Samwu vows to hold Tshwane political parties accountable for unpaid salary increases
Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers
The South African Municipal Workers' Union (Samwu) in Tshwane has threatened to use the 2026 local government elections to hold political parties accountable for refusing to pay outstanding salary increases of 3.5% and 5.4%.
These increases, part of a collective wage agreement for the 2021/22 and 2023/2024 financial years, have been a point of contention between the union and the City of Tshwane.
The workers' demands were aired on Wednesday during their march to Tshwane House, where they gave the city a seven-day ultimatum to respond.
The demands include implementing the outstanding salary increments and reinstating unfairly dismissed colleagues with immediate effect.
Samwu regional chairperson Lehlogonolo Maphatsoe accused the current administration, led by ActionSA, ANC, and EFF, of hypocrisy.
He claimed they had previously lied to workers by demanding the reinstatement of dismissed workers and the implementation of salary increases when the DA-led administration was in power.
'It is now their time to implement and they are doing something else,' he said.
He urged workers to unite, stating that no political party in Tshwane truly represents their interests.
Deputy Mayor Eugene Modise, who received the workers' memorandum of demands, said the city proposed a phased payment approach for the 3.5% salary increase to Samwu leadership, starting with junior staff, followed by middle staff, and finally senior staff, which the union reportedly agreed to.
However, Maphatsoe denied this, saying the city executive offered once-off payments in two instalments scheduled for 2026 and 2027, which the union rejected.
'We want the 3.5% to be implemented into our normal salaries, not as a once-off payment,' he said.
Modise said the city will review the cases of 43 workers who were dismissed and consider rehiring those who were unfairly dismissed.
Workers complained that they didn't have the tools of trade, but Modise countered that the municipality had procured at least 75 waste trucks.
With the 2026 local government elections approaching, Maphatsoe reminded workers of their voting power, warning that their collective action could impact the outcome.
'A political party that I will advise that you vote for is the political party that is prepared to pay our 3.5% increase and 5.4%,' he said.
The workers' demands come after a May 9 Labour Court ruling, which referred the matter back to the South African Local Government Bargaining Council for a new hearing on the 3.5% wage increase after the city had initially sought an exemption from implementing it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Litmus Test for SADC Unity in the Wake of US Military Overtures
Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema, Angola President Joao Lourenco, US President Joe Biden, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) President Felix Tshisekedi, and Tanzania Vice-President Philip Isdor Mpango at the Lobito Corridor Trans-Africa Summit December 4, 2024. ( Image: AFP Kim Heller The United States (U.S.) is romancing the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It is no whirlwind courtship. For months now, Washington has been actively engaged in the new peace process in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In July, senior leaders from the U.S. Africa Command visited Angola and Namibia. Last week, AFRICOM Deputy Commander Lieutenant General John W. Brennan and Ambassador Robert Scott held an online press briefing to provide some insight into the U.S. intentions. There is an unmistakable desire to deepen security links and avert the threat of terrorism and insurgency, which poses a risk beyond the Continent. The U.S. also hopes to elevate its economic presence in Africa. The G-7-backed Lobito Corridor, connecting Angola to the DRC and Zambia, is a flagship project. At the recent press conference, Brennan spoke of how the U.S. respects and honours the vision of "African-led, partner-led, and ally-enabled" projects. Brennan cited the Joint Combined Exchange Training (JCET) in Angola as such an example. However, behind the silky talk lies the grim fact that most foreign partner projects are owned and governed by foreign interests rather than driven by local needs or wishes. Despite all the overtures by the United States government, there is no true love affair in the offering. Stripped of all its seductive talk and promises, it is crystal clear that this newfound fondness for Africa is motivated by the United States' lust for mineral wealth, its excitement about the prospect of SADC as a security headquarters, and the thrill of winning strategic advantages over its key rivals, China and Russia. The U.S. does not love Africa. It loves to use Africa. For the U.S., the stability of Southern Africa, its enormous mineral wealth and its vital geo-strategic ports make it a highly attractive partner. Greater control over the Lobito Corridor is a significant win for the U.S., for it provides access to a critical sea route for both economic and military purposes. The charm offensive in the SADC must be viewed in the context of negative sentiments towards the U.S. in parts of Africa. There is little love left for the U.S. in parts of West Africa, the Sahel region, and most notably in Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger. It is not surprising then that the U.S. is desperately seeking a friendly outpost on the Continent, and Southern Africa seems to be a willing partner. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has recently spoken of how the U.S. is moving away from a "charity-based foreign aid model" to partnerships with African countries that "demonstrate the ability and willingness to help themselves." Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The US is a serial opportunist. Its roving eye is easily drawn to speedy, high-dividend transactions rather than long and steady associations. The U.S. expects that SADC will be up for sale, like much of Africa. Too often, the Continent is little more than a passing fancy in the rivalries of great nations. In the swoon of foreign advances, SADC must be cautious, and it is imperative that it resist becoming an easily discarded pawn in U.S. rivalries with China and Russia. The U.S. is unlikely to be a steady partner for SADC, especially under the Trump administration. A short-term fancy by the U.S. whose affections can be withdrawn in a wink, is not a sustainable partnership for SADC unless it is defined and dictated by SADC itself, rather than imposed by the United States. SADC must forget how U.S. Aid was stopped in an inhumanly hurried manner, jeopardising millions of impoverished Africans. What is concerning is that an overwhelming involvement of the U.S. in the Lobita Corridor, its military presence, and hold over mineral resources appears to emulate former exploitative colonial patterns. Equally worrying is the risk of U.S. interference with security priorities and protocols. The securitisation of SADC and the potential disorientation of its security plans, protocols and structures pose a direct threat to its sovereignty. Emotions can change; whims are not long-term commitments. SADC must be careful not to fall for a gambit that does not favour it in the medium to long term. The words of African Union Commission Chairperson Moussa Faki Mahamat must be heeded, "We are not pawns," he declared at the 2024 AU summit. At this juncture, SADC unity cannot be compromised, especially given the ongoing crisis in the DRC. A unified rather than individual country strategy is likely to strengthen the hand of the SADC in dealing with the U.S.'s partnership invitation. The Trump administration holds no affection for Africa. It is about narcissistic intent and interest. A penchant for power, not peace, is its motivational force. The intent is simple. For now, the U.S. is salivating about minerals, strategic ports, valuable shipping corridors and military presence. In West Africa, AFRICOM has been marched out. Now, the U.S. is hoping to be welcomed in Southern Africa. With the relative stability SADC offers, it could be a real win for the U.S. Unless SADC ensures that the relationship is one of mutual collaboration, support, and development rather than dependency and control, it will be but a pawn in the play of foreign players. In the Washington Qatar brokered peace deal for the DRC, SADC and the African Union were sidelined. This should make SADC proceed with caution. SADC risks getting caught up in an exploitative relationship – where its strategic assets and infrastructure are used for U.S security benefits and where extraction rather than development ensues. SADC must act in a unified manner, especially given that member countries have different historical relationships with and attitudes towards the U.S. SADC will need to be highly vigilant to ensure that military training exercises are not more sinister military plans by the U.S. to fight the growing influence of China and Russia. If SADC acts submissively and with naivety, smiles will turn to tears in a classic betrayal by imperial agendas. Africa must protect its heart and its sovereignty. Southern Africa cannot be turned into the U.S.'s new battlefield. What is certain is that Africa will continue to be a playground for foreign wars. With this understanding, SADC must not lose its sovereignty in the easy frolic and charm of foreign suitors. * Kim Heller is a political analyst and author of No White Lies: Black Politics and White Power in South Africa. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
‘Call each other comrade': MK Party orders members to drop ‘commander' title
Jacob Zuma's MK Party has officially replaced the title 'commander' with 'comrade', citing the need to end internal disrespect and build a more unified revolutionary movement. Image: Tumi Pakkies / Independent Newspapers Jacob Zuma's uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party has instructed its members to stop referring to each other as 'commanders' and instead use the title 'comrades', with immediate effect. The directive was issued in a communiqué dated August 7, 2025 by MK Party national organiser Joe Ndhlela and sent to all party structures. 'Dear comrades, the National Officials of the MK Party met yesterday, August 6, 2025. We made key decisions to strengthen our revolutionary unity and structure. These decisions take effect immediately,' Ndhlela said. 'All levels of the party must implement them without delay.' He said the decision was aimed at reinforcing a shared revolutionary identity and fostering equality among members. According to the communiqué, several structural title changes have also been introduced: -The title 'provincial convenor' is now 'provincial chairperson', including for deputies. - 'Provincial co-ordinator' becomes 'provincial secretary', also applying to deputies. -These changes will apply consistently across all levels - regional, sub-regional/zones, and branch structures. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'These updates are vital for the movement's strength and growth,' Ndhlela said. 'All structures must act quickly. Ensure every member knows and follows these directives.' Earlier this year, party leader Jacob Zuma criticised the use of the term 'commander', arguing that it promoted hierarchy and undermined mutual respect. 'Do you know what 'commander' means?' Zuma asked. ''Commander' implies a hierarchy, not equality. It's a serious military term. A commander is the person who gives orders, and when they speak, others listen.' 'We can't all be commanders, that's a problem…Luckily, in the MK Party, we are moving away from using 'commander' as a title, because it's not helping us with anything.' Zuma added that abandoning the title would help restore respect within the party. 'Instead, we will address each other as comrades. We will fix the whole thing so that we can respect each other - that's why there's no respect (within the party).' IOL Politics
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
My take on the rand and South Africa's future
