South remember colonialism and feel the 21st century liberates them from Western diktats. Where the US once posed as the sole path to progress, China's tech power and Russia's security reach now appear less like threats and more like counterweights. On soft power's front, when natural disasters strike or epidemics spread, Western-style NGOs and media have lost some of their framing power, as Chinese and Russian aid convoys now appear on television alongside those from the Red Cross. The velvet-glove diplomacy of the Cold War years – teddy bears over bombers – has been largely replaced by quarantine diplomacy, vaccine pledges, and once-dominant American development agencies playing second fiddle to Belt-and-Road contracts. In May, a major Democracy Perception Index reported that majorities of people worldwide now see the US negatively. The pollster noted that after Trump's return to the White House, America's reputation 'took a particularly massive hit in EU countries' and fell sharply everywhere. Even NATO founder Anders Fogh Rasmussen sighed that the US' standing was 'unloved' across most of the world. By contrast, China's image is improving globally, even overtaking the US in overall favourability in most regions. At home, the US is cannibalising its future. Budget cuts to core research agencies like the NSF and NIH are hollowing out the very ecosystem that once drove American innovation. Labs shrink, fellowships vanish, and global talent turns to Beijing, Singapore, or the UAE – where funding flows and visas follow. Meanwhile, China invests aggressively in semiconductors, AI, and green tech, eroding the US edge. As Oxford's Carl Benedikt Frey puts it, Trump's agenda risks dismantling the pillars of US innovation. Technological leadership is not a birthright but is built. And Washington is letting it rot. Trump's move to turn tariff-penalties and export bans into blunt instruments has worried many that he was abandoning existing rules and undermining the soft power that Washington has spent decades building. Analysts argue that American power rests on a blend of hard force and attraction, even though this very soft power has enabled hard power interventions. Interdependence with trading partners and multilateral institutions generates US leverage, while global admiration for 'American culture and ideals' makes allies pliant, they argue. Trump's assault on trade pacts and international agencies undercuts the foundation of American power and accelerates the erosion of the postwar order. In principle, if American power were absolute, it could force partners into line indefinitely. In practice, aggressive trade measures are sowing resentments. Many countries have been party to US-led trade deals expecting mutual benefit – now they wonder if Washington will simply upend their exports to punish political stances. The WTO and other legal venues, for a long time arenas where small states could begrudge larger ones, are being largely sidelined. Without clear enforcement, the most vulnerable economies will look for alternative blocs or simply bribe each other to stay out of the US orbit. The cruellest irony is that by inflicting pain on others – or threatening to – the US is undermining the very goodwill and partnerships that underpinned its postwar hegemony. The writer is a Lahore-based senior journalist
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan's plan to sharply increase growth faces headwinds, analysts say
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is aiming to sharply increase economic growth under its annual federal budget unveiled on Tuesday, but analysts are sceptical about the country's ability to meet its ambitious goals. The budget targets higher revenues and a steep fiscal deficit cut under International Monetary Fund (IMF) backed reforms. Yet, defence spending was hiked 20%, excluding military pensions, after last month's conflict with India. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said in a post-budget press conference on Wednesday that customs duties have been cut or removed on thousands of raw materials and intermediate goods. 'Industry here has to be competitive, competitive enough to export,' he said. But growth drivers remain unclear. The government is targeting 4.2% GDP growth in fiscal 2026, up from 2.7% this year, which was revised down from an initial 3.6% as agriculture and large-scale manufacturing underperformed. 'Pakistan's GDP growth projection of 4.2% appears ambitious given recent performance, and overly optimistic assumptions may place tax targets out of reach,' said Callee Davis, senior economist at Oxford Economics. Key highlights of Pakistan budget for 2025-26 Pakistan's past growth spurts were consumption-led, triggering balance-of-payments crises and IMF bailouts. The government says it now wants higher-quality, investment-driven growth. Aurangzeb said structural reforms are underway, pointing to East Asia-style pro-market transitions. 'This is an East Asia moment for Pakistan,' he said. The 17.57 trillion rupee ($62.24 billion) budget comes as Pakistan remains under a $7 billion IMF programme. Revenues are projected to rise over 14%, driven by new taxes and broadening the tax base. The fiscal deficit is targeted at 3.9% of GDP, down from this year's 5.9%. Income tax calculator for FY 2025-26 Key reforms include taxing agriculture, real estate, and retail, and reviving stalled privatisations. But revenue shortfalls this year have raised doubts, with both agriculture income tax and retail collections missing targets. Only 1.3% of the population paid income tax in 2024, government data shows. 'Pakistan's budget keeps the IMF and investors happy, even if it comes at a near-term cost to growth,' said Hasnain Malik, head of equity strategy at Tellimer. 'The political setup, with the military firmly in charge, also lowers the risk of protests.' While overall spending will fall 7%, defence will rise after the worst fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbours in decades. Including pensions, defence spending will total $12 billion, 19% of the federal budget or 2.5% of GDP, matching India's share, per World Bank data. The hike was enabled by a sharp drop in interest payments, as the central bank cut policy rates from 22% to 11% over the past year, easing domestic debt servicing costs. Aurangzeb said cuts in subsidies also helped create fiscal space.
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
FinMin's post-budget presser marred by journalist boycott
Listen to article Federal Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb is addressing a post-budget press conference, stating that the government tried to provide as much relief as possible to the salaried class. Speaking in Islamabad, Aurangzeb said that out of a total of 7,000 tariff lines, 4,000 have been brought down to zero. He added that these tariff reforms are expected to boost the country's exports. Earlier, the finance minister arrived for the briefing accompanied by the Finance Secretary and the Chairman of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). However, journalists boycotted the press conference in protest over the absence of a technical briefing on the budget. Reporters noted that for the past 20 years, it has been standard practice to provide a technical briefing to journalists following the budget. This year, they said, the government broke that tradition. Later, the finance minister instructed relevant officials to persuade the journalists to return. Federal Budget 2025 In line with the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) conditions for fiscal consolidation, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb maintained a firm stance in the federal budget for 2025–26. Despite this, he extended limited relief to the salaried class and offered incentives aimed at the real estate and construction sectors, seeking to revive industrial activity and spur economic growth. However, the government also unveiled several new revenue measures. A carbon levy of Rs2.5 per litre will be applied to petrol, diesel, and furnace oil starting next fiscal year, with plans to double it the following year. Other tax measures include a 5 per cent levy on large pensions, an 18 per cent tax on imported solar panels, and an increased surcharge on electricity bills to cover both interest and principal debt repayments. Furthermore, the government announced it would begin phasing out tax exemptions currently granted to tribal areas.