The author says the USD/ZAR is at peak for the year. Image: Supplied On Thursday, 24 July, an executive asked me whether they should hedge the Rand below R18 to the dollar. This was my short response: Hi XXX, My thoughts are that USD/ZAR is at peak for the year and we will see weakening from here [due to] USA tariff effects plus latest policy on ANC leaders. Based on that, I think it's worth us hedging against a weaker rand over next 6-12 months. Speculative but I don't see a reason for current level beyond a weaker dollar. My best, The above is months of news packed into three sentences that reflect more than just the exchange rate. So let's unpack. South Africa's political scene The first cracks in the Government of National Unity (GNU) emerged at the beginning of the year, as tensions within the parties escalated while attempting to agree on the budget. The GNU is South Africa's first multi-party alliance, created in response to the African National Congress (ANC) losing its majority in 2024. The GNU is still primarily made up of the ANC and its main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance (DA). Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Amidst the disagreements over the budget, the DA showed its colours by threatening to prevent budget approval unless it received concessions on the party's other agenda items. The ANC, in turn, showed the public that they are willing to work with parties outside of the GNU, namely the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), to achieve the ANC's ambitions. The Rand did not appreciate either of these plays. Then we had the unauthorised travel by former Deputy Minister Andrew Whitfield, who embarked on a state visit knowingly against the President's instructions. To Mr President, an open-and-shut case which resulted in immediate termination in July 2025. The DA was outraged. Then, the Minister of Police, Senzo Mchunu, was implicated in a corruption scandal involving the most dangerous gangs in South Africa. The president took his time to come to a decisive action, and only a week later, suspended the former minister pending investigation. The DA was once again outraged, claiming double standards and demanding the immediate termination of Mchunu. Choosing not to immediately suspend Mchunu was really shortsighted by the president, but the suspension has been the right call. South Africa has a robust judicial system, and we must maintain innocent until proven guilty, even when it involves one of the biggest scandals of the year. Sidebar: I wish I could say it was the biggest scandal of the year, but it feels like we're in a telenovela at this point. Political tensions and police corruption of the highest order are not exactly what maintain a strong credibility for the nation. The economics In the first quarter of the year, GDP growth was 0.1%. A figure that would have been negative (-0.3%) if it were not for good rains that boosted our agricultural sector. Bless the rains down in Africa. Unemployment in the first quarter went back up to 33%. For the youth (15-34) unemployment was even worse as it shot up to 46%. We have a stagnant economy, and nearly half of our youth are unemployed. Let that sink in. Headline inflation was 5.6% in July, and food took the lead. There's pretty much nothing that the South African Reserve Bank can do at the moment with glass fiscal levers ready to break. What we need right now is a huge step up on institutional credibility and private sector mobilisation. Trying to decide which is worse between the political scene and the economic data is a tough choice Why did we see a USD/ZAR below R18? As with all data, correlation is much easier to show than causation. I speculate that the chaos in the US is worse than that in South Africa. Global investors and markets have not appreciated President Trump's surprises, even if they are not so surprising. If we track a few other currencies against the the rand since the beginning of the year, we can suppose some of the reasoning through correlation. The dollar and the rand both weakened, but the dollar decided to step up the pace while running backwards, and now the rand is trying to catch up. It looks like the rand is going to be sprinting for the last half of the year. But, for now, we're still behind/ahead? Tariffs South Africa is most certainly in the crosshairs, and President Donald Trump's magazine seems bottomless. The outlook As the rand weakens, we have some form of revolution due to political instability and unemployment, chaos ensues, and South Africa finally resets. If we held all things constant, I would say that this is quite likely, but given how tumultuous this year has been, I doubt that this would be the case. I am also much more hopeful that things will improve. Maybe naively so. Here is a more realistic view of the year forward: I do believe the rand is on a path to weaken for the rest of the year. There is not much indication domestically that we will have anything substantial to shift that trajectory. In the best-case scenario, President Trump lifts the tariffs on South Africa, and we receive a ton of foreign investment to boost the rand and create employment. I can say there is a non-zero chance of this happening. What should we do? I'm not going to try to solve the dilemmas of our nation in one final section, but here are a few thoughts: South Africa needs to be reunited. We're a nation that works best and punches so far above our weight when we're together. GNU, EFF, MK, and all the others, please cut the nonsense and put the people first. President Trump loves a deal. Give him one. At the same time, the ones that have fared best are those that manage to build alliances amidst the chaos. Divide and conquer works in the 21st century, too, and it's what President Trump wants. Finally, kill the corruption tumour. It runs rampant everywhere regardless of colour. I know it's much easier said than done, but we seem to be at the height of both corruption and publicly exposing it. Let's push through the latter and hope the chemo is strong enough. Final word South Africa is weathering a Category 5 hurricane despite our lack of natural disasters. Nevertheless, we will get through it, like we always do. We have everything in our beautiful country, and now we just need our leaders to unite us on our way forward. Rayhaan Survé is the deputy chairman of Sekunjalo. Image: Supplied
